Except the data and economists like Robert Shiller (who created the Case-Shiller Home Price Index) say otherwise. According to the article: "Housing experts said the fact that it’s cheaper to rent in all 50 metros in 2025 is a broader reflection of rental and housing market conditions across the country." It's cheaper to rent on average regardless of whether you're renting a studio or a house in those areas. And while you were paying off your mortgage, those of us who invested in stocks were earning a higher compounding rate of return:
"Trish Regan: "People trap their savings in a home. They're running an opportunity cost of not having that money liquid to earn a better return in the market. Why do it?" Robert Shiller: "Absolutely! Housing traditionally is not viewed as a great investment. It takes maintenance, it depreciates, it goes out of style. All of those are problems."
Shiller estimated the real return on housing between 1890-1990 to be 0-1%, which is why it's mostly a consumption good, not an investment (the returns have been higher since then but still below the stock market). And it's an especially bad investment if you take out a 50-year mortgage at a higher interest rate.