Escort Only Section

[Guest]

>Having had the good fortune

>to have met some of

>the fine escorts who have

>participated in this thread, I

>trust them to talk about

>business matters in the thread.

> They all seemed like

>really nice guys to me.

> I know I

>behave in a decent way,

>so I have nothing to

>worry about.

 

There seems to be a little break-down in logic, here. Because you have met SOME of the escorts who have participated in this thread, and they SEEMED like nice guys to you, you come to the conclusion that there can't be any bad apples? Also, the point that concerns a lot of the clients who've participated in this thread is not that the truth will be reported about bad clients. The concern is that bad reviews will be responded to with lies about the client.

[Guest minstrel]

The prospect of this forum troubles me.

 

IMO, I am a good client - clean, generous, respectful and a stickler for punctuality. Most of my escort encounters have ranged from excellent to satisfactory. Some have been disappointing and a few were total disasters. But the only time I wrote a negative review was when the escort skipped out on me after collecting the fee.

 

If this happened again, what's to prevent the escort from posting the following in the new forum as a retaliation:

 

"John K./60-something/Korean American/currently living & working in Edinburgh/speaks with strong Bristish accent/travels to U.S. regularly ...... was a no-show last month ...... apologized and made a second appointment ...... was unclean ....tried to renegotiate the fee at the end of the appointment."

 

Since I often see escorts in my hotel, they always know my real name. Even if the escort is not allowed to use my name in his post, I am not protected because like John K., my personal particulars are such that I am easily identifiable. The next time I email an escort from "Edinburgh" with my particulars and get turned down because of the above posting - I'll never be the wiser.

 

I may have written my last negative review.

[Guest 7Zach]

>There seems to be a little

>break-down in logic, here.

>Because you have met SOME

>of the escorts who have

>participated in this thread, and

>they SEEMED like nice guys

>to you, you come to

>the conclusion that there can't

>be any bad apples?

>Also, the point that concerns

>a lot of the clients

>who've participated in this thread

>is not that the truth

>will be reported about bad

>clients. The concern

>is that bad reviews will

>be responded to with lies

>about the client.

 

 

What's more likely is that someone will melt-down, similar to that of BillyBoy last year or the couple of instances we've seen this year. In that case, the damage is done upon the post itself, and deleting it only serves to lessen the harm, but harm remains.