DFdub

https://rent.men/onlyosiris
anyone have experience with this delicious looking hottie?

Great trained massage. Great personality, and all the standard extras.

Great trained massage. Great personality, and all the standard extras.

Same guy; adding for search connection
https://rentmasseur.com/JakeAnderson

Met him a few times. He’s American and you probably did find his Insta. Pics accurate; slight diva-ish attitude but not offputting and I’m picky about that. Very engaging in conv, and more eager for fun than even I was. Surely marketing but keeps telling me I’m his type of daddy / asking for more fun at same rate so YMMV. I get my miles in regardless. 😉

Is the RM review from TexJoe on 12/30 you by chance @Texjoe96 ?  Hoping you can share more here on your exp if you ended up meeting him.

Massage is not good. Extras are mechanical. Seems ill at ease most of the meeting. Def get the impression this is a “no other choice and not a fan” situation vs “choosing more/faster money instead” situation.

More like he wants to be a stevia baby. Not nearly as tasty as real sugar, and leaves you feeling unsatisfied. 😉

I did end up meeting him. He is available for short term appts, but is looking for a long term sugar daddy. He is straight, and does nothing except allow you to service him. He has a straight friend with a sugar daddy who evidently is happy with no kissing, no mutual benefits, etc so he's looking for the same.

But more importantly, in what city were each of you in when it was written?  😆 

Agree with prior feedback.
Good B massage on a bed. Nice guy with as much convo as you like. Pics accurate; fit swimmer build. Great extras; YMMV.

Agree with prior feedback.
Good B massage on a bed. Nice guy with as much convo as you like. Pics accurate; fit swimmer build. Great extras; YMMV.

Just to lead by example.
 

Weren't you the one who suggested people could just be thoughtful 🤔. That goes both ways, and now is not coming from your way. It's absolutely relevant. You just are being obtuse because @DFdub pointed out that even some of your own Deli posts have, what is now, the incorrect city in the title. Having an incorrect city in the title makes the post title just as useless to CoM browsers with your use case for browsing as the city not being there in the title at all is.
You're ignoring the fact that even other people who use the forum the way you do may be annoyed by finding a provider post that even if only a few days or weeks old but is still on the front page of the Deli would show what would now be an incorrect location for that provider. Causing them the same annoyance that posts that have no city title cause you.

Definitely in the “the city in the title is not ideal” camp.
putting “currently in French Lick” inside the first comment will cause the thread to come up when searching for “French Lick” the same as in the title. Too many provs travel too often for it to be value add.

I guess my experience is cities in the title are far less reliable than others experience.
Not calling @Peter Eater out, just using him as example since he’s OP here. 3 of the first 5-6 threads he OPed show a different home city now. That’s high inaccuracy for me, and it seems unnecessary to ask him or a mod to update the title. Plus if we all know they’re wrong half the time, we know city is hit/miss even when there so unreliable by my standard.
City could be put in a tag or in the text and still show up in a search. So, searching for my home city still gets the same list of guys that are there / have been there.
I guess a key difference for me is that I like certain types so looking for anyone in Dallas first and then checking the link often gets me looking at guys that are just straight up not my type.

I guess my experience is cities in the title are far less reliable than others experience.
Not calling @Peter Eater out, just using him as example since he’s OP here. 3 of the first 5-6 threads he OPed show a different home city now. That’s high inaccuracy for me, and it seems unnecessary to ask him or a mod to update the title. Plus if we all know they’re wrong half the time, we know city is hit/miss even when there so unreliable by my standard.
City could be put in a tag or in the text and still show up in a search. So, searching for my home city still gets the same list of guys that are there / have been there.
I guess a key difference for me is that I like certain types so looking for anyone in Dallas first and then checking the link often gets me looking at guys that are just straight up not my type.

My choosing the word “portion” suggests I have. I don’t see that your comment demonstrates any flaws in my reasoning though.
I shared my opinion, and then answered your follow-up question. I’m not asking you to validate my opinion. Nor did I indicate your opinion is invalid; adults can disagree on things that do not have a right answer.

Simple - RM location has a completely different purpose / value proposition - point in time reference to hire now.
RM location is at the top because its purpose is forward looking. It shows where the provider is TODAY and where the provider’s home base is set TODAY and where the provider plans to be TOMORROW (i.e., always current status). Surely you’ve noticed the huge portion of providers that simply change their location completely vs using the travel dates function also. I want to hire. Who is/will be where I want to hire?
CoM on the other hand is providing reviews for a provider period unrelated to where they slept last.  Locations for reviews are always based on where they were YESTERDAY (i.e., backward looking). I want to hire HotTwinkDaddySlaveMasterBear. Is he any good? Oh yeah… maybe he was in French Lick 2 yrs ago when he was first reviewed; so what.
Ask yourself:  does the review of services change somehow if this traveler was based in Schenectady last year but is now based in French Lick? I mean, why would we make the OP responsible for keeping the title up-to-date? That’s a lot of overhead.

Definitely in the “the city in the title is not ideal” camp.
putting “currently in French Lick” inside the first comment will cause the thread to come up when searching for “French Lick” the same as in the title. Too many provs travel too often for it to be value add.

My choosing the word “portion” suggests I have. I don’t see that your comment demonstrates any flaws in my reasoning though.
I shared my opinion, and then answered your follow-up question. I’m not asking you to validate my opinion. Nor did I indicate your opinion is invalid; adults can disagree on things that do not have a right answer.

My choosing the word “portion” suggests I have. I don’t see that your comment demonstrates any flaws in my reasoning though.
I shared my opinion, and then answered your follow-up question. I’m not asking you to validate my opinion. Nor did I indicate your opinion is invalid; adults can disagree on things that do not have a right answer.

Simple - RM location has a completely different purpose / value proposition - point in time reference to hire now.
RM location is at the top because its purpose is forward looking. It shows where the provider is TODAY and where the provider’s home base is set TODAY and where the provider plans to be TOMORROW (i.e., always current status). Surely you’ve noticed the huge portion of providers that simply change their location completely vs using the travel dates function also. I want to hire. Who is/will be where I want to hire?
CoM on the other hand is providing reviews for a provider period unrelated to where they slept last.  Locations for reviews are always based on where they were YESTERDAY (i.e., backward looking). I want to hire HotTwinkDaddySlaveMasterBear. Is he any good? Oh yeah… maybe he was in French Lick 2 yrs ago when he was first reviewed; so what.
Ask yourself:  does the review of services change somehow if this traveler was based in Schenectady last year but is now based in French Lick? I mean, why would we make the OP responsible for keeping the title up-to-date? That’s a lot of overhead.

Simple - RM location has a completely different purpose / value proposition - point in time reference to hire now.
RM location is at the top because its purpose is forward looking. It shows where the provider is TODAY and where the provider’s home base is set TODAY and where the provider plans to be TOMORROW (i.e., always current status). Surely you’ve noticed the huge portion of providers that simply change their location completely vs using the travel dates function also. I want to hire. Who is/will be where I want to hire?
CoM on the other hand is providing reviews for a provider period unrelated to where they slept last.  Locations for reviews are always based on where they were YESTERDAY (i.e., backward looking). I want to hire HotTwinkDaddySlaveMasterBear. Is he any good? Oh yeah… maybe he was in French Lick 2 yrs ago when he was first reviewed; so what.
Ask yourself:  does the review of services change somehow if this traveler was based in Schenectady last year but is now based in French Lick? I mean, why would we make the OP responsible for keeping the title up-to-date? That’s a lot of overhead.

Massage is not good. Extras are mechanical. Seems ill at ease most of the meeting. Def get the impression this is a “no other choice and not a fan” situation vs “choosing more/faster money instead” situation.