Jump to content

Fresh Meat in Los Angeles :) -- Greg Scott


SAdler
This topic is 6883 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

>< Again, there is no link.

>

>For Chrissakes, Scott, EVERY ad on men4rentnow has a

>link. You simply click on the ad, which brings up the

>escort's page URL, and you copy and paste the URL. I just

>tried it with another escort -- works just fine.

>

>Is that too difficult for you to handle? I'd like to see his

>pics, but I am NOT going to wade through over 300 fuckin ads

>in LA.x(

 

Wow ... calm the FUCK down. First off. I don't opt to PAY to look at the ads like some people. SECONDLY, the option to EMAIL me or HIM to ask for pix was always there.

 

What is your problem NCM. If this is THAT big a deal to you that you feel a need to be rude to people maybe you need a life outside the boards?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest 2004

>>Just so I understand you were posing for semi nude pictures

>>when you were a minor and knew it was against the law to do

>>so?

>

>>Of course you didn't place the ad Scott.

>

>I sent out pictures on a personal level early on :) Nothing

>illegal there, as long as they didnt save them to their

>computer ;)

 

If you were 17 (which I don't believe) then it is illegal. Next time you're near a library maybe read a little about the law related to this issue.

 

>

>They were obviously used without my permission on this site as

>have been MANY.

 

Of course Scott you didn't post the ad though it reflects every personal detail you send in your emails to potential clients.

 

>If you've looked at any of my pictures

 

I'm looking at two of your pics and they look as if they show nudity to me. For someone who claims that they don't post any pics like this in their ad don't you think there seems to be quite a few Scott pics floating around?

>

>>Part of growing up is to take responsibility for your

>actions.

>>So far you, in my view, have failed to do that.

>

>Part of growing up is being a MATURE individual and not making

>statements designed specifically to bully or antagonize. You

>just seem like a bitter pathetic individual to me and I pity

>you.

>

>Exhibit A:

>

>RE: ....

>From: 2004

>Date: Jul 06th 2005

>>What IS your problem dude?

>you.

>

 

LOL wow busted me. COme one don't you think I knew why you sent that message. The sad part is you left out the paragraph that explains why YOU are my problem, dude. You know the part where I mention how pathetic it is of you to trash your clients or potential clients then offer a half hearted apology, I got wrapped up in things, I sunk too low, I didn't post those pics, I didn't post that ad, I don't negotiate my rates ... a common theme is emerging and it is showing you to the hiring world for what you really are.

 

I'm finished with you, class dismissed.

 

 

---/

So many years yet only one can be the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I'm finished with you, class dismissed.

 

Funny. I was going to say the same thing. I wasn't wasting my time with any more of your BS. And for the record, there WAS no other paragraph in your message to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On June 25 2005 the poster Sadler wrote

"This is what the OTHER board comes down to and I'd never start yelling at you big guy because I know you on a personal level but really. Do you have ANY idea how many ANGRY emails and IMs I got form guys asking how I was going to respond to your statement?

 

As a client you are asking an escort to sleep with you. If it weren't for the money, they wouldn't be doing it. Blunt as that is, it's the case. $150 to do something usually thought "disgusting" to a community or an individual just doesn't cut it. Sorry.

 

As to the going rate. You are pretty much known, from my experiences at the meetings and from dialogue here, for going after the rough trade and the hustlers of the species. I don't think going after "these" escorts is your thing. If I'm wrong I apologize, just going off of my experiences."

On june 26 2005 the poster biguyinpasadena wrote in respone to the above post

"In response to Reply # 23

 

 

Geez Louise Scott-I wish you would have privated me with THAT response!You have really cut yourself off at the knees here boy and I know you did not mean to.

So more cash makes something less "disgusting"to you?Sorry baby-that means you just crossed the line from "escort" to you know what.

Of course we would ALL like to be paid more for what we do,and I think it is in our culture that we are "entitled"to be paid top dollar for our time and expertise.

So I am glad that you are such a good"you know what"as to hide your disgust for the fun loving gent(and many of you know to whom I am refering)who has spent thousands of $$$on you thinking you were really having a great and fun time with him.

As to my preference for "trade" and street hustlers.Yes I do play with this sort of fella.They are there,they are ready,they play the games I sometimes have a desire to play.And yes I pay them CONSIDERABLY less than $250(that would pay for a group scene often!)But I also play with fellas advertising on rentboy/frontiers or who are reviewed on this site.

I have never paid more than $200 for a "play session.I have paid more(sometimes much more)for a longer session-but that has always been my choice-I have payed that as a personal consideration for the fella-they have never asked for it and it gives them a pleasant surprise,which gives me a good feeling.

I am definetly not alone in this as other posters to this thread have proven and from a very recent(6/24/05)search for talent(which drove all the way from long beach to downtown LA)off of rentboy.

I think you are doing a real disservice here to your fellow working boys-If everyone thinks they cannot consider having a paid encounter because they cannot afford,or they cannot justify,to pay $250 or more well that will drive consumers AWAY from that market.

So you are free to ask whatever you feel you are worth-but to state the "going rate"is $250 plus is a self promoting falsehood.

 

BigGuyInPasadena

 

Now Scott,as much as I really hate the he said/she said sort of post that some trolls on this board adore,I just had to remind you of what YOU wrote.

No anount of smoke and poorly installed mirrors are going to make that go away.And no cleverly worded non-apology nor out of context bullet pointed responses will work either.

It would have been much better for all of us if you would have left it at....

"This post is completely off base and I take total responsibility. I don’t eat crow. It’s not usually on my dietary menu but a good slice of humble pie is due at this point. I was completely wrong for using the words I did…it was pretty extreme and regret isn’t really worth much but I do apologize for saying it the way I did."(taken from a post by SAdler on July 5th 2005.

And please,if you think I am trying to tear down the boys in the biz remember who posted the WORKING link to your friend where he ask for the reasonable fee of $200 for his services versus some none working vague link/site reference.

http://babydb.male4malescorts.com/m4mdc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=7&topic_id=53657&mesg_id=&page=&mode=full#53820

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody said anything about making it go away big guy. But some people wanted to know why and to understand what I wrote. Not for you or anyone to tell me what I can and can't say.

 

I apologized and admit what was said was wrong in the way it was said. Did I give you the impression I expected it to COMPLETELY dissapear? Of course not ... don't really EXPECT anything out of it -- I just felt -- especially given your back handed attacks on certain people in your post -- the statements had to be made.

 

Greg and I discussed his rate shortly before this thread took off. I had shown him several boys in LA that fit his description and told him that if he could do the job efficiently he should have no problem commanding that rate. If he felt he needed more money faster or was not getting enough "bites" he could move down to $200 which he apparently did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>>I sent out pictures on a personal level early on :)

>Nothing

>>illegal there, as long as they didnt save them to their

>>computer ;)

>

>You know absolutely NOTHING about the law & it is obvious.

>

It's called a joke you half-wit. Hence the smiley faces. Is sarcasm BEYOND you? This is why I've stopped responding to your comments. I feel brain cells dying whenever I read anything you write.

 

If you don't have something intellectual to say in threads ... then don't. Attacking people and making silly comments are just worthless wastes of space. So continue to say what you want but until you make comments of actual SUBSTANCE I won't be responding to you in ANY thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>This is why I've stopped responding to

>your comments.

 

So, next you're going to try to cite some "serious research" to show that, by responding to my posts, you've actually stopped responding to them?

 

>If you don't have something intellectual to say in threads ...

>then don't.

 

I absolutely love it when someone whose command of standard English grammar would be below-par for a second grade special education student tries to lecture someone else on what is intellectual.

 

>until you make comments of actual SUBSTANCE I won't

>be responding to you in ANY thread.

 

So, when will this little rule take effect? You're going to respond by saying that you're not going to respond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott,my post contained no back handed slaps at anyone.My points to you were plain and you were the subject of my post.Stop trying to deflect this off of yourself and onto others.

You are not apologising sincerly.You are apologizing for the style in which your post was written-big difference,you know this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come on, Big Guy!

Scott's never wrong. He didn't behave badly. We did & that caused him to sink to our level. By claiming to merely react, he shifts the blame for his own actions onto others.

I used to think Scott was an attractive guy with potential. Now, I'm convinced that he's just an insecure little brat with delusions of grandeur. He's not even smart enough to realize that he's the repository of ALL of the answers to EVERYTHING.

He's a pathetic, worthless nothing & he allows himself to measure his self-worth by whether guys accept a price for him without question. The kid's a fucking mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now Erik-I do not think Scott is a big mess.I like him.I like you.I would love to see the two of you wrestle to see who gets to be top.I do wish you boys could get along a little better-you have more in common than you think I would guess-and that is where the problem,if there is a problem,may lie.

 

But I can only afford one of you and I guess we know which one of you that is :+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 2004

>Greg Scott aka Erik Douglas is not fresh meat. x( He has

>been escorting for over 2 years.

>

>I know this because I hired him (several times) in the

>past...and no complaints.

>

>So let's not present him as though he is a new-comer. :p

>

>

 

I had seen his ad on American Male at least 6 months ago but could not place him till you mentioned his OTHER name. Now this confirms that once again Scott Adler is trying to rip off the reading cients of this forum.

 

Scott claims he is fresh meat, claims he is his prodigym now what do you claim Scott, insanity?

 

---/

 

The years go by so quickly one year is always so yesteryear, but why me, not me, oh these wires are so tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL! I like you, Big Guy, but...

 

>I would love to see the two of you wrestle to see who gets

>to be top.

 

I'd sooner cut off my testicles with a rusty paperclip.

 

>you have more in common than you think I would

>guess

 

I just don't see that.

 

>But I can only afford one of you and I guess we know which one

>of you that is

 

As long as you're enjoying yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...