Forever is an awful long time. . .

[robberbaron4u]

The scenario is this: you are weary of the "escort" business and you meet a nice, mature gentleman of means who offers to take care of you in return for a mutually exclusive relationship. You are agreeable, and, the gentleman promptly performs upon his contractual obligations to you: he settles a few "past due" bills for you, sets you up in an nicely furnished "all expense paid" apartment, provides "legitimate" salaried employment for you, a clothing allowance at an upscale haberdashery, and, gives you the use of a vintage Mercedes-Benz motor car. Two weeks into the "relationship" it is brought to attention that you are yet out there selling your flesh on the www, and, to add insult to injury, entertaining one or two old clients in your new "digs". Should the gentleman be faulted for cutting the strings on your golden parachute and setting you on the curb for pickup?

[seeker630]

The scenario is this: you are weary of the "escort" business and you meet a nice, mature gentleman of means who offers to take care of you in return for a mutually exclusive relationship. You are agreeable, and, the gentleman promptly performs upon his contractual obligations to you: he settles a few "past due" bills for you, sets you up in an nicely furnished "all expense paid" apartment, provides "legitimate" salaried employment for you, a clothing allowance at an upscale haberdashery, and, gives you the use of a vintage Mercedes-Benz motor car. Two weeks into the "relationship" it is brought to attention that you are yet out there selling your flesh on the www, and, to add insult to injury, entertaining one or two old clients in your new "digs". Should the gentleman be faulted for cutting the strings on your golden parachute and setting you on the curb for pickup?

 

I assume the question is rhetorical.

 

(In which case, the point is really to relate an occurrence?)

[Scorpio]

(In which case, the point is really to relate an occurrence?)

 

That's rhetorical too, right?

[seeker630]

That's rhetorical too, right?

 

lol. Probably. I doubt that any more details will be forthcoming.

[Scorpio]

I doubt that any more details will be forthcoming.

 

I wouldn't bet on that.. posting history indicates that certain people are the soul of indiscretion.

[bigvalboy]

I wouldn't bet on that.. posting history indicates that certain people are the soul of indiscretion.

 

Shouldn't someone call Scott Grey on this one?

[Scorpio]

Don't jump to conclusions BVB. The scenario could apply to any number of people. I think you should edit your post until the big reveal is made.

[jjkrkwood]

To answer the question, whoever it was referring to - What did the older, monied gentleman really expect ? Monogamy ?? Love ?

 

Probably not the first boy to run amuck on him either. These old geezers with money will NEVER learn. Nor will the younger geezers with money.

 

Maybe they should look for another hobby to spend on ? Something with a better return on investment.

[robberbaron4u]

As stated, for consideration "paid in hand", the gentleman of means was to receive exclusive use of the rentboy. Being that the "patron" is a practical man of some experience in such matters, 'love and affection", in the romantic sense of the term, were not part and parcel of the bargain; however, I surmise the semblance thereof might have been expected or anticipated, but, again, not requisite to performance.

[robberbaron4u]

Unfortunately, a bet you lose. No "details", that is, "names", will be forthcoming from me as discretion is the "decent" thing in this particular situation.

[bigvalboy]

That's it Scorpio...I'm done here, I'm calling Scott. L O L

[robberbaron4u]

I trust you have "unlimited minutes" usage with your telephone service. . .

[jjkrkwood]

Unfortunately, a bet you lose. No "details", that is, "names", will be forthcoming from me as discretion is the "decent" thing in this particular situation.

 

Really doesnt matter WHO it is. The thread is really about WHAT it is, and from my viewpoint, its just another business deal gone Sour....

[+ Travis69]

It all depends on if the escort is easily replaceable. We all overlook bad personality traits if the butt is hot and tight enough or if the cock is big enough...... Seriously, the escort should be tossed to the curb.

[bigvalboy]

I trust you have "unlimited minutes" usage with your telephone service. . .

 

As a matter fact....I do. I pay an extra flat $25 fee every month, let's me call anywhere in the world, unlimited usage... even I dare say my good man, Norleans.

[TruthBTold]

Something tells me (or for that matter, I am assuming) that the older gentleman laid out some rules for the object of his affection - otherwise what was the purpose of the whole deal? Maybe altruism, but that is a very rare quality. Maybe Ghandi would have set his "boyfriend" up in such an arrangement. But putting him aside, the older gentleman would probably have told the object of his affection that theirs was a mutually exclusive relationship (even if it may or may not have been love) and that he expected exclusivity. It doesn't say that but I am assuming it. So, the curb is just the place for his object.

[+ purplekow]

Clearly by stating that you need to be discrete leads to the conclusion that there is a need for discretion and so this is a real situation.

As such, the older gentleman is perfectly within his rights to end the relationship if the contractual obligations are not being met. Seems the younger man here could have had his cake and eaten it but simply being a bit circumspect. So, I vote for lesson learned on both sides and it seems likely that the elder man will find another and it seems unlikely that the younger will find such a sweet deal as they don't seem to be as readily available.

[jjkrkwood]

Something tells me (or for that matter, I am assuming) that the older gentleman laid out some rules for the object of his affection - otherwise what was the purpose of the whole deal? Maybe altruism, but that is a very rare quality. Maybe Ghandi would have set his "boyfriend" up in such an arrangement. But putting him aside, the older gentleman would probably have told the object of his affection that theirs was a mutually exclusive relationship (even if it may or may not have been love) and that he expected exclusivity. It doesn't say that but I am assuming it. So, the curb is just the place for his object.

 

A rentboy agreeing to exclusivity ??? Are you kidding me ???? He may agree, but he wont comply. His beauty has an expiration date, and he can always probably do better (at least from HIS perspective).... The old guy was just plain ol stupid, and overcome by Lust and viagra. These guys need to get a grip on Reality....even with ALL their money....

[robberbaron4u]

Yes, yours is my viewpoint, too. The "mature gentleman of means", who has a good reputation, will not want for attention from suitors eager to avail themselves of his patronage. Unfortunately, the rentboy, with "40" just around Father Time's corner, the appearance of another "golden opportunity" will be limited. Too often, the "rentboy" is confident that he can "handle" his "patron", and, more often than now, the patron has, in fact, far more experience in the conduct of such relationships.

[+ purplekow]

A rentboy agreeing to exclusivity ??? Are you kidding me ???? He may agree, but he wont comply. His beauty has an expiration date, and he can always probably do better (at least from HIS perspective).... The old guy was just plain ol stupid, and overcome by Lust and viagra. These guys need to get a grip on Reality....even with ALL their money....

I think most men old enough and wealthy enough are more concerned about the illusion of exclusivity than the reality of it. The young man was in-dis-crete so now he is in-de-street.

[robberbaron4u]

As you have stated, gravity wins the game in the end. . .

[Phil_musc]

This is sad - but wait!! It might be just the thing for a new season for Dante's Cove or The Lair. Or maybe Desperate Housewives?

 

Sounds to me, though, like somebody wanted to make a little extra spending money - just the thing for those emergency purchases that come up from time to time. Depending on what the ground rules were, let it slide. If there were clearly delineated expectations, then time to throw the baggage out and move on. Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me all the way around though. No one got what they really wanted.

[jjkrkwood]

This is sad - but wait!! It might be just the thing for a new season for Dante's Cove or The Lair. Or maybe Desperate Housewives?

 

Sounds to me, though, like somebody wanted to make a little extra spending money - just the thing for those emergency purchases that come up from time to time. Depending on what the ground rules were, let it slide. If there were clearly delineated expectations, then time to throw the baggage out and move on. Sounds like a lose-lose situation to me all the way around though. No one got what they really wanted.

 

You mean none of those little mints on the escorts pillow ????