jackcali

Mine is too, but it's difficult to find a provider who wakes up early enough for me to stop by for a session and still get to work at a reasonable hour.  For a while I had a regular provider who also had a 9-to-5 job, and we'd meet for a quick session before heading to work.  Even if the session itself wasn't, cleaning up and getting ready for the office was about as realistic a BFE as you can get -- including elbowing each other out of the way to see in the bathroom mirror.  

This was a concept I had thought about yesterday reading this thread, and was considering how to put it in words. But the nub of my 'analysis' (to use a pretentious word for what I was thinking) was not that your final sentence was the answer, but rather that it was one way this could play out.
How a couple who both worked in this industry would treat any link between clients and each of them as providers would depend on the depth of their relationship. It is certainly possible that 'jealousy' or rather competition between them for clients could exist. If they were partners more of convenience, or not yet sure of the depth or permanence of their relationship to each other, if they had separate finances with only sufficient sharing for the day to day running of their household, then competition for clients would not be surprising. At the other end of the spectrum, if they saw their work as a shared enterprise where they each had marketable attributes that might appeal to different clients, but whoever the client chose would still contribute to their shared enterprise, I can image they might be perfectly relaxed as to whom the client chose. In between those two scenarios there are those with degrees to which they see their businesses as complementary, competing to some extent, but where it is not a zero-sum game.
Any couple who both escort will have their own place on this spectrum and we, as clients will not necessarily be aware of how the personnal dynamics of their relationship work. But we should not make assumptions, or judge them by their reactions. They are entitled to run their businesses and their relationships as they see fit. But we are entitled to respect, whatever they choose, and if there is drama in how their businesses and relationships intersect we don't need to be drawn into it.

https://media1-g2-c.gayporntube.com/contents/albums/sources/1499000/1499391/196006199.jpg

https://media1-g2-c.gayporntube.com/contents/albums/sources/1457000/1457976/193747225.jpg

Christmas Present.mp4

There is such a thing as professional jealousy.  In my professional career, when a client of mine decided to hire a different professional for work that I thought I could do just as well, I got pissed off.  Even if I admitted to myself that his new hire was better suited to that particular assignment, I still got pissed off.  His decision affected my feelings toward the client and, at least as far as I was concerned, permanently altered the relationship.  

Something similar happened to me.  I had a regular who was going to be out of town for a couple of weeks and he suggested that while he was away I should hire his boyfriend, who also escorted.  So I did, and had a good time.  If the two guys weren't connected, I might have kept with my regular and seen the boyfriend from time to time for a change of pace, but since I was sure they'd know about it I was afraid of the complications that could screw up the good dynamic I had with my regular.  I think it would have been much riskier to change horses, so to speak.  So I kept seeing the regular and only saw the boyfriend at my regular's suggestion.  And of course, though it's not really my thing, they did talk me into seeing them together a couple of times.  

There is an abundance of proof. Even with 6% on Rotten Tomatoes, All's Fair is raking in over 3-million viewers (great, by today's standards), and got renewed for a second season. In TV, "good" is always subjective.
The story is based on a series of popular romance novels, which usually means "low quality fare" by default. This isn't Paddy Chayefsky. The show's creator, Jacob Tierney, continually says in interviews how surprised he is by viewer reactions.
There is something unique going on here, and it's called a certain style of magic. Magic is rarely easy to achieve in the arts, but this show is having its moment. I see no harm at all in celebrating that, especially when the main characters are gay men in professional sports.

I support people making and watching whatever content they want, but something being popular does not make it good. 
A friend recommended it and asked that I watch at least four episodes. 
The acting from the two leads is embarrassingly bad. 
The writing is incredibly stupid.
The sex scenes are hardly revolutionary. 
It reminds me of Showtime after dark. Softcore for a female audience. 
Boring. 
My friend has no taste. 

From The Onion:
 

 
Hockey Players Blast ‘Heated Rivalry’ For Unrealistic Depiction Of Anal Sex 
‘When We Fuck Each Other, That’s Not How It Goes Down,’ Say NHL Athletes
 
Published:
December 19, 2025
TORONTO—Accusing the HBO drama of egregiously misrepresenting their experiences off the ice, the National Hockey League Players’ Association blasted Heated RivalryFriday for what it described as incredibly unrealistic depictions of anal sex between players. “The show’s portrayals of hockey players having sex with each other are wildly misinformed, and we are disappointed by the producers’ utter failure to accurately represent what we do to each other behind locker room doors on a daily basis,” read a statement cosigned by each of the NHLPA’s more than 750 active players, adding that the series’ glitzy, overwrought lovemaking scenes miss the mark on even the most basic details regarding the day-in, day-out sexual encounters that define their lives between games. “Yes, it’s true that we as professional hockey players spend the majority of our free time cramming our cocks into each other’s hot, hungry assholes—the show gets that right. But beyond that, every instance of anal sex you see on screen is pure fiction. It’s clear they didn’t bother consulting any actual hockey players, as the butt-fucking on the show could not be further from what really occurs.” The statement went on to say that while the show’s anal sex scenes are “ludicrous,” its depictions of oral sex between hockey players are pretty much spot-on.

Depends on what the priority is. If it is business and conference, stay close to that. Providers will come to you; anything within Manhattan is accessible. 
 
If it is holiday and hiring, as others mentioned, Hells Kitchen, Times Square or Chelsea work well. 

I once stayed there. The two beds were so large that you literally could not walk around the room. I brought a Gaiety dancer back with me one night. There was a noticeable age difference. As we got to the crowded elevators he started reviewing the play we had just seen. Except that we had not seen a play.

Yeah I imagine something similar happening and I want to avoid that convo cause it would beware for sure. The guy I’m not into as much is a nice guy and friends I’m just so much more sexually excited by the other. I guess if it’s an issue I should just find someone else, plenty of fish in the sea so to speak.