Virgin Reviewers

[johnnysneakers]

I have just read yet another review (on the review section, duh) from someone who claims this was the first time he hired an escort. I am totally struck by the number of people who have the balls to write reviews when it was their first experience. Frankly, there is nothing wrong with this at all but it does nothing to help my assessment of an escort; in my humble opinion, a virgin client is not likely to have as good or thorough judgement due to the stress of the event, the sheer excitement, the mystery of the unknown. Lets face it the thrill factor is significant, but what really counts is knowing just how damn good the guy was!!!

 

Do any of you share my skeptism?

[Guest JustANametoPlay]

Johnny your points are valid, and sometimes correct. BUT...

 

Aren't all reviews subjective? If a first timer is/was nervous and the escort made them comfortable and the experience pleasurable, doesn't that speak well about the escort?

 

 

And just becaue it is the first time with an escort it may not be the first time with a man, so they may know what good sex is!

[Scorpio]

Maybe these types of reviews are on no value to you, but they are of value to some people. First, they are important to the person that wrote the review. Second, they may be important to other first timers who may be searching for just the right escort with whom to have their first escort experience and/or sexual experience. So who better to inform first-timers than other virgins?

 

I think that regardless of a person's virgin status they know good sex when they experience it. I was fortunate when I had my virgin escort/sexual experiences fourteen months ago, as I chose well. My absolute first experience with Escort #1 was very good and I'd visit him again, but my second experience just a mere two days later with Escort #2 was absolutely outstanding--which I reviewed. I didn't gain a whole lot of experience in that first encounter, but I knew enough to know that the second one was a lot better than the first--at least for me. And I'm sure I would have felt the same about Escort #2 had he actually been my first experience instead of my second. And I certainly knew enough a month later to know that Escorts #3 and #4 were absolute duds and went unreviewed (at least by me.) I'm just fortunate that I didn't meet those two guys first, because I might have stopped there and not proceeded on this sexual exploration any further.

 

You are right about one thing. It does take a lot of balls to write that virgin review or to hire that virgin escort for that matter. But somehow I'm not sure you meant it as a compliment.

[Guest chaz49wm]

Johnny don't knock it till you try it at 48. It was my first real time and yes it was with a real nice guy as escort Stef. I Couldnt have ask for a better teacher. Yes I was nervous but he put me at ease. I was not new to liking males but new to it with someone besides my hand, vids and mags. Stef was a real person so I was in heaven. I feel like I conveyed to others what it was like. I dont wont to hear from all the studs who have done it for a long time. I want to hear it from new guys like myself or "Virgins as you call them" those are the guys who are untainted by it all. Hope you know where IM cumming from if not to bad. HUGS Chuck

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Just, Scorpio and Chaz, you comments reflect my thoughts on this topic.

 

Johnny,

 

> I am totally struck by the number of

>people who have the balls to write reviews when it was their

>first experience.

 

I didn.t realize that it took so much balls or I probably wouldn't have done it, though it wasn't easy for me anyway. Not only was it my first review, with my first escort, but it was my first time with a male -- triple witching hour -- I didn'r realize I was suppose to sell short. Live and learn. And just maybe it said something useful, if not valuable, about the escort.

 

Happy New Year

 

:-)

[mmk]

something else that a person needs to remember is that just because they are submitting a first time review here does not mean that they have not been with an escort before. I have been with a few different escorts but only one from this site (hopefully that will change in this new year). There are many escorts that do not advertise on this site but are on others or maybe just advertise in a local gay newspaper. I think that most of the people who are looking for escorts thru this site are savvy enough to distinguish the legitimate reviews from the ones that aren't.

[Guest starfucker]

>I have just read yet another review (on the review section,

>duh) from someone who claims this was the first time he

>hired an escort. Frankly, there is nothing wrong with

>this at all but it does nothing to help my assessment of an

>escort; in my humble opinion, a virgin client is not likely

>to have as good or thorough judgement due to the stress of

>the event, the sheer excitement, the mystery of the unknown.

> Lets face it the thrill factor is significant, but what

>really counts is knowing just how damn good the guy was!!!

>

>Do any of you share my skeptism?

 

Johnny, I share your skepticism of the first time review by the client who claims the experience was his first with an escort.

 

>I am totally struck by the number of

>people who have the balls to write reviews when it was their

>first experience.

 

It is not difficult to report a perceived great experience, first time or not. What takes balls is reporting a less than great experience. From comments in this and other threads, it is evident that many clients abstain from writing negative reviews. <from Scorpio: And I certainly knew enough a month later to know that Escorts #3 and #4 were absolute duds and went unreviewed (at least by me.)>

 

In summmary, the reviews here give me a guideline of what I might expect when hiring an escort that is new to me but still are not the last word.

[+ deej]

>There are many escorts that do not advertise on this site

>but are on others or maybe just advertise in a local gay

>newspaper.

 

Point of clarification: escorts do NOT advertise on this site. They are reviewed here. If an escort is not listed on this site, it is because no client has reviewed him.

 

It's a subtle but important point. This is NOT an advertising site, although it can generate some pretty darn good (or bad) publicity for an escort.

[Guest LG320126]

To Johnny & Starfucker -

 

I assume neither of you have ever written a review because at some juncture it would have had to have been your first.

[sdg]

I think the virgin review is an expression of thanks to the escort. A way to let them know they made a sometimes awkward and scary situation one that was good, fun. It was there entrance experience into the world of escorts and for them to review it is their way to say "yes I like it".

 

True they may find that their 2,3 or 100 is better but to them this one was the best. After all isn't it a matter of fact that we always remember our first.

 

sdg

[Guest doc]

I don't understand what the fuss is all about. Aren't the reviews based on what an individual's perception is anyway? In fact, I may think someone is really cute, someone else may think the person is average. It's all relative, just like a virgin reviewers opinion. As you read their review, remember it is their first escort encounter. Take all reviews for what they are worth.

[swallows22]

Deej- when you have an escort reviewed for the first time by a first time reviewer, that is advertising. Please do not equivocate. Cheers!

[+ deej]

>Deej- when you have an escort reviewed for the first time by

>a first time reviewer, that is advertising. Please do not

>equivocate. Cheers!

 

Equivocate?

 

This is a REVIEW site, not an advertising site. I would ask YOU not to equivocate.

 

It is up to the reader to decide whether or not a review is bogus. Knowing the lengths HooBoy goes through to validate reviews (particularly for first-timers) I have a little more faith in them than you do, obviously.

 

I met one of my very favorite escorts because of a first-time review by a first-time reviewer. I honestly don't care if that first review was bogus because every word of it turned out to be true, albeit understated.

 

Some see a glass half-full, others see it half-empty. Please don't ask others to use YOUR judgement system universally. It may not be right for them.

[mmk]

sorry deej, I should not have used the word "advertise" since escorts do not pay to have reviews put on this site. My apologies.

[Guest JT]

>>There are many escorts that do not advertise on this site

>>but are on others or maybe just advertise in a local gay

>>newspaper.

>

>Point of clarification: escorts do NOT advertise on this

>site. They are reviewed here. If an escort is not listed on

>this site, it is because no client has reviewed him.

>

>It's a subtle but important point. This is NOT an

>advertising site, although it can generate some pretty darn

>good (or bad) publicity for an escort.

 

Deej is right, escorts do NOT advertise on this site. They may announce their travel plans on the MC but let's be clear, they do NOT advertise here. Only some escort agencies DO!

 

 

JT

[Guest neverbeenhad]

Damn, I guess I can't write that review the first time I hire an escort.

Guys, come out of the cave, the world is very large; even the gay world. This site may make you think the world is full of johns and joneses, but most guys have never hired an escort. I never have, but I would love to. I just never got up the courage or ponied up the cash. I even get embarrassed getting lap-danced ! So why would you think somebody who says he's never hired a guy before is lying? Isn't that exactly the time you'd want to tell other people (anonymously) what you thought and how you felt?

Just wait till I open the wallet that first time, you'll hear about it. My review's gonna be like "War and Peace"--actually that's a great idea for an escort name, anybody wanna buy it? Warren Piece...

[Traveller]

>Damn, I guess I can't write that review the first time I

>hire an escort.

 

Never,

 

You are so fucking Lucky (who, by the way, barks "In-a-Gadda-Da-Vida" when being porked from behind - at least according to Hagan) because you registered with this site prior to January 1, 2002. Anyone registering after that date cannot file a review during the year 2002 unless they cast a completely useless ballot - such as smoothblond's about to do - for escort of the year and correctly guess the winner before TY announces it.

 

However, such late comers also have three other ways to join the club for the year 2002: (1) they can get Craig, sans mood rings and sporting Reichy tats, into a three way at the end of January with T2 and Nils, (2) they can get Donnie to finish his updating of Carnegie's classic tome, including the long anticipated chapters on scat and fat, or (3) they are 6' or taller, have 8" or more, are strictly a muslim top, and fuck me for a week. I know, I know, I've got the hard end of this bargain, but that's what I try to do to help Hoo and this site.

 

Later.

[Guest neverbeenhad]

Trav,

I'm not Muslim, but for some reason I do have dreams of getting captured by Israeli paratroopers.

[johnnysneakers]

My point is somehow being missed here. My original arguement was that virgin reporters seem to have a penchant for reporting their first escort conquest. I welcome their opinions. But why is there so many of them posting about their experiences when there are also so many others experiences in the nuances of the escort world not posting. Frankly, I will try the view of an experienced "hirer" over a virgin anytime. My oberservation is that that there are so many virgin reviewers posting here, which is welcome of course, but their view points are so limited that I do not give them much credence. Yes, I am an elitist, but a fucking experienced one and I am a proud of it. I am only too happy to share my conquests with others on an experienced basis which has a trackrecord of connaiseurship, knowledge and experience. And I respect others with similar experience. This is actually a case where some experience adds to the credibility of a review.:9 :9 :9 :9 :9 :9 :9 :7

[Bastian]

>(3) they are 6' or taller, have 8" or more, are strictly a muslim

>top, and fuck me for a week>

 

Geez Trav, it's harder getting into your little black book than getting a virgin to swallow. (not to mention gag just the way I like it}> )

 

How long does it take to convert anyway?

 

Bastian

(have a happy horny weekend guys)

[DaninWA]

(3) they

>are 6' or taller, have 8" or more, are strictly a muslim

>top, and fuck me for a week. I know, I know, I've got the

>hard end of this bargain, but that's what I try to do to

>help Hoo and this site.

>

>Later.

 

I'm 5'10" tall, 6" cut, and Catholic; but, I could fuck you for 2 weeks. Would that work?:*

 

Dan (hot for you, babe)

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

LMAO.... on all counts!!