"Dating" in double quotes because in order to date, one must find an individual willing to commit to a trial date, and there's the sticking point. Plus, my definition of dating includes testing the waters for a platonic friend, not always a sex partner.
I think my latency time between serious relationships must average 8 years or so. In those interims I am hard at work tilling the fields of social reciprocity, but those are barren grounds. Before dating apps, there were the likes of IRC, snail-mail newsletters, and online mailing lists. Things were bad then, and are as bad or worse today.
Bars are useless. Everyone has his ironclad circle, and new applications are not being accepted. I don't have the endurance to stay up till the wee hours in a dingy hole on the off chance I might end up with the one eligible bachelor, who also happens to be the inebriate that passes out in my arms.
Okcupid: When I first signed up several years ago, there was a glimmer of hope. People were more likely to respond, and I had a handful of initial encounters, leading nowhere. Nowadays, nothing.
Grindr: The chaos overwhelmed me, and I deleted the app 2 minutes after installing.
Scruff: Somewhat better, but no one seems sincere in actually meeting another person. Had one (sex-only) encounter that resulted in a repeat; when I inquired about a third go-round, I was given the most absurd excuse... But never mind. I have agreed to a couple of other howdy-dos on Scruff, but have been stood-up.
Meetup dot com: Ugh. Too often this option results in an awkward group situation where one lonely heart will attach himself to yours truly and will drone on for half an hour about his life history without pause, and, coincidentally, will not listen to a single reply. Or, the throng becomes so consumed with whatever activity provides the excuse for gathering, they cannot give a particle of attention to anyone else.
Doublelist: Populated with spouses cheating (or pretending to cheat) on spouses. Not a fertile territory.
The other outlets -- adam4adam, recon, etc. -- are equally dismal.
So, given all that (and I don't think I'm exaggerating, am I?), engaging a contractor doesn't seem all that outrageous. Sure, hiring has its pitfalls, but the odds of deriving some pleasure out of a meeting are gobsmackingly greater than Plan D, and the joy of simple, direct interaction with another human is its own reward.