TruthBTold

Courtesy of my man Moondance . . .

That is a nice hefty mouthful.

Thanks. I got distracted by one thing (well, two parts of one things) and one thing alone.

Mmmm, let's see.

I would take #1 (the non-tattoo guy).

Jeez, you would have to pull my tongue out of that well before we would even have to talk about squeezing his thighs around any part of me.

True. You are indeed in charge of your own body and your need to comply with the prescription's mandates. However I have taken my medication every day and so my statistics are AT LEAST 90% and could be well above. I can't answer for others who do not. So I have to accept or not accept the risks by assessing the many factors involved and go on from there. Even if I used a condom but did not use medication my risk would be the same and actually might be more. So I might choose to go without ejaculation in my butt. But that might be giving up too much.

Saw Bette Midler's Clams On The Half Shell http://i1-news.softpedia-static.com/images/news2/Bette-Midler-s-Birthday-Wish-To-Direct-Ariana-Grande-s-Next-Video-466269-7.jpg The tour to promote Talking Heads' Remain In Light

It is sort of like the regular Oscars. As I get older and older the less and less of the actors I know.

If I am drinking hard liquor half-empty, if it is wine half-full.

I'm getting some very erotic, creative ideas about these two.

According to the CDC (U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Truvada when taken consistently "reduces the risk of getting HIV from sex by more than 90 %." How much more it does not say. This conclusion is from a 2018 CDC statement. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/prep.html It also links various studies from which it is taking its conclusion. However, because condoms do protect against other STDs than HIV the CDC also recommends concurrent use.

If you find his attitude agreeable on texting/speaking with him then $350 seems reasonable considering the package. Of course, a second positive review would make him much more alluring.

Truer words have never been spoken (or printed that is).

Photographers really know how to pick 'em.

If you use torrents there are a few sites that have what they claim is the whole video. However the one I saw does not show the FA in a jacket. It begins with him getting ready for the BJ. Plus, it appears that Austin can barely maintain a hard-on. I guess that is what airline bathrooms will do.

I know that it is going to take a lot of pleading to fuck that ass.

Stolen from Marylander for very good reason

You mean did it take me until I saw his face, yes. I think that at first all you see is his body and occasionally the very bottom of his beard. Unfortunately I do not find that he has a body (or really even a beard for that matter) that stands out. Then while he is fucking him the camera pans up to his face. That is when I knew he was someone I knew knew from somewhere. I guess because his acting was fairly good in general that it took me awhile (before the scene was out) that he was a porn star. I just could not recall his name. Of course they did not list "Colby Keller" in the credits.

I agree with you that such acts are deplorable in any way and I said in my post I am not condoning those acts. However, the U.N. states that genocide "means any of the following acts committed with intent too destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, religious group . . . " and then goes on to delineate the many ways this can be done. (The International Criminal Court adopted a similar definition in 1998.) I believe the definition was created because it was in direct response to the outright slaughtering of the Jewish population in WWII based on ethnical and religious considerations. Unfortunately, it does not include disabled people as a separate group.

So, despite the fact that no one else seems to be paying attention to this HBO show ( ) it was so weird because last night my worlds collided. Actually I began watching this show in mid-first season (perhaps episode 5) and watched through Season 2. I decided that because I liked it so much I would go back and watched the first five episodes of Season 1. In the first episode, one part of the episode is about this gay guy (basically a twink) and his very overbearing female roommate. At one point he decides to use his Grindr-like app to pick up a guy. The next thing you see is him nude bent over the island in his kitchen and the equally naked guy fucking the hell out of the twink. While you can see most of the pick-ups body you do not see his face. After he cums, and walks around totally naked (you see everything), you finally see his face. Immediately I thought, "Shit, he looks so familiar. Who is that?" The twink then asks him if the pick-up would like to hang/go to a restaurant. The nude pick-up then says that he couldn't because he was in recovery and had to go to a meeting. The twink asks if he can go with him and during the rest of the episode you see the two of them periodically at these meetings. At any rate, finally I figured out that the pick-up was Colby Keller. It was so weird to see someone who I had known (and known very intimately in the porn world) in this other world. But he was really good in his scenes, actually sort of like the personas he tends to play in his porn scenes. Any way it was just weird. Colby with his characteristic beard at one of the recovery meetings with his fuck buddy.

Please, please do not take this as approving of either of the policies I discussed - sterilization or forced abortion - (and mentioned so in my original post). As crazy as it may sound, these practices, while reprehensible, may not be genocide because they are not targeted toward a particular group or groups. The U.N. has defined what it considers "genocide" and I think that preventing births without targeting particular groups and without killing live human beings is not genocide. See http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.html . It appears that the International Criminal Court has defined genocide in similar terms. In my eyes, trying to make sure that your "race" stays pure by eliminating all other cultural groups by preventing members of the other groups from being born should be genocide but I am not sure that under international law that it is. If I remember correctly, the U.S. forced sterilization on certain groups at various times, e.g., the developmentally disabled. Being that it is such a serious issue I truly apologize if my post is erroneous in any way.

I try to get through October without turning on the heat. However, here in Chicago it has consistently been in the low 50s and unfortunately as I get older I just can't tolerate temps in my home lower than 70/71. I try to balance it out by always wearing socks and some sort of over-shirt or sweater. For the most part it works to eliminate the guilt of trying to have the thermostat stay at 68 which I used to do. Thinking of moving to Palm Springs and just melting like the witch.

My guess (and it is really only a very limited guess as I know a limited amount about eugenics) is that eugenics attempts to build a "master race" from the ground up. I do not think that it mandates murdering those that are outside the master race. My guess (again) is that it might want to order that propagators that were not in the master race be subject to sterilization or perhaps even forced abortion. I do not think eugenics necessarily mandates (as the Nazis tried to do) to eliminate those they did not want in their master race which would be genocide. Both are disgusting practices but I think they can be differentiated.

Something so sexy about a baby face with a hairy chest.