oldNbusted

I've counted, by hand, millions of dollars worth of US bills. All the counterfeits I've encountered were comically obvious to me, including the ones given to me by a guy who was also highly experienced handling cash. I guess that's my roundabout way to say I would love to see if someone could pass me a bad bill.

I've gone through phases where my idea of a perfect weekend after crossing my threshold after work Friday evening, was not crossing it again until I left for work Monday morning. As they say, just because you are alone doesn't mean you are lonely.

This should cover it....

Well, it took two years but finally connected. If it's up to me, I certainly won't let two more years go by before we meet again, he knows what he's doing.

At first, I thought there was a possibility he wanted the fantasy that he's the escort being hired by guys he happens to find hot. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I have to say, if this takes off, it could revolutionize the industry.

The outcall only thing is unfortunate for me.

No worries, the worst of them were banished to the cornfield.

We don't have to imagine, this is the premise of multiple threads from Mocha, usually not well received in these parts. ?

1. Netflix does not own Hollywood, not even close. 2. I'm only aware that 2 of the 6 majors are implementing a direct to consumer streaming service. 3. The film distribution model has never been fixed. In 1960, ~30% of free-to-air network programing was Hollywood films. Premium Pay TV channels changed everything. Prerecorded home video media changed everything again. Per-Per-View TV changed everything again. Video-On-Demand, both rental and purchase, has changed everything again. 4. Netflix isn't a studio that produces their own content in the way the majors do. They are directly financing more films and series that are made by existing productions house, but they still buy the US domestic distribution rights to a lot of projects that have already been made. 5. Non-theatrical film releases are not new with Netflix. HBO and Showtime have bought the US distribution rights to films for decades. If you wanted to see Michael B. Jordan (figuratively hot) on the big screen in Fahrenheit 451 (literally hot), you were out of luck. I need a break, let's see a pic of that hotness... mmmmmmm 6. I'm not aware of any such thing as a 'Netflix graveyard'. In the early streaming day, Netflix had fixed length distribution deals for most of their content, the most famous was with Starz and Marvel. When the deals expire, the content goes elsewhere. For content that Netflix outright owns, I'm not aware they have ever pulled anything off the service, why would they? 7. For popular content they own, such as Orange is the New Black, or House of Cards, there have been home video releases, both DVD and Blu-Ray. I'd say the home media release has to have a chance at making money on its own. Not likely to see Chef's Table on Blu-Ray. The film Roma is coming out on Blu-Ray soon and I fully expect The Irishman will follow. 8. The Irishman would never have been made if Netflix has not stepped in to finance it, after the original studios backed out when the budget skyrocketed. This is just one example of the point @quoththeraven made elsewhere, more content is available to more people than ever before. When I worked in film exhibition in the early 80s, there were about 300-350 films released a year. Now it's ~700. And that's not counting all the high quality content that never sees a theater. Stepping back, I think the big picture is the old business model that we grew up with was largely based on scarcity. That was mostly because it was expensive to distribute the content. This is no longer relevant in an age of on-demand mobile HD streaming to every person and the business model is shifting to all the content all the time. In this world, people will go to the theater because they want a theatrical experience. In a surprise to me, this has actually turned out to be a lot more people than I thought. The number of movie tickets sold in the US last year was 1.3 billion, the peak just under 1.6 billion was back in 2002. While it appears to be on a very slow downward trend, there is no sign of a collapse and I am surprised. I have to say, the changes the theaters have made to keep people coming are fantastic. As far as I'm concerned there has never been a better time to be a movie fan.

I always thought it was "men are simple creatures". I know I was thinking that when one of the guys was making me smile by manhandling me through my pants Sat. night.

Someone I knew back in the day would have lost his whole mind if he got his hands on this guy.

If I'm interested in a guy, I will most likely be looking directly at him if he is within reach, so to speak, so he would not be able to sneak up on me, and I would be ready to engage. If I am not interested in someone, I avoid eye contact, and yeah, I would be very surprised if a guy engaged with me like that, but he still wouldn't have been able to sneak up on me. I have to admit, if a guy was that clueless, I would probably just just laugh it off.

and also at https://rentmasseur.com/Tamario

RentMan of the Day. He paid for front page and sidebar placement of his ad. I notice the review mentioned above is gone, the old review is from 2019.

Nice bubble. RMotD today...

I believe this is where @BabyBoomer usually pipes up...

Saw this in a profile, I thought it was amusing..

The way the question is framed makes it seem like this is a dating relationship, as in how many dates before you start being your true self, or something. In my mind, there is no connection between having multiple successful sessions and divulging personal info. I think in this situation, each person is free to offer or withhold their personal info at their discretion, it's totally up to them and no one should have an expectation. A client is not doing an escort some kind of favor by disclosing their real identity and an escort is not shady if they never do. I would never never never ask someone this. I can only imagine the firestorm if a thread were started about an escort who asked his repeat clients for personal info. On the other hand, there are people here who don't have a nom de guerre, so they never have to decide when to out themselves. My point is that it's their prerogative and their prerogative alone. And it shouldn't have any bearing on the sessions.

After you left, we found out that a naked hardbody black guy twerking on the face of a Burl Ives stunt double can still draw some looks.

I'd say Sean has set the bar very high. The review is comparing current intangibles vs past intangibles. Personally I'd not expect a high level of intangibles from a 1 hour session.

I only meant that Review #22 - 11/15/2019 addresses @latbear4blk questions if Sean is still smoking hot and delivering a premium escort service.

New review today with an answer... https://www.daddysreviews.com/review/sean_xavier_dc

I posted about it here https://www.companyofmen.org/threa...ing-from-the-ashes.128932/page-5#post-1377986 Another guy was harmless, just kinda clueless. For example, his ad said he was naturally smooth, his pics were of him smooth, and he turned out to be fairly furry. During our time, he complained about having to shave everything for some event that night. I was not sympathetic. He sent me multiple messages requesting a review, which I ignored. He's no longer advertising, just as well.

I have a couple I wish I could forget...

US domestic movie theater attendance contributes a small fraction to "Hollywood", and even at that, those numbers are not terrible, so overall the motion picture industry is doing better than ever. Technology has rapidly changed how people get their entertainment, just like the true smartphone era has only started to alter society in ways we won't understand for decades. I can say that the changes movie theaters have been forced to make to remain competitive have me going to more movies than I have in decades. Reserved, very comfortable, widely spaced seating is da bomb.