Escort Fees

[ErikMcAlister]

Scott... how long are you going to pretend that you're the only enlightened one & EVERYONE ELSE just doesn't get it?

 

>If someone takes

>less money, that’s a SERIOUS jolt to their self esteem.

 

Why's that? It just doesn't make any sense to me that you'd say that, unless you've already got self-esteem issues anyway.

 

>I mean, if someone pays you less

>for your creative field, are you thinking less of yourself as

>a person?

 

No. I'm thinking that whatever the service I provide & the price I've set don't match that particular person's needs. It has nothing to do with my value as a person. Quite frankly, I don't measure my self-worth by whatever someone else thinks. I'm surely not willing to let it be injured by someone who might not agree with me. You seem to do so all too readily.

 

 

>Escorts are individuals and when they lower their

>price, they need to evaluate their value to themselves as

>people

 

Not really. They need to just evaluate the simple economics of the situation. Suppose I have 250 more pages of cases to read one night. Someone calls & offers (for example) 2 hours at $300 when 2 hours would normally be (for example) $350. I'm probably less likely to take him up on it than if I had completed all of my reading & was just sitting around hanging out. PLEASE NOTE how my value as a person never entered the equation there. Why on earth would you let someone you've not met make you question your value as a person?

 

>How is that having it both ways. I’m setting prices and

>making it EASIER for clients.

 

You think that by stamping your foot you're going to establish strict rules of behavior. I hope you enjoy exasperation.

 

>By offering rates

>pertaining to the service I’m in essence negotiating for you

 

Oh, but it so demeans the client when you negotiate for him! When that happens, he must re-evaluate his worth as a person. Clients are people, too.

[SAdler]

>Were these e-mails that were actually sent from other people

>(besides Bobby Thompson) or were they e-mails yous ent to

>yourself from various e-mail addresses?

>

I would give you a list (and Bobby and I IM -- we don't email) but that would defeat the purpose of them privately emailing me.

 

>>Frankly at this point, I'd rather people see me for what I

>am

>>-- honest and blunt.

>

>Really? Let's see what an escort had to say about negotiating

>fees in their escort ad.

>

>[blockquote]I'm a freshman swimmer in college looking to

>pay off my tuition. I'm available for everything from a nice

>time on the town for dinner, to a massage, to a hot night of

>savage and passionate fucking. I would prefer if you were

>local but will travel as far West as Thousand Oaks and as East

>as West LA . As I said I'm a swimmer, former High school

>captain so I have the body. I'm 5'10, 155 pounds with short

>curly dirty blonde hair - Imagine Ryan

>Phillipe in Cruel Intentions. My eyes are hazel and I'm told

>they're some of my best features. I'm told my other best

>feature is my 8"s of thickness. My

>favorite thing to do with that thickness is shove it in my

>mouth. Yeah you heard right. I can suck myself off and do it

>whenever possible. The

>advantage to that is that while I'm shoving my dick in

>someone's ass, I can also go down on them at the same time. I

>can even suck myself off while I get fucked. Rates are

>negotiable and reasonable. I tend to serve a more elite

>clientele. Hope to hear from you![/blockquote]

>

>Who might have said this? Why none other than Scott Adler

>herself! (She who doesn't negotiate and doesn't advertise

>anywhere else but on this site)

>

>http://www.nakedjock.com/escort/losangeles/lascott/

 

How funny. Now this ad was not placed by me to my knowledge. Further more, even if it WERE placed by me it would have been when I was 16 as thats how old I am in those pictures. Did you neglect to copy THAT part from the other thread? Very slick. I would suggest deleting those pix in case of a raid

 

Meanwhile, nakedjock.com has gotten the same email as erados and big cock society. I did not post that ad and it needs to come down immediately. Check the email address on there. That eMail hasn't been used since Summer of 2002! Way to bring something out of context, do your research and you'll learn how to put forth a RELEVANT arguement!

>

>People getting walked on?? I am SHOCKED! I thought once the

>"mean girls" got kicked off this board that a gentleman's club

>was supposed to arise, and yet here's Scott claiming that

>NOTHING HAS CHANGED. How can that be? Boston Guy? Tampa

>Yankee?

>

It's just sad that according to one email from a posting client, "remember, you have a life and are smart, those queens on those boards have no life, that's why they are on there all the time and they are not near as smart as they think they are."

 

I swear it's like a fan club. I love it. LOL.

[SAdler]

Because it gives me something to do over my morning coffee which I just finished. Forget the fact that morning for me is 12 noon here LOL.

[SAdler]

>Scott... how long are you going to pretend that you're the

>only enlightened one & EVERYONE ELSE just doesn't get it?

 

I'm not pretending anything. And it's not a matter of ONE side. It's a matter of UNDERSTANDING each other's sides. I can completely acknowledge and respect what they’re saying. I might think they’re wrong but the fact is that they can’t validate other people’s opinions. So to answer your question …. Until I stop have coffee in the morning or they get it 

 

>Why's that? It just doesn't make any sense to me that you'd

>say that, unless you've already got self-esteem issues

>anyway.

 

Again. Put things IN CONTEXT and don’t just respond to what’s convenient for you.

>

>No. I'm thinking that whatever the service I provide & the

>price I've set don't match that particular person's needs. It

>has nothing to do with my value as a person. Quite frankly, I

>don't measure my self-worth by whatever someone else thinks.

>I'm surely not willing to let it be injured by someone who

>might not agree with me. You seem to do so all too readily.

 

You answered my question for me. It was rhetorical. The point was that it’s NOT the same. Creative services can be replaced by other people. When someone hires an escort, the idea is that they’re hiring a PERSON. When someone bargains, that’s being called into question. I’m not saying I’m injured or hurt, I’m saying that’s a psychological response and if people were more compassionate and socially courteous it wouldn’t be an issue

>

>Not really. They need to just evaluate the simple economics

>of the situation. Suppose I have 250 more pages of cases to

>read one night. Someone calls & offers (for example) 2 hours

>at $300 when 2 hours would normally be (for example) $350.

>I'm probably less likely to take him up on it than if I had

>completed all of my reading & was just sitting around hanging

>out. PLEASE NOTE how my value as a person never entered the

>equation there. Why on earth would you let someone you've not

>met make you question your value as a person?

 

Ah but yes. You’re assuming all escorts are hard up for cash at that point and need to be working at all times. That works for you. And you’re entitled to your opinion. Most people would rather be given the option to set a price rather than have it set for you.

>

>You think that by stamping your foot you're going to establish

>strict rules of behavior. I hope you enjoy exasperation.

 

I’m stamping no foot and experiencing no exasperation. I’m simply amused.

>

>Oh, but it so demeans the client when you negotiate for him!

>When that happens, he must re-evaluate his worth as a person.

>Clients are people, too.

 

That was completely out of left field and COMPLETELY unparalleled and irrelevant.

[ErikMcAlister]

>I would suggest deleting those pix in case of a raid

 

Earlier, the genius said that there was nothing illegal about the pictures. Which is it, Scott?

 

>do your research and you'll

>learn how to put forth a RELEVANT arguement!

 

Buy a dictionary & you'll learn that argument has only one E. I expect next we'll be treated to some lame 'oh, but the dialect leaves it open to interpretation' nonsense again. That, rather than admit your mistake, is your m.o. when you're corrected.

 

>I swear it's like a fan club.

 

I assure you, it is NOTHING like a fan club.

[ErikMcAlister]

>You answered my question for me. It was rhetorical. The

>point was that it’s NOT the same.

 

The point is that it IS.

 

>When someone hires an escort, the

>idea is that they’re hiring a PERSON. When someone bargains,

>that’s being called into question.

 

Only if the person is insecure about who he is as a person. For the well-adjusted, it isn't a problem.

 

>You’re assuming all escorts are hard up for cash

>at that point and need to be working at all times.

 

No, I'm not. If you're not doing it for the money, or to bizarrely validate what you feel is your worth, don't charge. If it is such a hobby & you don't need to do it, but only do it because you enjoy it, DO NOT CHARGE to see people. Then you'll take ZERO umbrage over negotiating.

 

>>Oh, but it so demeans the client when you negotiate for him!

>

>>When that happens, he must re-evaluate his worth as a person.

>

>>Clients are people, too.

>

>That was completely out of left field and COMPLETELY

>unparalleled and irrelevant.

 

You're not God, creampuff. You're not the arbiter of relevance. I think my statement demonstrated the utter silliness of your continued prattling on.

[noviceny]

OK, just experienced a real life story about escort fees.

 

I have to cut back on other expenses if I want to hire. It has been relatively easy to cut back on certain expenses during a month's time, in order to finance a little fun. However, I usually only budget for $200 (plus parking...fucken NYC!!!!), and on occasion $250.

 

Today, I was interested in a guy that has no reviews...a seemingly new guy, or at least unknown to me. As we were talking, he seemed cool and I figured alright this may be good. When I asked him the rate (which I rarely have to do cause its usually stated in a review or on a advertisement) he paused and said "$300" I thought and said that was out of my range and figured that we be it. He said to me, "What would you be willing to pay?" I responded that I was thinking more of $200. I did feel a little uncomfortable about "bargaining" but it really was a case where I couldnt afford an extra $100 and even if I had it, would I be willing to spend it on an unknown, with no recommendation ? The guy responded, "OK, we can do that" I was fucken blown away !!! At first I thought that maybe the guy was just giving a price to see if I would take it, and then I though, "well maybe he usually gets $300" Either way, we set up an appointment

 

If the escort posted $300 I would not have even made the call cause thats just out of my league. However, I dont feel I was disrespectful to the guy cause I didnt try to bargain with him...however, I still feel kind of weird accepting the lower rate...anyone have any ideas why ?

[JT Brooklyn]

Novice-Novice-Novice...Your "Buyer's Remorse" is Scary! LOL Your Having your "Fun time"..The "Workin Guy" is "Workin".. Everybody is Happy! Even with a "Hospital Bill", IF you are "Paying Cash"..The Bill is Reduced...! NO Biggie! There are many Great Guys "Workin" who will Negotiate.. The ones that Won't ..Usually have many Regular Clients.. Hooray for them!! LOL :+

[Txpaytoplay]

I want to take Novice with me the next time I go car shopping. Especially if he gets a 33% mark down. Ha, ha, Hope you had fun.;-)

[Txpaytoplay]

I want to take Novice with me the next time I go car shopping. Especially if he gets a 33% mark down. Ha, ha, Hope you had fun.;-)

[noviceny]

Tx,

 

I am the fucken man when it comes to buying a car !!!! I got my Honda Civic (yeah, I said it...I drive a Honda Civic..and what !!??) for 13,000 brand new...I went in with a fucken spreadsheet and 2 dealerships wouldnt even talk to me.

 

I just got back from a very fun time...it was a little bit shorter than an hour (45 minutes) but it was a great time and the guy really gave me a break on the price so I happily came and went :-)

 

BTW this is the first guy that ever made me feel like I would do any thing that he wanted...yes, I said it...this guy made me feel (physically) so good that I would have let him do whatever he wanted to me. That being said, I didnt let him do whatever he wanted to me cause my other head still rules and tells me to be careful. Had a very safe and very fun time.

 

As for my guilt/buyers remorse, well the funny thing is I understand what Scott is saying. In my heart, I kind of agree with everything Scott says, even though I dont think it makes total sense to me (although it makes a good deal of sense to me). I tend to think that its just that Im kind of soft when it comes to money and giving people what they are worth or maybe even more. In Brazil, I bargained a little for goods, but I feel dirty and wrong to bargain for "flesh" I dont know if Im right or wrong, but I know that I wouldnt feel good doing it and will always opt for saying no thank you rather than bargaining. I would rather not fulfill my desire to get off at the expense of having to feel that way and potentially making someone else feel bad. Again, maybe escorts would feel bad and would be happy to get the money, but I dont like being the person to make that decision. If I cant afford it, then I wont attempt it.

[noviceny]

Tx,

 

I am the fucken man when it comes to buying a car !!!! I got my Honda Civic (yeah, I said it...I drive a Honda Civic..and what !!??) for 13,000 brand new...I went in with a fucken spreadsheet and 2 dealerships wouldnt even talk to me.

 

I just got back from a very fun time...it was a little bit shorter than an hour (45 minutes) but it was a great time and the guy really gave me a break on the price so I happily came and went :-)

 

BTW this is the first guy that ever made me feel like I would do any thing that he wanted...yes, I said it...this guy made me feel (physically) so good that I would have let him do whatever he wanted to me. That being said, I didnt let him do whatever he wanted to me cause my other head still rules and tells me to be careful. Had a very safe and very fun time.

 

As for my guilt/buyers remorse, well the funny thing is I understand what Scott is saying. In my heart, I kind of agree with everything Scott says, even though I dont think it makes total sense to me (although it makes a good deal of sense to me). I tend to think that its just that Im kind of soft when it comes to money and giving people what they are worth or maybe even more. In Brazil, I bargained a little for goods, but I feel dirty and wrong to bargain for "flesh" I dont know if Im right or wrong, but I know that I wouldnt feel good doing it and will always opt for saying no thank you rather than bargaining. I would rather not fulfill my desire to get off at the expense of having to feel that way and potentially making someone else feel bad. Again, maybe escorts would feel bad and would be happy to get the money, but I dont like being the person to make that decision. If I cant afford it, then I wont attempt it.

[BewareofNick]

>How funny. Now this ad was not placed by me to my knowledge.

>Further more, even if it WERE placed by me it would have been

>when I was 16 as thats how old I am in those pictures. Did

>you neglect to copy THAT part from the other thread? Very

>slick. I would suggest deleting those pix in case of a raid

>

 

Dear me, Scott, you're not a very good liar. How would someone have gotten ahold of those types of pictures of you at 16? The reality of the situation is that you DID post that profile and you were 18. I suppose that much like Benjamin Nicholas, you are dishonest about your age.

[Guest 2004]

>>How funny. Now this ad was not placed by me to my

>knowledge.

>>Further more, even if it WERE placed by me it would have

>been

>>when I was 16 as thats how old I am in those pictures. Did

>>you neglect to copy THAT part from the other thread? Very

>>slick. I would suggest deleting those pix in case of a raid

>>

>

>Dear me, Scott, you're not a very good liar. How would

>someone have gotten ahold of those types of pictures of you at

>16? The reality of the situation is that you DID post that

>profile and you were 18. I suppose that much like Benjamin

>Nicholas, you are dishonest about your age.

>

>

 

Scott at this point are you trying to convince us or yourself that you didn't post that ad?

 

---/

I wasn't such a bad year, was I, no I wasn't so stop telling me I was so yesterday.

[modelscoutnyc]

>Very happy to be in the minority on this one. I would gladly

>skip a session or two with less expensive escorts to afford

>someone like Tristan Waters. Try hiring a really good escort

>for $200 in NY City. Yes bargaining may work on occasion, but

>probably not with the likes of Rick and Derek. Put me in the first

>category any day.

>Hey I hired a truly great escort this week for only $300 for

>two hours,

>but his rates will go up quickly once he is better known, if

>he decides to continue escorting.

>

>This topic has been discussed endlessly on the messsage

>center, often by the same people saying the exact same things

>word for word.

 

 

Your not in the minoity on this one, I like my men just like my cars. I owe 2 Benz, I like them elite,built tough, looking good, and a smooth enjoyable ride. Wheather I am on top or bottom. I would never call an escort an try to talk him down on his rate that is totally TACKY. The guy that begin this thread acts as if he is a victim to escort rates being high. If you want to see a particular guy that is not in your BUDGET then you clearly skip them. Don't whine about their rates or discredit the escorts that charge higher rates. I have been hiring guys for over 14 years, of course in 1990-93 the rates were cheaper than today, back then $175 - $200 was top dollar. Most boys were on pagers, an internet advertising was no existant, all we had was rag magazines. Just because a guy is expensive does not mean they are good escorts either, thats why I enjoy this website so much because of the review process, it helps give you a general idea of how they are as an escort. Some of the guys I have hired are Talvin DeMachio first porn star I ever hired, Haus Weston 2nd Porn Star,Trent Fosters,Nick German, Jamie Lee,Ricardo Milos, Gino Brazil,(just say have thing for hot Brazilians) Caesar of LA(recent hire FANTASTIC), Lorenzo of LA, Justin of LA, just name a few all these guys are well above 250 depending what your requesting, they are all professional yes he is worth every penny.

 

I have hired couple of guys that were $300+ dollars an clearly was not worth $50 for what type of experiece it was, very mechanical. There are tons of guys out here $200 or less, so just shop in the range your looking for, your clearly not looking for escort for a quality experience. Your just looking for SEX with anything with a dick or ass, basically a hustler. When I hire , I want QUALITY and everyone knows quality cost. I'm 48yr goodlooking guy, great shape and getting sex is not an issue for me, I hire escorts as a luxury, like fine dining. I have esquisite taste an want the BEST on the menu. If I just wanted to get off, I go to the chat rooms or one of the m4m sex sites, local book store, cruise spots there is always a willing mouth, ass, or dick for everyones taking.

 

I remember 5 years ago I saw a young man in Chicago, he had excellent pictures with rate of $150- $180. He was really hot an awesome in the sack, very interactive. He walked away with $300, I hired him again in Chicago 2 years later his rate was $300. I asked him at the end of our second session why did he increase his rate. He said "I feel my service was at this level, there lots of guys out here that do not do 1/3 of what I do nor look as good as I do an charge $200- $250. I felt thats what average escort rates an I am above average." I told him I couldn't aggree with him more and tipped him also.

 

You get what you pay for, somtimes being a thrifty shopper you do find good deals, but in time when you really want something special you save the money get quality.

[modelscoutnyc]

Sadler,

 

I am 48 years old an when I read your post, I knew exactly what your meaning when you said "old queens". I didn't take offense, Your post was right on the MARK when it comes to escort rates.But even though I knew what you ment there other's that may not an get offensive. Sometime in order to get a point accross you stick to the facts w/o usind descriptive adjectives.

[modelscoutnyc]

>I have never bargained. I think it would be insulting to the

>escort who has decided on what his time is worth. If I think

>it is too much, then he is out of my league, and I move on to

>someone else.

>

>Secretly, I figure that if I bargain, he will bargain out his

>services to me as well, not being top-notch, since I am not

>paying his full fee.

>

 

That is exactly what I feel should happen if someone was to barin their rates down, if your not paying the fullrate, why should you get the fullservice treatement.

[JT Brooklyn]

IMHO..Model.. Deserves his own "Client" Website! He Apparently is in his own "UpScale" League! Then again, Those who "Play in that UpScale League" Donot Boither reading M4M..They are too busy workin on their 3rd Mercedes..Novice and Bklyn were just not Destined to Play in Model's League! LOL :+

[BewareofNick]

>When you're 20, 25 seems old, and 30 ancient. That makes me

>a fossil, but Scott manages to treat me quite well. ;-)

>

>Scott is known to many for his sometimes youthfully

>inflamatory remarks -- both in email and in person. Call me a

>dolt, but I like it -- reminds me of his youth and passion.

>And what passion he has :9

 

Uncle, it's not the youthful exuberance that offends anyone. It's the incredible level of dishonesty with which Scott is conducting himself.

 

Consider that he posted an escort ad when he was 18 and in that ad, he stated that rates are reasonable and negotiable. This is contrary to his current stance of rates are unreasonable and not negotiable. Yet rather than simply say my opinion on the subject has changed over the last few years, he says that the ad was never posted by him and made demands of the websites carrying the ad that they remove them post haste.

 

Consider that he said he has never advertised anywhere except on this website, and yet he placed ads on nakedjock, erados and bigcocksociety.

 

Consider that he maintains that he was 16 in the pictures in those ads. This means that he either started escorting when he was 16 (which is possible I suppose) or that his true age is actually 2 yearsolder than what he currently claims (granted, this is better than the 10 year gap in Benjamin Nicholas' chronological age and his posted one). If he was 16, how did anyone get ahold of such pictures?

 

Consider that he calls clients old queens, trolls and the act of engaging in sex with them "as something considered disgusting", but turns around and back pedals faster than Ralph Reed at an Indian Casino.

 

Obviously, Scott has learned well at the feet of Benjamin Nicholas (and no, that's NOT a good thing, with apologies to M Diddy).

[Guest 2004]

>>When you're 20, 25 seems old, and 30 ancient. That makes

>me

>>a fossil, but Scott manages to treat me quite well. ;-)

>>

>>Scott is known to many for his sometimes youthfully

>>inflamatory remarks -- both in email and in person. Call me

>a

>>dolt, but I like it -- reminds me of his youth and passion.

>>And what passion he has :9

>

>Uncle, it's not the youthful exuberance that offends anyone.

>It's the incredible level of dishonesty with which Scott is

>conducting himself.

>

 

UB Scott might be amazing in bed no one is questioning that ability. But as BoN points out you and/or anyone would have to be blind to the lies and minipulation Scott has been embarking on in this MC.

 

This isn't youthfull thrills, this is outright hurt to people like his clients and potential clients.

 

If anyone reads what he has written here and can still hire him I have a bridge for sale, contact me.

 

---/

The years went by one after another and I sat on the bench watching my friends and foes have their 15 minutes. Then suddenly it was my turn to shine, my spotlight, my cheer. Then quickly they took all of that away from me. Oh the sorrow only a year can know. BTW: 1999 was actually gay regardless of what he claimed.

[JT Brooklyn]

2004..If your Talking about the "BKLYN BRIDGE" Sorry..Your Too Late..I SOLD IT 3x's already! The Sucker's are starting to catch on! lol :+

[Uncle Bill]

RE: Scott Adler

 

There really isn't any point in my debating how Scott actually treats his clients with people who have never been his clients. You don't like him -- fine, don't hire him. I hired him the first time because of a bunch of flak he was taking on this board about his rates at THAT time, and I've come back to him on many an occassion with much satisfaction.

 

Just to put a couple of things into perspective, his rate structure back then was exactly the same as it is today -- it is tailored to the services and length of time requested. He prefers not to publish it for what I consider to be valid reasons that I will keep to myself, but all you have to do is ask him, and he'll explain his rate structure to you very clearly. He has adjusted his rate downward at times for EXISTING clients at HIS initiation as a kind of frequent flyer reward (although there was one time when I initiated the discussion -- but that was only to ask if he'd consider lowering his fee a bit to make a 3-way more financially feasible, which he readily did). I don't know about that old ad, but it definitely has pictures of him before he turned 18 (I first met him shortly after he had turned 18, which I know for a fact, and I can tell that the pics in that ad are earlier).

 

Anyway, if you think he's a liar and/or are hurt by his comments, by all means don't hire him. If you like what I've had to say about him in the reviews I've submitted (which I still totally stand by), then you might want to consider him. Is he on the high end of non-porn-star escorts in L.A. in terms of fees? I'd say so, but not really by much for extended sessions. Is he worth his fee? I obviously think so, but that's a highly subjective matter. Do I wish his fee was lower? Of course, and it has kept me from hiring him as much as I would like, but it hasn't kept me from not hiring him at all, LOL. Has he ever tried to get more money (or anything else of value) out of me other than the fee we agreed to up front? Never (not even to the extent of pushing for expensive restaurants). Do I wish that he didn't make all the posts he has? Absolutely, but he hasn't said anything that's changed my opinion of him since I have other experiences with him to base that on.

 

Anyway, I've been holding my tongue for a while and finally decided to once again put in my two cents.

[BewareofNick]

RE: Scott Adler

 

>There really isn't any point in my debating how Scott

>actually treats his clients with people who have never been

>his clients. You don't like him -- fine, don't hire him. I

>hired him the first time because of a bunch of flak he was

>taking on this board about his rates at THAT time, and I've

>come back to him on many an occassion with much satisfaction.

 

No one has disputed the quality of his services. I was simply discussing the dishonesty with which he has conducted himself on this board.

 

> He has adjusted his rate downward at times for

>EXISTING clients at HIS initiation as a kind of frequent flyer

>reward (although there was one time when I initiated the

>discussion -- but that was only to ask if he'd consider

>lowering his fee a bit to make a 3-way more financially

>feasible, which he readily did).

 

So in other words, or more precisely, in HIS words, rates are reasonable AND negotiable. Why then has Scott felt the need to perpetuate a lie that he doesn't negotiate? Thank you for coming forward with additional proof of his dishonesty.

 

> I don't know about that old

>ad, but it definitely has pictures of him before he turned 18

>(I first met him shortly after he had turned 18, which I know

>for a fact, and I can tell that the pics in that ad are

>earlier).

 

Perhaps you should go into practice with Senator Dr. Frist. You met him after he told you he had turned 18. That does not mean he was 18. You ignore the rather obvious question: How did someone get those pictures of him at the tender age of "16"? How did they happen to know he would choose the stage name Scott? How did they happen to know his college e-mail address 2 years before he went to college? How can someone have the obvious sitting in front of them and still not see it.

 

>Anyway, if you think he's a liar and/or are hurt by his

>comments, by all means don't hire him.

 

That Scott is a liar is not in dispute. We've already established that with fact based information. To be hurt by Scott, I would have to care about his opinion of me. I do not.

[Guest 2004]

RE: Scott Adler

 

>There really isn't any point in my debating how Scott

>actually treats his clients with people who have never been

>his clients.

 

How do you know this?

 

You don't like him -- fine, don't hire him. I

>hired him the first time because of a bunch of flak he was

>taking on this board about his rates at THAT time, and I've

>come back to him on many an occassion with much satisfaction.

 

I haven't made a single post questioning Scott's ability in bed.

 

> He has adjusted his rate downward at times for

>EXISTING clients at HIS initiation as a kind of frequent flyer

>reward (although there was one time when I initiated the

>discussion -- but that was only to ask if he'd consider

>lowering his fee a bit to make a 3-way more financially

>feasible, which he readily did).

 

So he does negotiate, after all this is mainly what he has turned this thread's topic to. Therefore, you have proved several poster's point once again he is a liar.

 

> I don't know about that old

>ad, but it definitely has pictures of him before he turned 18

>(I first met him shortly after he had turned 18, which I know

>for a fact, and I can tell that the pics in that ad are

>earlier).

 

How do you actually know? If they were earlier than 18 again you confirm what many have said. He lied about placing the ad and his age. What he had done was illegal and possibly by hiring him near that time you too created a crime. Nice of Scott to care so much about his clients that he places them in a potential legal bind.

 

>

>Anyway, if you think he's a liar and/or are hurt by his

>comments, by all means don't hire him.

 

You completely miss the point here UB. First he is a liar. Including the fresh meat post that turned out to be a long time escort that he presented as something new. He called a friend of yours some very rude names and mocked his looks, he then tried a self serving apology that didn't fly. He lied about the pics and ad, in fact if one were to believe him the 3 ads currently found he had nothing to do with. He must have a fairy add godmother. Plus he described having sex with his clients as disgusting and you are a client, wow.

 

I really wish your post would have specifically addressed the issues. Instead you have chosen to post a glorified review without the sexual details of hiring Scott. The latter not in question in this thread.

 

Just remember next time you're in bed with him and he tells you how great looking and how good feeling you are his own words,he finds his clients repulsive and disgusting but less so when they pay him large sums of money.

 

BTW since Scott stopped posting I assume he no longer drinks coffee in the morning, too bad he has you trying to make everything go away.

 

The documentation is there, it wouldn't go away.

 

---/

In my year a certain escort was either 17, 19, 22 or more.

[taylorky]

RE: Scott Adler

 

>

>Just remember next time you're in bed with him and he tells

>you how great looking and how good feeling you are his own

>words,he finds his clients repulsive and disgusting

>

 

>

hey hey.....hell must have finally frozen over....scott adler and i agree on something....we both think uncle bill is repulsive and disgusting,perhaps for different reasons (scott adler has too have sex with him ewwwww) and i think a married father who takes money from his kids to pay young boys he fucks is not much of a father.