Jump to content

Escort Review History "abbreviated?"


Guest ncm2169
This topic is 6820 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

I agree, this is the perfect example. It also makes me wonder why his most recent review is 2002? He has updated his profile in 2005, so we know he is still escorting. Interesting, maybe Oklie can add some insight on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Anton, that was a useful reply you made and threw some light on the situation. I hope your "win-win" suggestion leads to an improvement from the current situation. I agree that some of the older reviews have useful information which the newer reviews don't necessarily contain. In fact, I have hired escorts based on old info and would not have hired them soley on the more recent info contained in reviews.

 

As an example, sometimes an escort will have a wide number of activities he will perform but if his recent clients are all "vanilla" you get no hint of what he is willing to do, other than the vanilla stuff. The older reviews which contain details of the escort's performance in the raunchier activities is sometimes lost under the "abbreviated" system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...