Tarte Gogo

Of course I forgot to mention that once you have a second appointment, all sorts of discussions can happen. Once you have come in someone’s mouth, you can basically trust them that they are not a cop. At least I would.

Of course the provider should have everything, and if he doesn’t, he is not really a pro, but as a client who doesn’t only do regulars, I cannot be sure that all my escorts are real pros and well prepared. So I carry everything. They make very small bottles: https://www.amazon.com/K-Y-Sensual-UltraGel-Personal-Lubricant/dp/B00QSHKE5K/ref=sr_1_4_s_it?s=hpc&ie=UTF8&qid=1523581547&sr=1-4&keywords=ky+ultra+gel

Interesting. Pinging @freecahill1965 who I thinks wants to see this thread.

You do know all phones today allow to take, and then keep, a screenshot of anything, right?

That is the simplest and wisest way to say it. There is indeed no need to use any negative words about escorts that are asking for stats. But there is also no need to hire them.

Just hire them for their time: discuss price for X hours of companionship. That is all. Once you are in the room with them, do not re-discuss the price, or agree for more for a particular sex act, or anything like this. Just let it happen. Pay before leaving, as agreed, for the good companionship time. As far as you are concerned you hired for companionship, and then the guys started undressing and touching you. It is not your doing that sex happened! Think about it: if ever some policemen start kissing clients, in order to catch them having sex against money, then it is entrapment which is illegal for the police to do in every state (some lawyer will have to back me up on this one).

That helps enormously. You are a star manmed. I have already hired Chris Horden twice last year. Thanks. Will cancel.

http://media.rentmen.eu/public/photos/main/44/284396_1522630368_nqv9w3f4rh.jpg

I booked Lars for tomorrow, taking the plunge and risking it. If anyone doubted it, there is a real Lars Nielsen that did work for Belami: http://thebananablog.com/blog1/2017/11/11/belami-lars-nielsen/ and that pornstar looks exactly like the RM pics. Anyone can confirm Mr Nielsen happens to be in NY these days? Maybe some belami fans like @Avalon can search the web for news or social media updates on Lars Nielsen?

20 yo Mendes https://www.instagram.com/p/Bhcf0MEDrFg/?taken-by=ghumendes

Getting close to 200 different guys, some with repeats, so no, my mum didn’t make me with a good enough memory for that many guys.

How about this analogy: Making commercial sex illegal because of sex trafficking is like making all sales of bananas illegal because some banana farm workers in one country in Africa are being abused.

I guess we can talk about in on boytoy.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/jeffrey-hurant-ex-ceo-rentboy-prostitution-sentenced-prison/ https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/jeffrey-hurant-rentboy-founder-prison-info.132334/

Ok guys, I gave him a second chance today and he was on time. I got a very rushed service, though. I wouldn’t recommend. You can find much better in Manhattan. I’ll write a review because there were some good aspects, and some bad. To @sexymonk and @nycman, I owe an apology for being so sarcastic about their interpretation of “white party” . I asked him directly and he said “it is coca”. So I guess that settles it, lol, I was very wrong. I guess I had never imagined that that type of drug usage was fully compatible with a beautiful muscular body and regularly working out. My only excuse is that I never use any of this shit, so what do I know? Plus I am biased towards giving hot guys the benefit of the doubt.

Who wants to explain to 7829V that nobody cares if our files are decrypted in a million years from now using up all the energy available in the solar system?

I forgot to mention that, I was thinking about it, yes the message needs to include confirmation that 1. We support the effort against trafficking and 2. This effort could be financed by taxes on legal prostitution. We also need to confirm we are happy for providers to pay income tax and for client to pay a sales tax on the service provided. That is a good one. Might be our best shot actually.

Well my lunch break has been replaced by ... lunch. I texted him 30 mins before arriving at his place. And then I texted him at his door, so that he would let me know which apartment to go up to. No reply until 12:40, when he finally texted me that he was still with another client and would be back home after 2 hours. And he dared to ask if I would wait. So I am having a poke bowl instead, and being pretty annoyed. I’d say avoid, unless you have nothing else to do for the day and don’t mind waiting on him. And if you meet him, ask him about the white party!

I can tell you a little bit later, he is my lunch break today!

Logically, if you think about it, you need 1. People who have hired them before to know that you have enough money to pay the elite escorts. 2. These same people to happen to know that you are looking for such escorts. 3. These same people to trust you with a secret about this whole business, and also to like you enough to have a reason to introduce you into the circle. So it relies on being “visible” and friendly to other rich people that likely have hired in the past, and on a bit of luck, because I assume just being rich is not a guarantee to have such connections.

Get 2 beautiful people on screen, saying they want to be that, but are not allowed by the state’s interference. I am worried that just a series of guys saying “i am a John” will look creepy, like they are admitting to a crime. Especially old ugly-faced blokes that look like me. Persuasion of the masses is important and if they have something they find unattractive to look at, while listening to the message, it will do the opposite of the intended effect, they will associate negatively with the message. Also being on your own on screen, people will just think, “well i too want sex with beautiful people, but that is not how it works, you don’t just get to fuck who you want in life”, but 2 people saying “we want to have sex and the government is forbidding it” that should resonate with anyone who is in favour of sexual freedom.

1. Don’t we already know what we want? We want decriminalisation, right? Anyone disagrees with that? Maybe we disagree on how to get there, but I think we all agree on the goal. 2. We already all are thinking on how to resist. I get PMs and texts from people who don’t necessarily contribute here, proving to me that there are many people actively thinking about this. Here is my thinking: we should use the methods recently used by the gay community to achieve their goals. 1. Get organised and visible, the way gay liberty groups got organised. Visible is the hardest part as usual. We should start getting some couples interviewed on TV to explain that their right to have sex the way their want to, are being denied. The couples should be one client and one sex worker, always agreeing with each other, always on message, that they both want to be free to have sex, and that they both want money to be involved, and that the state is interfering with their sex lives, by making what they want to do consensually, illegal. 2. Use language as a persuasion tool. When people wanted “gay marriage” to be legal, they progressed a bit using logical arguments, but not enough. That is because straight people were imagining the gay sex when they were hearing this phrase. Icky. When we started using “marriage equality” instead, much more people started to agree to it. Because everyone is in favour of equality. Is there an equivalent change of language, that we could make to advocate our rights, and that wouldn’t make monogamous people feel “icky” or jealous when they think about what we are doing?

Day one should be suitable. That is what I use, and I am also hiding it from the husband. It has password protection which should keep what is in it secret even if I get run over tomorrow.

Yes, all the time. I recommend to either not answer or keep it general and G-rated. Remember that hero spa was raided by NYPD only 2 months ago. You never know who is lurking and reading this.

Isn’t it amazing that we have to resort to definitions from a stay-at-home Christian mum? At least she is making sense.