August 16 review of Jasper Van Dean

[Stanwyck]

Today's review of Jasper Van Dean, by Xenonman, is largely identical to August 9's review of Jaxton Wheeler, also by Xenonman. (I knew I had fairly recently read the phrase "penis puppetry.") Each review is labeled as Xenonman's first.

[bigvalboy]

Good eye Stanwyck...For all practical purposes, the reviews are identical, and that makes them not believable.

[adventurous old guy]

Should this be communicated via email to Reviews editor, or can we assume that they will see this hear? Just thinking about closing the loop.

[Kenny]

!!!!!!

[+ Keith30309]

Interesting. I didn't see the reviews before removal but am guessing from the comments that it was favorable. I guess the possibilities are:

• A client saw both, had the described experience and simply replicated his text for convenience and to save time.
  
• Someone did not see both (or only one guy) but decided to submit a review without a meeting for some reason.
  

The fact that it's two unrelated guys makes it a weird circumstance.

[bigvalboy]

REVIEW WITHDRAWN FOR CAUSE

 

[BasketBaller]

Interesting. I didn't see the reviews before removal but am guessing from the comments that it was favorable. I guess the possibilities are:

• A client saw both, had the described experience and simply replicated his text for convenience and to save time.
  
• Someone did not see both (or only one guy) but decided to submit a review without a meeting for some reason.
  

The fact that it's two unrelated guys makes it a weird circumstance.

 

Today's was not favorable, and it was very specific. Odder yet that it would have been at all similar to another encounter. Weird.

[adventurous old guy]

Interesting. I didn't see the reviews before removal but am guessing from the comments that it was favorable. I guess the possibilities are:

• A client saw both, had the described experience and simply replicated his text for convenience and to save time.
  
• Someone did not see both (or only one guy) but decided to submit a review without a meeting for some reason.
  

The fact that it's two unrelated guys makes it a weird circumstance.

Another possibility is that the reviewer has issues. It was a "buyer's remorse" kind of review, where reviewer said he felt gyped, wish he had handled the situation differently, and cited youth and what sounded like some self-esteem issues around weight as the reasons he let himself be managed the way that he did.

[sincitymix]

I have mixed emotions when it comes to jasper. I hired him once, despite telling him what i wanted and his agreeing, it suddenly turned into.. no touching, no sexual contact, he doesnt do sex for money, time only etc. He is a nice guy. His pictures are accurate.., but meh, could be we got our messages crossed, but im not willing to chance a repeat hire.

[TruHart1]

I have mixed emotions when it comes to jasper. I hired him once, despite telling him what i wanted and his agreeing, it suddenly turned into.. no touching, no sexual contact, he doesnt do sex for money, time only etc. He is a nice guy. His pictures are accurate.., but meh, could be we got our messages crossed, but im not willing to chance a repeat hire.

I myself have no experience with Mr. Van Dean but I recall a few discussions and/or reviews where clients who expected to do more than muscle worship expressed great disappointment. Everything I've heard or read about him, including on his own website, makes a point of emphasizing that he does not have sex with clients. He seems to be a straight bodybuilder who is quite adamant about only letting clients enjoy him as a voyeur/witness as far as I can tell.

 

TruHart1

[sincitymix]

I myself have no experience with Mr. Van Dean but I recall a few discussions and/or reviews where clients who expected to do more than muscle worship expressed great disappointment. Everything I've heard or read about him, including on his own website, makes a point of emphasizing that he does not have sex with clients. He seems to be a straight bodybuilder who is quite adamant about only letting clients enjoy him as a voyeur/witness as far as I can tell.

 

TruHart1

True, but when i hired him, i had seen a review.where he topped, thought mabye all those disclaimers were for legal purposes, told him what i wanted.. he indicated no problem we would have fun....and then all above in my post when i got there.