José Soplanucas

Thank you for the feedback! As some other members pointed, rudeness is in the perception. I will not apologize because I would do it again. If that behavior is snarky to you, it is beyond my control. Grow some skin.

Absolutely not. If your friend exposes him for the language used in a private conversation, he will be behaving as a ps..black c**t.

Look... with or without civil formulas, in public or privately, none of that really matters to me. If anyone asks questions that can be answered in a five minutes search, it is not stimulus for my nice side. In public I will ignore them, in private I will redirect them, just as I did.

I wish I had such a rich vocabulary!

That is also my Good Twin, Latbear4blk. I am the Evil Twin.

If he would have done some minimal research, he would have seen those recommendations, probably in every single thread here about Brazil. Have fun, I had a blast last April! That was my Good Twin.

One question? I count three lazy questions that have been answered a zillion times. Yes, I was rude and would do it again.

Another demolishing argument.

What? How does a child predator look like?

This is a long thread, so I may be wrong, but I don't think they were linking his appearance to these crimes. They were rather sharing reasons why they disliked him before the last breaking news. I, myself, have always felt uncomfortable when looking at how this big White man was handling petite Latino and Asian twinks. But that has nothing to do with this trial.

So I do not have any objections. Check yourself.

I bet you than just as he did not have the decency to research the topic before asking (guess who was the rude member who refused to respond to his lazy questions), he will not make any effort to contribute to the common knowledge. I hope he proves me wrong.

Why not? I am just pointing out that we should not wish for him a harder treatment than the due treatment for anyone else in similar situations. Some posters think he should be punished now by holding him in a dangerous prison where his life could be endangered.

I empathize with your opinion, but legal procedures should not follow our opinions. We should treat him as if he were innocent until proven guilty.

Sure. Ask the Supreme Court.

All the threads about this are off the rails. The one in LPSG was deleted. Let's try to keep the things to the facts we know. He is being accused of trading on children porn, and considering federal involvement and procedures, we can assume the case is proved. We do not know whether or not he was fucking minors, the fact that we have seen him fucking twinks is not a proof. We may suspect he did, but we do not know. Children abusers and exploitators would have a much more challenging job without the merchants who make profit from harming children. Based on what we know so far, he deserves to be convicted and cancelled. However, it is also true that we and the prosecutors may be wrong. I bet we are not, but it is just a bet. This is one criminal case. The porn industry is not under trial. Gays are not under trial. Fucking twinks is not pedophilia. Websites promoting sex between older and younger partners are not covered pedophilia. They may be the best option for pedophiles, but most men who fantasize with and/or feel attraction for twinks are not pedophiles.

Yeah, that early reaction of mine was inspired by my natural sarcastic pessimism. He is being cancelled, and he deserves it.

I hope the children involved were not hurt, and if they were I hope they recovered and are living happy lives.

Not only a hand, I understand he is one of the owners.

The thread in LPSG has already 14 pages.

This incident may trigger a jump in his OF income. And that money keeps coming in no matter whether or not you are free.

Where did you read that?

Do you mean the restaurants chain? How can you underrate a restaurant that sells premade, frozen food and reheats pasta on a microwave?