Tarte Gogo

Hehe, well, that helps before meeting, but the question of what to do if the research still hasn’t protected you, what do you once you are at their place and they are not as advertise? I guess I’d simply walk away if I have no attraction for the guy. But if he is hot, I’d probably do him anyway. If you started touching and he doesn’t do what he promised, well, since you pay for his time only, you owe him the fee, so get whatever you can out of the encounter (for example just bust a nut by jerking off on his chest), pay up the agreed fee and write a bad, but accurate review on daddyreviews.com.

That wouldn’t be nice for him.

I am impressed that you resisted so strongly and commend you for that. I am not impressed that you let him stay 4 hours in your room though, do you have no sense of time passing? After the end of the first hour I would have told him: “you can stay if you want but I only agreed to pay you one hour, and I won’t be able to give you more.” That should have sent him on his way.

Lol, yes it is a vibrator that gets triggered by loud noises. And the loud noises that are picked up are when one tips them with tokens. So you can make them squirm by giving money.

These are studios, like in Medellin and Saint Petersburg. They keep part of the “tokens” you give them and give the rest to the boys.

Don’t bring sand to the beach. Get there and hire one locally. They will be much, much cheaper than bringing one from Europe. And some offer really excellent service.

Of course, but they also go completely overboard by calling me racist because I am white. That's fucked up. In fact that is racist. They assign a psychological trait to all the individuals in a group that has a particular skin colour. That is definitely part of my definition of "things only racist people do". Where does it stop? Next they are going to call for segregation, in order to protect the blacks against my racism? I am not accepting a new definition just because it serves some people's agenda, whether they are young or otherwise. Definition need to be useful to categorise concepts. If they loose that ability, we can ditch the word and we need to coin new words with formal definitions to discriminate between the old concept and the new, diluted one. Sorry everyone for having highjacked this Paris trip thread.

Well fair enough, if you think I am committing an etymological fallacy, maybe I am, but if we let meanings drift completely without restriction on such important concepts we are going to have difficulty having a sensible conversation in society. Btw are you aware that there is a large part of the left now that think that in the US, blacks cannot be racist, but also whites are all necessarily racist, because “racism is systemic”. That is their new definition of racist. https://mobile.wnd.com/2007/10/44291/ https://www.pambazuka.org/governance/black-people-can’t-be-racist What next? we define “racist” to include anyone whose opinion on how the solar system was formed we don’t like? Some other random meaningless shit? And when do we deal with the real problem of racism?

You don’t understand me. I don’t define race. Racist people do that. And that is why they are wrong. I am talking about the racists’ perception or definitions of the world, not mine or yours. I am aware that Skin color is only sometimes part of the racist’s problem. When bigots think of some group as a “different culture” and hate that culture, you have a problem, but often a solvable one (usually through integration). It doesn’t always work, but at least there is some way out, in their mind. But when they think of the group as a different and inferior race (like the German did with the Jews, yes they definitely thought themselves as the superior race https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_race) you have a much bigger problem because they start with something like apartheid, and they can go all the way to the worst of what mankind produces. That is when you have actual racism. Bigots can easily become racists, don’t get me wrong. They are much more common though, and i am open to see stats that contradicts me, but recently the most active and dangerous groups are the racists. The others cause harm, discrimination, which leads to poverty and a lot of other problems, but usually don’t lynch or build extermination camps. It might not be very different to you, and for sure they are both wrong, evil and dangerous but I know which I’d rather face.

Just to be clear I don’t think there is a problem with the Romanian culture, I think the behaviour of certain individuals as observed are a result of being uprooted + poverty + lack of opportunity and lack of hope to ever be able to build a proper future for oneself.

Well because of the historical death toll. When people believe they are a separate race, a superior one to another, things ended up real bad, like enslavement or extermination. But when they think it is based on a difference in culture, at least they understand that changing the culture which they dislike would solve the problem that they imagine exists, which means extermination isn’t “the only way”, unlike in the other case. Culture can significantly change, given a couple of generations. Even bigots know that (well, if they have done history at school). However if they think the culture is in the blood and cannot change, then they think wrongly that culture is the same as race and then that makes them racists of course.

Isn’t that part of the reason the first thread got deleted?

I think that’s mis-using the word, and abusing the language, and I won’t use it in that way. The problem with calling all bigots “racist” is that it dilutes the meaning and when you have to actually warn against a real racist, people will think “well, just another bigot” and not get the warning seriously. (Just like you, not saying anything about comments in this thread, making a general point).

https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/please-no-escort-reviews-on-the-message-board.138667/#post-1560618 (this is relevant if money was involved)

Can we please stop calling everything we don't like "racist"? Romanians are just as white as French people or Spanish people. They are all the same race. To claim that Romanians are a different race is just fucked up. If Tasso was racist he would hate Spaniards just as much. If you meant to say he has a bias against the Romanian culture, then just learn to use that word: "biased". It isn't very hard.

This is really interesting, I know he was born there in 52, but I didn’t know he hadn’t’accepted the new name. Where did you read this, if you remember? My google-fu fails me on this one, only brings “Putin was born in Leningrad” articles.

That is the walk of pride for me. “Yes I am getting some. With a super hot guy. Are you?”

On top of all the very good advice already given, I would ask you to submit a review to Daddy. These things are useful to know for everyone else, otherwise they can keep screwing clients for ever. So in short: - never hire them again - if he didn’t offer any compensation/fee reduction for his poor performance, write a fair but specific review at Daddyreviews, so we know who to avoid.

correct.

I have actually started laser hair removal. 2 sessions done. 4 more needed. It doesn't hurt me at all. I was convinced to start after touching @VictorPowers legs!

No he means Romanians. Since Romania joined the EU, the borders are open, so Romanians have emigrated to the big Western European cities. When they arrive, they happen to be among the most recently arrived and therefore the poorest (because no job and no right to unemployment benefits yet), and that is usually a situation that incentivises petty crime. Many in this situation would never do it, but a few do it a lot, and that’s no matter where they are from, it is based on the lack of any other option/ opportunity.

I thought I did, but maybe I am misremembering!

Sorry I am not familiar with the problem. Would a thorough shower and clean underwear remove the possibility of getting those bugs into your bed?

Nope, he is definitely not taller than me.

Mike is still a Babylon?