Gay Porn star quits consulate job after newspaper inquiry

[FinFangFoom]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

>FFF says that Roman is a “fucking idiot.” Working at the

>Israeli embassy and doing porn are “obviously” incompatible;

>exposure is guaranteed and firing is the logical and just

>response. Roman’s descent is so great that he will end up on

>Rentboy with all the other pathetic losers FFF deplores.

>(Nice touch, FFF, insulting all the escorts at once! And porn

>stars! You must have graduated 1st in your class at charm

>school.) Here’s the real juicy part: FFF expects us to

>believe, after unleashing this ugly tirade on us, that Roman

>is a “jerk and a liar.” Go figure. Of course, “any rational

>person” would agree with FFF. And “recent events” PROVE him

>correct. Is this not the most circular argument the message

>board has seen recently? Will the real idiot please stand

>up?

>

>It wasn’t that long ago that every one of FFF’s specious

>arguments could have been made in favor of firing people for

>being gay. In high moral outrage, the nasty bitter queens

>could shout: “My, my. She works as a DOCTOR and thinks she

>can visit a gay bar in the evening?!?! <Switching pronoun

>gender deliberately here:> He should expect to be fired! How

>trashy and ridiculous—a “doctor” thinking he can appear in a

>GAY bar. What an idiot! Doesn’t he realize someone is going

>to expose him? No rational person would be caught DEAD in a

>gay bar!” Most of us have heard this tired line of thought

>before. It's sad.

>

>I have no doubt that FFF can be found on another thread boldly

>proclaiming this the “land of the free.” Some freedom. (And

>don’t bother to point out to me that Roman worked for the

>Israelis—I know it and it’s beside the point.) The firebrand

>conservative FFF thinks the firing is just; he believes that

>it’s okay to punish someone for what he does in his private

>life—an activity that, unlike the hiring FFF does through

>Daddy's Reviews, is NOT illegal. Maybe it's the lube that

>Roman is bound to leave all over sensitive documents at the

>embassy! How messy is that! Conservatives used to stand for

>individual liberty and freedom. Those glory days are long

>past, apparently.

>

>I’m surprised that no one has mentioned the obvious porn star

>connection here: A very prominent executive at Microsoft

>moonlights (quite openly) as a very prominent porn star. He

>has a regular partner and they’ve even adopted children. (I

>can hear the shrieking now: A porn star can’t POSSIBLY be a

>fit parent!!) Fortunately, the minds in Redmond are a little

>more sophisticated.

>

>And that’s the kind of world I’d like to live in, a world

>where what people do with their penes is REALLY nobody’s

>business. A world where what people do in their private lives

>is not dragged into their professional lives. WHO THE FUCK

>CARES WHO IS MAKING PORN?? A world where people have genuine

>freedom would be a world where morons aren’t standing on the

>sidelines snickering and cheering at other people’s

>misfortunes.

>

 

 

Nurse! Tom has gotten loose from his restraints and is off his meds again - and I'm not talking Viread or Reyetaz.

 

Clinically yours,

 

FFF

[FinFangFoom]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

>FFF says that Roman is a “fucking idiot.” Working at the

>Israeli embassy and doing porn are “obviously” incompatible;

>exposure is guaranteed and firing is the logical and just

>response. Roman’s descent is so great that he will end up on

>Rentboy with all the other pathetic losers FFF deplores.

>(Nice touch, FFF, insulting all the escorts at once! And porn

>stars! You must have graduated 1st in your class at charm

>school.) Here’s the real juicy part: FFF expects us to

>believe, after unleashing this ugly tirade on us, that Roman

>is a “jerk and a liar.” Go figure. Of course, “any rational

>person” would agree with FFF. And “recent events” PROVE him

>correct. Is this not the most circular argument the message

>board has seen recently? Will the real idiot please stand

>up?

>

>It wasn’t that long ago that every one of FFF’s specious

>arguments could have been made in favor of firing people for

>being gay. In high moral outrage, the nasty bitter queens

>could shout: “My, my. She works as a DOCTOR and thinks she

>can visit a gay bar in the evening?!?! <Switching pronoun

>gender deliberately here:> He should expect to be fired! How

>trashy and ridiculous—a “doctor” thinking he can appear in a

>GAY bar. What an idiot! Doesn’t he realize someone is going

>to expose him? No rational person would be caught DEAD in a

>gay bar!” Most of us have heard this tired line of thought

>before. It's sad.

>

>I have no doubt that FFF can be found on another thread boldly

>proclaiming this the “land of the free.” Some freedom. (And

>don’t bother to point out to me that Roman worked for the

>Israelis—I know it and it’s beside the point.) The firebrand

>conservative FFF thinks the firing is just; he believes that

>it’s okay to punish someone for what he does in his private

>life—an activity that, unlike the hiring FFF does through

>Daddy's Reviews, is NOT illegal. Maybe it's the lube that

>Roman is bound to leave all over sensitive documents at the

>embassy! How messy is that! Conservatives used to stand for

>individual liberty and freedom. Those glory days are long

>past, apparently.

>

>I’m surprised that no one has mentioned the obvious porn star

>connection here: A very prominent executive at Microsoft

>moonlights (quite openly) as a very prominent porn star. He

>has a regular partner and they’ve even adopted children. (I

>can hear the shrieking now: A porn star can’t POSSIBLY be a

>fit parent!!) Fortunately, the minds in Redmond are a little

>more sophisticated.

>

>And that’s the kind of world I’d like to live in, a world

>where what people do with their penes is REALLY nobody’s

>business. A world where what people do in their private lives

>is not dragged into their professional lives. WHO THE FUCK

>CARES WHO IS MAKING PORN?? A world where people have genuine

>freedom would be a world where morons aren’t standing on the

>sidelines snickering and cheering at other people’s

>misfortunes.

>

 

 

Nurse! Tom has gotten loose from his restraints and is off his meds again - and I'm not talking Viread or Reyetaz.

 

Clinically yours,

 

FFF

[Bilbo]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

I think that Tom has a very good point here.

And I would like to take a second to mourn my favorite blog, The Riverdale Goddess. Her employer, rumored to be the un, told her she could either take down her blog or lose her job. I hope other people around here had found these writings and had enjoyed and learned from them, as I did, before the clampdown.

[Bilbo]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

I think that Tom has a very good point here.

And I would like to take a second to mourn my favorite blog, The Riverdale Goddess. Her employer, rumored to be the un, told her she could either take down her blog or lose her job. I hope other people around here had found these writings and had enjoyed and learned from them, as I did, before the clampdown.

[Mouth]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

Tom,

 

FFF is completely correct here. Read part of the Page 6 item here:

 

In e-mails to an interested party looking to hire Barak for "modeling" work abroad, Barak - who at first identified himself as Ragazzi - said, "I am single. I work at the United Nations in New York. They don't know about my other job, and that's how it should stay."

Barak told the party, "I need to know that I am not wasting my time here. And this is for real. I will need you to purchase a ticket for me online with American Airlines."

Barak directed the source to messenger tickets to his office at the U.N.

 

He goes on to say he's appearing in porn soon.

 

Why is he using his work e-mail to do this business. If he wants to be discreet, why isn't he being discreet. Why do so many others know his business, and why is he conducting personal, even if it is as innocuous as modeling, or even receiving or saying he can receive tickets from his office messenger from his workplace?

 

I'm constantly amazed and appalled at what people think constitutes proper work behavior. NOTE TO PEOPLE: DON'T PAY YOUR BILLS AT THE OFFICE OR ON THE OFFICE COMPUTER. DON'T DO ANY PERSONAL BUSINESS IN THE OFFICE YOU WOULDN'T WANT TRACED. DON'T VISIT PORN SITES OR OTHER SITES THAT WOULD BE INTERPRETED AS INAPPROPRIATE BY YOUR EMPLOYERS.

 

FFF is not being anti-gay or hostile to gays, or whatever else you're accusing him of being. FFF is being blunt. This guy's a hunk, but he's a big dumb idiot. This is why it's called work.

[Mouth]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

Tom,

 

FFF is completely correct here. Read part of the Page 6 item here:

 

In e-mails to an interested party looking to hire Barak for "modeling" work abroad, Barak - who at first identified himself as Ragazzi - said, "I am single. I work at the United Nations in New York. They don't know about my other job, and that's how it should stay."

Barak told the party, "I need to know that I am not wasting my time here. And this is for real. I will need you to purchase a ticket for me online with American Airlines."

Barak directed the source to messenger tickets to his office at the U.N.

 

He goes on to say he's appearing in porn soon.

 

Why is he using his work e-mail to do this business. If he wants to be discreet, why isn't he being discreet. Why do so many others know his business, and why is he conducting personal, even if it is as innocuous as modeling, or even receiving or saying he can receive tickets from his office messenger from his workplace?

 

I'm constantly amazed and appalled at what people think constitutes proper work behavior. NOTE TO PEOPLE: DON'T PAY YOUR BILLS AT THE OFFICE OR ON THE OFFICE COMPUTER. DON'T DO ANY PERSONAL BUSINESS IN THE OFFICE YOU WOULDN'T WANT TRACED. DON'T VISIT PORN SITES OR OTHER SITES THAT WOULD BE INTERPRETED AS INAPPROPRIATE BY YOUR EMPLOYERS.

 

FFF is not being anti-gay or hostile to gays, or whatever else you're accusing him of being. FFF is being blunt. This guy's a hunk, but he's a big dumb idiot. This is why it's called work.

[+ ArVaGuy]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

>Tom,

>

>FFF is completely correct here. Read part of the Page 6 item

>here:

>

>In e-mails to an interested party looking to hire Barak for

>"modeling" work abroad, Barak - who at first identified

>himself as Ragazzi - said, "I am single. I work at the United

>Nations in New York. They don't know about my other job, and

>that's how it should stay."

>Barak told the party, "I need to know that I am not wasting my

>time here. And this is for real. I will need you to purchase a

>ticket for me online with American Airlines."

>Barak directed the source to messenger tickets to his office

>at the U.N.

>

>He goes on to say he's appearing in porn soon.

>

>Why is he using his work e-mail to do this business. If he

>wants to be discreet, why isn't he being discreet. Why do so

>many others know his business, and why is he conducting

>personal, even if it is as innocuous as modeling, or even

>receiving or saying he can receive tickets from his office

>messenger from his workplace?

>

>I'm constantly amazed and appalled at what people think

>constitutes proper work behavior. NOTE TO PEOPLE: DON'T PAY

>YOUR BILLS AT THE OFFICE OR ON THE OFFICE COMPUTER. DON'T DO

>ANY PERSONAL BUSINESS IN THE OFFICE YOU WOULDN'T WANT TRACED.

>DON'T VISIT PORN SITES OR OTHER SITES THAT WOULD BE

>INTERPRETED AS INAPPROPRIATE BY YOUR EMPLOYERS.

>

>FFF is not being anti-gay or hostile to gays, or whatever else

>you're accusing him of being. FFF is being blunt. This guy's

>a hunk, but he's a big dumb idiot. This is why it's called

>work.

>

>

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Avatar%20Options/applause.gif

[+ ArVaGuy]

RE: Fin Fang Foom Thinks Roman Ragazzi Is An Idiot

 

>Tom,

>

>FFF is completely correct here. Read part of the Page 6 item

>here:

>

>In e-mails to an interested party looking to hire Barak for

>"modeling" work abroad, Barak - who at first identified

>himself as Ragazzi - said, "I am single. I work at the United

>Nations in New York. They don't know about my other job, and

>that's how it should stay."

>Barak told the party, "I need to know that I am not wasting my

>time here. And this is for real. I will need you to purchase a

>ticket for me online with American Airlines."

>Barak directed the source to messenger tickets to his office

>at the U.N.

>

>He goes on to say he's appearing in porn soon.

>

>Why is he using his work e-mail to do this business. If he

>wants to be discreet, why isn't he being discreet. Why do so

>many others know his business, and why is he conducting

>personal, even if it is as innocuous as modeling, or even

>receiving or saying he can receive tickets from his office

>messenger from his workplace?

>

>I'm constantly amazed and appalled at what people think

>constitutes proper work behavior. NOTE TO PEOPLE: DON'T PAY

>YOUR BILLS AT THE OFFICE OR ON THE OFFICE COMPUTER. DON'T DO

>ANY PERSONAL BUSINESS IN THE OFFICE YOU WOULDN'T WANT TRACED.

>DON'T VISIT PORN SITES OR OTHER SITES THAT WOULD BE

>INTERPRETED AS INAPPROPRIATE BY YOUR EMPLOYERS.

>

>FFF is not being anti-gay or hostile to gays, or whatever else

>you're accusing him of being. FFF is being blunt. This guy's

>a hunk, but he's a big dumb idiot. This is why it's called

>work.

>

>

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Avatar%20Options/applause.gif