Legit Offer: Seek Live In "Health & Fitness" Companion

[Guest HQ]

Hello all... I will try once more. I am seeking someone who understands nutrition and mild exercise between 19 - 33, (White Asian or Latin) to assist me in a lifestyle change.

 

Me: white male, 47, and obviously very overweight.

 

This would be a three month program, I will temp. relocate you to my Southern California apartment if you are not in the area. I am mainly seeking someone to take care of all my meals and to do some light exercise with me. You MUST be upbeat, friendly and able to motivate/encourage me in a positive way. I am not seeking a master or someone who thinks I'm going to be a three month sugardaddy. Note: You are HIV negative (As I am).

 

There will be a fee paid, you will have plenty of personal time.. that will be worked out in advance.

 

A few reasons why someone might want to do this.. a chance to work or live in SoCal for a few months, to create good karma... I don't know. Just want to find a "normal" guy who can work some magic.

 

There will be a background check, so you must be prepared once arrangements are made, to give me personal information. And YES this information will be kept private.. it is only being used to ensure that I have selected the correct guy.

 

If interested email me at nitrohq@hotmail.com Thanks.

[+ Lucky]

So what does HIV status have to do with this? Just another bigot looking for a boy to boss around if you ask me.

[MiamiLooker]

Any background check should be done on you

[Bilbo]

LAST EDITED ON Feb-25-01 AT 05:22PM (EST)[p]While I agree that a mutual background check might be a very good thing indeed, I can see where this man, assuming he is honest, may be coming from. If he has a man who is inspiring enough for this man to follow his lead for three months while trying to make a major lifestyle change, especially if they wind up living in close proximity, it is a no brainer that they may be tempted to have some sex. For which I certainly hope that this client realizes he would be paying extra. However, why get a major, important to your health crush on someone you wouldn't feel safe actually having sex with, if you can help it? (Note to get a lifers: I am not as prejudiced as I sound. My lover is a long time survivor.)

[+ Lucky]

Blacks and long time survivors need not apply.

[marc anthony]

Very Basic Background Check

 

I guess I am wondering why you have the same email address (nitrohq@hotmail.com) as Brad #2 in SD. That boy is 18, slim and a skater, and doesn't sound much like your description....For others who want to check it out, Brad #2 has many reviews, and the first few use the email address nitrohq@hotmail.com. The more recent ones use an AOL address.

[Bilbo]

As I said, I myself am not that prejudiced. However, you sir are repeatedly shooting yourself in the foot.

[Guest HQ]

RE: Very Basic Background Check

 

Marc you have a valid question thus the reason why I am responding. Brad (known here as Brad #2) lived with me for several months while sorting out some family problems. When he started to escort he had never used a computer... aside from mess around with mine. I am a somewhat private person and Brad was not allowed to sue my phone number... so he gave a few people my hotmail email address (nitrohq@hotmail.com).I did not like receiving his email plus the volume alone was amazing! So I asked him to get his own account, and he did so on AOL. As most people know Brad no longer escorts. I do not believe he maintains his AOL screen name either.

 

Once again thanks for giving me the opportunity to sort this out.

[marc anthony]

RE: Very Basic Background Check

 

Thanks for clearing that up. Too bad Brad is not still with you. His reviews make him seem exactly the sort of person you are looking for!

[Guest Wildcats]

RE: Very Basic Background Check

 

In spite of the explanation, there is still doubt that lingers in my mind about the similar e-mail addresses. E-mail addresses/accounts in hotmail, yahoo, etc., could be created at no charge. Similarly, several screen names (thus, e-mail addresses)could be had with AOL.

[Guest Jayinla]

LAST EDITED ON Mar-01-01 AT 12:21PM (EST)[p]I am a latin escort in la. if you are interested in a different arragement, not a live in.. but a person to help you work out and eat right.. email me back with more details.

http://www.angelfire.com/ca6/Escortjay

jay

[Guest HQ]

Jay thanks for the interest I have found someone.

 

Marc while I love Brad, he is a bit too carefree to be able to handle what I needed. As you will notice in his reviews he is sort of "for the moment." Plus, I have always teken care of Brad... it would be a strange role reversal. Also, he will soon leave for Florida where he starts school in August.

[+ Lucky]

You have found someome? I am so happy for you. Good luck with your weight reduction. I hope you don't get any diseases. Is the boy you found white, Asian, or Latin?

[Guest Daddy-In-Training]

Lucky, tone your attitude down please. -- Daddy

[+ Lucky]

When the moderator of the forum chooses, however rarely, to chastise a post, attention must be paid. Any criticism of my posts on this board is welcome, and when I am out of order, I am glad to be so informed.

My responses to this thread have been intended to be sarcastic. I may have been better advised to have just expressed my outrage at the post and been done with it. So I am clear, I read this post as an offer for a job from an overweight person looking to be motivated by soemone else to help him lose weight. It struck me as blatantly discriminatory. People with HIV were not welcome to apply nor were members of racial groups other than white, Asian, or Latin.

If in fact the message board can be used for employment posts, it has to follow the laws like any other medium. You can't discriminate based on race or disability.

The lack of outrage at this post may have been an indication that others did not take it seriously. There was some question as to whether the poster was in fact sincere or was who he claimed to be. The first person to take him up on his offer was told that the position was filled.

I truly hope that the poster loses whatever weight he desires, does not contract any diseases, and learns that people with HIV or of other races can be just as helpful in weightloss motivation as anybody else. If he was just looking for a houseboy and/or sextoy, well, then he should have just said so.

Hopefully, I have toned down my attitude as Daddy desires. If there is something else I am missing here, I hope no one will be shy in telling me.

[MiamiLooker]

Whether intended or not, I thought HQ's original post was less than forthcoming about his true intentions, to say the least...

[Guest AIM]

Why are you chastising him? I think he's made a very good point and has a right to make it. He did not use profanity, he did not call him any names, he just made a point. Is this an "open" forum or not?

[Guest HQ]

Thank you AIM for the valid comments.

[Guest Daddy-In-Training]

Thank-you Lucky

 

In our haste to write good pose sometimes it difficult to remember that in the written form, we don't have a lot of the non-verbal cues that we naturally use when in person, or even by phone. Words are truly sharper than a sword, and can cut far deeper. That's why, when I write, you'll find that I use a lot of the Emotion Icons, and when they don't fit, make up my own <Snort>.

 

<Serious>

However, may I respectfully point out that the overwhelming majority of the people on this board are of at least ONE minority? In my case, I can think of three that I'm a member of. IMHO, your assertion that the original poster must comply with the laws about discrimination is flawed and highly dependent on the jurisdiction that he lives in. (Federal law applies to organizations that are above a certain number of employees).

 

I certainly found your remarks to be biased, and in their own way just as bigoted as what you assumed. As for myself, I prefer to believe that the original post was done with the best of intentions and refuse to pile assumptions upon assumptions to simply make a belabored point.

<End Serious>

 

As for the sarcastic remarks that you made towards me <SWAT> :o

 

-- Daddy

[Guest Daddy-In-Training]

>Why are you chastising him?

 

Because I believe that he was out of line.

 

>I think he's made a very good point and has a right to make it.

 

Agreed (at least to the "right" portion of it).

 

> He did not use profanity, he did not call him any names, he just made a point.

 

Untrue statement. Being called a "Bigot" can be very much construed as name calling.

 

> Is this an "open" forum or not?

 

It certainly is, that's why I'm currently standing on my Soapbox <Hummm> You mean I'm not allowed to speak up? <Sigh!>

 

-- Daddy

[Guest AIM]

LAST EDITED ON Mar-13-01 AT 11:13PM (EST)[p]Mr. Daddy-in-Training,

 

You're the moderator of this forum so it's not quite the same thing. A poster being chastised by the owner/administrator of the web site hosting the message board is quite different from being chastised from a fellow poster. I know from your past writings that you are a highly intelligent person. So surely you understand the difference.

 

Great site by the way!

[Guest Daddy-In-Training]

>You're the moderator of this forum so it's not quite the

>same thing.

 

Your quite right, I am one of the two people that sets the

tone, and more importantly the limits for the message center.

 

>A poster being chastised by the owner/administrator of the

>web site hosting the message board is quite different from

>being chastised from a fellow poster.

 

Which is why, you'll find that I don't do it often...and when

I do, I tend to do it gently, and with respect.

 

>I know from your past writings that you are a highly

>intelligent person. So surely you understand the difference.

 

Thank-you, I do.

 

>Great site by the way!

 

That's Hooboy's fault...I just keep the bits flowing. But on his behalf, Thanks!

 

-- Daddy

[+ Lucky]

You're welcome, Daddy. I do think that if and when you express a personal opinion on a post, you should not do it as the moderator of the forum, but in your private capacity.

Discrimination against a person based upon race or disability is a violation of federal law. It doesn't matter what state the person lives in. A job posting that excludes applicants based on these factors is illegal, and the web site should not be posting them.

When we are seeking sex partners, then we can discriminate based upon our individual taste or desire. In reality, that's what I guess this original post was all aabout.

[Guest HQ]

>A job

>posting that excludes applicants based

>on these factors is illegal,

>and the web site should

>not be posting them.

>When we are seeking sex partners,

>then we can discriminate based

>upon our individual taste or

>desire. In reality, that's what

>I guess this original post

>was all aabout.

 

 

You sir do not have a clue what my post was about and have shown very little understanding of the word "reality." Your actions and hate will never make a difference in my life. My suggestion is for you to read the teachings of Buddha. You might learn something about yourself.

[MiamiLooker]

I don't quite understand your "reality" either. You advertise for "someone to take care of all my meals and to do some light exercise with me. You MUST be upbeat, friendly and able to motivate/encourage me in a positive way. I am not seeking a master or someone who thinks I'm going to be a three month sugardaddy." Initially, this sounds like you're looking for a live-in personal trainer/nutritionist.

 

However, you also state he should be "between 19 - 33, (White Asian or Latin)" and should be "HIV negative (As I am)." These additional requirements seem to indicate you're looking for a sexual partner, as well (I've had a personal trainer and I never thought to ask his HIV status, but then again, I didn't hire him for sex). If that's what you're looking for, why not just come out and say it?