Deep Thoughts

[Traveller]

>teddy kennedy has stood up for the rights of minorities and

>other opressed peoples for a long, long time. more than

>anyone can say about the idiot rasist Quayle or about the

>idiot rasist traveller. have you shot any muslims lately?

>

 

Craig, couple of queries first. Does a person become "opressed" when Ms. Winfrey sits on them? To which language does the word "rasist" belong? I'm trying to get a handle on what I share in common with the former VP. Next, since you asked, this weekend was particularly good one for shooting muslims. A nice mix of widows and orphans.

 

Later.

 

PS. Time to go blow my kike BF.

[Guest TruthTeller]

>Craig, couple of queries first.

 

Where are the queries? Are they hot? What are their names?

 

>I'm trying to get a handle on

>what I share in common with the former VP.

 

Qualye loved to get plugged by tall lean nice guys with big dicks. He loved Latins and CoreyNYC.

 

>Next, since you

>asked, this weekend was particularly good one for shooting

>muslims. A nice mix of widows and orphans.

 

How do you shoot them through their burkahs? I've always had that problem and couldn't quite solve it. I think some of them have bullet-proof vests embedded into those things, which is the REAL reason why they wear them.

 

Also, some of the men's turbans (and, at least in Eastern Afghanistan, some of the women's veils) are equipped with Wonder Woman-bracelet-like devices which shield them from bullets. I can't tell you the ammunition I've wasted because of those.

 

Congratulations on your successful muslim-killing weekend. Take it from someone who knows - it isn't easy.

[Guest Zach DC]

Hey TruthTeller,

 

Thanks for your deep thoughts. Here, you can share your ideas and questions on any subject -- they don't all have to be about me. (But it's nice to know you care.)

 

Zach DC

[+ Lucky]

I thought this thread was about turds that didn't flush....and I see that TT keeps posting....

[Guest TruthTeller]

>I thought this thread was about turds that didn't

>flush....and I see that TT keeps posting....

 

Your contributions to the dialogue are always so very stimulating. Oh, and look - Lucky almost expressed a thought in a complete sentence! Good little lucky.

[Guest DevonSFescort]

7Zach --

 

Nice survey of twentieth century liberal/conservative inconsistencies. I'd say it's only getting blurrier all the time with the phenomenon of globalization. Thomas L. Friedman argues that the old left/right divide has been replaced with a matrix. You have "separatists" (or isolationists) of both parties versus "integrationists" (or globalizers) of both parties on the one hand. On the other hand, you have "Let-Them-Eat-Cakers" (more likely to be GOP or independent) versus "Social-Safety-Netters" (more likely to be Democrats). I cribbed this from his book "The Lexus and the Olive Tree."

 

Clinton, of course, was both an "integrationist" and a "Social-Safety-Netter," but even that's too simple because he ran on welfare reform (and had the pressure from an ascendant Republican Congress and the luxury of a booming economy as the backdrop for achieving it). It probably says something about the American temperament that we elected a Republican (Nixon) to expand the welfare state and a Democrat (Clinton) to slim it down.

 

The war is also creating new (if temporary) alliances of strange bedfellows, as many "leave us alone" conservatives join many liberals in attacking some of Ashcroft's domestic "security" measures. Good thing, as far as I'm concerned.