Should I be worried or am I overreacting?

[+ Gar1eth]

Yeah but poop wouldn't be clear and jelly like?

I've had a condo break years ago-probably around 10 years. There was no sound. The escort (David from Spain who used to escort out of NYC if anyone wants to know) didn't ususally bottom and couldn't relax.

 

I would definitely go talk to a doctor. But I've never really heard of ejaculate being described as jelly-like. It seems more likely that it was lube.

 

I'm sure the physician you see or other healthcare giver will test you now-and there is an RNA test which can determine infection after 2 weeks or so.

 

I'd also suggest, as I'm sure others have, going on Prep.

 

I wish you well.

 

Gman

[+ Chris Eisenhower]

Condos these days are built on the cheap, and yet those HOA fees are so high.

[Steven_Draker]

For What Is Worth: I had a condom breakage a couple of times (this to tell you that breakage is pretty rare if condoms are used correctly).

In my case there was a dull sound and I immediately felt that the condom broke ... We, uncut guys, have more sensitive heads.

 

Gareth is right that the leakage could be lube and/or anal mucus. But that's just speculation. Did you think about sending it to the lab?

[+ ArVaGuy]

I'm not exactly sure why one member got a burr under his saddle regarding the issue raised by the OP. In the fifteen plus years I've participated on this forum there have been numerous similar posts from members asking advice on issues ranging from sex and personal finance, to a myriad of other issues that some here would wonder why anyone would raise such an issue on a message board in the first place.

 

From its inception under Hooboy, to its current administration by Daddy, this forum has strived to create a welcoming environment for anyone who shares our common interests. This place has not always been the "gentlemen's club" as envisioned. Lord knows the internet is very much a Wild West when it comes to anonymous posting. So we've seen our share of ad hominem attacks and meltdowns. Such episodes certainly keep things interesting around here that's for sure.

 

The OP asked a question that to some might seem silly or seeking attention with a made up scenario. But on the surface I see no issues with the question as asked. Something happened during a sexual encounter that has caused concern. He came here seeking advice, perhaps in a near panic, feeling comfortable enough to pose such a question. Overall this message board performed admirably dispensing serious advice and providing a wealth of information on post exposure protocols. We've even tossed in a little humor to lighten the mood. (Thank you Chris and Killian.)

 

So, in that spirit of helping out our brothers (and sisters) who post here, I will now add my two cents to the issue raised by the OP. (You guys thought I was done, I'm just getting started.). Here goes:

 

There is a practice known as stealthing in the bareback fetish community. This involves intentionally barebacking a bottom without their knowledge or consent. When I first read the original post this idea immediately came to mind. Condoms can be intentionality damaged or removed during sex with the express purpose of transmission of HIV. Women have been known to damage condoms with pinpricks in an effort to trick a man into fathering a child.

 

Here's a link to a website that gives step by step instructions on how to stealth an unsuspecting bottom. http://iblastinside.com/2012/06/top-10-stealthing-tips/

Besides pinpricks, this site suggests exposing condoms to extreme heat and cold in an effort to weaken them thus making them very susceptible to breaking. The site advises that if caught the perp should be evasive with a "these things happen" attitude. Above all, keep control of the condom and dispose of it quickly. Sounds familiar doesn't it?

 

I'm not seeking to alarm the OP any further. Some very good advice has been issued here. I don't think it's necessary to visit an ER even if it's been more than a week. See your primary care physician and tell him/her the entire story. Get tested and follow the advised protocol they prescribe. It's very possible you have nothing to worry about. But peace of mind is what you need.

 

If there's a lesson here it should be thus: keep control of the condoms. Bring your own to any and all sexual encounters. Insist on using them exclusively and don't have anal sex if the partner won't agree. That's the only way you'll ever be certain that the condom is not compromised in any way.

 

There, my two cents is done. :-)

[joselowe]

I'm not exactly sure why one member got a burr under his saddle regarding the issue raised by the OP. In the fifteen plus years I've participated on this forum there have been numerous similar posts from members asking advice on issues ranging from sex and personal finance, to a myriad of other issues that some here would wonder why anyone would raise such an issue on a message board in the first place.

 

From its inception under Hooboy, to its current administration by Daddy, this forum has strived to create a welcoming environment for anyone who shares our common interests. This place has not always been the "gentlemen's club" as envisioned. Lord knows the internet is very much a Wild West when it comes to anonymous posting. So we've seen our share of ad hominem attacks and meltdowns. Such episodes certainly keep things interesting around here that's for sure.

 

The OP asked a question that to some might seem silly or seeking attention with a made up scenario. But on the surface I see no issues with the question as asked. Something happened during a sexual encounter that has caused concern. He came here seeking advice, perhaps in a near panic, feeling comfortable enough to pose such a question. Overall this message board performed admirably dispensing serious advice and providing a wealth of information on post exposure protocols. We've even tossed in a little humor to lighten the mood. (Thank you Chris and Killian.)

 

So, in that spirit of helping out our brothers (and sisters) who post here, I will now add my two cents to the issue raised by the OP. (You guys thought I was done, I'm just getting started.). Here goes:

 

There is a practice known as stealthing in the bareback fetish community. This involves intentionally barebacking a bottom without their knowledge or consent. When I first read the original post this idea immediately came to mind. Condoms can be intentionality damaged or removed during sex with the express purpose of transmission of HIV. Women have been known to damage condoms with pinpricks in an effort to trick a man into fathering a child.

 

Here's a link to a website that gives step by step instructions on how to stealth an unsuspecting bottom. http://iblastinside.com/2012/06/top-10-stealthing-tips/

Besides pinpricks, this site suggests exposing condoms to extreme heat and cold in an effort to weaken them thus making them very susceptible to breaking. The site advises that if caught the perp should be evasive with a "these things happen" attitude. Above all, keep control of the condom and dispose of it quickly. Sounds familiar doesn't it?

 

I'm not seeking to alarm the OP any further. Some very good advice has been issued here. I don't think it's necessary to visit an ER even if it's been more than a week. See your primary care physician and tell him/her the entire story. Get tested and follow the advised protocol they prescribe. It's very possible you have nothing to worry about. But peace of mind is what you need.

 

If there's a lesson here it should be thus: keep control of the condoms. Bring your own to any and all sexual encounters. Insist on using them exclusively and don't have anal sex if the partner won't agree. That's the only way you'll ever be certain that the condom is not compromised in any way.

 

There, my two cents is done.

Thanks so much for this.....and I ended up going to the ER as the clinic suggested and they have me on Travuda and two other PEP meds since they want to clear me from all bacteria in case I also caught gonorrhea or claymdia

[sincitymix]

Santorum could come up on many colors, sometimes even liquid as clear as water.

 

The OP doesn't say if the masseur who allegedly deflowered him (as if that really matters) used lubricant, maybe some of that lubricant came out later.

 

Besides, the fact the OP takes time to say he was a virgin and he allowed that masseur to be the first man ever to top him simply makes me yawn... Does it matter if you're a virgin? I don't know if the story is even real, the whole "I was a virgin thing..." just makes me doubt.

 

I know common sense isn't common, but what about going to get some truvada and get tested instead of wasting precious time posting about the way he lost his virginity by a hot masseur in a Caribbean resort.

 

Let's bring some common sense to this tale.

LOL LOL I actually thought you were talking about senator rick santorum.. until I googled the word. lol I learn something new every day

[+ purplekow]

For those who wish to know what santorum means and how it came to mean that: http://www.refinery29.com/2015/05/88123/rick-santorum-definition-dan-savage

 

What Happens When You Google "Santorum"

COMMENTS

• http://s1.r29static.com/bin/avatar/a67/40x40,80/1297496/image.jpg
  
• MAY 27, 2015 12:30 PM
  
• KELSEY MILLER
  

• 70 SHARES
  

http://s2.r29static.com/bin/entry/12d/x,80/1422657/image.jpg

PHOTO: CHARLES SYKES/AP PHOTO.

 

News wires are abuzz this morning with the word that Republican Rick Santorum isexpected to announce that he will be running for President in 2016. But, Google the former senator's name, and you'll find a very different story.

 

Gather 'round, ye children, and let us recall the fable of how "Santorum" came to bedefined as: "the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex."

 

In April 2003, Santorum gave an interview in which he made deeply inflammatory statements about homosexuality. First, when asked to comment on the pedophilia scandal in the Roman Catholic Church, Santorum referred to the sexual abuse as "a basic homosexual relationship," and said it was society's acceptance of the gay ("deviant") lifestyle that enabled these abuses to take place. He went on to champion sodomy laws as a way of protecting, "the basic tenets of our society and the family. And, if the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything." Finally, Santorum conceded that he wasn't trying to pick on gay people, because y'know, they could be worse: "It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog."

 

A number of media outlets and politicians (on both sides of the aisle) publicly decried the then-senator's remarks, though he stood his ground on what he felt was "a very important point." Public figures are used to brushing off this kind of criticism, so columnist Dan Savagedecided to make a statement Rick Santorum would be forced to reckon with. "There's no better way to memorialize the Santorum scandal than by attaching his name to a sex act that would make his big, white teeth fall out of his big, empty head," Savage said in his May 15, 2003 column. So, he asked readers to send in their suggestions for a sexual act that we could henceforth define as "Santorum."

 

After two months and thousands of submissions and votes, Savage announced the winner: that "frothy mixture" took the honor in a landslide victory. Next, Savage and his readers took to the web, starting spreadingsantorum.com and santorum.com, in order to spread the message of the new definition. The campaign was swiftly and hugely successful; the websites quickly outranked Rick Santorum's own official website. Googling "Santorum" soon resulted in myriad results about the definition, and thus it remains today.

 

Now, 12 years later, searching for "Santorum" still gets you a whole heap of lube and fecal matter, with Rick's official website floating somewhere in the middle of it all.