Today's Coverboy Micheal Rome

[tanman4u]

There are a couple of 'um oddities about today's coverboy.

1. It's review #39 and there's only #'s 1 and 2 before, both are from 5 years ago. OK so maybe Daddy just

made a typo and #39 was meant to be #3.

2. Each of the 3 reviews are from first time reviewers and ALL are written in the same very broken english.

 

Anybody else find this very odd?

[actor61]

There are a couple of 'um oddities about today's coverboy.

1. It's review #39 and there's only #'s 1 and 2 before, both are from 5 years ago. OK so maybe Daddy just

made a typo and #39 was meant to be #3.

2. Each of the 3 reviews are from first time reviewers and ALL are written in the same very broken english.

 

Anybody else find this very odd?

Yes, I found it odd too. All 3 reviews were written in almost pidgen English. Very suspicious.

[+ Keith30309]

(Pst: Read the profile)

[edinbrooklyn]

,

[+ Charlie]

(Pst: Read the profile)

One doesn't need special talent at language analysis to realize that the same person who wrote the profile also wrote each review.

[J-Man]

Neither the review nor his ad mentions his age. He was doing porn many years ago (late '90s maybe?) for Bacchus, so he's got to be at least in his late 30s.