Gar1eth

Vajayjays scare me. Gman

Is it because bisexual individuals being attracted to more genders are more free sexually and so more likely to be attracted to escorting, or is it more of a marketing strategy to say you are bisexual and appeal to more clients? And would you think that most of these escorts are significantly bisexual in their private lives or mainly attracted to one gender? Gman

Do you care if you are in the seat just before or across from the bathroom? I've been in those a time or two. And it wasn't a great experience as breezes from inside the room wafted over me. Gman

Which of course slows the boarding process down. I don't do that. I prefer having my stuff near me. Gman

What a way to make a judgement on a situation when you weren't even there. Not to mention you are just about 100% wrong in your depiction of me. I was already sitting down at the time the flight attendant made the announcement, so obviously she wasn't referring to me. And I think everyone realizes that it can take longer than 10 seconds to put an article in overhead storage. 1st there is the process of taking it off your shoulder or even lifting it up in your hands. Now most people try to do this carefully and without swinging the object wildly as, especially in the tighter quarters these days, it's a lot easier to accidentally hit someone. Then there's the process of trying to make room in the bin in case there is stuff already in it. As for the contention that Zone 4 passengers shouldn't have the right to any bin space:mad:. To paraphrase a famous philosopher-"The airlines were made passengers and not the passengers for the convenience of the airlines." As for us 'simple folk,' sometimes what we do while sitting around and wondering (and during the 15 downtime between sets of our fiery dances ) is express frustration in online Forums. Of course it can open you up to those with feelings of noblesse without any sense of oblige. Yes, that's what we simple folk do (as you might surmise) Gman

Aside from their uncomfortable seats, I hate Southwest's no assigned seating. I don't mind them on a quick flight say from Dallas to Houston or Austin. But they are horrible on long hauls such as Baltimore to Seattle. Gman

The stewardess made the announcement that "as we have a very full flight, we'd like to ask you to step out of the row so people can get by." My response to this is people are standing in the aisle because they are putting luggage and other bags in the overhead storage. Personally I'd like the airline not charge me $50 dollars to check two luggage bags. In addition I'd like a forward seat pocket that is larger than a kitty flap door opening and can actually hold stuff. http://i1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii612/rexmaker/D265D239-89DF-4F7B-9B92-C63E5C8A5E41_zpswptcfsmw.jpg But it looks like neither I nor the stewardesses are going to get what we want. Gman

Are you sure, Phil? http://i1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii612/rexmaker/679B7BF5-31FB-4133-B902-65E18A71861D_zpsrrnvkz09.png Gman

Gman

Ok I don't get it. Is he counting the painting looking at his bum as a flirtation? Gman

For those who only shower ... wait for it... periodically!!! Gman

My sincere wishes for a speedy recovery!! Gman

There are usually exceptions that 'prove' the rule. :D:rolleyes: From Wikipedia: "The exception [that] proves the rule” is a saying whose meaning has been interpreted or misinterpreted in various ways. Its true, or at least original, meaning is that the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes (“proves”) that a general rule exists. For example, a sign that says “parking prohibited on Sundays” (the exception) “proves” that parking is allowed on the other six days of the week (the rule). A more explicit phrasing might be “the exception that proves the existence of the rule.” An alternative explanation often encountered is that the word "prove" is used in the archaic sense of "test".[1] Thus, the saying does not mean that an exception demonstrates a rule to be true or to exist, but that it tests the rule. In this sense it is usually used when an exception to a rule has been identified:[clarification needed] for example, Mutillidae are wasps without wings, and therefore are an exception that proves (tests) the rule that wasps fly. The explanation that "proves" really means "tests" is, however, considered bogus by some sources.[2][3]" (Note: I had read that this last paragraph was the reason for the saying. Imagine my horror to find out it might be false!!) There's more on this aphorism if you are so inclined- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule Gman PS @Epigonos, Epi, BUDDY, surely as long-time Forum Bros we know each other well enough for you to call me Gman, Hmm? PPS With apologies all around, and now back to your previously scheduled topic of HotFitLatin already in progress. Gman

I am put off by 'Ask Me' Orientations, 'Ask Me' Rates, 'Ask Me' Positions and Total Tops!!! Gman

@jjkrkwood, you should have tagged me in this thread, I almost missed it. Two questions-can you show us a picture of your masterpiece (and of course a picture of the chicken would also be nice:p)? If I'm not a big fan of horseradish, would I still like this? Gman

I have a friend who is married and to some extent considers himself bisexual. In my mind he's basically more gay-somewhere between a 4.5-5.25 on the Kinsey scale. He has multiple children and grandchildren. He tells me he loves his wife. On the other hand he tells me that straight guys are 'screwed' in a not very good way because to have sex they have to put up with women. The gist I got from that is that at least for him, most women are pains. I am describing 'masculine' when I use the term 'normal attitude' but I don't mean that for me they have to be the Marlboro Man-although I wouldn't mind the Old Spice Guy:p. It's a difficult subject for me as I'm not as masculine as I'd like although most escorts, if they haven't been totally lying to me, have told me I'm not particularly effeminate. I do have a high voice. But I can't help it. Maybe the same hormones influencing my larynx had something to do with my brain being gay. As for sexual attraction, I seem to be one of the 6's. (I wonder what percentage of us gay people are 6's). I don't ever remember being aroused by a female. Now it's possible that if I had gotten close and personal with a woman, they might have been able through physical means to arouse me but maybe not as vaginas scared me-they probably still do. As for being able to love someone you aren't sexually attracted to, well obviously that's possible. But it's not the stereotypical being 'in love'/romantic love which includes 'passion' that's enshrined by poets. Gman

I've lusted in my heart for many straight guys. But on a hiring basis the one that tempted me the most was Alain Deberry. He seems to have a bit of an attitude though. Plus he quit bottoming before I was ever able to hire him. As I've said before, while I know the overwhelming majority of gay escorts are not going to be attracted to me, still there's something in knowing that a guy I'm with is actually attracted to other males and that he likes that kind of contact-for example the feel of beard stubble against his neck. And yes I know about the Kinsey Scale. But I really question whether someone who is a 1 or a 2 (possibly even a 3) is really 'bisexual'. I mean yes they are by definition not completely straight. But in actuality do they have enough of an attraction for it to matter in the real world? I'm not sure that just being able to receive 'pleasure' from someone of the same sex should qualify you (or being able to achieve an erection considering the use of ED drugs and tri-mix) There's a scene from the movie Scenes From The Class Struggle In Beverly Hills. If I remember correctly the character Robert Beltran plays, Juan, has a bet with Ray Sharkey's Frank over who can score with someone. Juan loses. The forfeit of the bet was that Frank being bisexual would get to perform oral on Juan if Juan lost. Juan lost. Afterwards I seem to remember Frank asking Juan how it was. Doesn't Juan admit to it feeling good and says something about one hole is like another? But being a top I've never had the fantasy of wanting to be known biblically by a straight guy. I don't even want to be known biblically by someone who is gay. And considering my physical limitations of not having the strongest erections, I don't have the fantasy of being someone's first top. It's difficult for most first timers to relax. And junior has trouble staying hard against a closed entrance. I'm not criticizing @LivingnLA. I'm trying to explain my feelings on the matter. I realize for you the stereotypical straight attitude is important. It's actually important for me too. But I prefer to find it in gay men which is why I don't consider it as much 'straight' attitude as I do a 'normal' attitude-where I'm using 'normal' more (but to my shame probably not completely) in the statistical sense of the term as being how the average/median guy acts. Gman

Gman

Oh Lord!!! Gman

He's talking about the facial flush you get because it opens up blood vessels. I'm assuming the flush isn't dangerous as long as you don't have anything like an intracranial aneurysm or something like that. Alcohol can cause the same kind of reaction. Gman

No images for me!! Gman

The problem with these sites is #1. The companies making the drugs might not be FDA approved. So that means who knows what their production standards are. Anyone remember the recent scare with IV steroids here in the USA that were contaminated with fungus and caused multiple deaths? #2. There is a big problem worldwide with counterfeit drugs. The ED drugs are some of the most popular to counterfeit. And these are 'copies' of the real drug already. How much easier to counterfeit them. The counterfeits often can only be discovered by chemical analysis-not not looking at them. But if I were going to accept the risk, I might try some of the sublingual jelly. Gman

You'll have to explain this to us-ok me-who doesn't parlay moy the Fran-say. Gman

I've never heard of Cialis being only for young or in shape guys. While some guys may get better results from one ED drug as opposed to another, I don't think there is really any way to determine that in advance. I was probably 48 when I tried name brand Cialis. It was provided to me by my urologist. If he had thought it wouldn't work for me, he wouldn't have given me the sample. Gman

I'm not saying the site is not legitimate. I'm saying you can't depend on the drug due to fakes being out there and you are trusting a non-FDA approved drug company. You have no idea what their manufacturing standards are. Also when buying that stuff is illegal, more expensive than what I've shown you here, and you have to wait for it in the mail as opposed to popping down to whatever pharmacy GoodRx shows as the cheapest, why would you continue to use a foreign mail order site. Cialis didn't work for me the one time I took it. My doctor told me it might have a longer half-life, but that of the three available at the time it was the weakest. Gman