BSR

Although I plan to retire in WeHo, probably above the Sunset Strip, I've been looking at NYC housing, just for kicks. This place has MONTHLY homeowners' association dues of $4000 per month! Considering that it's a 2 bedroom apartment, what could the $4000 a month possibly be going for? Do you get escort visits on demand? Seriously, any of you living in the NYC area have any understanding of what the money is going towards? I pay under $400/month for my place in California, and that covers the roof, outside paint, pools, tennis courts, exterior landscaping, and paving for private streets. Is $4000/month just a big scam?

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1140-5th-Ave-7B-New-York-NY-10128/72531078_zpid/

The listing you posted is a co-op. I believe the maintenance fee for a NYC co-op unit differs from the HOA fee associated with condos. Condos in NYC list a condo fee (what the rest of the country more commonly calls the HOA) and monthly property tax separately. The monthly maintenance fee a co-op owner pays includes the property taxes owed by the cooperative.

When you consider the sky-high property taxes in NYC (the city gets ~60% of its revenue from property taxes) then add the monthly building costs, $4000 doesn't seem that high to me.

As many others in this thread have pointed out, a big old building in NYC (with its sky-high labor costs) has so many expenses that would never occur to you. My dad lived in NYC for 11 years. The doorman mentioned how much it cost to repair the two elevators that recently broken down. I forget the exact amount, but my dad said it almost gave him a heart attack. When his condo fee bumped up later that year, at least it was easy to understand why.

Swinging Richards could not have chosen to treat their dancers as independent contractors. The federal courts in Atlanta have ruled in several lawsuits that dancers at strip clubs have to be treated as employees, rejecting the clubs' claim that they are independent contractors. This holding is unlikely to be overturned in the foreseeable future.

I don't see how dancers are employees since they can work six nights a week or zero, stay from open to close or just an hour. Is there a single employee in America who can just tell his boss, "Nah, I don't feel like working this week"? Only independent contractors have that kind of flexibility. Then again, my opinion doesn't count for sh*t, and the courts have made their ruling.

It sounds like some ex-dancers, perhaps with an ax to grind, saw a chance to make some easy money. Crapfest! Ah well, hopefully SR survives the setback & forges on.

Pretty much every day for 25+ years, I started every morning with a quad espresso. I stopped the habit only after my fancy superautomatic died & I didn't feel like dishing out a grand (at least!) for a new one. I never thought about it, but my breath probably wasn't the best. Yikes! Maybe the old superautomatic's death was a blessing in disguise.

Everyone has a personal perception of value. Price doesn’t equal value that’s for sure. But...there can be a difference between $15 coffee beans and $30 coffee beans. I have many friends that won’t pay what I do for a steak...”it tastes the same!” they say. Not.

 

Artisan products take human touch. Green coffee beans from small farms worldwide. Organic products take more labor and more investment. Dry aged beef, wine, cheese....take up storage and real estate while aging.

 

I mentioned above that I’m careful when I shop at Whole Foods. Is some stuff overpriced? Of course. But is there also better quality items for the value of my dollar? Absolutely! And if I have the disposable income and in my budget (or a splurge!) the I’ll do it.

 

Hmmmmm, sounds similar to rate discussions elsewhere on The Forum! ?

Although I don't shop at Whole Foods (haven't even stepped foot in one, actually), I am grateful for the impact it's had on the competition. I do most of my grocery shopping at Sam's Club. Even though I live alone, I eat the same food so often (eggs, salmon, chicken, veggies) that I can buy in bulk without wasting anything. When I was a Sam's member 14 years ago, the quality was so mediocre that I stopped going. After reactivating my membership again just recently, I am wowed by how much the quality of fresh meats & produce has improved. Granted, other factors might be at play, like competition from Costco. But I can't help but think that much of the eye-popping difference is thanks to Whole Foods & the pressure it put on the marketplace to up its game.

What @Kenny condemns as gross speculation, I consider to be fundamental common sense. For example, it just doesn't make sense that someone goes out for Subway at 2 am in -20°. It just doesn't make sense that two Trumpers braved hypothermia & frostbite to stroll about the streets of the gayborhood at that hour. It doesn't make sense that (according to video surveillance), the Trumpers were able to assault Smollett (which involved pouring bleach on Smollett, hanging a noose around his neck & kicking him in the ribs), Smollett was able to fight back, gather himself, and recover his Subway sandwich all in the span of 60 seconds.

And whaddya know, the Chicago Police Dept. has arrested Smollett for a filing a false police report. If you know anything about how big city police departments work in such a high-profile case, the CPD went forward with the arrest of Smollett only after they were pretty damn sure that a conviction was a slam dunk.

I watched this show a couple of years ago and enjoyed it very much. The eye candy certainly was a plus. Don't seem to be plans for a second season.

There were 3 seasons of Merlí, but apparently Netflix bought the rights for only Season 1. I have no idea if they plan to buy Seasons 2 & 3. You just never know with Netflix.

On one hand, Netflix likes to buy TV series from Spain because they're a bargain (much cheaper than producing their own Spanish-language shows) and because the number of Spanish-speaking Netflix subscribers in the US is large and growing. On the other hand, Merlí is dubbed into Spanish (original language is Catalan). I don't know about other people, but dubbing drives me crazy.

By the way, do they show the Catalan or Spanish version on Netflix? Or do they give you a choice? If you're reading English subtitles, I guess it doesn't matter.

I had posted this in the lounge as I was hoping to get some insight into the history of homosexuality in the western movement. TV was only the trigger to the question. I guess it was moved as the TV portion seemed to be the lead and the responses follow that.

Still, if anyone has insight into homosexuality in the emerging western US, I would be interested in learning about it. A cursory Google of same revealed very little information.

When I visited the Cowboy & Western Heritage Museum (in OKC), I was surprised that they devoted a few exhibits to the role of prostitutes in the Wild West. Apparently, even small, remote towns had their fair share of working girls. I'm sure the ladies took care of the boys in town, but cowboys lived lives of penury & would have had difficulty scraping together even a modest fee. Plus they spent most of their time out on the range without a woman in sight. What happened out there we'll never know.

1. I would hire you in a nanosecond if we were in the same city.

2. Your face looks different in some pictures, leaner in some, fuller in others. The difference is enough that I kind of wondered if it was the same guy.

3. As much as I enjoyed looking at your pictures (each and every one of them LOL), I have to wonder if less is more. It's great that you give prospective clients a good idea of what you look like, but maybe your ad would be more effective if you left us browsers "wanting a little more" ... just my sense.

Since I have a wicked sweet tooth, it's been a decades-long battle to resist sugar. One thing I have managed to avoid is soda because it is the junkiest of junk food, all sugar yet zero nutrition. I used to drink diet soda until I read somewhere that despite the calorie difference diet soda is useless for weight loss. I also just had a feeling that diet soda had to be really bad for you. The science has since confirmed my instincts.

I also avoid fruit juices as much as soda. While OJ & other juices might have some nutritional value, their sugar content rivals or even surpasses sugar-packed soda. I even avoid fruit because the fructose sparks my cravings for more sugar (ice cream is my kryptonite). I figure I get plenty of vitamins & antioxidants from veggies.

Besides just watching out for sugar, one should also pay attention to the glycemic index of what you eat because a lot of food is surprisingly high-glycemic. Corn chips have a glycemic index rating of 105(!), Stoned Wheat Thins 96, and a marketed-as-healthy Nutri-Grain bar 94. Compare those ratings to jelly beans at 80. Who would've guessed?

At my old tennis club, there was a group of women who played during the day while the kids were at school. I called them the "wealthy housewives set" because it was a rather posh club, and I noticed what cars they drove. BTW, I only wished I were a wealthy housewife; alas, I was a semi-poor grunt who worked nights.

Anyway, I had a discussion recently with a friend who doesn't think Mrs. Bezos should get anything but whatever Jeff Bezos gave her during the marriage because if feminists believe in true equality, then husbands shouldn't fork over half the assets (which he alone earned) or alimony. I brought up the wealthy housewives set and that none of them would have agreed to give up her own career if her 50-something husband could just skip off with a half-his-age mistress at any given moment with financial impunity.

On one hand, it does seem a bit excessive for MacKenzie Bezos to get $75 billion out of the divorce. On the other hand, it seems outrageous that any wealthy man experiencing a mid-life crisis can leave his wife with nothing, after she gave up her own career, supported his career, took care of the home front, and raised his children. While it's far from a black & white issue, if I had to favor one position over another, I'd say she deserves half of everything.

No skin, not even a kiss, but this has to be my all-time favorite gay short. Click on the top right corner to get English subtitles.

I understand there are no restrooms for those standing in Times Square wanting to watch the Ball drop. People are waiting for many hours.

An uncle of mine used to wait tables at a restaurant in Times Square. He said that on NYE, they guard the bathroom like Ft. Knox, strictly for customers only. So no, definitely no public bathrooms. Guys in Times Square just pee on the pavement. Not sure what women do. Probably the same, just shielded by friends as best they can. Not that I was ever that tempted to go do NYE in Times Square while I lived in NYC, but the thought of wading ankle-deep in piss definitely killed any inkling of desire.

Many aspects of English make it difficult to learn, but I would think one of the toughest is which syllable in a word to emphasize. French is super easy, the last syllable (any exceptions, French speakers?). Spanish is pretty easy. There is a set of rules for emphasis that you learn as a beginner and are easy to master. All exceptions to the rule will simply have an accent over the vowel of the syllable to be emphasized (like énfasis). But English words, no rhyme or reason, as if every word had its own unique rule of pronunciation.

I was there this summer for my first time. It was mid week, the club was slow. I got there around 11. The dick dollars thing was confusing, and the guy didnt explain it well. Finally a very hot guy came on who gave me a lot of attention and invited me to join him in the VIP room. He indicated to me that if I did I would leave happy. I was surprised by the 100 fee, and they weren't clear how long that would get me. I paid it, we went back, and he spent a little while trying to talk me into buying a bottle of Champaign for the two of us. When I said no, he told me that my 15 minutes were up, and i had to pay another 100. I hadn't even gotten a dance. He promised if i did, i would get off, so i did. He then told me that we only had 15 minutes, but if i slipped the VIP guy a 200 tip, he wouldn't interrupt us again being that it was a slow night. This guy was really hot and i wanted what he lead me to believe would be as much time as i wanted. He told me to give him the cash, and he would negotiate the booth. He came back a minute later, and told me now that we had time, let's chat for a minute. He did dance as we chatted but he didn't touch me and told me I wasn't allowed to touch him yet. In another 15 minutes, the VIP lounge guy told us time was up. The dancer told me to give him a minute to sort it out, and came back saying things had picked up and we couldn't keep the booth past what was allowed. At this time I felt I had been scammed, I was out 400, and basically watched the guy dance for 15 minutes. I went to leave, and the dancer told me that I still owed him. I asked what the 400 was for, and he told me that all went to the tip and the house. I told him I had to buy more dick dollars, and he told me that those dont apply to private dances, private dances are cash. I was really frustrated at this point, and then he told me that I owed him 400. I about freaked out. I mentioned that he should have said something before we headed back, and that for that money I should have gotten what was promised. He called for a bouncer, and I gave him 200 so I could leave without any problems. So what amounted to a 15 minute dance i could have watched on the stage, and 15 minutes of telling him I didn't want a drink, cost me 600. I went to my hotel room, found a guy available on rentmen, and had a great time with him for half the price.

Basically, if you do go, make sure you know how it works or you will get heavily taken advantage of.

So sorry that happened to you, but so grateful that you posted your trip report. It sounds like SR has changed, a lot, and much for the worse. I have a cousin in Atlanta that I visited a couple of times even though "visiting my cousin" was really just an excuse to go to SR. My cousin is a perfectly nice guy, but we're not really that close. Looks like it might be a while before I visit him again.

One of the most interesting characters I met on the Strip was an elderly Chinese woman who was a card-counter almost her entire adult life. She moved to Las Vegas in 1961 with her two children. Her deadbeat husband had left her, and in those days, getting child support through the legal system was impossible. She couldn't get a regular job in the casinos because she claimed "I have slant eyes." So she figured out how to count cards. Back in those days, "the boys" ran the casinos, not big corporations. Since Las Vegas was more of a small town back then, everybody knew who she was and what she was doing but tolerated it because they knew her situation. She did get banned, all the time and by every casino in town, but back then all she had to do was stay away for a couple of months, and then they'd let her play again, not like today's lifetime bans. By counting cards, she raised two kids, bought a house, and sent the kids to UNLV so that they wouldn't have to end up as card counters. Now the two kids support their mom because she doesn't do much card-counting any more. She's the one who told me that those MIT kids ruined it for everybody else.

She told me about her wildest night. She went to the casino with three hundred bucks (remember, this is 1961, so factor in inflation). She had a bad night and ended up losing it all. She kept eight quarters in her purse as emergency money. She played a slot with the quarters and ended up hitting one for a hundred bucks. With that hundred, she went back to the tables, had a rollicking night, and ended up winning $5500! I was born in 1964, but I'm pretty sure $5500 was more than the average annual salary back in 1961.

My father's game was blackjack. He even bought a book on it.

 

I remember one time he and I were in a casino. I don't gamble - I'm too cheap. My father was at the blackjack table. At another seat was a drunk guy. While my father played I walked around the area. In the alley behind the casino was a pawn shop. Looking through the window I saw the drunk guy trying to pawn his watch. Sad.

You see and hear a lot when you live in Las Vegas, especially if you go to the casinos as often as I do. I once met a guy who was, at least for a time, a professional card-counter. He paid his entire way through UC Santa Barbara by playing blackjack. When I said that I thought the MIT guys ruined it for everybody, he said that you could still do it but had to be super careful. He works a day job now and plays blackjack just for fun and for some pocket money.

If you're ever in the unenviable position of trying to pawn your watch for gambling money (or money for any other purposes), be advised that if you bring in a brand new Rolex to a pawn shop, they'll probably offer you only 10% of the retail price. Yikes!

I've lived half my life in poker rooms, or so it seems sometimes. All traditional poker rooms in the US are non-smoking. Most rooms, unfortunately, are adjoining the main casino, so a lot of smoke does drift in, but at least you don't have to put up with the guy next to you chain-smoking. I've never been to the other type of card room, where games like pai gow are played.

I heard an ad on the radio for one. With all the Indian casinos I was surprised they still exist.

 

I remember an episode of the old "Dragnet" about a man with a gambling addiction who frequented card rooms. He stole from the company he worked at. Lied to his wife about having an ex wife he had to send alimony to.

What's a "card room"? Does that mean a poker room? I can't think of what else it could refer to.

I might have said this before, but it bears repeating in this thread. Las Vegas is fortunate enough to have a Catholic Charities that is very dedicated to helping the homeless. CC has very deep pockets because their fund for the homeless always takes in more in donations every month than they can spend. If you are homeless, CC will do just about anything to help you. They will feed you, they will give you groceries from their well-stocked food bank, they will find you temporary shelter, they'll help you get permanent housing, they'll set you up on job interviews, they'll counsel you on how to handle a job interview, they'll get you nice new clothes for those interviews, they'll pay for a makeover at the barber shop/beauty salon, they'll get you into rehab if you have a substance abuse problem ... in sum, they will move heaven and earth to get you off the streets.

The reason they take in more in donations than they spend every month is that they place two conditions on their assistance: 1) you have to get off the drugs/alcohol, and 2) you have to be willing to work. They've found that if a homeless person isn't willing to do those two things, they inevitably end up back on the streets. And in a feature in the local paper, the workers at Catholic Charities said that there are a surprising number of homeless who just aren't willing to work and/or aren't willing to kick their addictions. Ever since I found out about Catholic Charities' work, my view of the homeless, at least here in Las Vegas, has changed. Granted, some of the homeless I come across may not know about Catholic Charities, but whenever a homeless person asks me for money, I direct them to Catholic Charities. I even offer to let them use my phone. By the way, Catholic Charities will pick up a homeless person anywhere in the city and transport them to a temporary shelter. I don't give money to the homeless any more, but I do donate to Catholic Charities, even if its coffers are brimming.

Another way that the homeless situation in Las Vegas might be different from that of other cities is the amount that the homeless make panhandling. An article in the local paper featured a husband and wife who each panhandled two hours a day, seven days a week, so 28 hours total per week between the two of them. They tracked how much they took in a year: over $47K! OK, so maybe they're better at the panhandling thing than most homeless people, but they say that such generosity to the homeless is particular to Las Vegas. It's the mentality that if I give this homeless guy a dollar, I'll hit big on the slots tonight or all my football picks will come out. And I swear, you see some people almost falling out of their cars trying to give homeless people money. I doubt such zeal is merely passionate selflessness.

I clicked on this thread thinking it was the first line of a joke. So, three straight guys come to San Francisco. The first one sees ...

But no joke, just a warning. And as others mentioned, links to three guys who don't look particularly straight

.

Wow, really?

 

He medaled bronze, third out of how many contestants?

 

Way to shit on someone’s accomplishment. He can hold his head high as a proven OLYMPIAN, what’s your story?

I'm sorry, I must have missed the rule that you need to win at least an Olympic bronze medal before you're allowed to express an opinion.

Patrick Chan, gold medalist in the team event, earned a tech score of 87.67 whereas Yuzuru Hanyu, gold medalist in the men's singles, earned a tech score of 109.55. A score of 87.67 was the 2nd highest tech score in the team event (Kolyada was just a smidge higher at 88.35), yet it would have placed Chan only eighth in the free skate standings in men's singles. Hanyu's score was good enough for only second in the free skate, behind Nathan Chen's jaw-dropping 127.64. Rippon's tech score was 86.20 whereas men's singles bronze medalist Javier Fernandez scored 101.52. Of a maximum eight jumping passes (two can be combinations, one can be a series, the other five must be individual jumps), Rippon did two double axels and zero quads, good for the third highest tech score. Twelve-year-olds can do a double axel. In contrast, Javi did two quads and two triple axels, yet Javi's tech score was only good enough for fourth in the free skate. Chan and Rippon placed ninth and tenth respectively in the overall men's singles standings.

The Olympic Committee and the skating federations love the team event because it brings in ratings and money. In a sport with staggering expenses but just a trickle of revenue stream, Canada's gold medal will bring in a lot of money for Skate Canada. In that sense, I begrudgingly support the team event because anything to help with the horrible financial burden of figure skating is a good thing. But come on, the level of skating in the team event is a joke. Three nations fielded legitimate teams; three teams win a medal. Do the math.

And that’s my problem with American skaters. They’re too focused on cashing in. Other countries actually try to win it for them and for the country. Americans only have $$$ in their minds. Instead of training they’re out somewhere filming for an advertisement or something.

I think you're being too harsh. Figure skating is an insanely expensive sport. Skaters not only have a "head coach," like Brian Orser for Hanyu & Fernandez, but also assistant coaches (Tracy Wilson), "specialization" coaches (Javi worked with a different coach specifically to work on his spins, plus with someone from the Ballet Nacional to work on posture & positions), and choreographers (David Wilson). Plus they have to pay a fortune for ice time, travel expenses, equipment, and costumes. Yes, the US Olympic Committee and the US Figure Skating Association do give skaters some money, but apparently it's not much, not nearly enough to cover all those staggering expenses. Yes, American figure skaters are looking to make money, because that's their financial reality.

I don't know in-depth the financial situation of skaters from other countries, but I'm willing to bet the Russian Olympic Committee and Skating Federation provide a lot more financial assistance to their skaters than we give to ours.

Great skating by both ladies, but a tied score in the FS, come on. What are the odds for that. Seems like there has to be some sort of score manipulation by the judges, and it took so long for the scores to come up for both these ladies. Also I wonder about the possibility of computer hacking to change 1 value which could alter the results since the computers were hacked at the opening ceremonies.

Down to a hundredth of a point? I agree, that sounds crazy, just too much of a coincidence. At the same time, since the judges set all their GOE and PCS scores independently, with no idea of the other judges' scores, I don't see how any manipulation is possible.

Alina hits a 5-tripple combination like it's nothing in practice:

http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/alina-zagitova-hits-5-triple-jump-combination-practice?chrcontext=newsfeed

 

Goddess. All those other girls must feel completely intimidated by her, love it! <3

Zoinks! She can do a triple loop with almost no speed going into the jump. That jump combination is like nothing I've ever seen!

I appreciate athletic bodies as much as the next guy, but I'm routinely flummoxed as to why people just lose their shit about Olympic athletes. It's not unexpected that a bunch of teenaged and young adult elite athletes will have incredibly athletic "sexy" muscular bodies. I just don't get why it's such a big deal. I mean, don't we see hot men all the time?

Eric, if you're lucky enough to see a pair of thighs like Joey Mantia's all the time, then you live a charmed life. I don't, so Joey makes me go absolutely apeshit.