Today's coverboys More from a HS yearbook?

[+ purplekow]

After today's coverboys and following two recent coverboys who raised the question of age appropriate, I believe I will not be reading much less writing any reviews any time soon. The pair on the cover today again raise the question of age of consent and while both may indeed be 18, I just am not comfortable with these prepubic appearing people as coverboys. There were several other reviews which might have been used as the cover and while these would still be part of the package which would still raise the issue, by placing these four people as covers over the last 10 covers or so, I can't help but feel that the powers that be are playing with fire.

[Guy Fawkes]

You are not the Censor!

 

Age of Consent by State

• 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia
  

• 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas
  

• 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.
  

 

This constant demagoguery is getting tiresome. My minimum age is acceptable and legal in all the states of the union. If they are old enough to be reviewed; they are old enough to be cover boy. Feel free to take your politically incorrect ideology somewhere else.

[TerryP]

I'm with Daddy on this one. It seems as though PurpleKow is basing his opinion on the appearance of these two guys. If they were 40 pounds heavier I suspect he would not have the same concern. If you don't like it, don't read it. Most of us want this environment to be as open as possible.

[jgoo]

Daddy is using a reasonable (and legal) standard for posting of reviews so I don't necessarily believe he is playing with fire by posting the reviews being discussed due to age appropriateness. With regards to coverboys, I believe he does an exceptional job of selecting a wide variety of types which reflects the wide variety of preferences among those that I imagine frequent his site. Not every coverboy is going to meet with everyone's particular likes every day but please don't think that there are not others who do appreciate it.

[+ glutes]

Daddy is using a reasonable (and legal) standard for posting of reviews so I don't necessarily believe he is playing with fire by posting the reviews being discussed due to age appropriateness.

 

I agree, but sometimes I think I've stumbled onto a NAMBLA site...

 

http://daddysreviews.com/images/alex_and_leon_atlanta.jpg

[JT Brooklyn]

One Pix is worth 1 word...NAMBLA Let us see how many more Reviews in the "Barely Legal" Dept show up? NAMBLA has quite a membership..

[+ glutes]

Well I am not a member...

[Guy Fawkes]

Well I am not a member...

 

And neither am I! See the other thread for the discussion about "Age of Majority"

 

BTW: Making any more insinuations that I support or condone NAMBLA would be a really bad idea.

[josephga]

warning warning Joe is fixing to ask a most likely stupid question lol. What is NAMBLA? I would normally google but I don't want too look if its some child molesting site

[jgoo]

I had the same question....North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). It is their stated goal "to end the oppression of men and boys who have mutually consensual relationships".

[Guy Fawkes]

I had the same question....North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). It is their stated goal "to end the oppression of men and boys who have mutually consensual relationships".

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nambla

[+ purplekow]

i am curious why a negative comment about these particular coverboys generates an invitation to leave. I did not say I was leaving the site, although I would be joining a long parade if I decided to do so or was exiled, I did say I would not be reading reviews, as I would rather not be confronted with pictures depicting men who might reasonably be thought of as underage. As to whether they are underage or not, I would rather have my computer repairmen calling authorities because he finds a series of 3 pictures on my computer that suggest I have been peering at underage boys. We all have our own legitimate concerns about our vulnerability based on use of the internet. So are you peering down from the moral high ground or a high horse?

[JT Brooklyn]

Daddy sez: "If you want to take a break; write another post like that!"

[Guy Fawkes]

Because you was insulting the Young men in question, the Reviewer, the Site, the People that visit the site, and Myself. Now your trying to spin your negativity and bigotry. I for one am not buying it.

 

Those two young men have just as much a right to be Coverboys as anybody else.

 

i am curious why a negative comment about these particular coverboys generates an invitation to leave. I did not say I was leaving the site, although I would be joining a long parade if I decided to do so or was exiled, I did say I would not be reading reviews, as I would rather not be confronted with pictures depicting men who might reasonably be thought of as underage. As to whether they are underage or not, I would rather have my computer repairmen calling authorities because he finds a series of 3 pictures on my computer that suggest I have been peering at underage boys. We all have our own legitimate concerns about our vulnerability based on use of the internet. So are you peering down from the moral high ground or a high horse?

[NYTomcat]

i am curious why a negative comment about these particular coverboys generates an invitation to leave. I did not say I was leaving the site, although I would be joining a long parade if I decided to do so or was exiled, I did say I would not be reading reviews, as I would rather not be confronted with pictures depicting men who might reasonably be thought of as underage. As to whether they are underage or not, I would rather have my computer repairmen calling authorities because he finds a series of 3 pictures on my computer that suggest I have been peering at underage boys. We all have our own legitimate concerns about our vulnerability based on use of the internet. So are you peering down from the moral high ground or a high horse?

 

While I myself agree that I do not happen to be turned on by these particular men and it does always raise the concern that my computer might appear to have underage pictures on the memory. Even if that is Not the case. I must agree what choice does a site or the administration like daddy have but to give them equal potential billing with other escorts that might appeal more to me. While I do not find them my taste and might even find their look unappealing for moral reasons. Neither I nor the site get to be arbitors of what is proper nor should we. The reality is the law says consensual sex has ages. While I may find their childlike look disturbing others would find my interests just as unappealing and many would say " unwholesome " but that really is not our place to judge. Daddy clearly confirms the age of majority prior to posting pictures. For his own protection as well as the protection of anyone underage. Beyond that he would be violating their constitutional right from age discrimination if he did not give them equal footing.

 

However I do understand your concern and do think you pk raise valid issues that any active viewer needs to worry about in regard to having questionable photos in the history of their computer files

[instudiocity]

Daddy is using a reasonable (and legal) standard for posting of reviews so I don't necessarily believe he is playing with fire by posting the reviews being discussed due to age appropriateness. With regards to coverboys, I believe he does an exceptional job of selecting a wide variety of types which reflects the wide variety of preferences among those that I imagine frequent his site. Not every coverboy is going to meet with everyone's particular likes every day but please don't think that there are not others who do appreciate it.

 

LIKE!

 

Daddy's picked some AWFUL LOOKING cover boys in the past that I withheld comment on. It's his board, let him run it. It you don't like what Daddy does, "See Ya!"

[JT Brooklyn]

LIKE!

 

Daddy's picked some AWFUL LOOKING cover boys in the past that I withheld comment on. It's his board, let him run it. It you don't like what Daddy does, "See Ya!"

 

So Sorry someone was forced to comment ANYWAY..LOL