Reluctant to post review in these RentBoy gone days

[KentuckyBoy]

I have an explicit review of Adam Michaels ready to post but am gun shy with what has happened to RentBoy. Neither do I want to harm Adam nor myself. Am I being paranoid in these RentBoy gone days about posting a review...especially an explicit one?

[jawjateck]

Modest, general commentary will be my approach for the foreseeable future.

[Guy Fawkes]

Daddy Sez: "Until the Rentboy situation is resolved I am not comfortable posting explicit reviews."

 

I have an explicit review of Adam Michaels ready to post but am gun shy with what has happened to RentBoy. Neither do I want to harm Adam nor myself. Am I being paranoid in these RentBoy gone days about posting a review...especially an explicit one?

[Jon Royce]

You can never be too careful. The question is, did you have a good experience?

The other day I met with a sort of nerdy but sexy 22 y.o. black guy in the D.C. area. We had been exchanging e-mails and phone calls for some months - he needed new photos. I shot a few with my cell phone and later he fucked the daylights out of me. Somehow I'll figure out a way to share the experience and photos.

[Nebost]

I was also thinking about this very topic. I had a wonderful overnight with a well known Courtesan (wink!) recently, and having been giving some thought to what I should say. I think with some careful wordsmithing, this can be done to give justice to the service that was provided without getting anyone in trouble.

[Jon Royce]

If memory serves me - and it probably won't - years ago David Forest was arrested in Los Angeles County for giving referrals and went to trial. He was acquitted. I think the court found a referral was not the same as a pimp. Help me out here.

[+ purplekow]

Daddy, for those of us with reviews in the system, are you just hold on to them? Will you be letting us know the review was too explicit? Will you edit out the explicit parts? Will you send them back and suggesting we try again?

[Odinochka]

If memory serves me - and it probably won't - years ago David Forest was arrested in Los Angeles County for giving referrals and went to trial. He was acquitted. I think the court found a referral was not the same as a pimp. Help me out here.

 

Depending on the jurisdiction, it is a legal grey area. In some areas, the court would see you as committing "pandering"...while in others, they would not. Now, in Forrest's case, I think the acquittal came about because prosecution could not firmly establish that Forrest had a financial link to the "referrals"....but let's get real--it was David F'ing Forrest...of course he was getting a finder's fee, and was good about not leaving a paper trail. This man was the biggest pimp for male escorts in the 80s & 90s. Leopards never change their spots.

[Amoco]

I'm trying to understand this, too...there is nothing in most reviews that links money for sex in a quid pro quo. Each review specifies fees and number of hours spent. And though many have detailed accounts f sexual activity, I can't remember anyone ever suggesting that they paid "X" amount for some specific sex act. Instead, the information suggests that two adults got together for a certain period of time at a cost of this many dollars, and this is how they spent their time - isn't that an accurate definition of escorting? I understand that the case suggests that that is a thin veneer for prostitution, but it's also 100% true. I understand that they could choose to prosecute and/or shame the individuals publicly, but to what end? A misdemeanor conviction with a ticket? On the other hand, it does indicate commerce and again raises the issue of taxes being paid on the income by the escort.