Would You Hire Him?

[Doug69]

>You see, you are still missing one word in the sentence:

>responses. I refuse to ascribe to the turn the other

>cheek, get walked all over philosophy of some other liberals,

>much to certain people's distress.

 

So you're saying that the only time you engage in negative posts and personal attacks is when someone does it to you first - sort of the adult version of the 5 year-old's claim "She started it"?

 

As you sure you want to claim this? I can assure you it's not true.

[duke37]

Thank you for your post.

 

Jeff

[JamesK840]

In response to an attack, not necessarily on me. Assure away.

[Guest laverite]

In my case, the answer is it depends. One escort here started as a sweet and refreshing voice, but IMO has revealed himself to be a cyncical over-worked ticketron escort. As he moved from innocent escort to hyperactive personal compassion, his posts here have revealed an edge that I don't care for. In a way, I am happy I never let my curiosity get the better of me. Other escorts here have piqued curiosity but less in a sexual paying way as in a "wouldn't it be nice to 'prendre une verre` kind of way".

[paulsf]

I hired Ben Nicholas specificly because of his postings here.

I had always been curious about him, and then after reading

his postings for several months earlier this year, curiosity got

the better of me, and I decided to get in contact with him. It's proved to be a very positve decision for me and we have had some great times.

 

paulsf

[VaHawk]

Once again Doug69, you are 100% on target. I can verify that I have been attacked by JamesK more than once, because like he states, I too was responding to a negative post about me, and not initializing the negative post.

 

But as you state, those who complain about negative postings are very often guilty of the same, and don't think they are being negative because they believe their points of view are sacrosanct, and anyone who disagrees is negative. And the first thing they do, is call for banishment of the other posters from this board. And, if I remember correctly, there was a post by JamesK himself advocating a button to click on to register a vote for banishment. Nope, nothing negative there!

 

I loved your point about all the people who whine about how it keeps the lurkers from joining and posting. How the hell do these whiners have any kind of statistics to back up such an opinion! Have you also noted, how they state their opinions on this topic as most of the posters....where they hell do they get off speaking for most of the posters on this board, did they poll the posters? Of course not, they are only assuming that their personal opinion is a stated fact.

 

I totally agree with your opinion that this would be a super boring board, if it was limited to gushing, sticky sweet postings. As you say, that would certainly drive posters and lurkers to head for the hills to find a more diverse, interesting board.

 

All these goody two shoes postings and attacks and calls for banishmet on the more lively posters has indeed already led to the fleeing of some posters, including my most dearly missed poster of all time FFF. Not to mention causing others, such as ad rian to have to keep changing his user name.

 

I prefer posters who can get as well as they dish, and who can state and argue their views on a variety of topics, even if they are in total contrast against the majority of the posters. They make the board a much livelier place, and from what I've seen most of them never start a negative thread, and most attack only in response to a negative attack against them. If all the Miss Holly-Go-Lightly posters find the responding posts negative, then they shouldn't attack the other posters first.

[VaHawk]

Just my opinion, but threads like these posted by clients or wanna be clients are a much more waste of bandwith. IMO, you sometimes start threads of this ilk, which are mostly intended to flame, and try to stoke those flames not only against escorts, but also against fellow posters.

 

I think you left out a lot of escorts who post here as far as your opinion goes. To name just a few: Rick, Aaron, Franco, Gio, JeffOH, Seaboy4Hire, Steven Draker and TJ.

 

I also disagree with your opinion about Ethan and Benjamin. I like Ethan because he states his honest opinion about topics, and I think that is great. It certainly wouldn't deter me from hiring him.

 

As far as Benjamin goes, it was his postings here that attracted me to him the very most. I registered here because of his postings as they were so positive about being an escort and how to treat a client. It was his postings that made me contact him and hire him, as I knew he was the escort I most wanted to meet, and I really knew I wanted to just to meet as a person. It was one of the best decisions I ever made. I still love his postings and I have never seen anything over zealous or questionable about any of his posts. To this day, he is the only escort that I have hired more than once, and I would still hire him again.

 

I like finding out about escorts via their postings here and wish more would post here, but it is these out of left field negative postings about them, that probably make them not do so.

 

I have contacted other escorts who post/have posted here because their posts led me to email them and based on an exchange of email have proceeded to hire them, including Aaron Scott, David Gartner and Bastian(KS). I personally am really impressed by Seaboy's postings and would definitely inquire about hiring him, if he wasn't 3000 miles away. So far, I have yet to see an escort, I wouldn't contact/hire based on his postings.

[VaHawk]

See below, I just did. Now I guess we'll just have to vote to banish you for your continuing negativite posts on this board. So go ahead and try to rile me up to post a very well deserved counter attack against you, alas, I don't rise to your bait any more.

 

You just prove in spades, Doug69's statements about negative posters who think they aren't negative as stated in his response to JamesK.

 

Now you go off and have a very smiley day. Hope you find someone else you can rile up. I'm certainly glad that obviously I give you a reason to come here and post your hateful attacks against me. How are you going to get your rocks off now that I have totally dismissed you as someone who can rile me up. I guess you'll just have to find someone else.

[VaHawk]

Missed this the first time thru, so thank you Chuck, as I really appreciate your words of support. I agree wholeheartedly with your statements. IMO, it seems that a lot of posters here are really out to trash Benjamin. I am really sick and tired of people attacking and passing final judgement about escorts they have never met. I guess it gives them some kind of feeling of superiority, but it only comes across as pathetic, imo. Of course they have a right to express an opinion about other's posts, but that doesn't entitle them to trash an escort because they don't like his posts.

 

And I see nothing wrong with people who know the escort, to express an opinion that the escort is being wrongfully trashed. Of course, that makes us escort worshippers in their opinion, as their unfounded slander against an escort they don't know should take preference over someone who personally knows the escort.

 

I keep in mind one of HB's prime directives "if you didn't eat the meal, then you can't criticize the restaurant". This board's main purpose is to review escort's that you've met. Praise and recommendation to hire and/or criticism and recommendation to not hire for an escort you have not met is useless to the purpose of this site.

 

Perhaps it is time that HB would impose a fee to non-escorts to enter the mc, as perhaps that would put an end to this mc nonsense.

 

Have a very happy Holiday season. It is good to see you posting again, as you never post anything negative. Lots and lots of hugs to you!

[VaHawk]

Welcome back ad rian/nhlnbaguy/axehabia. It really is good to see you sticking to your true form, regardless of your handle. Eleven days and 56 posts, is that a record?

 

?I am happy I never let my curiosity get the better of

>me.

 

I'd bet you aren't 1/100th as happy as the escort.

[Guest Love Bubble Butt]

>You just prove in spades, Doug69's statements about negative

>posters who think they aren't negative as stated in his

>response to JamesK.

 

I never claimed to not be a negative poster. But I do admit that almost all of the negative posts I do post are about or in response to you. I just don't like you. As to why, se my posting above.

 

 

>How are you going to get your

>rocks off now that I have totally dismissed you as someone who

>can rile me up.

 

I could never get my rocks off having anything to do with you (ugh!) ... even if you paid me a large sum of money. Matter of fact, I think you're about the closest thing to a walking cure for homosexuality there is.

[Flower]

CHEER LEADER (or kiss-ass) OF THE YEAR AWARD GOES TO......

 

>Once again Doug69, you are 100% on target.

****

>But as you state,

*****

>I loved your point about all the people who whine

*****

>I totally agree with your opinion

*****

>As you say,

*****

 

And all of this just in ONE post

 

(drum roll)...and the cheerleader of the year award goes to...hmmmm, such a hard choice....VAHAWK!!!!!! Yayyyy, Bravo, cheers :7 }(

 

http://www.nestofdeath.com/philadelphia/cheer/ARZ/tirza2.jpg

[Guest Love Bubble Butt]

RE: CHEER LEADER (or kiss-ass) OF THE YEAR AWARD GOES TO......

 

I second the motion. (Almost made be barf when I read it. He's not even subtle about it.)

[Doug69]

RE: CHEER LEADER (or kiss-ass) OF THE YEAR AWARD GOES TO......

 

>(drum roll)...and the cheerleader of the year award goes

>to...hmmmm, such a hard choice....VAHAWK!!!!!! Yayyyy, Bravo,

>cheers :7 }(

 

As the originator of the Cheerleading designation, I must say to you, Flower (an emulating follower), that this is so dumb, even for you, for 2 reasons:

 

(1) The last 8 posts or so written to me by VaHawk were devoted to nothing but disagreeing with me rather vigorously and telling me how wrong I was on a variety of topics. After a lengthy exchange of posts in disagreement on several issues, he now writes a post where his view and mine are in accord, and that somehow aburptly transforms him into sycophantic cheerleader? Go read the last 8 posts he wrote to me and tell me how much of a cheerleader he is.

 

(2) The cheerleading designation is properly reserved for those ass-kissing, barren, substance-less posts that do nothing at all, and contribute nothing at all, other than to tell another poster how right or wonderful they are (such as "Great job. You tell him!"). VaHawk did nothing of the kind. Although in agreement with my view, he explained at substantive length what his view was, and why those sermonizers of civility are so delusional. He did anything but cheerlead.

 

I appreciate the flattery of wanting to emulate my posts by using my pictures and and responses. But I must request that you engage in such flattery in the future only by exerting more mental power (close your eyes tightly and concetrate) to understand what it is I have said that you wish to copy.

[Doug69]

> I can verify that

>I have been attacked by JamesK more than once, because like he

>states, I too was responding to a negative post about me, and

>not initializing the negative post.

 

Oh, I know. I've seen those personal attacks by James. The one thing I will say for James, though, is that he tries to be honest. He at least admits that he is a person who both: (a) comes here to lecture others about how awful and destructive personal attacks are; and (b) engages in personal attacks himself against other posters.

 

And while he resorts - by necessity - to the most inane defense ever of: "Well, my personal attacks and insults against others are justifiable and fine; it's other people's personal attacks that are the problem", at least he's honest enough to admit this gaping disparity in his standards, the exemption he gives himself, so that it's apparent how hypocritical he is.

 

Most others who parade themselves around as the Guardians of Civility and Niceness - who preach over and over against "negative posters" - won't admit that they engage in the exact "negative posts" (whatever that means) about other posters that they claim to decry. They will just come here, puke up their little lecture, and then refuse to acknowledge or even address all the negative posts they wrote.

 

It's ironic that such individuals almost invariably claim to hate the "Christian Right" because they condemn things that they themselves engage in, and yet these Defenders of Goodness and Niceness do exactly the same thing.

 

>But as you state, those who complain about negative postings

>are very often guilty of the same, and don't think they are

>being negative because they believe their points of view are

>sacrosanct, and anyone who disagrees is negative.

 

Precisely. Precisely. Precisely.

[Guest laverite]

>I prefer posters who can get as well as they dish, and who can

>state and argue their views on a variety of topics, even if

>they are in total contrast against the majority of the

>posters. They make the board a much livelier place, and from

>what I've seen most of them never start a negative thread, and

>most attack only in response to a negative attack against

>them. If all the Miss Holly-Go-Lightly posters find the

>responding posts negative, then they shouldn't attack the

>other posters first.

 

Once again, I could not agree more with you, Hawk!

[Guest Oren]

i HAVE to!

 

it isn't my intention to attack young benjamin, but i think we need more info...

 

>Actually, i would likely have fun with all escorts (myself

>included) mentioned. They all come across as intelligent,

>well-spoken & versatile guys with much more than just sex to

>offer.

 

i must point out that Ethan was one of the escorts mentioned. just for clarification: do your comments above apply to him as well, or did you forget about him?

 

(ugh.... 3rd person reference for a 1st person situation!)

[Guest Oren]

i HAVE to!

 

it isn't my intention to attack young benjamin, but i think we need more info...

 

>Actually, i would likely have fun with all escorts (myself

>included) mentioned. They all come across as intelligent,

>well-spoken & versatile guys with much more than just sex to

>offer.

 

i must point out that Ethan was one of the escorts mentioned. just for clarification: do your comments above apply to him as well, or did you forget about him?

 

(ugh.... 3rd person reference for a 1st person situation!)

[Guest Oren]

>I am really

>sick and tired of people attacking and passing final judgement

>about escorts they have never met.

 

what if that same escort has also made negative comments about another escort? does he get a pass?

[Guest Oren]

>I am really

>sick and tired of people attacking and passing final judgement

>about escorts they have never met.

 

what if that same escort has also made negative comments about another escort? does he get a pass?

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

RE: i HAVE to!

 

Yes, Ethan included...

 

Even though we've butted heads a little on other topics, it's not like that would influence me against him. His postings are bluntly honest, straight foward & show real smarts: Three qualities that not only make him a force to be reckoned with, but an intelligent one at that.

 

People do get angry with what he may say, but when it comes down to it, this is still a board (and site) founded on the principals of free-speech. HB just can't go around banning people because they're not popular. Wouldn't be much of a site then, would it?

 

As much as i don't enjoy the bickering & flaming of threads, i also know that sifting through the MC can turn up some really good info and conversations. That's why i continue to come back. There are some kickass minds on this board and watching the evolution of a post, from creation to opinion to flameout, is somewhat fascinating.

 

 

... or maybe i'm just a sicko Who knows?

 

 

Warmest Always,

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas

[theDCeBOY]

RE: i HAVE to!

 

hey there...

thanks for the compliment(s).

 

my vote is "sicko" }(

 

JUST KIDDING! seriously... i'm just kidding. folks tend to assume the worst from me at times, so, i just want to point out that my "sicko" comment was a joke. (sometimes i think i do more damage control than saddam... and i can feel myself channelling the saddam character from the south park movie.)

[pierrot]

What name does Smalltown John post under? I just saw his reviews, and I would really like to hire him. Does he ever come to NYC?

[theDCeBOY]

oddly enough, he posts as SmallTownJohn. whodathunkit?!?

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

RE: i HAVE to!

 

'Satan, your ass is big & red. Who could i mistake you for... Liza Minelli?'

 

Southpark The Movie: A fine piece of film indeed

 

Warmest,

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas