Isn't it a bit dicey?

[Guest Thunderbuns]

I read a review in the reviews for Tuesday/Wednesday (I think it was the first one) that I thought was deserving of discussion.

 

The reviewer had asked the escort to his home and made the comment that he only hired an escort a couple of times a year "depending on his wife's travel schedule"

 

If I was married I could never summon up enough confidence to invite an escort (presumeably unknown to me) into my home. Once this escort knew my address and my circumstances I would feel open to all kinds of chicanery.

 

And before all the escorts here go ballistic on me... I know most of you are professional enough to be trusted - but what about the occasional loose cannon we all know is out there?

 

What's your take on this? Foolhardy or not?

 

Thunderbuns

[Uncle Bill]

It's probably foolhardy, but I've done it three times before myself. In each case, I knew enough about the escort to feel resonably confident that there would be no problems -- although once I noticed the neighbors' prying eyes, so I had an appropriate story ready for my wife just in case.

 

I always figure that an escort could track me down anyway if he had the will too, so I make it clear (in a low-key way) to every escort I see that "outing" me to my wife, etc. would not end my life or even my marriage -- that, while it's something I'd like to avoid, it's not something I'll run from (or pay blackmail for).

[Rick Munroe]

Yum...that is so hot to fuck around with a married guy in his wife's bed. That image gets me so fuckin' hard. (Oh, sorry, I didn't answer your question, did I? OK, carry on...) }>

[CT Dick]

I'm single and living alone so this isn't an issue for me.

 

But....besides the escort causing trouble (which I have not experienced in my MANY hirings) what about snooping neighbors or the wife picking up clues you miss or an unexpected knock on the door.

 

Isn't it worth the piece of mind to drive to a cheap motel on the other side of town and be safer?

 

Dick

[+ Lucky]

What about integrity, honesty, and, shocking as it may seem, respect for the wife?

[taylorky]

i have to agree with lucky.cheating is one thing,but in the same bed your lover,wife,or whatever shares.seems just a little cold to me.not my place to judge,and don't mean to offend but..........

[Rick Munroe]

>i have to agree with lucky.cheating is one thing,but in the

>same bed your lover,wife,or whatever shares.seems just a

>little cold to me.

 

Yeah, OK, when you put it like that, it's not so hot. I guess I was just thinking of the fantasy of being the bitch's replacement. I suppose it's like the rape fantasy & the taking-everyone's-load fantasy: best left as fantasy.

[+ Lucky]

Rick, I appreciate your second thought on that. Thanks.

[Rick Munroe]

Hey, as often as I open my mouth around here, I'm bound to put my foot in it some of the time.

[Guest regulation]

>What about integrity, honesty, and, shocking as it may seem,

>respect for the wife?

 

You're confused, Lucky. This isn't a website where people feel issues like that should be allowed to get in the way of a man's desire to get his rocks off. This is a website where people who raise such issues get told by Rick Munroe that it's "none of their business" if married men want to cheat on their wives. That is what you said the last time this came up, right Rick? I'm not misquoting you, am I? :-)

[Rick Munroe]

[+ Lucky]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

I am always confused.

[+ Axiom2001]

Rick, you're being cheeky here, not tongue in cheek!

[+ Axiom2001]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

I'm not confused. If a man wants to cheat on his wife or partner or whomever-- do it away from the homestead! Other posters have given reason for this; thus I am loath to justify!

[+ Axiom2001]

RE: Back to the initial topic

 

Coincidentally--besides my computer just happens to be lying is my most recent copy of my health insurance newsletter. I just looked at it for the first time (very, very briefly) and noted the following quotations on the backside of this reading matter.

 

"Of you lead through fear you will have little respect. But if you lead through respect you will have little fear." - Unknown

 

"Character is doing what's right when nobody's looking." -J.C.Watts,Jr.

 

"If you really want to do something, you'll find a way.

If you don't, you'll find an excuse." - Unknown

 

"The past and the future are great places to visit, you don't want to live there." - Tom Payne

 

Which of the preceding quotes are relevant to the topic? Make your selection carefully. Justify succinctly and thoroughly.

[Guest regulation]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

>I am always confused.

 

Happy to help clear things up. There is a recent thread on "Married Men" -- it's in the "Ask An Escort" section if memory serves -- in which the subject of men who cheat on their wives with male escorts is discussed. Rick's contribution -- I'm sure he'll correct me if I mischaracterize what he said -- is to tell everyone how much he enjoys having sex with married men, and also to tell those posters who ventured to criticize the duplicity of such clients that it is "none of their business." I don't remember whether he mentioned having sex with clients of that sort in the very homes where they sleep with their wives.

 

Rick is remaining silent at the moment, but I am sure that is due to his characteristic and becoming modesty, not because he is unwilling to take responsibility for what he said on this subject earlier. :-)

 

This was a while ago, but I do seem to remember another thread started by someone -- was it Matt from Vancouver? -- in which we were told about a married client who had been blackmailed successfully by an escort whom he had seen. Was that you, Matt? If so, would you care to recount the story now that people have raised the issue again?

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

>I am always confused.

 

I don't blame you, Lucky! Confusion is the M.O. for those who chronically misquote. For the record, what I've posted here in the past was that, coming from a totally open & honest relationship as I do, I've always felt that guys who cheat are somehow missing something. They don't get to have that completeness, that feeling of sharing everything with their soulmate, that feeling that someone knows you & accepts you unconditionally as you are. I also wondered aloud if it was true that they wanted to be able to tell their wives, but that their wives wouldn't understand, and I was told that that was the case. Of course, since so many of my clients are married, and since that does turn me on, I would never be one to pass judgment (I never do anyway). It was just something that, caring as I do for my clients, I wished they could experience.

 

Having said all of this, let me end with: married cock rocks. So does single cock. Gay, straight, bi...it's all good. :9

[OneFinger]

>I'm single and living alone so this isn't an issue for me...

 

I, too, am single and living alone. But I still don't invite the escorts over to the house. For me, I am much less inhibited at a hotel and don't have to worry about the first-time escort scoping out the house.

 

I have a favorite escort that I've seen several times. I fully trust him and am sure he wouldn't rip me off. He knows my "real" name and home phone. But he still doesn't get invited over to the house. That bed is reserved for me and a serious boyfriend.

 

I can't imagine the size of the balls a married man must have to bring an escort into THEIR house. In my book it's totally inappropriate. I'm not knocking a married guy for hiring an escort - that's not the problem. I just don't think it's "right" to do it in the wife's bed. :-(

[Guest regulation]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

>I don't blame you, Lucky! Confusion is the M.O. for those

>who chronically misquote.

 

 

Alas, no one misquoted you. The "none of your business" statement I referred to comes from your post #33, dated April 7, in the thread "Married Clients" in the "Ask An Escort" section. :-)

 

>For the record, what I've posted

>here in the past was that, coming from a totally open &

>honest relationship as I do, I've always felt that guys who

>cheat are somehow missing something . . . .

 

That, more or less, is expressed in a different post of yours in the same thread. But we wouldn't want to leave out the other statement, would we? Someone might get the wrong impression. :-)

[Guest Hungman9]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

This is fascinating how Regulation makes his infatuation with Rick Munroe so obvious. He quotes or refers to Rick in nearly every post, and hangs onto and catalogues and memorizes every word Mr. Munroe posts. Interesting reading!

[Guest Thunderbuns]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

Congratulations Rick - you've managed to do it again!

 

Hi-jacking a post, that is.

 

I started a post re the stupidity and danger of having an escort in you house when your wife was away - and you managed to turn it into a post about the morality of cheating on your spouse in your mutual bed.

 

Not quite the same subject, but what the hell - if it makes your day complete...........

 

Thunderbuns

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

>I started a post re the stupidity and danger of having an

>escort in you house when your wife was away - and you

>managed to turn it into a post about the morality of

>cheating on your spouse in your mutual bed.

 

Gee, poor Lucky can't get a break, can he? I believe it was he, followed by Taylorky & another person, who began the issue of the morality of cheating, etc. And what's the problem with tangents, anyway? Can't threads flow like natural conversations? And...how hard is it to bring the topic back to where you want it to be? You do have that power. :*

[Flower]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

> coming from a totally open &

>honest relationship as I do, I've always felt that guys who

>cheat are somehow missing something. They don't get to have

>that completeness, that feeling of sharing everything with

>their soulmate, that feeling that someone knows you &

>accepts you unconditionally as you are.

> *****

>Of course, since so many

>of my clients are married, and since that does turn me on, I

>would never be one to pass judgment (I never do anyway). It

>was just something that, caring as I do for my clients, I

>wished they could experience.

>

>Having said all of this, let me end with: married cock

>rocks. So does single cock. Gay, straight, bi...it's all

>good. :9

 

Rick, I don't know you but wish I did. I love your attitude, your comments and the happy tone you bring to this site. When I want to feel good, I look for that pretty butt Icon to..., er, read (sigh) ;-)

 

Having read your "Take back the site" post, it appears that you were practicing giving the to personal attacks--good for you, but I doubt he got it. I think it will take a while for it to sink in that he has just been ignored--but keep it up.

 

Being a married man, albeit one who has just come out, I have a married AND gay cock for you to rock -- where you at babe? }> ��

Flower :*

[+ Lucky]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

Wow. What a firecracker I am, huh? Confused and can't get a break!! As much as I like Rick Munroe, I would like to have a smooth muscular Latin guy sent over to sit on my face for the fourth. I may stay confused, but at least I would get a break. And it would shut me up for several hours! Happy Fourth guys!

[Guest regulation]

RE: Isn't it a bit confusing?

 

>This is fascinating how Regulation makes his infatuation

>with Rick Munroe so obvious. He quotes or refers to Rick in

>nearly every post, and hangs onto and catalogues and

>memorizes every word Mr. Munroe posts. Interesting reading!

 

I don't deserve any credit for knowing something about Rick's posts. The fact is, there are so many of them it isn't easy to avoid them. How many threads on the first page of this section are either started by him, refer to him or contain posts by him? I think you'll find there aren't many that don't meet that description. :-)