"La Dolce Vita" - fake pictures continue

[bcohen7719]

I saw "La Dolce Vita" now advertising on masseurfinder.

 

This "hunk" is a picture of someone

else, and I said so in my review. A suspicious counter-review was posted, especially because it used an obvious take-off of my own "handle."

 

"Dolce" at any rate looks nothing like this. His hands were also extremely weak, and he didn't help me at all. IMHO he was also

unattractive, although to his credit he was very polite. Hire if you have low expectations.

 

BC

 

http://www.masseurfinder.com/members/dolcevita.shtml

[Steven_Draker]

link: http://daddysreviews.com/review/dolce_vita_nyc

[+ glutes]

Sounds like he should be called La Dolce Cheata...

[Terpmaniac]

Did you notice the reply? He dosen't even deny the pics are fake! Unfucking believable! He just dismisses the fake pics like its no big deal. Glad you the warning because I have been drooling over those fake pics your months.

[bcohen7719]

Terpmaniac:

 

Thank you for your nice note. You are right, of course. I was drooling, too. When I finally met up with the "real" Dolce Vita, it was like whiplash.

 

BC

[bigvalboy]

Just curious BC, but why did you continue with the massage when you realized that It wasn't him?..This has been discussed here in the forum before and I know some guys feel obligated to continue. I did once, but vowed never again. What were your thoughts as soon as you noticed that this wasn't the guy in the photo.? Again, just curious. I think sometimes these guys keep doing it because they realize it's a numbers game. A certain percentage will always pay anyway.

[zeyfur]

The latest review has come from a reviewer who has reviewed two others before him. Seems genuine to me.

[bcohen7719]

Bigvalboy:

 

That is an excellent question. The answer is because I was an IDIOT, and just too nice. You are absolutely correct that I should have turned him away. However, I'm relatively new to this area; I wasn't thinking. In addition, I didn't want to cause a scene. I'm not sure what other people do to protect themselves from rip-off's: I always wondered if other clients keep baseball bats next to their doors just in case.

 

i can reiterate without any ambiguity that the beautiful photography of the body shown in Dolce Vita's ads do not belong to him. They must have been taken from a physique model's website. This said, again, he was not impolite.

 

BC

[Lewis H]

As I mentioned before in another thread, that photo belongs to a Brazilian model and it was taken from a photo set from the popular Terra The Boy series of Terra.br (IIRC). I can't recall the name of the model off-hand, as I had to google it to look it up. Perhaps an old "La Dolce Vita" thread might have it and be worth dredging up.

[bigvalboy]

At least you realize the error in judgement. Like I said, I fell for that once and REALLY regretted it. Now I am just hard core. If you lie about your pics then you are lying to me and I just won't tolerate that anymore. If it is an outcall, then I just thank them and say "you know what, you have misrepresented yourself and I am leaving" and I walk away. If it is an incall, the moment the door opens and I realize, I say the same thing and say "I'm sorry but this isn't going to work for me" and I simply close the door. You have to think fast and make that assesment on the fly as it were. Don't feel obligated in anyway. And BC you are not an idiot, maybe too nice, but not an idiot. lol

[bcohen7719]

Bigvalboy:

 

Thank you for your kind words. To this day, I also feel slightly victimized, although

certainly "Dolce" was not a thug, and far worse things have happened to clients.

 

Oh, by the way: I remember now that I chatted with "Dolce" before the appointment. Then, he was somewhat impolite, in the sense of sounding like "I'm overly busy, don't waste my time." I think that should have been a warning sign as well.

 

"Le Wh*re": Thank you again for your note! I remember you had mentioned this during the first go-around. I'll try to find a picture of that Brazilian model, and if I can, I'll post links to that plus "Dolce" below these notes. Then, everyone can judge for themselves. I caution that "Dolce" does not show his face.

 

Thanks again, guys!

 

BC

[bcohen7719]

Zeyfur:

 

If "Dolce" had a body like the one shown in his ad, I wouldn't be complaining--I'd be his regular client! I wish I had your sense of optimism...!

 

BC

[MiamiLooker]

The latest review has come from a reviewer who has reviewed two others before him.

 

Did you verify the other two reviews? Just because the reviewer states this was his third review doesn't mean it's true.

[zeyfur]

If the review is indeed fake then report it to daddy so that it can be removed.

[zeyfur]

His first fake review was from someone who had reviewed three others before. God. Looks like daddy can be easily fooled.

[Steven_Draker]

The latest review has come from a reviewer who has reviewed two others before him. Seems genuine to me.

 

Did you verify the other two reviews? Just because the reviewer states this was his third review doesn't mean it's true.

 

bcohen7719's negative review of Dolce (review #2) was published on August 2nd 2011

 

Dolce's third review written by Cohen321 was published on August 17th 2011. Cohen321 says that he has three review published. Only two could be found thru the advanced search and Google search. Dolce's one and the one about NYC's escort Kai Lee published on August 18th 2011 http://www.daddysreviews.com/review/kai_lee_nyc

 

A suspicious counter-review was posted, especially because it used an obvious take-off of my own "handle."

 

Difficult to say if the handle Cohen321 is a take-off of your handle, bcohen7719, primarly because Cohen321's first review (if at all published) is missing or cannot be found. Was that handle created before August 2nd or after is the question here.

[bigvalboy]

BC. one last thing. I noticed that you mentioned his impoliteness on the phone before hand, and yes that is a HUGE warning sign for me. If they ever display the attitude of "I'm overly busy, don't waste my time" or just display a cold demeanor either in an email or on the phone, I stop all communication and consider myself lucky that I just saved some money and time.

 

Good Luck, BC

[Phil_musc]

$200 for a massage with a guy who uses someone else's pictures and has weak hands?! I have made bad descisions in the past based on thinking with parts of my anatomy that aren't even close to the cerebellum. We all make these mistakes, but I have tried to learn from them. Bcohen, you were too nice here. BVB, I have tried to adopt your MO. Thanks for tine inspiration.

[jjkrkwood]

I value MY money wayyyyyyyyy too much to be that polite. Hit the road Jack.....!

[josephga]

you can contact masseurfinder show prof the photos aren't his and they will remove their ad. I've had a about half a dozen advertisers removed for using others photos b4

[bcohen7719]

How do I show what I think meant meant to type, 'proof'? Also, J., I don't like thinking of myself as policing anyone else other than complaining on this forum...and expressing appreciation to everyone who has been nice enough to listen and be supportive!

 

BC

[bcohen7719]

BVB: You are absolutely correct. This was only one of two of my very few "masseur" experiences. If I do this again, I'll not go along with anyone with a "snippy" attitude.

 

BC

[bcohen7719]

bcohen7719's[/color] negative review of Dolce (review #2) was published on August 2nd 2011

 

Dolce's third review written by Cohen321 was published on August 17th 2011. Cohen321 says that he has three review published. Only two could be found thru the advanced search and Google search. Dolce's one and the one about NYC's escort Kai Lee published on August 18th 2011 http://www.daddysreviews.com/review/kai_lee_nyc[/color]

 

 

 

Difficult to say if the handle Cohen321 is a take-off of your handle, bcohen7719, primarly because Cohen321's first review (if at all published) is missing or cannot be found. Was that handle created before August 2nd or after is the question here.

 

Steven:

 

I love you from afar, but a coincidence in regard to <bcohen7719> and <cohen321>,

one right after another with the same escort/masseur....? Ha!

 

BC

[bcohen7719]

Le Wh*re:

 

I did my best to find the photo you are referring to, but failed. "Terra the Boy" seems to be a long series of photos that go on from year-to-year. Can you reach back in your memory to think what the name of the model may have been?

 

With appreciation,

 

BC

[Lewis H]

http://blog-imgs-23.fc2.com/m/a/n/manse/vinicius-postiglione-the-03.jpg

The model's name is Vinicious Postiglione, and the shot on the right is the one Dolce Vita used, flipped and cropped. The white graphic on the corner is the logo of Terra The Boy.

 

I don't know if Daddy would remove the pic from his review with this proof, although but it can also serve as a warning for people who would recognize the fake pic from the reviews (well, at least until Dolce Vita begins using other pics instead).

 

Le Wh*re:

 

I did my best to find the photo you are referring to, but failed. "Terra the Boy" seems to be a long series of photos that go on from year-to-year. Can you reach back in your memory to think what the name of the model may have been?

 

With appreciation,

 

BC