Possible new escort rating system?

[johnfran]

I am so annoyed at the prevalence of fake ads and pics that never seem to go away. What about the idea of providing a rating system (i.e. accurate pics and confirms what he will or will not do, etc.). By this I mean, an escort must meet in person with well known or even not so well known reviewers and confirm that his pics are accurate and interests as stated are accurate . "Image is worth a thousand words as well!" If he does, he gains a "seal of approval" so to speak that will help his business and help weed out the flakes. Not fool proof but since most escorts do their business in the larger cities, it could help. Thoughts???

[+ Funguy]

Way too cumbersome to have to vet the escorts and, IMHO, most escorts would not submit to it. However, if Daddy were to include those things for reviews instead of just recommended, not recommended, satisfactory, unsatisfactory, it would be MUCH better.

[BgMstr4u]

Usually reading the reviews of the known and trusted generally yields this information. But if it were to come to an inspection, well, I would certainly be happy to volunteer as one of the evaluators.

[+ bigjoey]

Yes, count me in as an evaluator; the casting couch is ready and waiting!

[+ Gar1eth]

Usually reading the reviews of the known and trusted generally yields this information. But if it were to come to an inspection, well, I would certainly be happy to volunteer as one of the evaluators.

 

Yes, count me in as an evaluator; the casting couch is ready and waiting!

 

Now, Now Guys!! I'm sure if such a rating system ever were put into place, it would be a requirement that the interviewers "Look But DON'T TOUCH!!!!!

 

Gman

[marylander1940]

Now, Now Guys!! I'm sure if such a rating system ever were put into place, it would be a requirement that the interviewers "Look But DON'T TOUCH!!!!!

 

Gman

 

Or pay and touch all you want as usual.

 

Imagine the scene:

 

"Hi, I'm representing Daddy and I want to have sex with you for free". LOL

 

Usually reading the reviews of the known and trusted generally yields this information. But if it were to come to an inspection, well, I would certainly be happy to volunteer as one of the evaluators.

 

Yes, count me in as an evaluator; the casting couch is ready and waiting!

 

Thanks for applying but...

 

Do we want the interviewer/tester to be versatile?

Must he have a big cock to check guys are truly bottoms? Who check the would-be-interviewer-tester has a big cock?

In shape or fat to make sure the escort can escape reality and make all of us feel wanted?

40's, 50's or 60's?

Do we give the escort a 30 minutes notice for him to take Viagra or just knock at his door and see if he can get it hard?

[Juan Vancouver]

I am so annoyed at the prevalence of fake ads and pics that never seem to go away. What about the idea of providing a rating system (i.e. accurate pics and confirms what he will or will not do, etc.). By this I mean, an escort must meet in person with well known or even not so well known reviewers and confirm that his pics are accurate and interests as stated are accurate . "Image is worth a thousand words as well!" If he does, he gains a "seal of approval" so to speak that will help his business and help weed out the flakes. Not fool proof but since most escorts do their business in the larger cities, it could help. Thoughts???

 

That system is already in place. It's called escort reviews.

 

One other thing came to mind when I read your post: if you are going to assume that what one escort did with John Doe is exactly what he will do with you, then you will always be disappointed. The interaction between an escort and a client vary depending on a myriad factors, namely their mutual interests, their physical abilities, whether the body cooperated or not on that specific session (as in whether anal was possible because of a stable and clean gut), whether both participants were clean and smelled and tasted fresh and minty (That can determine whether kissing even took place), just to name a few.

 

Just because Danny kissed Billy passionately doesn't mean Danny will, should or must kiss you the same way. If Danny is not kissing you passionately but Danny has been known for kissing passionately clients similar to you then it would be safe to assume that there is something on your side that you are doing (Or didn't do) that is altering Danny's abilities.

 

More than "what did he do" I would be very interested in "How did he do it?", "Did he seem to be enjoying himself?", "Was he attentive, kind, passionate and paying attention to his client's needs and response?", "Did I feel like a valued, seen human being while I was with him?", etc.

 

Just writing this, it became clear to me that we might be talking about two entirely different things. One is a rating system for escorts or companions, the other is a rating system for prostitutes that are being hired to perform acts. Those are two very valid professions but have very little in common. If that is the case, If you really are talking about this, then I guess it is important to know if the prostitute was able to deepthroath or not, or if he was able to fuck and how many times he came.

 

I am going to finish this by saying that so many clients complaint about fake ads, poor service, and horrible experiences but when it comes to actually writing a review they don't and then justify not doing for endless reasons. That is especially bad in Canada where we don't have a review culture. That's why it is almost impossible for Canadian escorts to accrue reviews.

 

There is only one way to uplift the quality of the overall escort experience: that way is to review. Often. Truthfully. Every single session that you have.

[desertguy1954]

I agree with Juan. Only by going thru the review process about an escort can other guys be alerted to red flags or possible red flags. The reviews are helpful up to a certain point. What I experience is with a guy is going to be different from what anyone else does.

I have been with some escorts that yes, they did "perform" just as their ad stated they would. Since I was getting my "basic" needs meet that being getting the my ass pounded it was fine.

The ones that I have enjoyed and would do a repeat with are the ones like Juan (hopefully some day) and others, who after numerous reviews over a long time have never had anything written negative about them. That list is small, but I am sure each one of them is worth every minute. They show not only in their positive reviews but also in their ads that they are great guys to be with if only for an hour or longer. They also show a love and enjoyment of their profession.

So yes, continue to post the ads, so we can all benifit from it.

[instudiocity]

That system is already in place. It's called escort reviews.

 

One other thing came to mind when I read your post: if you are going to assume that what one escort did with John Doe is exactly what he will do with you, then you will always be disappointed. The interaction between an escort and a client vary depending on a myriad factors, namely their mutual interests, their physical abilities, whether the body cooperated or not on that specific session (as in whether anal was possible because of a stable and clean gut), whether both participants were clean and smelled and tasted fresh and minty (That can determine whether kissing even took place), just to name a few.

 

Just because Danny kissed Billy passionately doesn't mean Danny will, should or must kiss you the same way. If Danny is not kissing you passionately but Danny has been known for kissing passionately clients similar to you then it would be safe to assume that there is something on your side that you are doing (Or didn't do) that is altering Danny's abilities.

 

More than "what did he do" I would be very interested in "How did he do it?", "Did he seem to be enjoying himself?", "Was he attentive, kind, passionate and paying attention to his client's needs and response?", "Did I feel like a valued, seen human being while I was with him?", etc.

 

Just writing this, it became clear to me that we might be talking about two entirely different things. One is a rating system for escorts or companions, the other is a rating system for prostitutes that are being hired to perform acts. Those are two very valid professions but have very little in common. If that is the case, If you really are talking about this, then I guess it is important to know if the prostitute was able to deepthroath or not, or if he was able to fuck and how many times he came.

 

I am going to finish this by saying that so many clients complaint about fake ads, poor service, and horrible experiences but when it comes to actually writing a review they don't and then justify not doing for endless reasons. That is especially bad in Canada where we don't have a review culture. That's why it is almost impossible for Canadian escorts to accrue reviews.

 

There is only one way to uplift the quality of the overall escort experience: that way is to review. Often. Truthfully. Every single session that you have.

Damn, I want you to pick me up in a bar, take me home and never let me go...

[+ Axiom2001]

Damn, I want you to pick me up in a bar, take me home and never let me go...

 

Damn, instudiocity, I love what you wrote. If I had a vast amount of $$$s which would let me to travel to cities to visit particular men, I'd definitely fly out of SFO

to Vancouver to meet the Mr. Juan Bruno, a man I'd desired to meet for many a year. Hope when that time comes that it will not be too late for me!

[MalcomXpark]

That system is already in place. It's called escort reviews.

 

...if you are going to assume that what one escort did with John Doe is exactly what he will do with you, then you will always be disappointed. The interaction between an escort and a client vary depending on a myriad factors...their physical abilities, whether the body cooperated or not on that specific session (as in whether anal was possible because of a stable and clean gut), whether both participants were clean and smelled and tasted fresh and minty (That can determine whether kissing even took place), just to name a few.

 

Well said! Not all clients are the same, not all interactions are the same, etc.

 

http://www.fightplay.tv/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/FIGHTPLAY_t_shirtmission_impossible.jpg

 

http://uncommonchick.com/wp-content/uploads/definitely-half-empty-fish.jpg

 

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-i-am-i-plus-my-circumstances-jose-ortega-y-gasset-69015.jpg

[Juan Vancouver]

Damn, I want you to pick me up in a bar, take me home and never let me go...

 

Damn, that gave me a boner! I don't know if that makes me a romantic at heart, a horned dog or something somewhere in the middle. =)

 

And Axiom... I really hope we will get a chance to meet real soon!

 

Big hug to you all!

[Newly]

I know I'm stating the obvious but it seems that there are forum members who hire escorts based on body types/parts and really aren't too interested in the person attached to them, and there are members who while not looking for a boyfriend are looking for a mental "clicking" with the escort. I assume that the same holds true for what clients an escort is interested in. It's not that one is "right" and the other is "wrong", they're just different and the differences are causing some friction in the forum. This made me think back to the reviews I have written and while they are 100% honest, they are biased in that I am the type who wants to make a mental connection and don't really give a hoot about the escort's size, build, etc. If I like him as a human being everything else is pretty irrelevant. So an escort that I gush over may be totally wrong for a client looking for a certain size, age, eye color or what not. I guess this could be covered in a very long and detailed review, but I wish there was a check box type option to describe what you are like as a client. Maybe that would make it easier to determine how much a review applies to you? Even then I certainly can't explain why certain escorts have just clicked so well. I wish I could, but I'm guessing it's just chemistry.

[instudiocity]

Damn, that gave me a boner! I don't know if that makes me a romantic at heart, a horned dog or something somewhere in the middle. =)

Now you've given me a boner, too! I like romantic horn dogs with a Juan Vancouver brain!!

[instudiocity]

...I wish there was a check box type option to describe what you are like as a client. Maybe that would make it easier to determine how much a review applies to you?

Isn't that covered in the "About the Reviewer" section?

 

Reviewer

• Handle:Client (First Review )
  
• You: Don't care about their stats, I care about the mental connection and the human being I'm with whom I'm engaged. I like all types of guys.
  

[bigvalboy]

Now you've given me a boner, too! I like romantic horn dogs with a Juan Vancouver brain!!

 

+1

[Newly]

Yes, it certainly could be. But just about every one I've seen just states the reviewers age, body type and occasionally, but not often, a bit more.

[ericwinters]

Kind of like the ebay rating / feedback system.