Why we can't proof postings carefully enough

[Guest Dan]

This was in an escort's response to a negative review:

 

"Everything else he mentioned below belongs on the comedy network, only to dumb to be aired."

 

That's two much too bare!

 

(I should know about this: I've made enough faux paws here's myself.)

 

Dan Dare

http://www.geocities.com/dandare_laca/DanDare4Hire.html

[whipped guy]

... And not even MS Word is smart enough too catch those faux paws....:-)

[+ glutes]

Two boot:

The response never addressed his proclivity for the bottle...

[bigguyinpasadena]

That the reviewer kept refering to said 'scort drinking "whiskey" sounds like a reformed drunk chastising someone else for drinking.

I have a couple of friends like that and that is exactly the tone they take.

Something not quite right about the review nor the response.

[Steven_Draker]

I think that the response doesn't put the reviewee in his best light. I've met him and have done a threesome overnight with him and even though he's a social drinker he's not a bad person. Just the response is a bit too harsh (in my opinion).

 

Steven Draker ~

http://www.hotsexystud.com/uk

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/steven_draker_brussels.html

[Guest alanm]

The escort, Vincent, never addressed the issue of his drinking which was the client's major problem. It's also never a good idea to bash a client so badly about his personal grooming. On the other hand, the client was taking a chance in hiring an escort from out of town whom he had never met for the weekend. There are about two dozen escorts who are nationally or internationally known and discussed frequently on this site. You are safe in hiring any of them sight unseen, not so sure Vincent is in that category.

[Steven_Draker]

>The escort, Vincent, never addressed the issue of his drinking

>which was the client's major problem.

 

When I read the review, the client's major problem was the lack of passionate/french kissing and mutual oral, not the drinking.

 

SD ~

[Guest alanm]

The reviewer writes at some length about Vincent's drinking both nights, especially the second night when he supposedly passed out drunk. I would not have found Vincent's drinking acceptable & doubt that many other clients would either, since very little sex took place. Whatever the truth is about that weekend, the escort's response could have been much more polished and sensitive.

[augustman]

It would appear on the surface that the review and the response have left more questions than answers. For this site that is failure on both fronts. It definitely is apparent there was a communication issue between client and escort. I am not sure the client did the thorough reading available given the reviews written for Vincent. I never got the impression from vincent's reviews that the oral activity and interaction were Vincent's top qualities.

 

Second, if the client was clear on expectations it may be that Vincent was not clear on his limitations, but again his reviews may have indicated that this may have not been the best match for the client.

 

Third, it is amazing that Vincent did not address the drinking issue. How an escort responds to a negative review is I think an important tool for clients in hiring. Even though Vincent did address the clients complaints regarding interaction and oral, to simply ignore the alcohol statements does give the impression that they were true. I do not think becoming drunk is the best way to deal with a client who may have hygiene issues.

 

Finally if Steven recommends someone I would accept that recommendation without question. That said this review and response leave more questions than answers. Fortunately Vincent would never fit the type of activity I seek so I would never have to worry.

[noimanLA]

Not really sure why it matters so much about whether an escort's grammer is such an important topic?? I work for a major corporation and many executives have terrible grammer in emails they send, and this does not reflect on the person at all. So what if the grammer in Vincent's response was incorrect, WHO CARES! I am sure his point was made regardless of his grammer. What is this, a forum, or a grammer test? And the fact as to why he did not address the drinking issue is only supposition on our part.

 

I have seen Vincent on a couple of occasions and found him to be a perfect gentleman, was not an "alcoholic", and shows his clients a great time. Read his other reviews, Vincent has a number of great reviews, and is quite clear when setting up a meeting what he will or will not do in a session. His pictures ARE accurate, as is his description.

 

I feel that the tone of Vincent's response was due to the attempt by the client to make it seem as though Vincent defrauds his clients. Which is not true in any sense.

 

As a client of Vincent's I would highly recommend his services. And the next time I see him, I will be sure to quiz him on his proper usage of the English language! LOL!

[+ deej]

Murphy's Law of internet postings: Any time you post a rant, you'll make the same mistake you're ranting about.

 

>Not really sure why it matters so much about whether an

>escort's grammer is such an important topic?? I work for a

>major corporation and many executives have terrible grammer in

>emails they send, and this does not reflect on the person at

>all. So what if the grammer in Vincent's response was

>incorrect, WHO CARES! I am sure his point was made regardless

>of his grammer. What is this, a forum, or a grammer test? And

>the fact as to why he did not address the drinking issue is

>only supposition on our part.

 

It's grammar.

 

Someone is bound to call you on it so I thought I'd save them the time. No harm, no foul. Just pointing out Murphy's Law in action.

 

>And the next time I see him, I will be sure to quiz

>him on his proper usage of the English language! LOL!

 

How fortunate for him! :7

[noimanLA]

Well, nobody's perfect. My bad. But thank you for reinforcing my point. People are more interested in finding fault with other people than discussing the topics that matter. Such a shame.

[Steven_Draker]

>Finally if Steven recommends someone I would accept that recommendation without question.

 

Thank you for your trust, Augustman and happy to see that you changed your mind and you're back in posting mode.

 

Steven Draker ~

http://www.gaydar.be/sexystud25

[Guest Dan]

>Not really sure why it matters so much about whether an

>escort's grammer is such an important topic?? I work for a

>major corporation and many executives have terrible grammer in

>emails they send, and this does not reflect on the person at

>all. So what if the grammer in Vincent's response was

>incorrect, WHO CARES! I am sure his point was made regardless

>of his grammer. What is this, a forum, or a grammer test? And

>the fact as to why he did not address the drinking issue is

>only supposition on our part.

 

Well perhaps you didn't catch the irony of his writing "to dumb..." I mean that's just one time you don't want to make a fough paux. Know what I mean?

>

>I feel that the tone of Vincent's response was due to the

>attempt by the client to make it seem as though Vincent

>defrauds his clients. Which is not true in any sense.

 

I really didn't intend for this to be about the review, the reviewer or the escort other than his grandmar. But, if you read the review, the client sure seemed pretty pissed and with good reason. Also, not quite classy to trash the client as he did in his response.

 

Dan Dare

http://www.geocities.com/dandare_laca/DanDare4Hire.html