orville

One of my regular escorts told me that after asking the client some questions like age, ethnicity, and after few message exchanges discussing specs and rate, he already knows who is a timewaster so he will stop responding not caring about the possibility of losing business because the profile is "very consistent". I told him that he might be losing business but he stood by his words. I would like to know the opinion of other working guys.

Have you ever had a client that despite being a loyal regular joe, had any weird OCD, Mania, or Ritual that he performed or asked you to repeat before, during or after every session?

When you arrive to the masseur's home and see the facilities, what kind of workspace, layout, or objects (besides a table) can give you a hint that you are about to have a professional experience or an amateur delivery provided by a college or inexperienced guy, so you can maybe call it off and avoid a bad experience? Pictures are welcome.

Caption: I'm innocent, I did nothing. They held me against my will and started licking me as part of their nasty ritual. I felt myself used, being passed between hands. They never stopped licking me, one after the other, until one of them died, hehe.

Bumping this thread. Is it my impression or escorts are not getting text message notifications from RM Messenger?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZllHJchzbG0:137

It provided guidelines that later had to be pulled back https://bgr.com/2020/04/09/coronavirus-usa-cdc-fixes-hydroxychloroquine-covid-19-info/

Sure, like CDC giving green light to Hydroxychloroquine.

Good to know that even a Nobel Prize and probably one of the greatest contributions to medical science in human history can be looked down upon thanks to personal appreciations of facts no one is 100% sure about. Unless you were there, so you can make now those affirmations. If so, good for you. If anyone is unsatisfied with the Nobel Prize appointments, they're free to do their claims to the organization, given that, as it seems, we are all owners of our own truth.

Yes, you can twist my words all you want to win a useless argument. He probably had errors but also many successes previous to his biggest one, which happens to be discovering the HIV virus, and that won him a Nobel Prize, which not many can account on their careers. Be happy in your small bubble.

Human nature is fantastic. Most ordinary people will overlook 1,000 successes because of 1 fail. No matter all the things the subject of their judgment did right in the past. You are not factoring that there is an agenda, by big pharma and the media. Reason why the WHO covered the outbreak at the beginning, because of the Chinese government pressure. This I'm not inventing. First they said China did a great job but now the WHO is pointing their fingers at China. It's on the mainstream media now, because it came to light thanks to investigative journalism. Medications and the vaccine are the big business here and they will keep talking about it as the main topic, granted. You definitely have a blind trust in whatever is fed to you via mainstream media corporations.

Just because he has an important credit in his career, his findings are way more credible than any of our opinions. And we are not talking ANY important credit here but the NOBEL prize. He's obviously way smarter than the rest of us 'average-smart' people, and a laureate expert scientist in his field. He's also not dependant on any employer, corporation or media to conduct or vet his research. Reason why you probably won't read this on any mainstream news media outlet as they typically have liabilities with Big Pharma advertisers and governments. If you read the complete article, he did not work alone but with a biomathematician and the results of his studies have been corroborated by a separate team in India, later forced to remove their paper publication because of "editorial pressure".

Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Prize for discovering HIV already said that we can get rid of HIV even if exposed multiple times, as long as we have a good immune system, but why COVID could be weakening now has a plausible theory here: https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/nobel-prize-2008-covid-is-man-made-do-not-accept-a-vaccine.157932/

I agree. Haters will always gonna hate.

OMG, sometimes you act like teenagers. The guy is handsome, provides the service with his hands, and maybe some other thing. I don't care about his abs.

Google should know something about it.

That was implied ?

So republicans are masochists too?

Thanks, his original Facebook Page Michael Bragalli shows last activity 18 May 2018 It also says: Président Fondateur at Iron team (Canada). But when you visit that page the last activity is from September 2018. Maybe Canada cracked down on his steroids supplemented business? Now he might be looking to balance his finances while exploring his sexuality on the side.

So he is Mike Buffalari ?

Even though it's a noble idealistic proposal, it will never happen for so many reasons. Uber being the only platform I can remember where providers can rate clients too, @latbear4blk gave a great example with Yelp, reviews (across industries) are mostly of providers, for clients to read and make a decision where to put their money. Not that it would be impossible for escorts to rate clients, but I think it would be incredibly impractical from an execution POV, starting from the fact that there are more clients than providers, like WAY MORE. It would be unmanageable for RM to dedicate more tech power to supply that additional feature on the website. I also think that the majority of us, clients and escorts, are very forgiving unless something very bad happened. Multiple times I have preferred to post no review, than a bad one. And I think escorts would prefer to just move on and try to make more money rather than investing precious time and resources vetting clients. If anything, I don't think escorts would ever disclose who their best clients are? Hence, any space to review clients would organically evolve into a space to trash bad clients. Now that I just typed that it doesn't sound too bad, but I think it would become a vendetta downward spiral, which in return would give the escorts who submit bad clients' reviews, a bad reputation. What client would like to get involved with a provider who is perceived as too vindictive and conflicting? I would think that what escorts want to focus on, is on getting the best possible reviews for themselves. That's how the money-stream flows, FROM the client TO the escort, hence the escort is the depository of the supply or service, whose "quality" is more likely to be rated and "valued", not so much the client who holds the money and the leverage in this power relationship, so the client gets to vet. Finally, if such space to review clients ever appears in this forum, I don't think escorts will engage. They don't even participate in the "Ask an Escort" forum as much as they participate in "The Deli", just saying!

I saw in Bigmuscle.com some hot daddies in their 50s and 60s, that are not in RM or RMasseur. Is it there where escorts move when they become "less marketable", or the destination for those who don't want to retire?

You naughty boy!

Don't overthink it. Just post anything that makes you horny

Great input to my quest for the truth. I think I'm still not clear about all the turnarounds expressed here. However, if I count the responses to this thread it seems like there is some trend inclined to the "booked in advance appointments" side of things.