Jump to content

Review of "Hunter" today


actor61
This topic is 3388 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

I'm a little confused by the review of Hunter posted on Daddy's site today. I have hired him several times and the description given today does not at all match what I found. The reviewer says that Hunter is "uncut" and that he is "versatile". In my experience, both of these statements are false. Hunter's ad plainly states that he is a top and that he's cut, and that is certainly what I discovered to be true when I was with him. Could the reviewer have confused him with someone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused by the review of Hunter posted on Daddy's site today. I have hired him several times and the description given today does not at all match what I found. The reviewer says that Hunter is "uncut" and that he is "versatile". In my experience, both of these statements are false. Hunter's ad plainly states that he is a top and that he's cut, and that is certainly what I discovered to be true when I was with him. Could the reviewer have confused him with someone else?

 

To play devil's advocate, you never know... guys with big dicks often get categorized as tops only because that's what most everyone wants from them, and a few escorts I know only advertise as tops despite their own versatility, as it's technically safer, not to mention easier than prepping to bottom all the time. Maybe he's branching out, and his chemistry with the client veered that way, who knows.

 

That said, yeah, I remember him advertising (as his current ad does) only as a top, and he IS cut. Could possibly be an oversight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To play devil's advocate, you never know... guys with big dicks often get categorized as tops only because that's what most everyone wants from them, and a few escorts I know only advertise as tops despite their own versatility, as it's technically safer, not to mention easier than prepping to bottom all the time. Maybe he's branching out, and his chemistry with the client veered that way, who knows.

 

+1

 

True, sometimes an escort is a victim of their own perception/description as le ***** posted.

 

I also think people see certain attributes of an escort (or see how they are in porn... for those doing both) and they get the idea the escort only likes to be a certain way. I once had an escort tell me people want him to mainly be a top because most of the vid work he's done he's a top. Even so, he enjoys bottoming just as much. When he told me this, he seemed a bit disheartened. I gladly topped him. :-P

 

With that said, this particular review seems to be a case of mistaken identity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that the reviewer thought he was much shorter than the escort claims to be-5'11 versus Hunter claiming 6'3". And if Hunter's pictures are accurate, I agree with his self-description of being muscular more than than the reviewers description of him as average.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...