lonely_john

I remember that submitting a review required filling out a form. Then there was a little interaction, if needed, between him and the reviewer. I'm almost certain that most of the process was "manual" and required more information than necessary. On RM reviews are automatically accepted as long as there's previous communication between the provider and the reviewer in their system. When providers get reviews they don't like, they can request removal if they can prove the meeting never took place (i.e. a malicious review). In most cases, RM will remove any review, sometimes even without proof because their business model gravitates around the escorts. However, with that being said I've seen them keeping negative reviews of escorts who stole money or committed other criminal activities. If there is a new review site it could bring added value by not exclusively favouring the escorts but also the clients in cases of bad service.

It can be automated and human-assisted as in RM. There is a cost of technology though.

Advertising is the way to go in most cases. I suspect that a membership cost could cause the number of active members to drop.

Your remark makes no sense because to start, that never happened. He would consult nothing. And EVERYONE knows that. Again non-sense. Making the decision to improve a website is not exclusive of any kind of management style. And who appointed you to make the decision that there will be only 1 single person making all the decisions? We have been discussing on this thread that there is a legal process to be completed before we know about a new manager. People are just trying to get organized so we don't get back to the same old. Sad to see that some people can only think backward. And yes, not long ago people who would feel offended would report this comment to get me banned - no opportunity to dialogue. SMH.

Twitter is populated with window shoppers with no intent. RM provides high-quality traffic of guys with purchase power who wouldn't mind subscribing with the hopes of getting time with him. As per his reported behaviour with prospect RM clients on this thread, some will, most won't. He's just playing a numbers game.

If his Twitter account is linked to an OF, that might explain everything. Not looking to escort at all, just looking to promote his OF.

And 6'2"/160 lbs?

What made you hand over the money on that 10% of the cases?

More appropriate but my point is that there should not be 1 single person making all the decisions, especially if those decisions are going to be made in a capricious and belligerent way. And sorry if I offend anyone with this, but the archaic idea that effective management is achieved only when 1 single person has complete control of everything is complete BS.

I actually ended up watching this video after reading an article on the internet. The subject is real. I understand that a 1st trial is just that and there are many phases until a successful vaccine is approved. However, this new information is very encouraging.

Why the word "dictator" keeps popping out on this thread. It's frankly distasteful.

While divorce rates were already increasing before the Pandemic, as with many other aspects of the Economy and Society, Covid only accelerated the speed of change, and that might be the reason for the spike in divorce rates. Divorces and Marriages Tumbled in U.S. During Covid, Study Shows

@Charlie that's a very valid point but it actually sounds like you know something that others don't. I haven't followed all the threads so I apologize if this has been asked before: Who are the potential candidates that the court could appoint as the new owner?

100% Agree. No need to wait until a formal decision is made in court. Having at least a sketch of a plan is better than having nothing and letting the whole thing fall into chaos.

On a lighter note, this thread reminded me that there are few athletic demonstrations as funny as Men's Synchronized Swimming - as portrayed in Too bad they are not in the Olympics.

Mixed-gender events in athletics, swimming, table tennis and triathlon have been approved for the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games, the IOC has announced.

I didn't remember the previous thread. He's really hot but too many red flags now: Previous profile with very negative reviews and shut-down. New profile with a name change. Orientation: Ask Me. Position: Ask Me. I Am Into: Nada. Safe/bb: Nada. Rate: $400+ for mostly muscle worship? If his OF doesn't show him banging any girls there is a chance that he's not straight but just a muscular bottom or the steroids are already messing with his balls and capacity to be sexually functional. If so, it might be the reason why there's not a single dick pic.

This is just not true. I have friends who are members of the board of directors at not-for-profit organizations with years in operation and growing every year, and there is not 1 single person making all the decisions. I think the expression 'benevolent dictator' is an oxymoron. If anyone would like to look at examples of outcomes under a dictatorship they should be looking at the current situation in Cuba or North Korea.

Very very handsome. Only if he was a top ... *sigh*

I know that Latin people, especially Brazilians, have the habit of brushing their teeth thrice a day (after every meal) which I think it's different from what some people in the Northern Hemisphere do.

Haha, you're mean. Yeah, I know, some guys just 'skip' leg day. Btw, his legs look more than ok to me. ? And I like how masculine he is. Also ... How much is pricy? Would you mind sharing what he quoted you and for how long?

I believe this is being proposed because during the past administration it looked like there was 1 single person making most arbitrating decisions, especially regarding moderation (deletion of dissenting comments, just for thinking different) and banning (without warning) of members of the forum, in a way that almost felt like totalitarianism with no right to reply or dialogue, or at least that's how I felt it sometimes. Change for the better always requires work. I'm just not sure that the community needs a committee of 15, or that they need to work almost at a full-time capacity. Perhaps the number of committee members and number of hours needs to be reformulated considering the tasks that reallly need to be done as a priority? Would they need to submit some sort of personal information to be part of the committee? Could they keep their anonymity while collaborating? What I know is that in every team there are always 1 or 2 people who will be pulling more of the weight and that's ok. They will know who they are and at what capacity they can volunteer their time. But don't make it look as if it's something that no one should do just because you don't like the idea. I don't know what will be the scope of work but when I've volunteered it in the past, for other causes, most times it was 1 to 3 hours per week

It's true but there are escorts. I think they want everyone to have representation, so having at least 1 or 2 escorts to make the voice of providers heard wouldn't be bad.

Same as RM cancels your client membership if you fail to provide ID along with CC payment, they probably couldn't present a valis ID given that the real guy is in the UK, then the profile 'expires' or becomes 'inactive'. If the ad is not taken down by RM this week, we could help them by reporting it so gets shut down. ? PS: I wish the real guy was really escorting *sigh*