incall/outcall

[johnnyboy]

it has been discussed more than once but this is my opinion about incalls and outcalls.

in my hometown i prefer incalls because i dont want an escort at my home for privacy reasons. then it seems strange that i prefer to be at his place because the escort then gives up his privacy. people could say book a hotel but hey having an incall i can afford more hours or more meetings. When not being in my hometown i let the escort come to my hotel because i (my company) already paid that bill.

i certainly respect escorts doing incalls. they have to clean up every time and letting clients to become closely part of their private life. for that reason i never make comments about their home because once an escort said to me (that was an outcall)that he really didnt like it when he got a review in which the client was describing his house. i think that's a good reason. as a client you should only say something about his house when it's really dirty so you can warn other people. well this is my opinion. any comments

[+ Charlie]

Having had one very bad experience with an incall at my place many years ago, I almost always prefer to go to the escort, unless it's an escort I already know, or who is well known on here. It's selfish, I realize, to expect the escort to provide the venue, but after all, I am the one who is paying for the event. A practical reason for going to the escort for a first meeting is that it is easier to just leave if he turns out not to be as represented, or unsatisfactory during the experience. (Of course, one time an escort hid my clothes so I couldn't leave, but that is a story for another time.)

[Lankypeters]

Charlie makes good points as always.

 

I prefer to visit the escort as his place of business/residence. I think the situation is safer, especially on a first visit. On the other hand, once I know a guy, or book him through a service, it's nice to have him come play in my kingsize bed, then roll over for a great night's sleep once he leaves.

 

I also enjoy seeing where the guys live/work. I've been to places and neighborhoods that are a bit dreary, to more that have been very nice. I think if the latter is the case, you ought to mention how pleasant the apartment was. You don't have to describe it in detail that identifies it. But it's a plus for potential customers to know they'll be hooking up in attractive surroundings. Then there are guys -- like Steven Draker, for one -- who stay in cool boutique hotels. Getting fucked in those places can really be a turn on. (Of course, getting fucked by Steven in any place is a turn on.)

 

Would be interesting to start a thread about working guys with attractive apartments. Dane Scott's digs are sharply done. Fredrick Ford also has a nice pad, with warm lighting and good music. The great Reese Roothmeier (sp.?) was as skillful with home design as he was with den design. Kevin Slater has one of the nicest apartments I've visited. I refrain citing the attractive details. I'll just say he really knows how to set up a hot bedroom.

 

 

 

Lankypeters

[Steven_Draker]

Thanks, Lanky. Next time you're in Chicago check out the Blackstone hotel

 

http://blog.tripkick.com/2009/02/the-blackstone-hotel-a-chicago-classic-reinvented/

 

From personal experience, I think that a 'neutral' place like a hotel room is a better choice for a first time visit with an escort.

After a relationship is established things can be taken to a further level.

 

Cheers, Steven ~

[a href=http://www.hotsexystud.com/uk]website[/a] [a href=http://www.daddysreviews.com/review.php?who=steven_draker_brussels]reviews[/a]

[a href=http://www.tofighthiv.org/goto/stevendraker]Aids LifeCycle 2009[/a]

[Guest Merlin]

Most escorts seem to prefer incalls since they tend to charge less than for outcalls.

[Lankypeters]

>Thanks, Lanky. Next time you're

>in Chicago check out the Blackstone hotel

>

 

 

If you're on the room service menu I will.

 

Lankypeters

[Guest zipperzone]

for that reason i never make comments

>about their home because once an escort said to me (that was

>an out call)that he really didn't like it when he got a review

>in which the client was describing his house. i think that's a

>good reason. as a client you should only say something about

>his house when it's really dirty so you can warn other people.

 

I don't see anything wrong with saying his home was clean, comfortable, conveniently located or other such positive comments.

 

Personally I prefer the escort to come to my home. There is something about being able to go to bed/sleep right after he's left that beats getting dressed and driving back across town, possibly in the dark and/or rain. That can take the relaxing edge off the experience.

[JT Brooklyn]

OK I will be the one to just say it "No Pussy Footin' Around"..

 

It's "CHEAPER" to visit them and I don't have to Dust My Place!

 

Of course I have unfortunately Visited a couple of Working Guys where Dust was the last thing on their minds! ;-)

[Guest Wetnwildbear]

Incall or Outcall really depends on who has the better selection

 

of interesting things to play with or the best play space.

 

 

For those guys who travel there is only so much you can bring on the

 

plane - so I would be inclined to have the guy cum to me provided he

 

is well reviewed and reputable guy - That way we could make use of

 

my collection - plus whatever he can carry.

 

 

However, I love to go "visit" a guy who has lots of interesting and

 

possibly new things to play with when I am traveling!

 

 

Same applies to local guys - not that there are many/any in

 

my home town!

[pierrot]

I agree with the poster who said I prefer to go to the escort when it's someone new. Thereafter it matters less, but I don't really want to give my address to someone I've never met. Also there's the doorman who is going to see this person (I'm in NYC where many buildings are doorman guarded). I've never had a problem, but it could be embarrassing if the escort turned out to be a bad experience.

 

Hotels are ok, but of course they are the most dangerous from a legal standpoint. Again, in NYC, LA, SF, there don't seem to be any sting initiatives against online hookups with escorts, but if there were, hotels are where they seem to set up. So I'm always a little nervous about meeting in a hotel, but have never had a problem.

[Businessguy]

I prefer to meet the first time at a hotel of my choosing. For me, it provides a bit of security in that there are other people around who can come to the rescue if necessary. Better to be a bit embarrassed than ripped off or injured. I have gone to an escort's location on a first date and been put off by their surroundings which has made it difficult to enjoy the session. I think the risks of the area of town should also be considered. Certain parts of many cities are not the place for strangers, especially alone at night. However, I have had some other fantastic experiences at an escort's location. I like in-control guys and so to be on their home turf is a plus for me. I guess evaluating the risks by reading up on the reviews is a good place to start. If in doubt, pick a neutral secure place to meet like maybe a restaurant and then go from there. I can understand why an escort may want more for an out-call. It takes a certain amount of time and effort for them to get there.