Some escorts' rudeness is mind-boggling!

[VaHawk]

Whatever the hype allows.

[BobbyThompson]

Instead of condensing the last post so people didn't get bored, I'm going to leave yours intact so people can see just who cruel you are.

I posted based on the exact content responding to what was obvious in Goldenguy's post, whereas you go out of your way to make assumptions on my life, education, and character, when you remain woefully ignorant of anything about me. My post was relatively innocuous and you took it as an opportunity to be as rude as you wish. Ironic, in a thread of escort rudeness.

 

>LMFAO, is this a real post? Just because someone states that

>he feels that escort fees are way overboard, doesn't imply

>that someone "dislikes" or is "envious" of escorts!

>

 

Read his original post. It is dripping with envy and disdain. I'm not talking about envy over earning, but over lifestyle.

 

>Of course you are so VERSATILE, that if your ass is less in

>command than you wish, you can always MASSAGE, even though you

>have no QUALIFICATIONS or experience as a masseuse! BELIEVE

>IT OR NOT! there are people looking for a TRUE massuese whose

>talents include a PROFESSIONAL massage and not merely some

>vain self-important TWINK boy whose massage abilities consists

>only of twirling his girly fingers and posing!

 

I am actually very adept at massages. I am just as good as any CMT, as most of my reviews suggest, but if I were to go to receive a certificate, which requires no qualifications, it would make not a bit of difference in my technique.

 

>No one assumes anything, but you have no problem, in turn

>about making general assumptions about others, mostly unkind,

>in this public forum, do you?

>>

 

Not an assumption nor an assumption of others, but one specific person who's comments were so littered with the obvious that I didn't have to farm for assumptions.

 

 

>And I hope you treat the next client who expresses an opinion

>different than yours, on the HB MC, with more than the

>pre-judged hatred that you treated this client to!

 

First of all, he is not a client of mine. Second, I haven't prejudged him, I have judged him on the content of his post, entirely on the words he's chosen to represent himself, and only in relation to his subject. I didn't judge him on anything other than what he brought up, unlike what you did for every word of my post.

>

>But I doubt it, as you are so SPECIAL! x( :-( After all, I

>can't even IMAGINE how much education, talent and God given

>gifts it takes to spread one's legs and take a cock up one's

>butt!

 

Since you are referring to me, a brief and very cursory resume.

My education: Private Catholic school from kindergartern to junior high; high school at an all-boy college prep school taught by brothers, where I had my first semester of college completed at SEVENTEEN before I even graduated. Having been enrolled in several colleges, my consistently top tier placement in the class (unless of course I venture into math and science...eeee).

 

Talent: Play classical piano and can sit down and improvise something euphonic for as long as one likes.

 

God-given gifts? Well, that qualifies as genetics, the one *requirement* of escorting, and I think I do just fine.

 

I'll wait for you to spew your unrestrained and unfiltered vitriol at this post, which I'm sure you will attack word for word and continue to berate my character and upbringing.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Hey Bobby,

 

Nice post, controlled, responsive, on point. Exactly what I have come to expect from you. You suffer arrogant SOBs better than I.

 

Some guys have made reasonable comments in this thread such as the originator complaining, with merit it seems to me, about a couple of individual escorts and some others with individual cases. That also includes opinions on escort rates which is fair to comment on as was your response. Not that everyone has to agree. I tend to take the other side of the argument more but I respect your view and concede some points to you. What is so hard about taking a different opinion without getting ugly? Seems beyond the capacity of some.

 

And some have made sweeping bad-mouth generalizations with their broad brushes and others uttered their paranoia about about what is said behind 'their backs' and made it seem as though that is a escort-wide practice too. (Yeah, paranoia is the right term.) There are some bad apples out there... some escorts are not a pretty picture. Neither are some clients exactly peaches as examples surfaced in this thread. Not surprising that you were attacked for giving no more than just your thoughtful opinions from the other side of the fence. That alone is enough to set some off. Then again, I think a change in humdity can set some off.

[Doug69]

>Nice post, controlled, responsive, on point. Exactly what I

>have come to expect from you. You suffer arrogant SOBs better

>than I.

 

Good, panting doggie. If Bobby came here and recited the telephone book - or even if he came here and copied pages from Mein Kampf into his posts - you'd be crawling behind him as fast as you could to tell him how brilliant and elegant and restrained and insightful his post is, and would then prattle on yet again about how it shows that he's the beacon of maturity, human goodness, and wisdom. Then, tongue hanging out, gasping for air, you'd ask him, rhetorically, yet again: "Are you SURE you're only 19, Bobby??"

 

Can't you just jerk off thinking about his tight boy asshole without trying to pretend that he has anything erudite or worthwhile to say? Why must you deceitfully convert your dirty old man sexual attraction to him into some sort of admiration for his non-existent intellect and charm? Is it that whores can't be hot to you unless you pretend that they're young Victorian gentleman just out of finishing school, or is that your hard cock causes you to think that anything that drools out of a hot kid's mouth is brilliant or fascinating?

 

I see straight guys all the time sitting in restaurants or bars with some hot stupid girl indulging their chatter and pretending that the empty hot air coming out of their mouth is interesting and worthwhile. Straight guys complain all the time about how much it sucks that they have to indulge this chatter from hot girls and pretend that they're interesting and smart just in order to fuck them.

 

Isn't one of the benefits of hiring whores that you get to dispense with that pretense? Why would you want to pay and then STILL pretend that juvenile, cliched chatter and insecure, self-aggrandizing boasting ("I'm a concert pianist and I went to college!") is anything other than what it is? Do you enjoy being a good panting doggie, or have you not come to the realization that you still get to fuck him as long as you have your $20 bills in your hand - no need for the fake ass-kissing?

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

The Secret Lives of Escort

 

The escorts I have had the pleasure to become acquainted with have rarely discussed clients, either specifically or generally. Any such discussions tend to highlight either a tremendous kindness or a notably unfortuante incident, just as Mr. Rumsfield and Ms. Rice might have celebrated over something that went right in Iraq but complaned to one another about what might have gone wrong. In my experience, these conversations, complimentary or otherwise, are minor. Most of them tend to be discussions about handling things which came up, advise, problem solving, something as simple as where to find a good hotel.

 

The fairness of rate issue has been discussed ad naseum on this site. Suffice to say that any client who believes that any escort is making $250 or $300 an hour eight hours of the day is, unfortunately, quite mistaken. Even the most popular flavor of the moment twink on this site is not able to physically see that many clients in one day nor, realistically, are that that many clients who have that kind of resources to spend on an on going, daily basis. As I have stated time and time again, at least in my case, when you take into account the time I spend chatting with clients on line, exchanging e-mails, answering questions and so forth, the actual money earned for the "hour" I spend is not as high as it appears. I particularly think of three clients I saw last month, each of whom needed not only some hand holding both literal and mental, but also links to site on proper prepartion to bottom and other information. I will certainly acknowledge that there are some clients whom I have seen before who re-book where there is far less time spent versus money earned, nonetheless, again at least in my case, I often provide more services at less cost to repeat and regular clients.

 

Finally, to the topic at hand: are some escorts rude? Of course. In my opinion, the response in the case of Wisconsin Tom shows both a lack of professionalism and a lack of common courtesy. I had a similar instance, where a client drove to Los Angeles from another county to attend a charity auction, so yes, this client had "other" business in Los Angeles besides seeing me. However, this client could have elected to drive back the same night or made arrangements to sleep at a friend's. Instead, wanting to make an appointment to see me, he booked and paid for a motel room for the night. If I had a 6 a.m. engagement the next morning, I would never have accepted a 10:00 p.m. appointment, personally. However, if I had accepted such an appointment, I would damn well make sure I had a nap and a wake up call in order to perform not to my client's expectations but to my own of what a client merited.

 

When I first discovered the reviews, I sometimes read them all or most of them, now I rarely read any, but do always look at the Escort Responses. Generally, I am surprised at the escorts who respond, especially those who respond with attacks on clients. Often, any situation has to have two sides and it is rare that a reviewer will simply and spitefully attack. However, if a review is written spitefully and as an attack, this would be readily apparent to anyone else reading a review and were I the escort, unless there was something that really absolutely required a response, I would simply let the reviewer's own words debunk the review. Otherwise, responses such as this one (Wisconsin Tom's) cause the escorts more harm than good.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Slow day at the ranch...

 

So many words... so little content. (Something of an overstatement but I'm feeling generous today. )

 

Speaking of mind boggling...

 

On reflection I am impressed with the fact that you either remembered enough of a post of mine to quote a line or expended the effort to look it up.

[bigguyinpasadena]

[bigguyinpasadena]

Yeah,,,None of that "self agrandizing boasting"around here.

There are LAWYERS,LAWYERS I TELL YOU who find the time in their busy lives to live in this site while charging clients around $15 dollars to fax a single page of text,created by a computer program,to a client.

Talk about RUDE!

Of course that is how they afford their other hobbies,

But god forbid that a hooker actually have a brain,have some real talent and charge accordingly.

Sleazy Lawyers or Hookers?,ummmmm I choose hookers.

This is not meant to be a slight on the good folks who practice law,just a slap to some SLEAZY lawyers who MIGHT be hanging out on this sight.

[VaHawk]

GOD, I LOVE Doug69, and if it weren't for the "gay Nazis", there would hopefully, be more guys who have enough "balls" to call all you sycophantic, piss sucking lap doggies on the carpet!

 

>Can't you just jerk off thinking about his tight boy asshole

>without trying to pretend that he has anything erudite or

>worthwhile to say? Why must you deceitfully convert your

>dirty old man sexual attraction to him into some sort of

>admiration for his non-existent intellect and charm?

 

OH GOD, Doug is SO REAL!! I just LOVE how all these drooling, fat old farts TRY to JUSTIFY their pedophiliac tendencies by imbuing teenaged, cluesless boys with SUPERIOR intellect and maturity! Their fawning is TOTALLY PUTRID!!!

 

 

>Isn't one of the benefits of hiring whores that you get to

>dispense with that pretense? Why would you want to pay and

>then STILL pretend that juvenile, cliched chatter and

>insecure, self-aggrandizing boasting ("I'm a concert pianist

>and I went to college!") is anything other than what it is?

>Do you enjoy being a good panting doggie, or have you not come

>to the realization that you still get to fuck him as long as

>you have your $20 bills in your hand - no need for the fake

>ass-kissing?

 

ONE WOULD THINK SO!

[MiamiLooker]

>GOD, I LOVE Doug69, and if it weren't for the "gay Nazis",

>there would hopefully, be more guys who have enough "balls" to

>call all you sycophantic, piss sucking lap doggies on the

>carpet!

 

You think it takes balls to post anonymously to this or any other message center? How so?

 

 

>OH GOD, Doug is SO REAL!!

 

Your pom-poms are showing....

[pictureframe]

I noticed in today's review of Tom that he tried to invalidate the no show review because he had such a good experience. Some people are really not very smart - how can he even try to defend a "no show"! When Tom himself admitted he was asleep!:+