Jump to content

Bruno Gaucho at the Gaiety

Guest Sports

By Guest Sports
in Male Strip Clubs

This topic is 7201 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Guest Sports

Guest Sports

Posted
Posted

Bruno Gaucho was at the Gaiety Saturday night. He put on an excellent show and after seeing his second dance number (the boy is huge) I can see why he is so popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Fin Fang Foom

Guest Fin Fang Foom

Posted
Posted

Hmmmm. Dancing at The Gaiety. It's my understanding that guys dance (and I use that word loosely) there to drum up business. If, as Bruno says, he's working around the clock, all the time, I wouldn't think he would have the free time on a SATURDAY NIGHT to "dance". Might it be that those $400 appointments have dried up and now he's resorting to escorting in a less sporting way?

 

Inquiring minds would like to know.

 

 

Poetically yours,

 

FFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ad rian Enthusiast

ad rian

Posted
Posted

>Hmmmm. Dancing at The Gaiety. It's my understanding that guys

>dance (and I use that word loosely) there to drum up business.

>If, as Bruno says, he's working around the clock, all the

>time, I wouldn't think he would have the free time on a

>SATURDAY NIGHT to "dance". Might it be that those $400

>appointments have dried up and now he's resorting to escorting

>in a less sporting way?

 

Like a lot of things with the Bruno adverts here, I agree this does not add up. It continues to be "a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma;" but perhaps the key has something to do with these English missives from a guy whose most positive reviewers say he has scant knowledge of the language. I wish him the best of luck, as I do his "team". A star is born, set the star-fuckers free!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Fin Fang Foom

Guest Fin Fang Foom

Posted
Posted

>UAUAUAUAUAUA!!!!!

>

>

>THANK YOU !! VERY MUCH!!!

>

>THANK YOU AGAIN....

>

>THANK YOU FOREVER...

>

>XXXXOOOOOOXXXXXOOOOXX

>

>

>BRUNO GAÚCHO

 

 

No offense, but why do Bruno's responses sound like Michael Jackson is writing them for him?

 

I can't speak for anyone else, but it's creepin' me out.

 

While I've got Bruno's attention, when are you going to make a video?

 

Curiously yours,

 

FFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Spida Enthusiast

Spida

Posted
Posted

I think there is only one way to resolve this Bruno Issue that I have been reading about on these posts! The only way is to send someone (ME) to Brazil for a date with him. I will come back and give you all the intimate details and set everyone straight (so to speak!!).

 

So I am going to have to ask for a sponsor or donations. After all I will be demonstrating an uncanny selflessness to my fellow readers! Email me directly for instructions on where to send the cashier checks or money orders. And remember guys I am not doing this for me but rather for you!! So you will not be in the dark any longer on this Bruno issue.. See what a nice guy I am :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Brazil Nut

Guest Brazil Nut

Posted
Posted

>Hmmmm. Dancing at The Gaiety. It's my understanding that guys

>dance (and I use that word loosely) there to drum up business.

>If, as Bruno says, he's working around the clock, all the

>time, I wouldn't think he would have the free time on a

>SATURDAY NIGHT to "dance". Might it be that those $400

>appointments have dried up and now he's resorting to escorting

>in a less sporting way?

>

>Inquiring minds would like to know.

>

>

>Poetically yours,

>

>FFF

>

 

Sorry to disappoint you, Fang, but you're wrong on all counts.

 

Bruno is leaving tomorrow - so he's not "drumming up business" - and he wanted to try out dancing at the Gaiety before he left. He had been asked a few times to dance there, as he has been asked to appear as a guest at several agencies in other cities. Always before he declined. Think of his appearance at the Gaiety as a farewell gesture and public finale. And as NYO has mentioned in another thread now he can say that he has performed on Broadway. And far from "drumming up business," Bruno has had to turn away quite a few clients because his "dance card" (in or out of the Gaiety) was filled. I suspect a few of the readers here could confirm that.

 

Which brings up a second point where you are wrong. It was ad rian who proclaimed on the basis of no evidence whatsoever, without ever having met Bruno, as a ridiculous claim, and in direct contradiction to all the available facts, that Bruno was seeing 12 clients a day for 2 hours each.

 

And yet a third point where you are wrong: you seem to be suggesting that dancing at the Gaiety is not "working" - that if Bruno were "working" he wouldn't "have the free time on a SATURDAY NIGHT to 'dance'". The dancers are *performers* at the theater, and are *paid* for their performances *by the theater management*. In addition, they may be hired by the patrons for private dance performances, for which they are *also paid,* by the patrons. That sounds like "working" to me - or are you suggesting that dancers who perform for an audience are not "working"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ad rian Enthusiast

ad rian

Posted
Posted

>Which brings up a second point where you are wrong. It was

>ad rian who proclaimed on the basis of no evidence whatsoever,

>without ever having met Bruno, as a ridiculous claim, and in

>direct contradiction to all the available facts, that Bruno

>was seeing 12 clients a day for 2 hours each.

 

Actually, as I have explained before, my comment was intended as SARCASM based on his advertised 2 hour appointment minimum, his own earlier email complaining of his phone mail account being full, and the "positive" reviews that talked about the phone ringing around the clock while he was "working". One additional piece of evidence, I guess is his more recent emails bragging of his earnings here. Maybe it just comes down to taste, but I prefer the illusion, even if that is all that it is, that the escort is seeing one guy a day and that's me. It's a major turn off to me to think that the escort is seeing two or more people the same day even if the number is still less than 12. Reasonable people can disagree about this, but that is my preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Fin Fang Foom

Guest Fin Fang Foom

Posted
Posted

>The dancers are *performers* at

>the theater, and are *paid* for their performances *by the

>theater management*.

 

First of all, please dispense with the charade that these guys are hired as DANCERS. Twyla Tharp hires dancers, The Gaiety hires whores. As I've said before, let's not glamorize what they're doing. When I've gone to The Gaiety, I wasn't going to see dancers. I was going to see naked whores - and I've yet to be disappointed.

 

And second, how much ARE they paid to shake their groove thangs on stage?

 

 

>or are you suggesting that dancers who perform for an

>audience are not "working"?

 

 

(See above)

 

 

Frigidly yours,

 

FFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Bitchboy

Guest Bitchboy

Posted
Posted

You'd almost believe this Bruno dude is Jewish with the effort ad rian puts forth in belittling him. As far as his postings being "Michael Jackson" in tone - there's some truth to that, but still enormously less offensive than that cheerleader who has taken over the Gaiety reviews. What a phony bore he is. NYO 's job is obviously safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Donnie Apprentice

Donnie

Posted
Posted

>I can't speak for anyone else

 

That's because no one else speaks as queenily as you do. <FFFinger snap>

 

>but it's creepin' me out.

 

I'm sure the escorts you've hired feel the same way.

 

>While I've got Bruno's attention

 

You desperately want any attractive guy's attention. Too bad you can only get it online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Donnie Apprentice

Donnie

Posted
Posted

>As I've said before, let's not glamorize

>what they're doing.

 

Yes, you've said it too many times before. OK, we get the point: These guys are whores and you desperately wish you could be one too. Now move on.

 

>And second, how much ARE they paid to shake their groove

>thangs on stage?

 

More than you'll ever get paid to watch them and jack off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Brazil Nut

Guest Brazil Nut

Posted
Posted

Fin Fang Foom and his Non-Response Response

 

>>The dancers are *performers* at

>>the theater, and are *paid* for their performances *by the

>>theater management*.

>

>First of all, please dispense with the charade that these

>guys are hired as DANCERS. Twyla Tharp hires dancers, The

>Gaiety hires whores. As I've said before, let's not glamorize

>what they're doing. When I've gone to The Gaiety, I wasn't

>going to see dancers. I was going to see naked whores - and

>I've yet to be disappointed.

 

First of all, please dispense with the squalid tactic of subtly trying to change the topic into something else. The issue was NOT what the job title of these guys is - dancers or anything else. The issue was your suggestion that if Bruno was "working around the clock, all the time, <you> wouldn't think he would have the free time on a SATURDAY NIGHT to 'dance'", i.e., you are saying that Bruno dancing is not Bruno working, or that dancing is not working. Your statement is ridiculous on the face of it, since dancing - or whatever you want to call it - at places like the Gaiety is a well-known form of the work that some of these guys do. Whatever you want to call it, or whatever you want to call these guys, or whether or not you approve of it, you are talking about them *doing their work*. And thus your original statement is self-contradictory, which is what I was pointing out. But, of course, you're not interested in making sense; you just want to find another opportunity to trash Bruno.

 

The Gaiety maintains the fiction that these guys are dancers, just like the fiction is maintained here that they get paid only for their time. Big deal. You don't like the term "dancers"? OK. Call them anything you like. How about "antelopers"? But they get *hired* to "antelope" at the theater and they get *paid* for "anteloping". That sure sounds like work.

 

And, by the way, it was YOU who used the term "dance" to describe what Bruno was doing. That just makes your reply all the more ridiculous.

 

 

>And second, how much ARE they paid to shake their groove

>thangs on stage?

 

I don't know how much, and I myself have never done it. But it is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT how much they get paid - whether it is $1 or $1,000,000. Payment for work is payment for work; just ask the IRS. The amount is set by agreement between the parties.

 

 

>>or are you suggesting that dancers who perform for an

>>audience are not "working"?

>

>(See above)

 

I *did* see above, and there is nothing there that responds to this question. All you tried to do was to *obscure* the question by talking about something else and making an irrelevant response.

 

And, of course, it is typical that you completely ignored the first two points where it was shown that you were wrong, particularly the very first one, which is the main one that goes to the heart of your original comment. Instead, you are trying, by obfuscating the third point and invoking a semantic argument over terminology, to deflect attention from the glaring fact that you were wrong.

 

 

>Frigidly yours,

 

It's warm in Brazil. Why don't you go there to warm up, see Bruno and toast your buns. Some good sex might do you good and make you less crabby. Or are you afraid that he would toast your buns for you?

 

 

Clarifyingly yours,

 

Brazil Nut

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Fin Fang Foom

Guest Fin Fang Foom

Posted
Posted

RE: Fin Fang Foom and his Non-Response Response

 

My my my! I think someone has developed a little crush on Mr. Gaucho. It's very sweet and oh so "sixteen years old".

 

 

>I don't know how much, and I myself have never done it. But

>it is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT how much they get paid

 

Au contrare, but it's totally relevant! It has been discussed before in these hallowed cyber-halls that the guys aren't making anything off their tips each night and what they are paid to antelope is minimal at best. It has been explained that guys are there to drum up business for "privates". So, my point was that it was interesting that Mr. Gaucho was doing something on a Saturday night that was actually COSTING him money since, to quote him, he was "working non-stop, around the clock". The contention that he anteloped to give something back to everyone and show his appreciation for all the love and blah blah blah he received is nothing but hoo-ie. If he could have been making $400 in private, he wouldn't have be anteloping in front of larger version of the card game from "Sunset Boulevard".

 

I'm going to Brazil in March and I may look up Mr. Bruno - at a greatly reduced rate.

 

Transatlantically yours,

 

FFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Contact Info:

The Company of Men
5834 C. North Kings Hwy #4343
Alexandria, VA 22303

Email: moderators@companyofmen.org

Help Support Our Site

Our site operates with the support of our members. Make a one-time donation using the buttons below.

$10 $25 $50 $100 $200

Make a recurring donation

Additional Resources

×
×
  • Create New...