TruthBTold

Vinnie . . .

Like 'em cute . . .

In a recent interview with Rob Reiner, he said that unlike Archie Bunker Carroll O'Conner was even more leftist than Reiner in his real life. It is very difficult for me to make up my mind about the Reboot. As has already been discussed, the deluge of themes do tend left on many occasions and I suppose everyone will have to wait until things have calmed down to seem it it turns one way or another. There was no doubt, even if its main character was a rightwing buffoon, what kind of depiction Norman Lear wanted for the show. Also, as already mentioned it has to be considered that Wanda Sykes is involved in writing a portion of it. Also, Sara Gilbert, out and proud lesbian, was the person who suggested bringing the show back to television and is an executive producer. From the episodes I saw there were enough funny lines to keep me interested. I am not sure if it will last. And if Rosanne's political philosophy becomes much preachier in the hopes of converting I will definitely boycott the show.

Yes, very handsome, sexy men. And some of the best actors.

Well, he went from being a great bottom in the 80s to being a "Dom power Versitle Top" now. Not that that is not possible but the waste of a nice butt, particularly the pictured one.

The question is whose?

Yep, Jesus rose.

Besides the obvious, smart guy, good actor, good director.

Oh, that is too bad that you won't be able to bring one of the guy's you associate with. You generally mingle with the cream of the crop.

Sometimes you love what you never knew you wanted or needed.

Then again, ferocious prosecution of the proposed law against escort websites by the Justice Department will cut off most of the sexual outlet for Republican legislators (especially young but legal males). So perhaps it won't be used against sites such as Rentmen.

I suppose masturbating would help. Semen must count for something (besides feeling good).

I was wondering if the definition(s) of prostitutions/escorting always includes exchanging the providing of sexual acts for money? Or can it be sexual acts for anything of value? And has the insertion of a paragraph such as "I do not accept money for sexual acts. I am compensated via contributions for my time only. Anything that happens during that time is a decision made between two consenting adults," been seen to protect against prostitution claims? Or does a prosecutor just go on the full extent of the facts as they emerged in the circumstances. Otherwise, regular meet ups from sites as Grindr could be interpreted as providing something of value being given for sex - companionship.

There is certainly something to say for holding your own against Julie Andrews.

Oh, I did not realize. The number of reviews noted is not by the site but rather by the person doing the review? So the number could be fabricated?

Sometimes some accusations end up being totally true.

Was that ass photoshopped? If not prepare to be suffocated.