Jump to content

Suck this COCK! Or test your x-ray vision.


RockHard
This topic is 4393 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

So you think you can clock the Photoshopped cock? Well good luck.

 

To beat the summer heat, try and figure out the 10 specific items that have been added, subtracted, or altered from the original photo on the right. Winners receive a special photo from RH's private collection of men.

 

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8026/7545917098_9da2616026_b.jpg

 

ps This thread idea was the inspiration of an escort near and dear to my heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

RH: really like your vintage guys, altered so subtly that they look great even 'shopped, so will try this.....

 

dick lengthened (nice natural-looking job!), vein deleted just above it, vein deleted on left bicep, lamp or thing removed from behind his right side (our left), wrinkle removed from sheet under his dick, left eye lowered a bit, ....

 

damn, that's all I can get.....

 

found more: left thumb altered,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really would like to dip into RockHard's Special Collection, but I can spot only seven differences on the left-hand picture:

Softer focus

Warmer tone

Piece of dark furniture on the left is gone

Bigger dick

Less vascularity on his bicep

Less vascularity on his abdomen

He's a bottom

Very subtle and realistic work. I tried to cheat by creating a 'difference layer' in Photoshop, but my version is the underpowered one. Story of my life. http://www.maleescortreview.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really would like to dip into RockHard's Special Collection, but I can spot only seven differences on the left-hand picture:

 

Softer focus

Warmer tone

Piece of dark furniture on the left is gone

Bigger dick

Less vascularity on his bicep

Less vascularity on his abdomen

He's a bottom

 

Very subtle and realistic work. I tried to cheat by creating a 'difference layer' in Photoshop, but my version is the underpowered one. Story of my life. http://www.maleescortreview.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif

 

Here's what I have...

 

eye level is different

vein in arm

vein in groin

dick length

speaker things on left pic are gone

chin/nose placement / face slightly longer

balls lower

left thumb adjusted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to cheat by creating a 'difference layer' in Photoshop, but my version is the underpowered one. Story of my life. http://www.maleescortreview.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif

 

Rockhard will take you over his knee for trying to cheat!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I have...

 

eye level is different

vein in arm

vein in groin

dick length

speaker things on left pic are gone

chin/nose placement / face slightly longer

balls lower

left thumb adjusted

 

Not only is the dick longer, but the curve is different. Sorry, I haven't a prayer of getting all 10 by myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice work, so far.

 

Not only is the dick longer, but the curve is different.

 

The cock shaft is a given, the easiest pick of the 10. And, yes, I did curve it to make it look more flaccid. If you simply lengthen the shaft without adding a curve downward, the cock will easily take on the appearance of erect, which is a no-no here.

 

The cock shaft is one of 10, and the curve aspect is included in the shaft lengthening process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else think his left thumb looks like an uncut penis?

 

That's it! http://www.maleescortreview.com/forum/public/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.png And what I thought was a hangnail is actually a fleck of dried smegma. Nice touch, RockHard!

 

OK, only two to go. http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb252/Ronnies_Pets/smileys%20emoticons/smiley_goodluck_yellow.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ps acknowledging that an exceptional escort was the inspiration caught my eye. It really added a lot to the post, RH.

 

I've always been a firm believer in giving credit where credit is due.

 

ps No one has guessed all 10 correctly. But a few members here have good vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, here are the results.

 

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7119/7556454152_3dd72c6c3e_b.jpg

 

No one guessed correctly because you're not supposed to see the digital watermarks. They are viewable at 300% and provable in a court of law, but you're not supposed to see them with any ease. If you have Photoshop, it's possible to find them. But without knowing where to look, especially if an image has more than one, the experience is like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

 

So, if you're an escort who owns his own photos, there are two important things you should do to qualify for compensatory damages if your photos are stolen and you want to pursue legal action. (1.) Your images must be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, and (2.) Your images must be watermarked. The key to successful watermarking is concealment. But if push comes to shove, you have to be able to prove in a court of law that the mark is there.

 

Now, on to some of you other guys who were brave to test your vision.

 

I'm impressed. I pity the poor, stupid escorts who engage in stolen photo activity trying to sell their shit. Some of you guys are spot on, and if I do this again, I now know I have to up the ante on my game.

 

Also, his balls were enlarged (hard to see in shadows).

The ballsack was enlarged, and the shadow made it extremely difficult to see. Good catch.

 

Face made longer.

Sorry. Not sure what to say about this bad call. I'm not a fan of changing face shapes. I always figure, if there's something about a face you don't like, photograph another.

 

On the other hand, eye plane issues are very common. The cause varies. Sometimes it's lazy face muscles, other times it's lighting, and other times it's optics. If it's a difference that stands out in a photo, and it looks odd, I say fix it.

 

Hairline changed.

Sorry.

 

Softer focus. Warmer tone. He's a bottom

The focus did not change.

 

The images were duped with identical data. I could have played with color tone but I felt that would have been unfair, since too many browsers don't recognize ICC color profiles, and those that do are completely dependent on monitor choice, and we all know two monitors of the same brand don't display identical colors. So, if the images have a different tone on your monitor, and it's noticeable, I suggest it might be time for a new monitor.

 

As for seeing "bottom" status, Lookin, your eyesight is much better than mine. I was unable to see the guy's hemorrhoids. :-)

 

Rockhard will take you over his knee for trying to cheat!

I gave thought to members having access to editing software. Hence, the decision to add watermarks and use them as a test for the benefit of other escorts.

 

Does anyone else think his left thumb looks like an uncut penis?

The thumb penis head is cut, just a miniaturized version of his own.

 

This probably doesn't count either, but if you look at the veins on the left bicep, there are actually two veins that have been removed (at right angles to each other).

I treated the bicep as one fix. I like bulging veins but it depends on where they appear and how the light catches them.

 

Nice work, everyone. Look for my new, tougher test soon. Thanks for playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7119/7556454152_3dd72c6c3e_b.jpg[/url]

 

No one guessed correctly because you're not supposed to see the digital watermarks. They are viewable at 300% and provable in a court of law, but you're not supposed to see them with any ease.

 

Since there was a prize offered here from RH's special private collection of men - I thought it would be fun to see what would have happened if someone had been clever enough to view the RH watermark (#8) at a higher resolution as he stated. I gave up at 497% after it was supposed to be viewable at 300%. This is the #8 area at 497%. It's clear why nobody won this time.

 

http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/hh630/BonerPlus/rock300.jpg[/img]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bone-head?

 

Not all editing programs view 300% the same way. Not all monitors display images at the same pixels per inch. Granted, I stuck the "fix" number over the watermark without thinking someone would actually check for the watermark. The watermark is there. The point is I could prove it if I needed to do so, legally. The point wasn't to make it easy for someone to win a photo from my private collection, since this photo is already from my private collection. Duh.

 

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7247/7557631890_8148aa7062.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granted, I stuck the "fix" number over the watermark without thinking someone would actually check for the watermark.

 

As opposed to next to the fix, like you did all of the others. Yeah. I find the tiny size of that 8 rather dwarfed next to the size of that @RH watermark, but whatever. I happen to have a high-end monitor and high-end editing software. The watermark was not in the original photo.

The watermark is there.

 

Yes, clearly it is now since you over-layed it on the image after my post. That was indeed a rapid response!:rolleyes:

 

 

The point wasn't to make it easy for someone to win a photo from my private collection

 

I agree, it shouldn't have been easy to win. It should have, however, been possible.

 

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7247/7557631890_8148aa7062.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...