DFdub

Back as FightMasseur
https://rentmasseur.com/FightMasseur

In-person inspection works best. LatinoDesire is magic_experience regardless of profile pic editing. Same guy.

Not a name change. For whatever reason, he's running both ads. Def the same masseur though.

Agree with others. Nice, friendly twink. Sexy with accurate pics. Massage solid B but great erotic elements throughout.

I've seen him before. Massage was so-so. Looks several years older than claimed. Personality came across as cocky to me rather than confident, and not a good playful cocky. Did not click well; would not repeat personally. YMMV.

Back as FightMasseur
https://rentmasseur.com/FightMasseur

Back as FightMasseur
https://rentmasseur.com/FightMasseur

It’s Duda / Magic Experience at it again… same guy/address and same shady picture practices 😁
https://rentmasseur.com/Magic_experience

Saw him in May. Pics are definitely dated. Reasonable massage, but not sensual IMO. Did not find him friendly at all, and skipped HE because it immediately felt mechanical and not erotic in the least. Maybe YMMV, but hard no repeat for me.

Nice guy, quiet.  Definitely looks like pics, and nice equipment. Massage technique not great, also not super interactive.  Didn't seem into it.  YMMV for deli svcs.  Would not avoid a repeat depending on options, but not lining up to go again.

He's fantastic, and adorable personality. Saw him last year and very sad he's staying on the east coast this trip.

Agree generally. Saw him a few times. He’s not quite twinkish to me; a bit more solid than I think of as twink but def not thick. Pics are accurate. He is eager to please for sure and very responsive. Massage is reasonable but untrained and quickly shifts to body contact and well… other pursuits. 😉
Recommend if the massage itself is not high priority. No English skills still as of my last visit.

You seem to be the only one with a problem with him 
that might “confirm the value of your assessment”
doth protest too much 

This makes no sense, but confirms the value of your assessment.  Refusal to look at and believe actual evidence because there’s a pretty boy that had sec with you seems much more on the mark of your comparison, however, avoiding politics is one of our community standards, so I will  honor them.
To the topic, he definitely stole and made it extremely difficult to get it back.  I found him to be shallow and not very intelligent, but that may be the language barrier.  As long as you don’t give him any money prior to services, he will probably be ok, but still a risk.   Happy to provide evidence, including a letter from Venmo I got for my records, feel free to DM me.  The money was eventually returned, without any assistance from  Turbook, so I don’t feel the need to keep going on it. But I will defend myself from spurious accusations.

Interestingly, he never asked me for a deposit. I intend to meet him the next time he happens to be where I am!

Actually, if you know how Venmo works, this isn’t factual.  That’s maybe where Venmo is to blame in confusing people looking at these screenshots.  The original amount doesn’t display “on hold”  until a dispute is filed, then it will display next to the date of the original transaction.  If you look at the dispute date of the original transaction, it is not until AFTER Turbbok got money back from his dispute of the transaction labeled “Refund”, labeled so to make me think he was refunding the original deposit.  His dispute was filed the same day he sent it to me, so there is no way he would think that the original 200 was on hold at the time he filed a dispute.  The screenshots posted with the dates of the disputes was the damning evidence (along with my multiple conversations with Venmo to confirm these facts).
When someone sends you Venmo, the money is available instantly. Which is why I was able to transfer it immediately to my bank.  My account goes into default when his dispute is resolved and the money transferred to his account, another point which he damn well knows he has 200 bucks that shouldn’t be there.  Regardless of how confusing Venmo display is, they had no part in his filing a dispute of his supposed refund.  Venmo did nothing wrong other than make it difficult to detect his scheme.  Ironically, it’s the very scam he accused me of trying to pull by not sending him money as “family and friends” which is not refundable.  I believe he knew exactly what he was doing and wasn’t confused at all.  One person’s experience doesn’t need to determine your hire, it’s just additional data to decide along with all the others.  I got my money back, but I know it wouldn’t have happened without this website and people who support clients in holding escorts accountable and warning each other when things like this happened.  I have stopped deposits all together, even when I fly guys into whatever city I’m in for the night.  I think it’s too tempting for even the usually decent escort to make a quick buck and think there won’t be repercussions.  

Easy.
Review the receipts Turbook shared with ansh0620.  First one shows the original $200 was on hold so Turbook did not get it. Second one on that comment shows the $194 refund sent to DC. I suspect if I sent a refund for money I never received, I would cancel it too.
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616
Third another screenshot from Turbook showing the dispute.
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616
Fourth - DC sent a screenshot showing the dispute was pending during the 3-4 week dispute period he himself mentioned.
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616
Finally, Venmo resolved the dispute in his favor per his last screenshot. Venmo resolved the dispute in the time they said, even though it took way too long - ergo partial blame.
Take a step back as mature adults / grown ups - both parties had screenshots supporting their version. Almost a dozen members have very positive feedback over a long period. One single member had a very large reaction to a Venmo-related issue and now is pursuing some sort of blood oath vendetta to ruin a person's livelihood because he wants an apology without offering one himself for larger harm he caused to Turbook over an unfortunate misunderstanding.
Decide for yourselves, but review all evidence rather than just repeated rants.

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.
The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.

Maybe he didn't know about this forum until now? You get as much grace as you give.
I met Owen a few months ago. Massage was reasonable (but I get a lot of LMT non-RM massages so high bar). Experience was very favorable. He was professional, accommodating to my schedule, easy to communicate, and offered options/extras. Good experience considering some of the terrible cash grabs lurking out there.
@Owen Grey Much respect for you owning the past and responding publicly. Ignore anyone who holds onto minor slights for years, bud.

Absolutely agree. Never ever send deposits.
But, let's not disregard many positive reviews from multiple members that actually met the provider, and boycott a provider due to one single deposit refund fiasco that ended with everyone even. 🤷🏻‍♂️
After all, not a single member who has actually MET Turbook has given negative feedback. Maybe having scammer alert warnings follow him perpetually due to a resolved issue is a bit much - and exactly the type of questionable behavior Turbook referenced as a red flag in the texts.

Absolutely agree. Never ever send deposits.
But, let's not disregard many positive reviews from multiple members that actually met the provider, and boycott a provider due to one single deposit refund fiasco that ended with everyone even. 🤷🏻‍♂️
After all, not a single member who has actually MET Turbook has given negative feedback. Maybe having scammer alert warnings follow him perpetually due to a resolved issue is a bit much - and exactly the type of questionable behavior Turbook referenced as a red flag in the texts.

Easy.
Review the receipts Turbook shared with ansh0620.  First one shows the original $200 was on hold so Turbook did not get it. Second one on that comment shows the $194 refund sent to DC. I suspect if I sent a refund for money I never received, I would cancel it too.
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616
Third another screenshot from Turbook showing the dispute.
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616
Fourth - DC sent a screenshot showing the dispute was pending during the 3-4 week dispute period he himself mentioned.
https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/158221-scammer-alert-justin-gringotuyoo/page/2/#findComment-2416616
Finally, Venmo resolved the dispute in his favor per his last screenshot. Venmo resolved the dispute in the time they said, even though it took way too long - ergo partial blame.
Take a step back as mature adults / grown ups - both parties had screenshots supporting their version. Almost a dozen members have very positive feedback over a long period. One single member had a very large reaction to a Venmo-related issue and now is pursuing some sort of blood oath vendetta to ruin a person's livelihood because he wants an apology without offering one himself for larger harm he caused to Turbook over an unfortunate misunderstanding.
Decide for yourselves, but review all evidence rather than just repeated rants.

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.
The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.
The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.

The evidence posted by BOTH of you supports a misunderstanding, with Venmo partially to blame. Look at all the evidence. Your posts continually read like you only accept evidence that supoorts your preconceived judgement.
The matter was resolved. Open yourself to the possibility that he honestly was trying to help resolve it, and that - for the first time EVER? - a large financial corp had a system issue that made things hard to resolve. Ever had to dispute a credit card trans before? My goodness.