Censoring Fake Reviews

[killianjamesnyc]

This morning a very very very fake review was posted about me. Absolutely none of it was true, down to my stats and where I host clients.

[Scorpio]

Email Daddy: [email protected]

[Steven_Draker]

Lastly, My last review on Daddy's was FAKE. I have never traveled to the Bronx to meet anyone. I would especially not meet them at a deli, as I host at my apartment in Manhattan. My stats on his review are all wrong and the biggest sign should have been "...your group parties and family events...", to my knowledge Daddy's doesn't hold those.

 

I take the reviews on daddy's seriously. This is just a huge disappointment and I hope it is rectified AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

 

Killian,

You can write a rebuttal and send it to Daddy. He'll attach it to the fake review in question.

[bigvalboy]

This morning a very very very fake review was posted about me. Absolutely none of it was true, down to my stats and where I host clients.

 

Well Killianjamesnyc, I too saw your review, and my immediate reaction was that it was fake also. Though it happens, I was puzzled by the fact that they gave you only a "satisfactory" and then went on to post a rather positive experience. The last line about 'group and family' events struck me as the most odd, and at that point I just dismissed the whole thing as being a fake review.

 

Unfortunately these things happen, and your best recourse is to post a rebuttal. A "professional" response by an escort to a fake review can go a long way in maintaining your reputation. That being said, I think that your ad and pics are extremely hot, but sadly I rarely get to NYC, and I just left WEHO, where apparently you are heading. Smart move, enjoy the warm California sun, and I wish you the best going forward...Cheers, BVB

[leigh.bess.toad]

Well Killianjamesnyc, I too saw your review, and my immediate reaction was that it was fake also. Though it happens, I was puzzled by the fact that they gave you only a "satisfactory" and then went on to post a rather positive experience. The last line about 'group and family' events struck me as the most odd, and at that point I just dismissed the whole thing as being a fake review.

 

Unfortunately these things happen, and your best recourse is to post a rebuttal. A "professional" response by an escort to a fake review can go a long way in maintaining your reputation. That being said, I think that your ad and pics are extremely hot, but sadly I rarely get to NYC, and I just left WEHO, where apparently you are heading. Smart move, enjoy the warm California sun, and I wish you the best going forward...Cheers, BVB

 

See what you miss when you don't make it to DC? One day, BVB.

[bigvalboy]

See what you miss when you don't make it to DC? One day, BVB.

 

LOL...I know I know, I would go for Killianjames alone, and after reading that impressive lineup of escorts that you had attend, I was very jealous indeed. Looks like I have something else to add to my bucket list. No real excuses next year, I am only a little over a 2 hour flight away. Cheers to all....

[jawjateck]

Killian is a superbly handsome man, and very sweet too! It was a serious oversight on my part to not schedule a session with him while in DC. That is a mistake I do not intend to repeat.

[leigh.bess.toad]

LOL...I know I know, I would go for Killianjames alone, and after reading that impressive lineup of escorts that you had attend, I was very jealous indeed. Looks like I have something else to add to my bucket list. No real excuses next year, I am only a little over a 2 hour flight away. Cheers to all....

 

God, I can't believe I'm saying this already, but plan on the weekend of January 16-18. The luncheon will be on January 18.

[bigvalboy]

God, I can't believe I'm saying this already, but plan on the weekend of January 16-18. The luncheon will be on January 18.

 

Thanks Lee, I anxiously await meeting everyone, including Killian and Chris, and so many others... It's already on my calendar....

[leeper]

I just put it on my calendar for next year so I don't inadvertently schedule something I can't get out of like I did this year. Really sorry I missed it.

[leeper]

Getting back to the original subject matter of the fake review. I knew it was questionable when he described Killian's cock as "thin" - twice. Having firsthand experience, that is not a descriptor that I consider remotely accurate.

[leigh.bess.toad]

Getting back to the original subject matter of the fake review. I knew it was questionable when he described Killian's cock as "thin" - twice. Having firsthand experience, that is not a descriptor that I consider remotely accurate.

 

Never having seen it, I wasn't sure. But the pictures sure as hell don't look like it's thin. Or if that's their idea of thin, I sure as hell don't want to see thick. Ouch.

[killianjamesnyc]

Ruff Ruff ::POKE::

[BaronArtz]

Isn't there supposed to be a verification system in place before any review is published, especially when it's mediocre, or mediocre-negative? Think of how much business this guy has lost because it was put up there. Not everybody reads this forum ... Then, on the other hand, if there is a system in place and our friend Killian James didn't respond, it would shed a different light on this. I don't know. There are always 2 sides to a story.

 

I imagine it's no fun reading your cock being referred to as 'thin'. Nor is it fun reading you were double fucked if that didn't take place.

[+ poolboy48220]

I think there's a system in place for an escort to respond to negative reviews, but this one was positive. But definitely weird. "he sensually serviced my partner and I on our penis'". I initially gave it a bit of cred because it looked like a non-native-English speaker, but ... dayum.

 

Going to go make a grilled cheese.

[Professor Mitch]

Based on recent personal experience, "thin" is not the appropriate adjective. And as a professor, I know my adjectives

[BSR]

The questionable review was positive in some aspects yet horrible in others. 5'7" & 180 pounds yet an "average" build? In that context, "average" becomes a euphemism for chubby and out of shape. Penis thin & less than 5"?? To note details like that while writing about a positive experience ends up being more damning than a review that is entirely negative. Lucky for Killian he has so many fans on this board to set the record straight.

[killianjamesnyc]

I think all of you will get a chuckle out of the response I am sending daddy on this recent fake review. I will have the final word.

[+ WilliamM]

The questionable review was positive in some aspects yet horrible in others. 5'7" & 180 pounds yet an "average" build? In that context' date=' "average" becomes a euphemism for chubby and out of shape. Penis thin & less than 5"?? To note details like that while writing about a positive experience ends up being more damning than a review that is entirely negative. Lucky for Killian he has so many fans on this board to set the record straight.[/quote']

 

There's no question that the review is unusual and weird, but I do not agree that it ends up being more damning than a review that is entirely negative. It's a first time reviewer who may just not know how to write a review. What's good for Killian (beside this discussion) is that all his other reviews are very positive, without this weird element. As has been written -- not everyone here reads this forum.

[killianjamesnyc]

This person knew that it would get posted because of the pre-set selections like "Would you hire again: YES" etc. In my opinion, there definitely needs to be a better screening process. These reviews are followed and scrutinized by so many people.

[killianjamesnyc]

William, this review is FAKE. I would never meet anyone at a deli in the bronx lol, nor have a grilled cheese before I bottom? lol.

[+ deej]

This person knew that it would get posted because of the pre-set selections like "Would you hire again: YES" etc. In my opinion, there definitely needs to be a better screening process. These reviews are followed and scrutinized by so many people.

 

You might want to peruse the review site's FAQ. (Particularly the "I'm and escort..." section.) If you're going to publicly diss the owner, it helps to know what you're talking about.

 

But since you claim to know exactly how reviews are handled, why not spell out the entire process? It's some of the best entertainment Daddy gets.

 

A good rule for life: you may hurt yourself if you run with scissors.

A better rule for life: pissing off Daddy may bite you in the ass.

[+ Gar1eth]

Killian- I haven't met you. I would like to. But I probably won't get the chance. But if you will take some advice, write your rebuttal. But be very careful when you write it. Don't be extremely sarcastic or hurtful. You should basically just say that you think this is a false review and explain why but without overly attacking the the reviewer. Rebuttals that attack the reviewer usually come back to haunt the escort in the end. And in this case probably the majority or even more of us on the Forum- and I have to believe that even people who don't read the Forum- anyone with a reasonable amount of sense should realize that there is something wrong- most likely false- about that review when read in comparison to your other reviews.

 

Gman

[killianjamesnyc]

I sure hope so, however, you never know how people think. I always assume people are taking these reviews very seriously because I do.

[killianjamesnyc]

I'm not saying I know exactly how they are reviewed and in no way am I dissing anyone. All I'm saying is that this is hurting me greatly, especially since I never even met this person and his stats are all wrong about me. It is not remotely consistent with what my clients or anyone who has met me has said about me. I have written my rebuttal to the fake review, I hope it is humorous enough and people get that it is fake as pam andersons breasts.