FAKE reviews written by NY agencies?

[Donnie]

Mark Richardson

 

LAST EDITED ON Mar-09-00 AT 07:41PM (CST)[p].

[Donnie]

Mark Richardson

 

On a slightly different note, I'm just curious about something: Mark Richardson's last 2 reviews, dated 3/19 and 3/9, are both from the same reviewer about the same encounter (each one mentions Mark being stuck in traffic, him jacking off on a chair while wearing socks, etc) with slightly different wording in each. Not the same as a fake review but I couldn't see that without commenting!

[Donnie]

It seems like Maximum Escorts and Campus Escorts are submitting fake reviews to advertise their agencies. Very sloppy work, guys! I do not mean to single out the escorts themselves, because it is so apparent that the reviews were done to promote the agencies. Two recent reviews I read were submitted by reviewers who describe themselves as << a top in my early 30's.  I am in good shape.>> and << in my thirties and considered good-looking by many>>, the idea probably being that "our guys are so hot, hot guys hire them" or "this is the type of client we want."

 

One review is for Tony#3 from 3/20. The first suspicious line is when we are told that he <<is definitely only 19 years old>> Did the reviewer check his driver's license? Then we get to the ad: <<I have to thank the great guys at Maximum for recommending him...they...spent time helping me select him from their large (and growing!!) list of guys>> How does he know their list is growing??

 

The other is for Brad, posted on 3/21. <<It took me a while to get in touch with someone at Campus Escorts as they only work in the late afternoons and nights.>> This is to let us know when to contact them. <<However, once I did, I was greeted with the nicest staff.  The owner was extremely helpful and nice on the phone.>> Innocent enough but then... << I was assured by the agency that Brad was good-looking (been told that many times before by other agencies and been very disappointed).>> totally contradicts what the reviewer says in his description of himself: << I normally do not hire escorts>> How can you be disappointed many times by other agencies but not normally hire ecorts??

 

Maybe I'm wrong and maybe I'm nitpicking but am I the only one who suspects that the agencies are submitting reviews?

[Guest davos3]

You seem to have an eagle eye (evil mind?) and have spotted some true trend. The REAL reviews are very helpful and informative. These obvious fakes are a real drag! Keep on policing!

[Guest Ken]

I'm convinced that the last review of Justin Powers in NYC was written by no other than himself. It is in the same manner and form that he uses in his e-mails.

[Bilbo]

While I too deplore it, at least it lets us see pictures of their guys.

[Guest Skeptic]

The Skeptic salutes you. You are doing the Lord's work!

[HooBoy]

RE: Mark Richardson

 

You're right, they were identical.

 

Sometimes I get double postings because the reviewers hit submit twice or something. On really busy days, I don't notice it because I'm just sending out confirmation letters. I do not read the reviews until its time for them to go up.

 

With this new format of putting the newest reviews at the top, this may unfortunately happen from time-to-time. I'm checking, however on days that I'm publishing 20 - 30 reviews, things get blurry after awhile.

 

I do very much appreciate you pointing it out - an email message to me is sufficient - and I'll make the appropriate fix ASAP.

 

Thanks,

 

HooBoy