Jump to content

Roman in NYC...know him ?


noviceny
This topic is 6912 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

I once engaged a Roman who was at Maximum and also on rentboy. Total turn off. Came in, immediately striped to an ugly thong, threw a large towel on the bed and said, "Here!" He was husky and had a big, fat dick, but his technique was crude. When he left, he tore up my address and phone number, which he'd scrawled on a slip of paper, and said, "See that? I won't rob you." Your move -- if it's the same creep.

 

Lankypeters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>The Roman that I hired in NYC, at traveller's suggestion,

>turned out to be more concerned about money than anything

>else.

 

I probably saw him a dozen times over the years. Still recommend him. A clipped toy poodle to the poster who can identify his latest nom de guerre.

 

Later.

 

PS. Unleashed was pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two Romans in NYC and we may be getting them mixed up in this thread.

I saw a Roman whose reviews are listed on this site under Roman-Chicago/New York. This is the same one that Traveller reviewed long ago. He is just as the reviews described, tall, great body, very well hung and a great top. His profile says versatile. I can't attest to that, but he was a great guy, very sexy and very ready to go at it.

 

The descriptions given in the negative posts here don't exactly sound like him to me, either physically or personality wise. But I don't know for sure. There is another escort who advertised a lot for a while whose reviews are listed simply Roman-NYC. Him I don't know.

 

It is true that the Roman I saw (Roman-Chicago/NYC) uses very old pictures. Those have been there for quite a while, and one of them is now being used for an ad by "Arman" sometimes on Rentboy. Again, I don't know if that's the guy I saw or not.

 

But I do concur with Traveller that the Roman I saw was terrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, me again. I just double checked the existing reviews and there are two other Romans listed in NYC reviews, Roman #2 and Roman #3. I don't know either of these. There also used to be this other one who was simply Roman-NYC (but not Chicago). It's all confusing.

 

But the Roman I wrote about before, whom Traveller and I recommend, could not be described as "husky" I don't think. So I don't think he's the one Lankypeter saw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...