A Real Beauty...It's A Shame He's Uncut

[Guest Hole_4_Hire]

Les,

 

This is the best set I've ever seen you post!! Thanks.

 

BTW, I really prefer uncut cocks for both oral and fucking. As a professional bottom, I find uncut cocks much more satisfying. And, yes, I can feel a difference. ;-)

[Guest Les]

I mean it's not the end of the world but if I had my drothers I'd wish his folks had the obsterician give him that little snip...Am I being too fussy? (I know a majority of you prefer the intact look and feel)...anyways here he is: (name unknown)

http://www.clubfreshmen.com/display_images/photos/k00064/k00064-0091.jpg

[Guest Les]

http://www.clubfreshmen.com/display_images/photos/k00064/k00064-0011.jpg

[Guest Les]

http://www.clubfreshmen.com/display_images/photos/k00064/k00064-0041.jpg

[Guest bottomboykk]

You speak blasphemy! ;-)

 

There are few things in life I love more than an uncut cock. And that cock, along with the guy attached to it, is a thing of beauty!

 

YUM!

[Guest Thunderbuns]

I agree with Les - clip & snip is definitely the way to go. The Jews really know where it's at.

 

All that wrinkled skin just hangin' there? - Yuk!

 

And proper hygiene is so much easier to achieve.

 

OK guys - jump all over me - I can take it.

 

Thunderbuns

[Guest bottomboykk]

I used to hate uncut. Then one of my trips to England turned me around. I was a real slut that trip and was with a ton of guys, all uncut, and I just flipped over them. I did a 180, and ever since have been a lover of uncut cocks.

 

Not that I turn down cut cocks mind you! }> But, I do admit, when I discover that a guy that I assumed would be uncut (e.g., a Brit or Hispanic) turns out to be cut, I have a twinge of disappointment.

[+ Axiom2001]

I am proud to be UNCUT; my hygiene during my years here has been impeccable; I truly ENJOYED the skin of a fabulous Hugarian escort in Chicago this past June, and just last Sunday, an escort in SF who has fabulous nips-- a big thick cut cock-- admired my uncut state and kept stating that he loved uncut men!

 

I've had men give my cock a workout when they note that it had NOT been clipped at birth.

 

This gorgeous man here is oh myyyyyyyyyyy! When he's turgid or in the tumulent state-- he could render the active partner a very tender feast!:9 :9

 

Again this old adage is appropriate: "...different strokes for different folks."

 

(Aside from the above--Les, on the message board in South America, could you write the telephone number for your Exotic Brazilian tour; a number is there, but I think a number might be missing! Thanks, man, AX)

[+ Axiom2001]

<A Real Beauty...It's Great That He's in Tact:)

[catnip]

Les, you always have the best taste! I'm too stuck on his dreamy eyes and nice cock-sucking lips (oh, Id kiss them, too) that I don't even mind that pig-in-a-pouch look downstairs.

 

Thanks,

[Rick Munroe]

CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

Les, you only think an uncut dick is ugly because you've been brainwashed to think so (btw, I don't prefer cut or uncut; I love 'em all). I'd urge anyone who thinks circumcision is a good and necessary thing to read this article by Dr. Paul Fleiss: http://www.nocirc.org/articles/fleiss1.html

 

According to the article, this is how the horrendous crime of circumcision harms the penis:

 

"Circumcision denudes: Depending on the amount of skin cut off, circumcision robs a male of as much as 80 percent or more of his penile skin. Depending on the foreskin's length, cutting it off makes the penis as much as 25 percent or more shorter. (***SIZE QUEENS TAKE NOTE!!!) Careful anatomical investigations have shown that circumcision cuts off more than 3 feet of veins, arteries, and capillaries, 240 feet of nerves, and more than 20,000 nerve endings.31 The foreskin's muscles, glands, mucous membrane, and epithelial tissue are destroyed, as well."

 

"Circumcision desensitizes: Circumcision desensitizes the penis radically. Foreskin amputation means severing the rich nerve network and all the nerve receptors in the foreskin itself. Circumcision almost always damages or destroys the frenulum. The loss of the protective foreskin desensitizes the glans. Because the membrane covering the permanently externalized glans is now subjected to constant abrasion and irritation, it keratinizes, becoming dry and tough. The nerve endings in the glans, which in the intact penis are just beneath the surface of the mucous membrane, are now buried by successive layers of keratinization. The denuded glans takes on a dull, grayish, sclerotic appearance."

 

"Circumcision disables: The amputation of so much penile skin permanently immobilizes whatever skin remains, preventing it from gliding freely over the shaft and glans. This loss of mobility destroys the mechanism by which the glans is normally stimulated. When the circumcised penis becomes erect, the immobilized remaining skin is stretched, sometimes so tightly that not enough skin is left to cover the erect shaft. Hair-bearing skin from the groin and scrotum is often pulled onto the shaft, where hair is not normally found. The surgically externalized mucous membrane of the glans has no sebaceous glands. Without the protection and emollients of the foreskin, it dries out, making it susceptible to cracking and bleeding."

 

"Circumcision disfigures: Circumcision alters the appearance of the penis drastically. It permanently externalizes the glans, normally an internal organ. Circumcision leaves a large circumferential surgical scar on the penile shaft. Because circumcision usually necessitates tearing the foreskin from the glans, pieces of the glans may be torn off, too, leaving it pitted and scarred. Shreds of foreskin may adhere to the raw glans, forming tags and bridges of dangling, displaced skin."

 

(I resent the fact that my parents chose, by having me circumcised, to have me maimed & disfigured without my consent, for no good medical reason.)--->

 

"Circumcision violates patients' and human rights: No one has the right to cut off any part of someone else's genitals without that person's competent, fully informed consent. Since it is the infant who must bear the consequences, circumcision violates his legal rights both to refuse treatment and to seek alternative treatment. In 1995, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics stated that only a competent patient can give patient consent or informed consent.67 An infant is obviously too young to consent to anything. He must be protected from anyone who would take advantage of his defenselessness. The concept of informed parental permission allows for medical interventions in situations of clear and immediate medical necessity only, such as disease, trauma, or deformity. The human penis in its normal, uncircumcised state satisfies none of these requirements."

[Guest curious2000]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

I totally agree with Rick, circumcision is a tramatic, brutal,over used,out-dated, and unnecessary procedure. I am circumsised, as most American males are, but will never know the joys of feeling a full orgasm with all of my foreskin nerve endings intact the way nature intended it. I still have good orgasms with my cut cock, but how will I ever know if they could have been even better with all my penis intact? most of the uncut guys I have been with moan and express pleasure more and seem to cum harder and with more intensity than the cut ones. Also, fucking is less painful for the recepient with an uncut cock when the skin glides over the head during anal intercourse, and makes it slide easier. The argument that they are un hygenic is just old and tired and untrue, and an insult to 80 per cent of the population that is uncircumsised.

[Guest sniper]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

I have to take issue with one of the above assertions, Rick -

25% or more shorter? They're not lopping off your glans. There would be NO effect on erect length. Think about it.

[+ glutes]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

I'll take him, foreskin and all!!!!!!!!! It is the entire package you look at - Imagine his glutes...

[Guest Les]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

Hi Rick,:7

Thanks for the link/excerpt. I've read articles from the good doctor before and am aware that there is quite a 'natural' movement out there. My fetish for cut cock is not absolute...obviously because I love Latinos and Asians and Europeans and Africans...LOL

You know me looking at your butt...you could lead me anywhere.

 

I found this guy to be breathtakinly beautiful as his picture slowly downloaded on my screen...then jarringly I see that ugly looking, foreskinned covered thing looking all the world like a Sharpei...well it put me off. Even in the pic where he's erect the head never leaves the house.(Overhang?)

He just looks like a guy who should be cut...at least to me.

Here he is again:

http://www.clubfreshmen.com/display_images/photos/k00064/k00064-0191.jpg

 

I hope the link works...or maybe you'll have to click the red X and show picture.

[Guest Les]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

Here's one for you Glutes...It's the best butt shot I could find.

Why he doesn't roll over and sread'em for us assmen I'll never know! :7

http://www.clubfreshmen.com/display_images/photos/k00064/k00064-0181.jpg

[Guest Les]

>(Aside from the above--Les, on the message board in South America, could you write the telephone number for your Exotic Brazilian tour; a number is there, but I think a number might be missing! Thanks, man, AX)

 

Well you know I would AX, but I think it's Lucky who provided the number. I provided a link below...:7

[Rick Munroe]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

>He just looks like a guy who should be cut...at least to me.

 

You must really despise him to want him to be mutilated/tortured/damaged & never again experience the pleasure he now knows. Stick to butts, Les. :*

[Guest]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

>The surgically externalized mucous membrane

>of the glans has no sebaceous glands. Without the protection

>and emollients of the foreskin, it dries out, making it

>susceptible to cracking and bleeding."

>

 

I really don't care that much about cut versus uncut, but this website is full of half-truths and all-out lies. Studies have shown no decrease in sensation or pleasure to the man with the cut cock. Only an ignoramus would think that a cut glans is susceptible to cracking and bleeding. In fact, many, many studies have shown that men with cut cocks are less susceptible to STD's including HIV (as well as to urinary tract infections). Of course, whether one considers a cut cock "disfigured" or not is purely a matter of personal taste. There are plenty of people on both sides of the issue. That website is certainly not the place to look if you want a balanced or objective look at the subject!!

[Guest]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

>Because circumcision usually necessitates tearing the

>foreskin from the glans, pieces of the glans may be torn

>off, too, leaving it pitted and scarred. Shreds of foreskin

>may adhere to the raw glans, forming tags and bridges of

>dangling, displaced skin.

 

I have seen the penises of literally thousands of circumcized men. I have never seen one with pits or scars from circumcision, let alone "tags and bridges of dangling, displaced skin." Bridging what to what? What I have seen many times is scar tissue between the foreskin and the glans of circumcized men (bridging the foreskin with the glans), often requiring surgery to correct. As a matter of fact, I just saw an example of this today! The only type of person I could think of who would believe that website would be a faithful wife with little knowledge of penises, circumcized or not.

[Guest Thunderbuns]

RE: CIRCUMCISION IS A CRIME

 

>I totally agree with Rick, circumcision is a tramatic,

>brutal,over used,out-dated, and unnecessary procedure.

 

Sorry - but I couldn't disagree more!

 

>most of the uncut guys I have been with moan and

>express pleasure more and seem to cum harder and with more

>intensity than the cut ones.

 

Rumour has it that Ms Munroe moans with the best of them.

 

>Also, fucking is less painful

>for the recepient with an uncut cock when the skin glides

>over the head during anal intercourse, and makes it slide

>easier.

 

Bull - pure bull

 

The argument that they are un hygenic is just old

>and tired and untrue

 

I agree - they CAN be just as clean but it takes a lot more attention to achieve this. And they don't stay as clean for as long. 12 hours after a shower the cut jobbies can still smell fresh. The helmut crowd, on the otherhand usually have an odor to them of stale sweat and piss. YUK

 

>and an insult to 80 per cent of the population that is >uncircumsised.

 

And this stat comes from where?

 

I know this can be argued from both points of view and never be resolved. It is 100% a matter of personal preferance. But for me, the sight of a helmut is a real turnoff. The only thing I find more revolting that 1 uncut cock is 2 uncut cocks. The pictures on the net of what is called "docking" makes me want to hurl.

 

Thunderbuns

[trilingual]

I've known several men who were circumcised as adults when they converted to Judaism. When I asked them if they noticed any real difference in sexual sensation, their response was uniformly "no."

 

Although I'm Jewish, I don't have any particular preference for cut/uncut guys. However, I do get turned off by guys whose foreskin doesn't retract when they're erect. That starts me thinking about hygiene flaws. In Brazil, where almost everyone is uncut (but hygiene-crazed) having a non-retractable foresking is considered to be a gross deformity. The technical term for it is "phimosis," and the Portuguese word for it, "fimose" can be used as a nasty insult. Brazilian guys with that condition usually have it taken care of by an M.D. Especially because for guys with a very "tight fit" the inability of their foreskins to retract can be very uncomfortable or downright painful when they're aroused.

 

Obviously, for Jewish and Muslim men, circumcision isn't a matter of choice. It goes with the territory, as a fundamental element of the faith. Jewish law does permit an infant not to be circumcised if doing so would be life-threatening (like if the child has a bleeding disorder). I don't know about Islamic law, but I imagine there are similar dispensations. In Europe and the former Soviet Union, a lot of Jewish men aren't circumcised because after World War II their parents decided against it for fear of it being an identifying mark in the event of another Holocaust. However, many such men have chosen to be circumcised when they've emigrated to Israel. There haven't been any reports of mass regrets for having been circumcised, even as an adult when they would presumably be able to tell the difference.

 

I'm very suspicious of the "no-circ" types: they're on a real crusade, and the anger and reeking contempt they express towards their parents for having circumcised them as infants I think is just a mask for other deep-seated issues these men have with their families, or their internalized self-hatred. Plus, they have that totalitarian "only we know what's best for all other men" attitude that's scary and repulsive. It's no different than the kind of stuff spouted by certain man-hating "radical feminist" lesbians. If you don't agree with their "politically correct" crap, you become the enemy. Bleah! I don't know about the rest of you on this board, but I don't need anyone else doing my thinking for me, and making my moral/ethical decisions for me.

 

I'm also dubious of the sincerity and consistency of the "no-circ" crowd. They rant on about circumcision referring to it as "mutilation," but don't seem to have anything to say about guys who mutilate their precious intact foreskins by piercing them, or using PA's, or doing other non-natural things to their penises or foreskins. In fact, I'd venture to say a lot of the "no-circ" propagandists do such things to their own foreskins. So pardon my skepticism here.

[Guest brianbb069]

cut or uncut - viva la difference! and thx for the gr8 pix!

[Guest ortrud45]

I'm with TRI on this one: I dislike uncut guys who have such an amount of foreskin that, when fully erect, their glans is still covered by it.

That's the reason I'm not really turned on by the guy's pictures LES

has posted.

But in general I prefer uncut over cut. Why? I like it very much and it's a huge turn-on for me to watch the transition an uncut dick traverses from flaccid to erect ... and especially when the glans gets engorged with blood, the skin retracts and the head gets more and more visible, snaking out of the foreskin!

:9

But all in all I think the subject of this thread is once again a matter of how we were brought up; and as an adult it's mostly a matter of taste.

[Guest chicagojeff]

I have to disagree Tri. I'm one of those "no-circ" types and I'm not on any crusade, I don't have any deep-seated issues with my parents and I don't have any self-hatred. And I would never say that I know what's best for all men. But I do think that all men should be given the opportunity to express what I believe is an important choice about what is done to their body. I wish I could have decided at the age of 15 or 18 or 21 if I wanted to be circumcised. Unfortunately it was done before I could exercise any say in the matter. And I deeply regret that. As far your skepticsm regarding men who rant about circumcision and then go and have themselves pierced: I don't understand why you view this as an inconsistency in their logic or behavior. They are freely choosing to do as they please with their body.