I will not give details?

[axebahia]

>But readers DO want to know whether and how well an escort

>being reviewed sucks/gets sucked, fucks/gets fucked, massages,

>kisses, etc.

 

I totally agree, as we have seen with some of the best reviewed escorts here, reviews without this essential information are inherently unreliable. They give absolutely no guide to prospective cliets about whether the clients would on similar facts judge a reported experience as positive or negative and thus worth the escort's price.

[axebahia]

>But readers DO want to know whether and how well an escort

>being reviewed sucks/gets sucked, fucks/gets fucked, massages,

>kisses, etc.

 

I totally agree, as we have seen with some of the best reviewed escorts here, reviews without this essential information are inherently unreliable. They give absolutely no guide to prospective cliets about whether the clients would on similar facts judge a reported experience as positive or negative and thus worth the escort's price.

[Guest DickHo]

EXHIBIT A--6/10 Review of Matt in London

 

"It would be unrealistic to go into the full detail of our time together. Suffice it to say it was the most superb encouter with no hint at any stage of anything smutty about it. At the end there was no hustling to get me off the premises. Instead, we talked lying together for some considerable time. It was a delight to talk to someone who could converse so freely on a myriad of subjects and who appeared genuinely interested in what one had to say. I was eventually asked if I would like to take a shower and we continued to talk before sadly it was time to go. In his most courteous way I was escorted to the door. He bade me farewell and I returned from whence I came..."

 

from whence I came?

[Guest DickHo]

EXHIBIT A--6/10 Review of Matt in London

 

"It would be unrealistic to go into the full detail of our time together. Suffice it to say it was the most superb encouter with no hint at any stage of anything smutty about it. At the end there was no hustling to get me off the premises. Instead, we talked lying together for some considerable time. It was a delight to talk to someone who could converse so freely on a myriad of subjects and who appeared genuinely interested in what one had to say. I was eventually asked if I would like to take a shower and we continued to talk before sadly it was time to go. In his most courteous way I was escorted to the door. He bade me farewell and I returned from whence I came..."

 

from whence I came?

[chrismac]

I was wondering if someone would mention that review of Matt. I read it thinking, "who invited Jane Austen to the party?"

[chrismac]

I was wondering if someone would mention that review of Matt. I read it thinking, "who invited Jane Austen to the party?"

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

I think the requirements for a good review are minimally…

 

Was he professional in his preliminary communications and in setting up the appointment? (Very, acceptable, poor)

Was he on time within reason – say +/- 10 minutes – or did he timely communicate any delay?

Was he clean and sober?

Did he want money up front?

Personality and attitude? (Great, nice, dial-tone, piss-poor)

Did he kiss? ? (Yes, no, not necessary) Optional: How well? (Judgment call so different drivers get different mileage)

Did he do oral? ? (Yes, no, not necessary) Optional: How well? (Judgment call)

Did he do anal? (Yes, no, not necessary) Optional: How well? (Judgment call)

If yes to anal then was he Top/Versatile/Bottom for the appointment, not for the record.

Did he live up to what he promised?

 

I don’t want a porn short story. Neither do I want a One-Minute Mystery. I trash the mysteries because I don’t have the time to waste reading other peoples tea leaves. I wade through the porn for a while until it is clear that the review is a vehicle for someone’s creative writing or pent up frustration to express long denied passion. When it becomes work to extract the essence of the encounter I bail.

 

I have become a little more explicit of late in reaction to no-content reviews – maybe a little too… but as a reader I prefer that one errs on too much info rather than not enough. There is a reasonable line to draw between informative and salacious reviews. And if some want to be salacious… well, this is an adult site. Just don’t waste resources with no content chaff.

 

Information-free reviews are a waste of time, bandwith and bytes IMO. They ill serve the escort reputation and the reviewer credibility. If a reviewer behind an anonymous screen name is too discrete to indicate what he was doing with an escort behind closed doors then he really is to discrete to be posting reviews IMO.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

I think the requirements for a good review are minimally…

 

Was he professional in his preliminary communications and in setting up the appointment? (Very, acceptable, poor)

Was he on time within reason – say +/- 10 minutes – or did he timely communicate any delay?

Was he clean and sober?

Did he want money up front?

Personality and attitude? (Great, nice, dial-tone, piss-poor)

Did he kiss? ? (Yes, no, not necessary) Optional: How well? (Judgment call so different drivers get different mileage)

Did he do oral? ? (Yes, no, not necessary) Optional: How well? (Judgment call)

Did he do anal? (Yes, no, not necessary) Optional: How well? (Judgment call)

If yes to anal then was he Top/Versatile/Bottom for the appointment, not for the record.

Did he live up to what he promised?

 

I don’t want a porn short story. Neither do I want a One-Minute Mystery. I trash the mysteries because I don’t have the time to waste reading other peoples tea leaves. I wade through the porn for a while until it is clear that the review is a vehicle for someone’s creative writing or pent up frustration to express long denied passion. When it becomes work to extract the essence of the encounter I bail.

 

I have become a little more explicit of late in reaction to no-content reviews – maybe a little too… but as a reader I prefer that one errs on too much info rather than not enough. There is a reasonable line to draw between informative and salacious reviews. And if some want to be salacious… well, this is an adult site. Just don’t waste resources with no content chaff.

 

Information-free reviews are a waste of time, bandwith and bytes IMO. They ill serve the escort reputation and the reviewer credibility. If a reviewer behind an anonymous screen name is too discrete to indicate what he was doing with an escort behind closed doors then he really is to discrete to be posting reviews IMO.

[KY_TOP]

>I have become a little more explicit of late in reaction to

>no-content reviews – maybe a little too… but as a reader I

>prefer that one errs on too much info rather than not enough.

>There is a reasonable line to draw between informative and

>salacious reviews. And if some want to be salacious… well,

>this is an adult site. Just don’t waste resources with no

>content chaff.

 

>

 

I agree and I too have become "more explicit" as I have written more reviews. I have wondered if the reviews I write have gotten too explicit and may be bordering on "Porn Stories".

 

But, after you read one of the reviews I have written you will know what the guy will do and if he is any good at it. After re-reading a few reviews, after they were posted, I have wondered if I went overboard. Then I'd receive an e-mail from the Escort thanking me for such a Great Review.

[KY_TOP]

>I have become a little more explicit of late in reaction to

>no-content reviews – maybe a little too… but as a reader I

>prefer that one errs on too much info rather than not enough.

>There is a reasonable line to draw between informative and

>salacious reviews. And if some want to be salacious… well,

>this is an adult site. Just don’t waste resources with no

>content chaff.

 

>

 

I agree and I too have become "more explicit" as I have written more reviews. I have wondered if the reviews I write have gotten too explicit and may be bordering on "Porn Stories".

 

But, after you read one of the reviews I have written you will know what the guy will do and if he is any good at it. After re-reading a few reviews, after they were posted, I have wondered if I went overboard. Then I'd receive an e-mail from the Escort thanking me for such a Great Review.

[pierrot]

I totally agree with the original poster. Reviews that avoid the sexual details makes me wonder if the poster is writing a valentine for a friend. It's not worth posting unless you're going to tell us something. And who are these guys who are objecting to "porn". Hello! You're on a web site about male prostitutes! Where do you guys get off being prudish? Do you think somehow the holy Virgin will forgive you all your sins because you don't talk about it afterwards? Please. We're all interested in sex with men or we wouldn't be here. If sex offends your delicate sensibilities, boy did you take a wrong turn getting here. Go back to reading your Barbara Cartland novels, but don't come on a sex web site and tell us that we're vulgar for wanting to know if a guy has a big dick and is willing to suck or fuck.

[pierrot]

I totally agree with the original poster. Reviews that avoid the sexual details makes me wonder if the poster is writing a valentine for a friend. It's not worth posting unless you're going to tell us something. And who are these guys who are objecting to "porn". Hello! You're on a web site about male prostitutes! Where do you guys get off being prudish? Do you think somehow the holy Virgin will forgive you all your sins because you don't talk about it afterwards? Please. We're all interested in sex with men or we wouldn't be here. If sex offends your delicate sensibilities, boy did you take a wrong turn getting here. Go back to reading your Barbara Cartland novels, but don't come on a sex web site and tell us that we're vulgar for wanting to know if a guy has a big dick and is willing to suck or fuck.

[VaHawk]

Well, it was your post that refered to 40 and 50 year old bois?

[VaHawk]

Well, it was your post that refered to 40 and 50 year old bois?

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Announcement = Review w/o Details

 

>I agree that lines like, "the details of our encounter are

>between (the escort) and me" ....

 

... then so is the review!! IMO

 

I'm coming to the opinion that such a statement should be grounds for rejecting a review.

>

 

>That said, I wouldn't discourage reviewers who don't care, for

>whatever reason, to disclose all the salacious info. I've

>learned about some newbie escorts from those kind of Reviews,

>and, while I'd obviously appreciate more details, just

>learning about the existence of a new escort is worth not

>hearing the details of the previous encounter.

 

If it wasn't so much work maybe such reviews should be consigned to a new category: 'Announcments' or 'Client Introductions' . Not a serious suggestion, although... I wonder how 'reviewers' would react to having their contribution routed to the announcement bin. Would this provide incentive to 'flesh out' }( their next review, cause them to fold their tent or neither? I find two of the three acceptable outcomes.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Announcement = Review w/o Details

 

Well, I got to the climax of today's review of Jason just by looking at his pic!!

[Mac Star]

RE: Announcement = Review w/o Details

 

I pretty much agree with this idea, except that this would make more work for Hooboy. I don't think this could be self-regulating.

 

I understand those who don't want to wade through porn-stories to get to the kernel of information which tells them to hire or not to hire, but for me it depends upon the story. Some inspire interest, others don't. Sometimes a detail or two tells me everything I want to know.

 

I don't quite know what to make of the vehement reaction from one or two guys who say they prefer just to look at the pictures. A more detailed review won't stop these guys from looking at the pictures. What's the problem if many of us prefer to know a bit about the escort's sexual prowess?

 

I still don't see who benefits from a review that skirts the question of sex. The guys who just look at the pictures don't read it anyway, and the guys who look for detail get nothing out of it.

 

I do understand that reviewing skills improve over time, along with experience. The more experience you have with escorts, the better you can evaluate a guy. Here's to more experience.

[Mac Star]

>Well, Peter Pan is still a boy... and

>does have a little fairy around at all times...

>Oh wait maybe he did and you just think that stuff in

>the jars is peanut butter. CLAP, CLAP, CLAP.

 

1. Did you really think those were mushrooms

they were sitting on all the time?

 

2. Avoiding the clap is usually a good idea.

 

3. Just letting some guys off the hook?

[Guest Dan]

And from the Escorts side of the fence, I can tell you that it would be appreciated if you did not give extraneous details such as telling us about your flight, your hotel, the restauarant, etc. You get the idea. I've heard some people complain about HooBoy editing some reviews, and then I read some where they seem to be writing "what I did on my summer vacation" for 2 or 3 paragraphs and then they get to reviews said escort.

 

If you want to tell us about these things or anything else not really pertinent to the escort, then do a posting in the Lounge!

 

As for details, I know that when a client wrote that I was the best fuck of his life, that seemed to be the one detail that a lot of guys needed to hear!

 

Smiles! :7 ;-) :9

 

Dan Dare

http://meetlocalmen.com/mlm/dandarela.html

[+ Lucky]

"As for details, I know that when a client wrote that I was the best fuck of his life,..."

 

Oh, that guy. Is he out of Bellevue yet?

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

RE: Announcement = Review w/o Details

 

>Well, I got to the climax of today's review of Jason just by

>looking at his pic!!

 

He is hot but I've seen much better pics of his. }( I have had the hots for him since his first review.. and to think I sat on my ass for over a month in the same town. Called him -- he was repsonsive and even offtered to make special arrangements for an incall that I needed. I just can't get over the hump of $250 in a second or third tier town or even... It is not the money per se, as I spent as much or more on guys who ask for less but deliver beyond the agreed time with a great quality experience. I did find two stellar examples in Tampa and one in DC that I'd be hard pressed to imagine could be bettered. In fact, if one could then I know I had made it through the pearly gates to hustler heaven.

 

:+