Jump to content

Keeping the closet door locked .


Guest RetrdEscrt
This topic is 8233 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Posted

>i was yanked out the closet at the age of 17......

 

>i am NOT ashamed of who or what i am,and i will never hide the FACT

>that i am gay just to keep a "friend"

 

Well said....nor should you ever be ashamed of being gay. I only wish I had your attitude many years ago, or that I was "yanked' out of the closet.:) at 17. "Yanked" sorta suggestes it wasn't voluntary and I bet there is an interesting story there, but not my place to ask }(

 

Anyway, I have finally reached the point I am proud of who I am and thouroughly enjoy being out and about with my gay friends -- much more so that being around my str8 friends. :+

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

>i was yanked out the closet at the age of 17......

 

>i am NOT ashamed of who or what i am,and i will never hide the FACT

>that i am gay just to keep a "friend"

 

Well said....nor should you ever be ashamed of being gay. I only wish I had your attitude many years ago, or that I was "yanked' out of the closet.:) at 17. "Yanked" sorta suggestes it wasn't voluntary and I bet there is an interesting story there, but not my place to ask }(

 

Anyway, I have finally reached the point I am proud of who I am and thouroughly enjoy being out and about with my gay friends -- much more so that being around my str8 friends. :+

Posted

>The answer is obvious from what you have written--you remain

>silent, and at most smile when they in fact wear their

>sexuality on their sleeve. I'm sorry, but contrary to what you

>say, your real being appears stiffled by your str8 friends and

>your desire to fit in.

 

Another good point (as usual) from Flower. Too bad it can't be green. :*

Posted

>The answer is obvious from what you have written--you remain

>silent, and at most smile when they in fact wear their

>sexuality on their sleeve. I'm sorry, but contrary to what you

>say, your real being appears stiffled by your str8 friends and

>your desire to fit in.

 

Another good point (as usual) from Flower. Too bad it can't be green. :*

Posted

>He's not

>shoving it down people's throats. I stand by my contention

>that the behavior of many gays at these parades is nothing to

>cheer about or admire. I firmly believe they do more harm

>than good.

 

And you don't think blatant displays of heterosexuality aren't crammed down our throats, in the media & in real life, every single day of our lives? It hasn't hurt their cause. :p

Posted

>He's not

>shoving it down people's throats. I stand by my contention

>that the behavior of many gays at these parades is nothing to

>cheer about or admire. I firmly believe they do more harm

>than good.

 

And you don't think blatant displays of heterosexuality aren't crammed down our throats, in the media & in real life, every single day of our lives? It hasn't hurt their cause. :p

Posted

> If people ask me if I'm 'gay', I say no, I'm 'Glutes'.

> What I do in bed friends and aquaintances generally don't

>care, and don't want to hear about it either. This sort of

>goes along with what Bill O'Reilly expresses on his show, and

>I believe him. (Oh boy, I'm gonna get into shit for this)

 

Well, they may not be interested in the particular position you take in bed, but your friends should care about how your love life is going. It's a matter of casual, everyday conversation. It would be hard to believe that if someone is really your friend, that they don't care about your personal life, and vice-a-versa. To merely avoid the topic would have to be quite awkward, actually...

Posted

> If people ask me if I'm 'gay', I say no, I'm 'Glutes'.

> What I do in bed friends and aquaintances generally don't

>care, and don't want to hear about it either. This sort of

>goes along with what Bill O'Reilly expresses on his show, and

>I believe him. (Oh boy, I'm gonna get into shit for this)

 

Well, they may not be interested in the particular position you take in bed, but your friends should care about how your love life is going. It's a matter of casual, everyday conversation. It would be hard to believe that if someone is really your friend, that they don't care about your personal life, and vice-a-versa. To merely avoid the topic would have to be quite awkward, actually...

Posted

>Of course you don’t want to march – neither do I. The

>difference is that I don’t resent those who do.

 

I'm sure you're not ignorant of the fact that many gay men feel as I do about these demonstrations. Trying to make us feel guilty about that is pointless, so you may as well give it up.

 

>It’s like you want to prove a negative and that’s always very

>difficult to do. You don’t want the flamboyant elements out

>their parading around representing you. As if their absence

>will somehow demonstrate to the straight world that there is a

>segment of the gay population who is almost just like them.

>

>That just doesn’t make sense.

 

The way you put it, it sure doesn't. I don't claim their absence would do anything, but I can see the impression that is created as a result of their practice of appropriating the term "gay pride" for their demonstrations. The impression given is that they represent all gay men. But they don't.

 

>I’m trying to point out that I

>don’t think it is right for people who feel that way to resent

>or denigrate others who don’t feel the need to fit into

>straight society.

 

What do you say to the several posters in this thread who clearly resent and denigrate those who do want to fit into straight society? Like Rick Munroe, for example? That okay with you?

 

 

>Of course I understand that, but I think it’s a cop out.

>Being gay is still very, very far from JUST being about

>sexuality.

 

Please speak for yourself. I fail to see what a person's private sexual conduct has to do with his ability to do his job, his ability to serve his country, his ability to be a parent, or his ability to commit to a relationship with another person. The assumption that his private conduct has absolutely NOTHING to do with these other things is the whole basis for opposing anti-gay discrimination, in case you weren't aware of that. It doesn't make sense to treat people differently if the differences between them are very minor and are confined to their private lives. But if you take the position that the differences are not minor and not private, discrimination no longer seems so unreasonable. That's the problem.

 

 

>I don’t know where you get the impression that they claim to

>speak for anyone other than themselves.

 

From the fact that they tell everyone their demonstrations represent "gay pride," where else?

Posted

>Of course you don’t want to march – neither do I. The

>difference is that I don’t resent those who do.

 

I'm sure you're not ignorant of the fact that many gay men feel as I do about these demonstrations. Trying to make us feel guilty about that is pointless, so you may as well give it up.

 

>It’s like you want to prove a negative and that’s always very

>difficult to do. You don’t want the flamboyant elements out

>their parading around representing you. As if their absence

>will somehow demonstrate to the straight world that there is a

>segment of the gay population who is almost just like them.

>

>That just doesn’t make sense.

 

The way you put it, it sure doesn't. I don't claim their absence would do anything, but I can see the impression that is created as a result of their practice of appropriating the term "gay pride" for their demonstrations. The impression given is that they represent all gay men. But they don't.

 

>I’m trying to point out that I

>don’t think it is right for people who feel that way to resent

>or denigrate others who don’t feel the need to fit into

>straight society.

 

What do you say to the several posters in this thread who clearly resent and denigrate those who do want to fit into straight society? Like Rick Munroe, for example? That okay with you?

 

 

>Of course I understand that, but I think it’s a cop out.

>Being gay is still very, very far from JUST being about

>sexuality.

 

Please speak for yourself. I fail to see what a person's private sexual conduct has to do with his ability to do his job, his ability to serve his country, his ability to be a parent, or his ability to commit to a relationship with another person. The assumption that his private conduct has absolutely NOTHING to do with these other things is the whole basis for opposing anti-gay discrimination, in case you weren't aware of that. It doesn't make sense to treat people differently if the differences between them are very minor and are confined to their private lives. But if you take the position that the differences are not minor and not private, discrimination no longer seems so unreasonable. That's the problem.

 

 

>I don’t know where you get the impression that they claim to

>speak for anyone other than themselves.

 

From the fact that they tell everyone their demonstrations represent "gay pride," where else?

Posted

>Why don't you inform them otherwise, since you know their

>impressions are false?

 

And what exactly would you like me to tell them? Where can I find data about the numbers of gay men in America who live private, unremarkable lives?

Posted

>Why don't you inform them otherwise, since you know their

>impressions are false?

 

And what exactly would you like me to tell them? Where can I find data about the numbers of gay men in America who live private, unremarkable lives?

Posted

>It's interesting how those who live the stereotypes demand

>that others who don't are either hiding and self loathing or

>are forgetting where they came from. It's ridiculous!

 

 

I agree, except that I don't think 'ridiculous' is a strong enough word.

 

>Absolutely!! I agree 100% with this statement.

>Unfortunately, it doesn't apply here. The majority of

>straight people hold the (incorrect) assumption that being gay

>is just about perverted behavior. And the actions of many gay

>men at these parades don't CHALLENGE these assumptions, they

>REINFORCE them! And that's the problem.

 

 

Very well said. To those who denigrate gay men who want to fit into straight society I ask, what is your alternative? Straight society is the society we all live in, folks. Anyone who thinks he doesn't need to deal with that is living in a fantasy world.

Posted

>It's interesting how those who live the stereotypes demand

>that others who don't are either hiding and self loathing or

>are forgetting where they came from. It's ridiculous!

 

 

I agree, except that I don't think 'ridiculous' is a strong enough word.

 

>Absolutely!! I agree 100% with this statement.

>Unfortunately, it doesn't apply here. The majority of

>straight people hold the (incorrect) assumption that being gay

>is just about perverted behavior. And the actions of many gay

>men at these parades don't CHALLENGE these assumptions, they

>REINFORCE them! And that's the problem.

 

 

Very well said. To those who denigrate gay men who want to fit into straight society I ask, what is your alternative? Straight society is the society we all live in, folks. Anyone who thinks he doesn't need to deal with that is living in a fantasy world.

Posted

I just read this whole thread for the first time and it really makes me feel kind of sad.

 

I'm in my late 40s and I've been out for more than 20 years. Before that, I dated women, almost got married (twice!), etc., etc. It's a typical story for someone my age. When I was growing up in a conservative small town, the word "gay" meant "happy" and "queers" were definitely to be looked down upon. Growing up at that time meant being young and involved with all of the movements that made the late 60s so exciting -- the peace rallies, the environmental movement, etc. I remember when the black rights movement first started and trying to convince my parents to change their whole way of looking at "colored" people -- which was the polite way to describe black people in the 60s. Then the women's movement started and I remember my father thinking the whole world was turning upside down and he couldn't understand what was wrong with the way things had always been. Of course, he wasn't black and he wasn't a woman...

 

But, somehow, I was either completely unaware of the Stonewall riots and the resulting emerging gay rights movement or so peripherally aware of them that they didn't really stick with me. So the word "gay" continued to be "happy" to me for a long time.

 

I wasn't really aware that I might be "homosexual" or "queer" until after college and the thought was distressing, to say the least. Even while I was dating women, I was becoming more and more aware that I was attracted to men. Not only that, the depth of attraction that I could feel for some men was far stronger than the depth of attraction I felt for women. Eventually I decided that I had to figure out if I was gay or not. At that time, I felt more alone than at any other time in my life. I felt like I was the only gay person in the world and I was certainly ashamed of how I felt. And there was nothing like the Internet to turn to.

 

But I decided that I had to figure out if I was gay so I started going to gay clubs and meeting gay people and it took only a few weeks to realize that not only was I gay, that I also wasn't the only person and that there were many gay people out there who were interesting and fun and smart and involved in all kinds of activities, people I liked and many of whom quickly became friends. I felt liberated in ways that I had not expected. I also grew to like myself a lot more than I had before and I came quickly to believe that being gay was normal for me and I didn't care if it wasn't normal for someone else or someone else didn't like it.

 

Within a year, I had come out to all of the important people in my life: family and close friends. I lost one long-standing friend but gained many new friends in the process. My family didn't understand it but loved me and accepted me and my decisions. It has never come between us. With my friends, sharing with them an important truth about myself has strengthened our friendships and allowed me to combine my gay and straight friends at any time without needing to care or worry about who knows what. Some of my good gay friends have become good friends with some of my original good straight friends and my family has met and cared for my boyfriends.

 

Having said all of that, I've been happy to see what's happening with young people today. It seems more and more common for people to come out at 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 and for young gay people to be far more accepted by their peers than would have been the case for me in high school. So it's been comforting to feel that society is moving forward toward eventual acceptance of gay people as a normal part of society -- where being gay can be a sort of non-event.

 

However, some of the opinions expressed above still seem to represent the kinds of fear that I felt 20 years ago. Perhaps it's because the people writing are my age or older and our opinions and feelings are often shaped by our youth. But I cannot imagine going through life keeping an important, salient fact about myself from my family or close friends. Doing so would seem to imply that those important people in my life don't need to know the truth about who I really am and they are not strong enough or mature enough to handle the fact that I am gay.

 

Family and friends should be supportive of each other, in good times and in bad. But we can only be supportive and supported if we're honest with the important people in our lives. My brothers and sisters don't all lead their lives exactly as I would like them to but they are my brothers and sisters and I support them and I always will. But if I found out that one of them had been in a very important relationship with another person and had been afraid to tell me about that relationship, I'd be seriously pissed and would be very vocal about it with them. If they can't trust me, their brother, with the truth about what is going on in their lives, then who the hell can they trust? Living a life shouldn't involve going to one's grave having kept one's personal life secret from all of the people in one's life.

 

I said at the top that reading this thread makes me feel sad and it does on a number of different levels. It's pretty clear that some of the contributors here still see being gay as being inferior to being straight, as something that has to be apologized for. There's a reference to "throwing it in people's faces". My God! Haven't we gotten past those old attitudes? Straight people don't feel like they're shoving their sexuality in our faces when they make out in public. Why, in America, should the rules be different?

 

The Constitution, thankfully, is a lot about protecting the rights of the minority. Although I dislike the current US Supreme Court, even these members understand that they are there to keep the majority from trampling on the rights of minorities. The majority doesn't always rule in our society and we are much stronger for that.

 

But legality and culture are different. Black rights came about because people stood up and said "We're equal and we're not going to accept second-class treatment anymore." Ditto with the women's rights movement. And the gains that have come about in gay rights have also occurred only because people stood up and shouted and got into people's faces and said, essentially, "I don't care if you like this or not, but I'm as good as you are and I insist on my rights."

 

The people here may or may not find gay pride parades comfortable; they may or may not like drag queens or the pictures on the front pages of the newspapers; they may consider themselves "normal" and having nothing in common with "those people". But that's truly an ignorant point of view and it astonishes me to see posters who are clearly not stupid and not ignorant take that point of view.

 

The history of gay rights is not so long that it should be forgotten already, especially by gay people. The kinds of acceptance we do enjoy, the movement in society's attitudes, the legal rights we have gained -- all of these things have come about because gay people have done two things: (1) we have collectively gotten in society's face and demanded equal rights; and (2) we have come out by the millions, quiety or loudly, and said to the people in our lives "I'm still me, I'm no different than I was before and I want you to know that I'm happy and healthy and I want you to be happy for me."

 

As more and more people did this, more and more Americans started to put a face on gay people. Instead of thinking gay men were those "queers" who were hanging around dirty bookstores, we became their friends and sons and daughters and sisters and brothers and fathers and mothers. And all of a sudden, straight people started standing up and joining us and saying that equal rights was a good thing.

 

I'm not advocating that anyone do anything. But I do think it's sad if someone doesn't respect themselves enough to come out to their friends and family. And, no, you cannot convince me that there are other good reasons not to tell your close friends and family that you are gay. At some level, you must believe that you aren't as good as they are.

 

Sure, people can say I'm practicing pop psychology. I don't care. If someone is gay and afraid to tell their brother or sister, or their best friends, then they don't respect themselves, at some deep and important level. Why else would someone want to have a relationship with someone that is so unequal -- they can tell you all about what's going on in their lives and all about their concerns and problems but you cannot share with them? Please... it's ok, I guess, if you don't respect yourself enough (although it really isn't...). But don't compound the offense by trying to justify it by making all kinds of weak excuses. At least be strong enough to admit that you don't think you're as good as they are. If you did, you'd be willing to stand up and say "You don't like me? Fine. Let me know if you change your mind." and then go associate with people who do like you.

 

If this sounds awfully strong, sorry, but we're talking about fundamental honesty here, honesty in interpersonal relationships between gay people and the closest people in their lives. When we're afraid to share our lives openly and honestly with those who are closest to us, we perpetuate all of the negative stereotypes in the minds of our friends and in our own minds -- which is the worst and saddest thing of all.

 

And for those who say "I'm only gay for sex", please, let's be more honest about that, too. Do you only want to have gay sex for sex? Do you never, ever want to be in love? If yes, I truly feel sorry for you, for sharing love with another person is so far beyond just having sex that you can't really even compare them in the same sentence. But if you do want love, then are you going to have sex with men and love with women? How honest is that? Or will you fall in love with some lucky man and then not tell those who are closest to you about your relationship, your love, your happiness? This is just so fundamentally dishonest and unfair that it appalls me.

 

It's dishonest on the face of it. And it's unfair, first and foremost to you. You're allowing yourself to continue thinking that your feelings are somehow wrong or not as good as or not as legitimate as those of stright people. You're allowing yourself to live a life that involves hiding at some level, perhaps many levels. That's ok if you're 17 but not ok as an adult. And hiding a relationship is fundamentally unfair to your lover and it's fundamentally unfair to your friends and family. You're not even giving them a chance to demonstrate to you that they are strong enough and wise enough and that they care for you enough to accept you for the person you truly are.

 

I've come out to so many people over the last 20 years that I couldn't begin to count them. And I lost just one friend in the whole process -- and I think it was his loss.

 

Being in the closet today is just sad. I cannot think of any other word that expresses my feeling. I feel sad for those of you who feel you must stay in the closet, for you are shortchanging yourself and those around you. I hope you decide someday to let a little sunshine into your life.

 

BG

Posted

I just read this whole thread for the first time and it really makes me feel kind of sad.

 

I'm in my late 40s and I've been out for more than 20 years. Before that, I dated women, almost got married (twice!), etc., etc. It's a typical story for someone my age. When I was growing up in a conservative small town, the word "gay" meant "happy" and "queers" were definitely to be looked down upon. Growing up at that time meant being young and involved with all of the movements that made the late 60s so exciting -- the peace rallies, the environmental movement, etc. I remember when the black rights movement first started and trying to convince my parents to change their whole way of looking at "colored" people -- which was the polite way to describe black people in the 60s. Then the women's movement started and I remember my father thinking the whole world was turning upside down and he couldn't understand what was wrong with the way things had always been. Of course, he wasn't black and he wasn't a woman...

 

But, somehow, I was either completely unaware of the Stonewall riots and the resulting emerging gay rights movement or so peripherally aware of them that they didn't really stick with me. So the word "gay" continued to be "happy" to me for a long time.

 

I wasn't really aware that I might be "homosexual" or "queer" until after college and the thought was distressing, to say the least. Even while I was dating women, I was becoming more and more aware that I was attracted to men. Not only that, the depth of attraction that I could feel for some men was far stronger than the depth of attraction I felt for women. Eventually I decided that I had to figure out if I was gay or not. At that time, I felt more alone than at any other time in my life. I felt like I was the only gay person in the world and I was certainly ashamed of how I felt. And there was nothing like the Internet to turn to.

 

But I decided that I had to figure out if I was gay so I started going to gay clubs and meeting gay people and it took only a few weeks to realize that not only was I gay, that I also wasn't the only person and that there were many gay people out there who were interesting and fun and smart and involved in all kinds of activities, people I liked and many of whom quickly became friends. I felt liberated in ways that I had not expected. I also grew to like myself a lot more than I had before and I came quickly to believe that being gay was normal for me and I didn't care if it wasn't normal for someone else or someone else didn't like it.

 

Within a year, I had come out to all of the important people in my life: family and close friends. I lost one long-standing friend but gained many new friends in the process. My family didn't understand it but loved me and accepted me and my decisions. It has never come between us. With my friends, sharing with them an important truth about myself has strengthened our friendships and allowed me to combine my gay and straight friends at any time without needing to care or worry about who knows what. Some of my good gay friends have become good friends with some of my original good straight friends and my family has met and cared for my boyfriends.

 

Having said all of that, I've been happy to see what's happening with young people today. It seems more and more common for people to come out at 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 and for young gay people to be far more accepted by their peers than would have been the case for me in high school. So it's been comforting to feel that society is moving forward toward eventual acceptance of gay people as a normal part of society -- where being gay can be a sort of non-event.

 

However, some of the opinions expressed above still seem to represent the kinds of fear that I felt 20 years ago. Perhaps it's because the people writing are my age or older and our opinions and feelings are often shaped by our youth. But I cannot imagine going through life keeping an important, salient fact about myself from my family or close friends. Doing so would seem to imply that those important people in my life don't need to know the truth about who I really am and they are not strong enough or mature enough to handle the fact that I am gay.

 

Family and friends should be supportive of each other, in good times and in bad. But we can only be supportive and supported if we're honest with the important people in our lives. My brothers and sisters don't all lead their lives exactly as I would like them to but they are my brothers and sisters and I support them and I always will. But if I found out that one of them had been in a very important relationship with another person and had been afraid to tell me about that relationship, I'd be seriously pissed and would be very vocal about it with them. If they can't trust me, their brother, with the truth about what is going on in their lives, then who the hell can they trust? Living a life shouldn't involve going to one's grave having kept one's personal life secret from all of the people in one's life.

 

I said at the top that reading this thread makes me feel sad and it does on a number of different levels. It's pretty clear that some of the contributors here still see being gay as being inferior to being straight, as something that has to be apologized for. There's a reference to "throwing it in people's faces". My God! Haven't we gotten past those old attitudes? Straight people don't feel like they're shoving their sexuality in our faces when they make out in public. Why, in America, should the rules be different?

 

The Constitution, thankfully, is a lot about protecting the rights of the minority. Although I dislike the current US Supreme Court, even these members understand that they are there to keep the majority from trampling on the rights of minorities. The majority doesn't always rule in our society and we are much stronger for that.

 

But legality and culture are different. Black rights came about because people stood up and said "We're equal and we're not going to accept second-class treatment anymore." Ditto with the women's rights movement. And the gains that have come about in gay rights have also occurred only because people stood up and shouted and got into people's faces and said, essentially, "I don't care if you like this or not, but I'm as good as you are and I insist on my rights."

 

The people here may or may not find gay pride parades comfortable; they may or may not like drag queens or the pictures on the front pages of the newspapers; they may consider themselves "normal" and having nothing in common with "those people". But that's truly an ignorant point of view and it astonishes me to see posters who are clearly not stupid and not ignorant take that point of view.

 

The history of gay rights is not so long that it should be forgotten already, especially by gay people. The kinds of acceptance we do enjoy, the movement in society's attitudes, the legal rights we have gained -- all of these things have come about because gay people have done two things: (1) we have collectively gotten in society's face and demanded equal rights; and (2) we have come out by the millions, quiety or loudly, and said to the people in our lives "I'm still me, I'm no different than I was before and I want you to know that I'm happy and healthy and I want you to be happy for me."

 

As more and more people did this, more and more Americans started to put a face on gay people. Instead of thinking gay men were those "queers" who were hanging around dirty bookstores, we became their friends and sons and daughters and sisters and brothers and fathers and mothers. And all of a sudden, straight people started standing up and joining us and saying that equal rights was a good thing.

 

I'm not advocating that anyone do anything. But I do think it's sad if someone doesn't respect themselves enough to come out to their friends and family. And, no, you cannot convince me that there are other good reasons not to tell your close friends and family that you are gay. At some level, you must believe that you aren't as good as they are.

 

Sure, people can say I'm practicing pop psychology. I don't care. If someone is gay and afraid to tell their brother or sister, or their best friends, then they don't respect themselves, at some deep and important level. Why else would someone want to have a relationship with someone that is so unequal -- they can tell you all about what's going on in their lives and all about their concerns and problems but you cannot share with them? Please... it's ok, I guess, if you don't respect yourself enough (although it really isn't...). But don't compound the offense by trying to justify it by making all kinds of weak excuses. At least be strong enough to admit that you don't think you're as good as they are. If you did, you'd be willing to stand up and say "You don't like me? Fine. Let me know if you change your mind." and then go associate with people who do like you.

 

If this sounds awfully strong, sorry, but we're talking about fundamental honesty here, honesty in interpersonal relationships between gay people and the closest people in their lives. When we're afraid to share our lives openly and honestly with those who are closest to us, we perpetuate all of the negative stereotypes in the minds of our friends and in our own minds -- which is the worst and saddest thing of all.

 

And for those who say "I'm only gay for sex", please, let's be more honest about that, too. Do you only want to have gay sex for sex? Do you never, ever want to be in love? If yes, I truly feel sorry for you, for sharing love with another person is so far beyond just having sex that you can't really even compare them in the same sentence. But if you do want love, then are you going to have sex with men and love with women? How honest is that? Or will you fall in love with some lucky man and then not tell those who are closest to you about your relationship, your love, your happiness? This is just so fundamentally dishonest and unfair that it appalls me.

 

It's dishonest on the face of it. And it's unfair, first and foremost to you. You're allowing yourself to continue thinking that your feelings are somehow wrong or not as good as or not as legitimate as those of stright people. You're allowing yourself to live a life that involves hiding at some level, perhaps many levels. That's ok if you're 17 but not ok as an adult. And hiding a relationship is fundamentally unfair to your lover and it's fundamentally unfair to your friends and family. You're not even giving them a chance to demonstrate to you that they are strong enough and wise enough and that they care for you enough to accept you for the person you truly are.

 

I've come out to so many people over the last 20 years that I couldn't begin to count them. And I lost just one friend in the whole process -- and I think it was his loss.

 

Being in the closet today is just sad. I cannot think of any other word that expresses my feeling. I feel sad for those of you who feel you must stay in the closet, for you are shortchanging yourself and those around you. I hope you decide someday to let a little sunshine into your life.

 

BG

Posted

>I said at the top that reading this thread makes me feel sad

>and it does on a number of different levels. It's pretty

>clear that some of the contributors here still see being gay

>as being inferior to being straight, as something that has to

>be apologized for. There's a reference to "throwing it in

>people's faces". My God! Haven't we gotten past those old

>attitudes? Straight people don't feel like they're shoving

>their sexuality in our faces when they make out in public.

>Why, in America, should the rules be different?

 

 

As a matter of fact, I don't appreciate being made to watch straight people making out in public any more than I appreciate having to watch gay people do it. Both are examples of private behavior that should not be foisted on people in public places. I know plenty of straight people who feel the same way. I believe that's where the derisive expression "Get a room!" comes from.

 

>But legality and culture are different. Black rights came

>about because people stood up and said "We're equal and we're

>not going to accept second-class treatment anymore."

 

 

Not quite, no. The genius of King and his cohorts was to show Mr. and Mrs. America a group of people exactly like them -- hardworking, suit-and-tie-wearing, churchgoing, family men (and women) -- with the sole difference being the color of their skin. The success of the Civil Rights movement was based on emphasizing similarities, not differences. It was when more radical elements started to emphazize "cultural" differences that the movement ran out of steam.

 

 

>And the gains that have

>come about in gay rights have also occurred only because

>people stood up and shouted and got into people's faces and

>said, essentially, "I don't care if you like this or not, but

>I'm as good as you are and I insist on my rights."

 

 

That's probably why the gains have been so marginal.

 

>The people here may or may not find gay pride parades

>comfortable; they may or may not like drag queens or the

>pictures on the front pages of the newspapers; they may

>consider themselves "normal" and having nothing in common with

>"those people". But that's truly an ignorant point of view

>and it astonishes me to see posters who are clearly not stupid

>and not ignorant take that point of view.

 

 

It does not astonish me to see you adopt the standard Politically Correct point of view, since that is what you invariably do. I do not fault black people or Latinos or gays who have mainstream values for being critical of members of their groups who trash those values. They have just as much right to their opinions as anyone else. Insisting on that right does not make them 'traitors' to their race, though folks like you would have it otherwise.

 

 

>I'm not advocating that anyone do anything. But I do think

>it's sad if someone doesn't respect themselves enough to come

>out to their friends and family. And, no, you cannot convince

>me that there are other good reasons not to tell your close

>friends and family that you are gay. At some level, you must

>believe that you aren't as good as they are.

>

>Sure, people can say I'm practicing pop psychology.

 

 

Yes, that is exactly what you are doing. You are not qualified to psychoanalyze anyone. You are merely using a few buzzwords from the field of psychology to denigrate people who disagree with you. I had thought you were too mature to do such a thing, but I was clearly wrong about that. Well, live and learn.

 

 

>But don't compound the offense by trying to justify it by

>making all kinds of weak excuses. At least be strong enough

>to admit that you don't think you're as good as they are. If

>you did, you'd be willing to stand up and say "You don't like

>me? Fine. Let me know if you change your mind." and then go

>associate with people who do like you.

 

That is pure, purer, purest bullshit. Keeping a sense of personal privacy is essential to individual dignity and needs no excuse. The people whose behavior needs to be excused are those who suffer from some compulsion to bare their inmost thoughts to others who have never asked for or indicated any interest in such confidences. They are the ones who need to be in analysis.

 

>If this sounds awfully strong, sorry, but we're talking about

>fundamental honesty here, honesty in interpersonal

>relationships between gay people and the closest people in

>their lives. When we're afraid to share our lives openly and

>honestly with those who are closest to us, we perpetuate all

>of the negative stereotypes in the minds of our friends and in

>our own minds -- which is the worst and saddest thing of all.

 

 

Is that right? I would like to ask you and the others who have talked about 'honesty' in this thread how honest they have been with the people in their lives about the fact that they get much if not all of their sexual satisfaction by hiring prostitutes. If you haven't come out to the people in your life about that, I don't want to hear any more lectures about honesty from you. Aren't you tired of 'living in the shadows?' Of living a life of deceit? No?

 

 

>And for those who say "I'm only gay for sex", please, let's be

>more honest about that, too.

 

I really can't tell you how weary I am of hearing total strangers like you indulge in the incredibly egotistical fantasy that they know what is going on as far as my feelings are concerned. You seem to love to lecture other people about how you think they should act and think and feel. Since 95% of your posts here consist of lectures just like that, that's not easy to miss. But someday perhaps you will realize how off-putting and egomanaical that behavior really is. Your assumption that only you know what is best for people and that anyone who disagrees with you is a fitting object for universal pity is utterly nauseating. If you really have any desire to communicate with anyone other than those who already agree with you, get a new shtick.

Posted

>I said at the top that reading this thread makes me feel sad

>and it does on a number of different levels. It's pretty

>clear that some of the contributors here still see being gay

>as being inferior to being straight, as something that has to

>be apologized for. There's a reference to "throwing it in

>people's faces". My God! Haven't we gotten past those old

>attitudes? Straight people don't feel like they're shoving

>their sexuality in our faces when they make out in public.

>Why, in America, should the rules be different?

 

 

As a matter of fact, I don't appreciate being made to watch straight people making out in public any more than I appreciate having to watch gay people do it. Both are examples of private behavior that should not be foisted on people in public places. I know plenty of straight people who feel the same way. I believe that's where the derisive expression "Get a room!" comes from.

 

>But legality and culture are different. Black rights came

>about because people stood up and said "We're equal and we're

>not going to accept second-class treatment anymore."

 

 

Not quite, no. The genius of King and his cohorts was to show Mr. and Mrs. America a group of people exactly like them -- hardworking, suit-and-tie-wearing, churchgoing, family men (and women) -- with the sole difference being the color of their skin. The success of the Civil Rights movement was based on emphasizing similarities, not differences. It was when more radical elements started to emphazize "cultural" differences that the movement ran out of steam.

 

 

>And the gains that have

>come about in gay rights have also occurred only because

>people stood up and shouted and got into people's faces and

>said, essentially, "I don't care if you like this or not, but

>I'm as good as you are and I insist on my rights."

 

 

That's probably why the gains have been so marginal.

 

>The people here may or may not find gay pride parades

>comfortable; they may or may not like drag queens or the

>pictures on the front pages of the newspapers; they may

>consider themselves "normal" and having nothing in common with

>"those people". But that's truly an ignorant point of view

>and it astonishes me to see posters who are clearly not stupid

>and not ignorant take that point of view.

 

 

It does not astonish me to see you adopt the standard Politically Correct point of view, since that is what you invariably do. I do not fault black people or Latinos or gays who have mainstream values for being critical of members of their groups who trash those values. They have just as much right to their opinions as anyone else. Insisting on that right does not make them 'traitors' to their race, though folks like you would have it otherwise.

 

 

>I'm not advocating that anyone do anything. But I do think

>it's sad if someone doesn't respect themselves enough to come

>out to their friends and family. And, no, you cannot convince

>me that there are other good reasons not to tell your close

>friends and family that you are gay. At some level, you must

>believe that you aren't as good as they are.

>

>Sure, people can say I'm practicing pop psychology.

 

 

Yes, that is exactly what you are doing. You are not qualified to psychoanalyze anyone. You are merely using a few buzzwords from the field of psychology to denigrate people who disagree with you. I had thought you were too mature to do such a thing, but I was clearly wrong about that. Well, live and learn.

 

 

>But don't compound the offense by trying to justify it by

>making all kinds of weak excuses. At least be strong enough

>to admit that you don't think you're as good as they are. If

>you did, you'd be willing to stand up and say "You don't like

>me? Fine. Let me know if you change your mind." and then go

>associate with people who do like you.

 

That is pure, purer, purest bullshit. Keeping a sense of personal privacy is essential to individual dignity and needs no excuse. The people whose behavior needs to be excused are those who suffer from some compulsion to bare their inmost thoughts to others who have never asked for or indicated any interest in such confidences. They are the ones who need to be in analysis.

 

>If this sounds awfully strong, sorry, but we're talking about

>fundamental honesty here, honesty in interpersonal

>relationships between gay people and the closest people in

>their lives. When we're afraid to share our lives openly and

>honestly with those who are closest to us, we perpetuate all

>of the negative stereotypes in the minds of our friends and in

>our own minds -- which is the worst and saddest thing of all.

 

 

Is that right? I would like to ask you and the others who have talked about 'honesty' in this thread how honest they have been with the people in their lives about the fact that they get much if not all of their sexual satisfaction by hiring prostitutes. If you haven't come out to the people in your life about that, I don't want to hear any more lectures about honesty from you. Aren't you tired of 'living in the shadows?' Of living a life of deceit? No?

 

 

>And for those who say "I'm only gay for sex", please, let's be

>more honest about that, too.

 

I really can't tell you how weary I am of hearing total strangers like you indulge in the incredibly egotistical fantasy that they know what is going on as far as my feelings are concerned. You seem to love to lecture other people about how you think they should act and think and feel. Since 95% of your posts here consist of lectures just like that, that's not easy to miss. But someday perhaps you will realize how off-putting and egomanaical that behavior really is. Your assumption that only you know what is best for people and that anyone who disagrees with you is a fitting object for universal pity is utterly nauseating. If you really have any desire to communicate with anyone other than those who already agree with you, get a new shtick.

Guest Bitchboy
Posted

The only thing that makes me sad about this entire discussion is that so many people see nothing beyond their myopic worlds. It's like, they owe nothing to anyone. It's hedonism at its ugliest. It's not how I want to spend my life.

Guest Bitchboy
Posted

The only thing that makes me sad about this entire discussion is that so many people see nothing beyond their myopic worlds. It's like, they owe nothing to anyone. It's hedonism at its ugliest. It's not how I want to spend my life.

Posted

>As a matter of fact, I don't appreciate being made to watch

>straight people making out in public any more than I

>appreciate having to watch gay people do it. Both are

>examples of private behavior that should not be foisted on

>people in public places. I know plenty of straight people who

>feel the same way. I believe that's where the derisive

>expression "Get a room!" comes from.

 

It doesn't matter if you like it or not. You're free to hold a puritanical point of view if you like and to practice that. What we're talking about instead is freedom and rights -- the right for gay people to be just as public about their feelings and relationships as straight people. The old "shoving it in their face" argument is all about repression and making feel like what they're doing is dirty. I don't accept any of it.

 

 

>

>Not quite, no. The genius of King and his cohorts was to show

>Mr. and Mrs. America a group of people exactly like them --

>hardworking, suit-and-tie-wearing, churchgoing, family men

>(and women) -- with the sole difference being the color of

>their skin. The success of the Civil Rights movement was

>based on emphasizing similarities, not differences. It was

>when more radical elements started to emphazize "cultural"

>differences that the movement ran out of steam.

>

 

Ran out of steam? Where have you been for the last 30 years? I'd say a great deal of what they set out to accomplish has already happened and, more importantly, the attitudes of great portions of the population have undergone huge shifts, towards recognition of the importance and validity of equal rights without regard for face. I wouldn't call that running out of steam.

 

>

>>And the gains that have

>>come about in gay rights have also occurred only because

>>people stood up and shouted and got into people's faces and

>>said, essentially, "I don't care if you like this or not,

>but

>>I'm as good as you are and I insist on my rights."

>

>

>That's probably why the gains have been so marginal.

>

 

Marginal? Marginal? Ask the 17-year-olds who are coming out of the closet. Ask the people who work for companies with non-discrimination clauses. Ask the citizens of towns and cities and states with non-discrimination ordinances and legislation. Ask those who have formed civil unions in Vermont. Ask those who have even more rights in other countries, including the right to marry. Ask the gay members of the military in most other countries. Ask our Canadian friends just to the north. Marginal? Please, you can do better than that.

 

 

>>The people here may or may not find gay pride parades

>>comfortable; they may or may not like drag queens or the

>>pictures on the front pages of the newspapers; they may

>>consider themselves "normal" and having nothing in common

>with

>>"those people". But that's truly an ignorant point of view

>>and it astonishes me to see posters who are clearly not

>stupid

>>and not ignorant take that point of view.

>

>

>It does not astonish me to see you adopt the standard

>Politically Correct point of view, since that is what you

>invariably do. I do not fault black people or Latinos or gays

>who have mainstream values for being critical of members of

>their groups who trash those values. They have just as much

>right to their opinions as anyone else. Insisting on that

>right does not make them 'traitors' to their race, though

>folks like you would have it otherwise.

>

 

For as long as I've been posting here, you have pulled out the old "politically correct" label whenever you want to denigrate a point of view. At this point, it's really sort of meaningless and it's really lost any real descriptive quality. But if by that you mean that I think we should not lose sight of the very real gains we enjoy because of the efforts and actions of the drag queens and activists who started the gay rights movement and who continue to push it forward, then I'm proud to hold that point of view. And if you mean that I believe that gay people who put the activists and drag queens down because they make them feel uncomfortable -- because they are worried their friends and family will see pictures and think that they, too, are just like that? -- that I think these gay people are practicing a certain obvious kind of self-loathing, then yes, you're right. And I think it's crystal clear for all to see.

 

 

 

>

>>I'm not advocating that anyone do anything. But I do think

>>it's sad if someone doesn't respect themselves enough to

>come

>>out to their friends and family. And, no, you cannot

>convince

>>me that there are other good reasons not to tell your close

>>friends and family that you are gay. At some level, you

>must

>>believe that you aren't as good as they are.

>>

>>Sure, people can say I'm practicing pop psychology.

>

>

>Yes, that is exactly what you are doing. You are not

>qualified to psychoanalyze anyone. You are merely using a few

>buzzwords from the field of psychology to denigrate people who

>disagree with you. I had thought you were too mature to do

>such a thing, but I was clearly wrong about that. Well, live

>and learn.

>

 

It doesn't take a degree in pyschology to see what's happening here. If you or others were completely comfortable with being gay and with who you are, you wouldn't care a bit who knew about it. If you knew that they'd be happy that you shared your life with them, you'd probably do so. (Perhaps not; you seem like a very, very private person. But most people do not tell out of fear, not out of wanting privacy.)

 

 

>

>>But don't compound the offense by trying to justify it by

>>making all kinds of weak excuses. At least be strong enough

>>to admit that you don't think you're as good as they are.

>If

>>you did, you'd be willing to stand up and say "You don't

>like

>>me? Fine. Let me know if you change your mind." and then

>go

>>associate with people who do like you.

>

>That is pure, purer, purest bullshit. Keeping a sense of

>personal privacy is essential to individual dignity and needs

>no excuse. The people whose behavior needs to be excused are

>those who suffer from some compulsion to bare their inmost

>thoughts to others who have never asked for or indicated any

>interest in such confidences. They are the ones who need to

>be in analysis.

 

 

Sorry, this isn't bullshit and I think you know it. We're not talking about sharing "innermost thoughts" with "others who have never asked for or indicated any interest in such confidences." I'm talking about sharing major things about one's life with close family and friends. Having a boy friend or lover, for example, and not sharing that with one's sister would be like not being invited to your sister's wedding or even being told about it or that she was married. Dating people and not being able to discuss the relationship with close friends and families is like never expecting them to talk to you about their relationships. For your sake, I truly hope that is not indicative of the state of your interpersonal relationshps. No, it's not about privacy and it won't be no matter how many times you try to say it is. It's about fear and acceptance and being afraid of being rejected by people who are important in one's life. And that fear and the willingness to give into it and accept its message about the worth of one's life is what is bullshit.

 

>

>>If this sounds awfully strong, sorry, but we're talking

>about

>>fundamental honesty here, honesty in interpersonal

>>relationships between gay people and the closest people in

>>their lives. When we're afraid to share our lives openly

>and

>>honestly with those who are closest to us, we perpetuate all

>>of the negative stereotypes in the minds of our friends and

>in

>>our own minds -- which is the worst and saddest thing of

>all.

>

>

>Is that right? I would like to ask you and the others who

>have talked about 'honesty' in this thread how honest they

>have been with the people in their lives about the fact that

>they get much if not all of their sexual satisfaction by

>hiring prostitutes. If you haven't come out to the people in

>your life about that, I don't want to hear any more lectures

>about honesty from you. Aren't you tired of 'living in the

>shadows?' Of living a life of deceit? No?

>

 

For the record, I've hardly hired at all for quite some time now. The thrill seems to be gone. Further, I've discussed this with several friends and a sister. I was open with all of them about hiring to take away the boredom of "yet another hotel room." I don't find anything to be ashamed about or to hide in hiring escorts, except for the obvious fact that it's still illegal in most jurisdictions. I refuse to buy into the idea that hiring a young escort to have fun somehow makes me a less-worthy person or someone who should feel embarrassed about his life.

 

If any of my friends asked if I had ever hired escorts, I'd most certainly tell the truth. If other people asked, I'd probably stare at them long enough for them to understand that they asked a personal question that went beyond the boundaries of our relationship, just as if they had asked if I like to fuck or be fucked. Nothing I have said in this thread mandates or even recommends sharing the personal details of one's life with anyone and everyone. There are many ways of being out. But hiding the fact that one is gay from one's family and close friends is just sad.

 

 

 

 

>

>>And for those who say "I'm only gay for sex", please, let's

>be

>>more honest about that, too.

>

>I really can't tell you how weary I am of hearing total

>strangers like you indulge in the incredibly egotistical

>fantasy that they know what is going on as far as my feelings

>are concerned. You seem to love to lecture other people about

>how you think they should act and think and feel. Since 95%

>of your posts here consist of lectures just like that, that's

>not easy to miss. But someday perhaps you will realize how

>off-putting and egomanaical that behavior really is. Your

>assumption that only you know what is best for people and that

>anyone who disagrees with you is a fitting object for

>universal pity is utterly nauseating. If you really have any

>desire to communicate with anyone other than those who already

>agree with you, get a new shtick.

>

 

If you were that weary of hearing things you didn't want to hear, you wouldn't keep coming here, would you?

 

Yet you were the first one to respond to what I wrote and I wasn't surprised to see that. You're bright, you understand what you believe in, you're articulate and you feel things strongly. But your writings here, the present ones included, demonstrate that you feel that "being gay" simply isn't "as good as" or "as valid as" being straight.

 

No, I cannot go and point to where you've said that exactly. But it comes across loud and clear. Don't believe me? Ask the others.

 

I have no idea where you live, how old you are, or what you do for work. But it's clear you're in the closet and clear you're old enough and smart enough to have thought through the reasons why. And those reasons still come down to fear of rejection or simply lack of acceptance.

 

In somes ways, it's akin to feeling a need to post here under different screen names to add legitimacy to what one writes. I've been posting at this place since it began and I've used exactly one handle -- Boston Guy. My record is clear and I don't apologize for anything I've written and I stand by that record. Can you say the same thing?

 

BG

Posted

>As a matter of fact, I don't appreciate being made to watch

>straight people making out in public any more than I

>appreciate having to watch gay people do it. Both are

>examples of private behavior that should not be foisted on

>people in public places. I know plenty of straight people who

>feel the same way. I believe that's where the derisive

>expression "Get a room!" comes from.

 

It doesn't matter if you like it or not. You're free to hold a puritanical point of view if you like and to practice that. What we're talking about instead is freedom and rights -- the right for gay people to be just as public about their feelings and relationships as straight people. The old "shoving it in their face" argument is all about repression and making feel like what they're doing is dirty. I don't accept any of it.

 

 

>

>Not quite, no. The genius of King and his cohorts was to show

>Mr. and Mrs. America a group of people exactly like them --

>hardworking, suit-and-tie-wearing, churchgoing, family men

>(and women) -- with the sole difference being the color of

>their skin. The success of the Civil Rights movement was

>based on emphasizing similarities, not differences. It was

>when more radical elements started to emphazize "cultural"

>differences that the movement ran out of steam.

>

 

Ran out of steam? Where have you been for the last 30 years? I'd say a great deal of what they set out to accomplish has already happened and, more importantly, the attitudes of great portions of the population have undergone huge shifts, towards recognition of the importance and validity of equal rights without regard for face. I wouldn't call that running out of steam.

 

>

>>And the gains that have

>>come about in gay rights have also occurred only because

>>people stood up and shouted and got into people's faces and

>>said, essentially, "I don't care if you like this or not,

>but

>>I'm as good as you are and I insist on my rights."

>

>

>That's probably why the gains have been so marginal.

>

 

Marginal? Marginal? Ask the 17-year-olds who are coming out of the closet. Ask the people who work for companies with non-discrimination clauses. Ask the citizens of towns and cities and states with non-discrimination ordinances and legislation. Ask those who have formed civil unions in Vermont. Ask those who have even more rights in other countries, including the right to marry. Ask the gay members of the military in most other countries. Ask our Canadian friends just to the north. Marginal? Please, you can do better than that.

 

 

>>The people here may or may not find gay pride parades

>>comfortable; they may or may not like drag queens or the

>>pictures on the front pages of the newspapers; they may

>>consider themselves "normal" and having nothing in common

>with

>>"those people". But that's truly an ignorant point of view

>>and it astonishes me to see posters who are clearly not

>stupid

>>and not ignorant take that point of view.

>

>

>It does not astonish me to see you adopt the standard

>Politically Correct point of view, since that is what you

>invariably do. I do not fault black people or Latinos or gays

>who have mainstream values for being critical of members of

>their groups who trash those values. They have just as much

>right to their opinions as anyone else. Insisting on that

>right does not make them 'traitors' to their race, though

>folks like you would have it otherwise.

>

 

For as long as I've been posting here, you have pulled out the old "politically correct" label whenever you want to denigrate a point of view. At this point, it's really sort of meaningless and it's really lost any real descriptive quality. But if by that you mean that I think we should not lose sight of the very real gains we enjoy because of the efforts and actions of the drag queens and activists who started the gay rights movement and who continue to push it forward, then I'm proud to hold that point of view. And if you mean that I believe that gay people who put the activists and drag queens down because they make them feel uncomfortable -- because they are worried their friends and family will see pictures and think that they, too, are just like that? -- that I think these gay people are practicing a certain obvious kind of self-loathing, then yes, you're right. And I think it's crystal clear for all to see.

 

 

 

>

>>I'm not advocating that anyone do anything. But I do think

>>it's sad if someone doesn't respect themselves enough to

>come

>>out to their friends and family. And, no, you cannot

>convince

>>me that there are other good reasons not to tell your close

>>friends and family that you are gay. At some level, you

>must

>>believe that you aren't as good as they are.

>>

>>Sure, people can say I'm practicing pop psychology.

>

>

>Yes, that is exactly what you are doing. You are not

>qualified to psychoanalyze anyone. You are merely using a few

>buzzwords from the field of psychology to denigrate people who

>disagree with you. I had thought you were too mature to do

>such a thing, but I was clearly wrong about that. Well, live

>and learn.

>

 

It doesn't take a degree in pyschology to see what's happening here. If you or others were completely comfortable with being gay and with who you are, you wouldn't care a bit who knew about it. If you knew that they'd be happy that you shared your life with them, you'd probably do so. (Perhaps not; you seem like a very, very private person. But most people do not tell out of fear, not out of wanting privacy.)

 

 

>

>>But don't compound the offense by trying to justify it by

>>making all kinds of weak excuses. At least be strong enough

>>to admit that you don't think you're as good as they are.

>If

>>you did, you'd be willing to stand up and say "You don't

>like

>>me? Fine. Let me know if you change your mind." and then

>go

>>associate with people who do like you.

>

>That is pure, purer, purest bullshit. Keeping a sense of

>personal privacy is essential to individual dignity and needs

>no excuse. The people whose behavior needs to be excused are

>those who suffer from some compulsion to bare their inmost

>thoughts to others who have never asked for or indicated any

>interest in such confidences. They are the ones who need to

>be in analysis.

 

 

Sorry, this isn't bullshit and I think you know it. We're not talking about sharing "innermost thoughts" with "others who have never asked for or indicated any interest in such confidences." I'm talking about sharing major things about one's life with close family and friends. Having a boy friend or lover, for example, and not sharing that with one's sister would be like not being invited to your sister's wedding or even being told about it or that she was married. Dating people and not being able to discuss the relationship with close friends and families is like never expecting them to talk to you about their relationships. For your sake, I truly hope that is not indicative of the state of your interpersonal relationshps. No, it's not about privacy and it won't be no matter how many times you try to say it is. It's about fear and acceptance and being afraid of being rejected by people who are important in one's life. And that fear and the willingness to give into it and accept its message about the worth of one's life is what is bullshit.

 

>

>>If this sounds awfully strong, sorry, but we're talking

>about

>>fundamental honesty here, honesty in interpersonal

>>relationships between gay people and the closest people in

>>their lives. When we're afraid to share our lives openly

>and

>>honestly with those who are closest to us, we perpetuate all

>>of the negative stereotypes in the minds of our friends and

>in

>>our own minds -- which is the worst and saddest thing of

>all.

>

>

>Is that right? I would like to ask you and the others who

>have talked about 'honesty' in this thread how honest they

>have been with the people in their lives about the fact that

>they get much if not all of their sexual satisfaction by

>hiring prostitutes. If you haven't come out to the people in

>your life about that, I don't want to hear any more lectures

>about honesty from you. Aren't you tired of 'living in the

>shadows?' Of living a life of deceit? No?

>

 

For the record, I've hardly hired at all for quite some time now. The thrill seems to be gone. Further, I've discussed this with several friends and a sister. I was open with all of them about hiring to take away the boredom of "yet another hotel room." I don't find anything to be ashamed about or to hide in hiring escorts, except for the obvious fact that it's still illegal in most jurisdictions. I refuse to buy into the idea that hiring a young escort to have fun somehow makes me a less-worthy person or someone who should feel embarrassed about his life.

 

If any of my friends asked if I had ever hired escorts, I'd most certainly tell the truth. If other people asked, I'd probably stare at them long enough for them to understand that they asked a personal question that went beyond the boundaries of our relationship, just as if they had asked if I like to fuck or be fucked. Nothing I have said in this thread mandates or even recommends sharing the personal details of one's life with anyone and everyone. There are many ways of being out. But hiding the fact that one is gay from one's family and close friends is just sad.

 

 

 

 

>

>>And for those who say "I'm only gay for sex", please, let's

>be

>>more honest about that, too.

>

>I really can't tell you how weary I am of hearing total

>strangers like you indulge in the incredibly egotistical

>fantasy that they know what is going on as far as my feelings

>are concerned. You seem to love to lecture other people about

>how you think they should act and think and feel. Since 95%

>of your posts here consist of lectures just like that, that's

>not easy to miss. But someday perhaps you will realize how

>off-putting and egomanaical that behavior really is. Your

>assumption that only you know what is best for people and that

>anyone who disagrees with you is a fitting object for

>universal pity is utterly nauseating. If you really have any

>desire to communicate with anyone other than those who already

>agree with you, get a new shtick.

>

 

If you were that weary of hearing things you didn't want to hear, you wouldn't keep coming here, would you?

 

Yet you were the first one to respond to what I wrote and I wasn't surprised to see that. You're bright, you understand what you believe in, you're articulate and you feel things strongly. But your writings here, the present ones included, demonstrate that you feel that "being gay" simply isn't "as good as" or "as valid as" being straight.

 

No, I cannot go and point to where you've said that exactly. But it comes across loud and clear. Don't believe me? Ask the others.

 

I have no idea where you live, how old you are, or what you do for work. But it's clear you're in the closet and clear you're old enough and smart enough to have thought through the reasons why. And those reasons still come down to fear of rejection or simply lack of acceptance.

 

In somes ways, it's akin to feeling a need to post here under different screen names to add legitimacy to what one writes. I've been posting at this place since it began and I've used exactly one handle -- Boston Guy. My record is clear and I don't apologize for anything I've written and I stand by that record. Can you say the same thing?

 

BG

Posted

Boston Guy, your post is great. I agree with most of what you say, and I certainly identify with your story. The only question I have is why you bother to engage woodlawn in this discussion. What a hopeless task that is!

Posted

Boston Guy, your post is great. I agree with most of what you say, and I certainly identify with your story. The only question I have is why you bother to engage woodlawn in this discussion. What a hopeless task that is!

Posted

>What a hopeless task that is!

 

Nah. He's a bright guy who represents a valid point of view. I don't agree with his point of view but it's as valid as mine. And if we only listen to those who agree with us, we never learn. :-)

 

BG

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...