Where is jason coxx???

[+ Axiom2001]

Last June I was fortunate enough to have engaged the services of Mr. Jason Coxx of NY/NJ. I have been unable to find his website, and today when I surfed the 100 Best Escorts' Site, he did not appear first as it has been for many months. I want to see him again, perhaps next June in NYC. Please help me and thanks!

[Guest jeffOH]

>Last June I was fortunate enough to have engaged the

>services of Mr. Jason Coxx of NY/NJ. I have been unable to

>find his website, and today when I surfed the 100 Best

>Escorts' Site, he did not appear first as it has been for

>many months. I want to see him again, perhaps next June in

>NYC. Please help me and thanks!

 

The obvious place to look would be the NJ section of the escort review site. His reviews contain his e-mail address and phone #.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[Guest Jason Coxx]

Hi Guys,

 

My website has been down for the past two months because I have been dating someone regularly and have chosen to focus on that relationship rather than escorting.

 

Jason Coxx

jason@jasoncoxx.com

917-242-8307

http://www.jasoncoxx.com/jasoncoxx.JPG

[BewareofNick]

Well, at least now we know where FFF is

[Guest jeffOH]

>Well, at least now we know where FFF is

 

DOUBLE;-)

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[HooBoy]

Daddy-In-Training and I did a thorough review of Jason Coxx's email and IP addresses as well as Fin Fang Foom's and came to the conclusion they are not the same person. I posted something about this long ago and I really wish the issue would die.

 

Maybe they're dating each other and if so, I wish them well.

[Guest jeffOH]

All that PROVES is that two computers MAY have been used by JC/FFF.

It seems to me that he's smart enough to have done that.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[HooBoy]

>All that PROVES is that two computers MAY have been used by

>JC/FFF.

>It seems to me that he's smart enough to have done that.

>

>Jeff4hire@aol.com

 

Give it a rest. It's old news. There are more interesting things to discuss.

[Guest Viewmaster]

Jeff, while I generally agree with you on most issues, I have to agree with Hoo on this one. Isn't enough "punishment" that JC/FFF"s meltdown took place before the eyes of so many? Let him salvage whatever dignity he can by calling this a retirement. BTW: while FFF and JC may or may not be separate on the other side of a PC screen, from this side they can be read as one because it was JC himself who acknowledged that FFF wrote for both. That makes them one person in cyberspace at least.

[Guest jeffOH]

>>All that PROVES is that two computers MAY have been used by

>>JC/FFF.

>>It seems to me that he's smart enough to have done that.

>>

>>Jeff4hire@aol.com

>

>Give it a rest. It's old news. There are more interesting

>things to discuss.

 

Of course it's old news Hooboy and YES, there are MUCH more interesting things to discuss. My point was that a "thorough

investigation" of IP addresses and e-mails merely SUGGESTS that they're possibly not the same person...it is not conclusive proof.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com

[Guest jeffOH]

>Jeff, while I generally agree with you on most issues, I

>have to agree with Hoo on this one. Isn't enough

>"punishment" that JC/FFF"s meltdown took place before the

>eyes of so many? Let him salvage whatever dignity he can by

>calling this a retirement. BTW: while FFF and JC may or

>may not be separate on the other side of a PC screen, from

>this side they can be read as one because it was JC himself

>who acknowledged that FFF wrote for both. That makes them

>one person in cyberspace at least.

[Guest jeffOH]

>>Jeff, while I generally agree with you on most issues, I

>>have to agree with Hoo on this one. Isn't enough

>>"punishment" that JC/FFF"s meltdown took place before the

>>eyes of so many? Let him salvage whatever dignity he can by

>>calling this a retirement. BTW: while FFF and JC may or

>>may not be separate on the other side of a PC screen, from

>>this side they can be read as one because it was JC himself

>>who acknowledged that FFF wrote for both. That makes them

>>one person in cyberspace at least.

 

Oops! Didn't mean to do that.

 

Viewmaster, yes, I do agree with you as far as it being punishment enough. I was merely pointing out that the "evidence" was not 100%

conclusive, that's all.

 

Jeff4hire@aol.com