The "NO/NO" review

[Guest Gentle Dude]

TNFH wrote:

 

>Jason does know who I

>am because I told him

>so previously. I hope

>this answers your question.

 

If you check Jason's comments, he addresses you (TNFH) and Meister as the same person. If you both have the same IP address, then you and Meister are either roommates using the same computer or one person with dual or multiple personalities. So who's turn is it to respond now. No wonder Jason last comment states that this whole episode is giving him the heebie geebies.

 

Give it up guys...you got caught with your hands in the cookie jar.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if both of you don't respond anymore....if you do, at least use another computer so it wouldn't be so obvious.

 

GD

[Boston Guy]

IP Addresses

 

Just a minor point...

 

In this case, it does seem pretty odd that they both have the same IP address (I wonder, though, if HB is getting the full IP address reported in all circumstances).

 

However, I thought it worth pointing out that an IP address does not have to point to a specific computer. While it often does, I'd go so far as to suggest it usually does not.

 

Computers in networks (including the Internet) can either have a specific IP address assigned to them or can be set up to have an IP address assigned dynamically when they connect to the net. People who connect to AOL through a modem, for example, use a dynamic IP address that is assigned by the network. It really only can be used to tell that the person is coming from inside AOL's network.

 

Similarly, most DSL providers use dynamic addressing as well, meaning that you don't get your IP address until you connect and it will change each time you do so.

 

But even small networks can be set up this way and there would be a circumstance that would seem suspicious here: suppose two guys were on a small office network that used dynamic addressing and both of them logged into M4M. If one turned his computer on and connected to the network, he'd be assigned an IP address within some small range. Suppose he posted here and then turned off his computer and went home. The other guy came in and did the same thing from his computer. It's entirely possible within that small network that he'd be given the IP address the other guy just disconnected from.

 

All of that notwithstanding, there are so many IP addresses available to AOL and DSL providers that it would be extremely unusual for two posters here to have the same full (all four parts) IP address dynamically assigned.

[BewareofNick]

This is TFNH's AOL profile: (screenname TCPinNYC)

 

Member Name: Terence

Location: NYC, UWS near Lincoln Center

Sex: Male

Marital Status: Single; free to play, date, mate

Hobbies: Most visual & performing arts, travel, fine dining, skiing, boarding, blading, playing pitch and catch - and looking to do and share all of this with an equally centered and evolved partner who is over 40.

Computers: 6', 180, and keeping it together at 52

Occupation: Fashion Exec

Personal Quote: The unexamined life is not worth living: Socrates

I'm looking for someone who is cerebral in the living room and carnal in the bedroom: Me

 

 

This is Meister's AOL profile (screenname TCPUSA):

 

Sex: Male

 

As you can see, Meister's has been deliberately deleted by the user. I am doing a little research (and those of you who have been here a while know how I LOVE to do that, but what I've uncovered to date (some is not posted here) strongly points to Meister and TFNH being one and the same.

[bluenix]

I think Tar Baby comes from "Brer Rabbit." A ruse. Won't speak and sticks to your hands. I know people like that ;-)

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

BewareofNick,

 

Your priceless!!

[BewareofNick]

>BewareofNick,

>

>Your priceless!!

 

 

A massage, $75

An escort, $250

BewareofNick, priceless

 

for everything else, there's MasterBationCard!

 

Thanks, TY. You made me smile :o)

[Guest CTMUSH]

Thanks guys for all the "private dick" work (puns intended), and now lets get back to the original question. This board has had numerous threads discussing why so few reviews and why people are reluctant to submit reviews. I'll speak for myself, unless I have a terrible experience, the person totally misrepresented themselves or it was a complete ripoff I will not put in a NO review for whatever reason. My purpose is not to discuss the reasons, which could go on forever, but to ask is there not a middle ground we can agree to without being so negative, so harsh. HooBoy is it not worth a try to see if it stimulates more reviews? Personally I have been with some of the top escorts on this board. I have enjoyed their company and enjoyed them as people but in fact there has been encounters where the sex was not that good IMHO. But that's only my experience, and because everyone else enjoyed there experiences, I would not even consider putting in a NO review. First of all the escort would be furious and then all of you would chew me up and spit me out. No thanks. There has to be a way for us to indicate the experience was OK but not the greatest. Come on guys, we need some support here, if we want HooBoy if make a change!!!

[Guest Meister]

Sorry for the delay in response; I've been traveling. Seems like quite a commotion went on. I believe technical questions have been answered, so I won't go there.

 

In the end, this just points out the very real need for a better review system. When I wrote mine I went out of my way to say right up front that the no's weren't what they seemed, and yet feathers still got ruffled. While almost every rebuttal I've read here blamed the reviewer, the rebuttal this time deflected attention by bringing a third party into the scenario(TFNH). What it's taught me is that it just isn't worth the aggrevation to write a review unless it is glowing.

 

What happens next: I'd predict a glowing and supposedly genuine review of Jason in the near future, saying "what was that guy thinking of, Jason is the greatest thing since the invention of sliced bread." And it will be read as the real and honest review.

[Guest Fin Fang Foom]

>the rebuttal this time deflected

>attention by bringing a third

>party into the scenario(TFNH).

 

I see you're trying to perpetuate the charade that you and TFNH aren't the same person.

 

Now I'M getting the heebie geebies!

 

FFF

[BewareofNick]

>>the rebuttal this time deflected

>>attention by bringing a third

>>party into the scenario(TFNH).

>

>I see you're trying to perpetuate

>the charade that you and

>TFNH aren't the same person.

>

>

>Now I'M getting the heebie geebies!

>

>

>FFF

 

 

I can say with absolute certainty that Meister is lying when he says he is not TFNH. Besides everything else, I put both AOL screennames on my buddy list. TCPinNYC came on, logged off and immediately TCPUSA signed on. (He was changing screenames) I observed this three times. Unfortunately, there's no way to screencapture this.

[Guest Gentle Dude]

I won't go into details, but there is a way to trace e-mails to its source. It's used to stop harassing e-mails and spammers. Law enforcement uses the same method to track down sexual predators in cyberspace.

 

I try to stay away from controversy, but I just hate it when someone tries to destroy another person's credibility and reputation; thus affecting his livelihood.

 

Meister/TNFH. you do owe Jason an apology. If you're too embarassed to say it in the message board, at least do it privately....let's just say you made an error in judgment.

 

And oh Jason, I already have an accountant.

 

P.S. Bof N: He uses a third alias but this time he did not use his initials TCP....Look again at this whole thread. I let you figure this one out.

 

Ciao!

[BewareofNick]

>P.S. Bof N: He uses a

>third alias but this time

>he did not use his

>initials TCP....Look again at this

>whole thread. I let you

>figure this one out.

 

 

Dude, I think even Chief Wiggim could have figured that one out!