suspicious review? (your opinions please)

[N.N.]

Does anyone else find today's (Nov. 15) review of David Gartner

suspicious? I don't want to spoil all your fun in reading it

while looking for telltale signs, but I will point out that the

last sentence "If u want hella sexual excitement or an evening of

intellectual talk this boy IS for you" has words in common with

David's own writings: "intellectual" (talk/conversations) from

http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?p=999&gid=1143765&uid=688956

and "hella", from comment #15 in the "Prices for?" Lounge thread

http://www.male4malescorts.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=39371#39393

And like several sentences at the end of this latest review, that

Lounge comment uses doubled periods for punctuation. The review

is said to be someone's second, but no previous reviews are listed.

 

Disclaimer: I wrote a mixed review of David recently. I wish

David well; I'm questioning today's review not out of any ill

will toward David, but because some points in the review look

suspicious to me. I think it's worthwhile to talk about

questionable reviews here; I spoke up about one from JJ Stutz

a few weeks ago, and I've never been a client of JJ's.

 

Fellow observant readers: what's your verdict on this review?

[N.N.]

Does anyone else find today's (Nov. 15) review of David Gartner

suspicious? I don't want to spoil all your fun in reading it

while looking for telltale signs, but I will point out that the

last sentence "If u want hella sexual excitement or an evening of

intellectual talk this boy IS for you" has words in common with

David's own writings: "intellectual" (talk/conversations) from

http://www.picturetrail.com/gallery/view?p=999&gid=1143765&uid=688956

and "hella", from comment #15 in the "Prices for?" Lounge thread

http://www.male4malescorts.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=39371#39393

And like several sentences at the end of this latest review, that

Lounge comment uses doubled periods for punctuation. The review

is said to be someone's second, but no previous reviews are listed.

 

Disclaimer: I wrote a mixed review of David recently. I wish

David well; I'm questioning today's review not out of any ill

will toward David, but because some points in the review look

suspicious to me. I think it's worthwhile to talk about

questionable reviews here; I spoke up about one from JJ Stutz

a few weeks ago, and I've never been a client of JJ's.

 

Fellow observant readers: what's your verdict on this review?

[sman]

man give it a break.

[sman]

man give it a break.

[Guest dstud4hire]

Hmm, I don't know about fake.....generally, if they have faked one, they fake them all. we had one like that in the st.louis area, ricardo. If you read any of his reviews, they were all written in the same vain, same terminology.

 

The only thing that is a for sure thing, the writer has clearly seen waaaay too much porn......I mean please...using the word 'mantool'

 

of course, I guess I should be the one to talk.....I have caught my self shouting out "take that man meat!"

 

LOL

[Guest dstud4hire]

Hmm, I don't know about fake.....generally, if they have faked one, they fake them all. we had one like that in the st.louis area, ricardo. If you read any of his reviews, they were all written in the same vain, same terminology.

 

The only thing that is a for sure thing, the writer has clearly seen waaaay too much porn......I mean please...using the word 'mantool'

 

of course, I guess I should be the one to talk.....I have caught my self shouting out "take that man meat!"

 

LOL

[Guest]

Well, another nice touch is that the reviewer lists himself as a repeat reviewer, but under "Previously published reviews" puts down "none." I guess there is little to no proof-reading of these reviews...

[Guest]

Well, another nice touch is that the reviewer lists himself as a repeat reviewer, but under "Previously published reviews" puts down "none." I guess there is little to no proof-reading of these reviews...

[+ glutes]

ALL reviews are suspicious until proven otherwise. At best they are entertainment in my experiance.

[+ glutes]

ALL reviews are suspicious until proven otherwise. At best they are entertainment in my experiance.

[KY_TOP]

The only real suspicious thing I saw about the review is that it list David as "30". I've never met him, would like to though, but the other reviews list 21 and his pic doesn't look 30 to me.

If he wrote it himself, why would he put his age as 30?

 

I did note the reviewer also listed his own age as 30.

[KY_TOP]

The only real suspicious thing I saw about the review is that it list David as "30". I've never met him, would like to though, but the other reviews list 21 and his pic doesn't look 30 to me.

If he wrote it himself, why would he put his age as 30?

 

I did note the reviewer also listed his own age as 30.

[Guest YFSC]

>Hmm, I don't know about fake.....generally, if they have

>faked one, they fake them all.

 

Not necessarily. Escort submits a fake first review or two to announce his coming out (so to speak) onto the stage. Gets a real review or two. Then nothing for a while and business is slow so he submits another fake to get noticed again and drum up business. Then a couple more real ones. Then - well, you get the idea.

 

When you read the reviews vertically (the whole history of reviews for a single guy) instead of horizontally (the individual new reviews on any given day), as I have done when looking to hire in various cities that I would be visiting, you start to see that there are quite a few that are probably like that.

[Guest YFSC]

>Hmm, I don't know about fake.....generally, if they have

>faked one, they fake them all.

 

Not necessarily. Escort submits a fake first review or two to announce his coming out (so to speak) onto the stage. Gets a real review or two. Then nothing for a while and business is slow so he submits another fake to get noticed again and drum up business. Then a couple more real ones. Then - well, you get the idea.

 

When you read the reviews vertically (the whole history of reviews for a single guy) instead of horizontally (the individual new reviews on any given day), as I have done when looking to hire in various cities that I would be visiting, you start to see that there are quite a few that are probably like that.

[Guest YFSC]

>The only real suspicious thing I saw about the review is that

>it list David as "30". I've never met him, would like to

>though, but the other reviews list 21 and his pic doesn't look

>30 to me.

>If he wrote it himself, why would he put his age as 30?

>

>I did note the reviewer also listed his own age as 30.

 

How about - to make it look real. So that people would say exactly what you just said and think that it must be real because the guy obviously knows his own age (or the one he claims to be in "escort years").

 

That's actually not such a rare mistake in reviews - the blank just says "Age" and it comes way before the rest of the description of the escort. It can easily be taken as referring to the reviewer by someone who is not paying attention, and people are accustomed to filling in their own age in a blank that just says "Age". I've seen it a number of times before, and who's to say that DaveyBoy hasn't run across it too?

Not that I'm saying this review is a fake, mind you... ;-)

[Guest YFSC]

>The only real suspicious thing I saw about the review is that

>it list David as "30". I've never met him, would like to

>though, but the other reviews list 21 and his pic doesn't look

>30 to me.

>If he wrote it himself, why would he put his age as 30?

>

>I did note the reviewer also listed his own age as 30.

 

How about - to make it look real. So that people would say exactly what you just said and think that it must be real because the guy obviously knows his own age (or the one he claims to be in "escort years").

 

That's actually not such a rare mistake in reviews - the blank just says "Age" and it comes way before the rest of the description of the escort. It can easily be taken as referring to the reviewer by someone who is not paying attention, and people are accustomed to filling in their own age in a blank that just says "Age". I've seen it a number of times before, and who's to say that DaveyBoy hasn't run across it too?

Not that I'm saying this review is a fake, mind you... ;-)