Does it Need to Move to Turn You On ???

[jjkrkwood]

I was just realizing that in my younger years a flat pictorial spread of Hot, nude guys was enough to turn me on and get my motor and other parts UP and running.

 

However, now that I am older, I find that pictures no longer do the trick, and I need to see some "moving" image in order to be turned on. Either in the form of a Web-Cam image, or full-out porn. And of course, if there is sound, thats the icing on the boner....

 

So, question is, do you need it to "Move" to be a turn-on, or does a single dimension pic

do the trick for you ?

[leigh.bess.toad]

Interestimg question. I guess i'm in an unusual position, looking at probably 5-10k pics a week to try to put together the galleries. After a while, I noticed that, in many ways, their effect on me was becoming diminished. There still are those exceptional pics that do capture it, but they are becoming much rarer. Of course I have always been stimulated by the auditory so porn with simply a sound track and nothing else doesn't do much for me either.

[seeker630]

With the proliferation of video on the web, I seldom spend much time looking at still photos. I can appreciate them, but I don't find them very stimulating. I wonder if part of the issue is that I don't concentrate on them for arousal but move on to a video.

 

I also find that a good soundtrack adds to the arousal factor - not so much dialog but the natural sounds of sex, especially when there's a microphone picking up the sounds of a hot oral scene and it's obvious that someone is really enjoying his 'work'!

[Bosguy]

I like both. If I'm in a very relaxed mood and maybe listening to music, I love to look at pictures of handsome guys and dream of being with them. If I'm "home and horny" I love to find a quality porn that I could be in that situation and ENJOY the "RESULTS"

 

Boston Bill

[bluboy]

I think it is not that you are older it is that the internet and the wide spread availability of moving pron images has upped the ante on what we all need to turn us on. when I was a boy I was hard and turned on by looking at playboy and JUST IMAGINING the men looking at the playboy women. This was the ONLY porn that was even sometimes available. Then there was VHS which was when I first saw moving images. By the time I was cruising in the Adonis Theater (god those were the days) playboy no longer excited me. Now with the internet and all kinds of dog and pony shows available all the time if I see a movie with 2 guys just having "normal" sex I am completely bored. The hard on ante is WAY WAY up. I think to myself often how does someone like "Oklahoma" who is now USED to six guys in the bed at a time and six hot guys at that making real home porn EVER settle down to one guy who is marginal looking and spend the rest of their life together. Is this now even possible? He and us are trapped by our imaginations coming true. We are no longer happy with the "normal". Blu

[gallahadesquire]

...Now with the internet and all kinds of dog and pony shows available all the time ...

 

Dog and pony show? I thought most people weren't into that kind of beastiality.

[Guest countryboywny]

It's a mixed bag for me. Some pictures turn me on, some don't. Same with movies and all other forms of porn. I can be turned off by as many images, pics, movies, live shows etc. as I can be turned on by. It's all about content.

[+ purplekow]

I find the more forbidden the items are, the more exciting it can be. Looking at a still picture of a sexy hard man while sitting at a business meeting in which i may be overseen can be very exciting. I guess the danger adds to the appeal.

[Pegasus]

I like both. With still imagery, my sense of fantasy and imagination flows more. With a video, I just watch and tend not to project my own imagination into the scene as much.

[rvwnsd]

I still like both pictures and videos. Currently, I spend twice as much time looking at videos as I do pictures, which is inverse of where I was ten years ago. However, I attribute that to the increased availability (and quality) of online videos.

[justaguy]

I agree with what others have said—technology and availability have shifted the scales. These days, a picture can catch my eye but video provides the real heat.

[+ Axiom2001]

I agree with what others have said—technology and availability have shifted the scales. These days, a picture can catch my eye but video provides the real heat.

 

And for me, with video at times, I can vicariously feel the experience that the versatile guy is undergoing! [Recently I've watched two hot escorts being fucked hard by two giant, big dicked studs!

Both escorts experience pain during their sessions: I sympathize as well as empathize and feel as if it's happening to me! I, also strangely enough, at times wish that I were receiving what is being put into their

tight crevices!! So I'd presume that the "action" or "moving" has more of an effect on me than the visual although I do appreciate and enjoy looking at photos of hot, naked men of all colors and ages!!!

[Lohengrin1979]

I find that when it comes to nudity and hard cocks, I prefer them to be moving. Still pictures of half clothed or even open shirt type outfits on guys, I find to be intensely erotic as well. Each medium has it's place for me, I guess.

[Phil_musc]

In younger days when I was more into weed (shhhhhh), stills had a way of getting into my mind and engaging my fantasy more so than the video loops that were prevalent. The problem for me with the video loop (and all the moving stuff mentioned above) it that it is all spelled out for you. Whereas with stills, the mind can get into the guy and run with the possibilities and I find it easier to project myself into the action. It's just easier to use the stills as a point of entry and departure into a fantasy; I find it much harder to watch a video and place myself in the action. It's like movies versus live drama - with movies it's all realism but with live drama you have to bring some imagination into play. There is something to the statement that crops up here from time to time that the brain is the largest sex organ.

[doitb4ugo]

While I like both still pics and video, I need the video to really get me going....On a side note, the hotest thing for me is still reading porn....gets me very aroused and always makes it easy to bang one out.

[Phil_musc]

Doit- you have found out my secret vice!! I totally agree with you about reading. Harkening back to those weedy days of yesteryear though, pictures were still better - reading took more concentration than I was sometimes able to bring to the task at hand.

[gp0560]

Pics, some. For my taste, shirtless in jeans is still the best pose. Lately, I find that looking at pics less often is better. Maybe it's to space out that kind of experience, maybe it's my frustration at not knowing where to find so many hotties in real life!

 

Videos, not so much any more unless both guys are muscled. Maybe it's just me (it usually is), but the scripts are sooo predictable: kiss, suck, fuck, cum. I just fast-forward to two minutes before the end and watch the cum shots.

 

Text, oh yeah, baby! There's where my imagination can go wild. Nifty is the greatest thing since condoms.

[Phil_musc]

You are sooo right, gp!

[gp0560]

One of my favorite videos starts with the sexiest, most erotic scene I know of. Two guys enter, one from each side of the screen, circle each other while gazing at each other. They don't kiss for a long time, just graze each other's lips lightly. And so on. The scene builds in tension until finally they kiss. From then on, it's kiss, suck, fuck, and cum, but not so rushed and "angry" as in most vids.

 

The only clues I can give as to how to identify the video are that it lasts about 30 minutes and is an mpg file. My copy dates from five years ago, and somewhere along the line, I renamed it to Tommy and Benjamin, which must be the first names of the guys. If anyone here can track down the original, please let me know.