harey

Yep, he definitely monitors here and blocked me on RM after I commented using photos that aren't him. I haven't actually seen his recent profile but wasn't logged in when I clicked your link, so it opened. Wow, morphed for days.

Maybe RM should add "Rough Trade" as an orientation choice. That might clear up some confusion. TWO ESCORTS CHATTING IN A HOTEL BAR Escort 1 to Escort 2: "Hi, you gay/bi/straight?" Escort 2: Straight Escort 1: Cool. Have a girlfriend? Escort 2: No, a boyfriend. You have a girlfriend? Escort 1: Yeah, I'm straight-straight. Escort 2: Oh...you're Trade.

I completely agree and found the same from my own experience. On the other hand, it's helpful for new clients to have a basic understanding of an escorts normal limits. I would rather take a chance with a openly "limited" escort (and discover later that more is possible if we have chemistry) than meet with a provider who is somewhat vague about his limits. But this particular escort isn't vague. When I texted him, he was quite clear about limits up front.

I had an amusing email exchange with him on RM. He gave me a good impression and seems discreet. Not sure yet if I'll pursue a meeting.

You have good taste. He's stunning. Your 2 is a good question. If you are sure he's not real, then maybe he moved on and the ad hasn't expired yet. Might also be that a scammer is looking for a certain type of gullible client and you don't seem like easy pickings. Are you sure he's fake? In general, some real escorts just aren't responsive at times, either because they are sketchy or for their own reasons.

I noticed the difference recently when updating my RM client profile. The "looking for" option for escorting was not showing on Rent.men. It's unclear to me if they are starting with one platform and going to change the other site later or if there are legal reasons why one site needs to eliminate that specific wording.

Both. More likely to order clothes online if I bought something similar in a store and know the sizing/fit. Household items I'll often buy online because it's so convenient to have them waiting at my door after work. I recently moved and made a flurry of Amazon purchases - so many I lost track of what was coming. That really was like Xmas. I don't miss the mall or the rude clerks.

What a fascinating choice for a first post on this forum.

Oh, you naughty boy.

Interesting. I may ask a few that question.

This may have been discussed before but didn't show up when I searched. Apologies if it's a rehash. Recently I was having pillow talk with a provider and he asked if most of the RM guys are Bi or Straight. The question surprised me until I looked around and noticed quite a few escorts who list themselves as Bi. Has anyone ever performed an analysis on RM, old Rentboy, or Friendboy to find orientation broken out by percentage? I suspect that some escorts listed as Bi are really Gay but lean toward masculine. If clients are looking for Bi/Straight, then a little false advertising might bolster business. For others, Bi may mean "attracted to men but not overly feminine". The inaccurate self-identification would skew the data, but I'd still be interested in seeing the breakdown. Has anyone taken the time to do a count for a city or noticed any trends over time? There are so many weird ideas about Gay equating to feminine, and feminine being weak. For my personal choices, I'm more interested in energy than labeling. I am curious, though, about the decisions escorts make in presenting themselves and if that's influenced by their own opinions - or what they think appeals to clients.

Yes, I agree. I've seen some studies online about that topic and it's pretty sad. I seem to recall reading an idea that sexual predators may select gay boys more often because the boys are shy or seem more vulnerable. If that is true, then adult men who report being molested as children could more likely be gay because that's how they were born to begin with - not because childhood rape changed their orientation.

@MichiganMan I say follow your gut. The photos connect to someone real and who really looks like that. His current location is Michigan on social media. You're welcome to PM me for more information.

Thanks for posting that. I completely agree. My regular guys are all very different from each other but have some things in common. One common trait is that they don't like time wasters or being treated like meat for sale, and that's what I like to see. Why would I spend my time with a man who doesn't respect himself ? Most of my repeats are also very discreet, and some don't even advertise openly, so a desire for privacy doesn't surprise me. For new hires or first contacts, I try hard to get an accurate "read" on the guy based on his profile and ad text, as well as any information I've gathered from the forum. Then I contact him. Based on my impressions, I might be more businesslike, or quite casual in tone, or go out of my way to offer a compliment as an icebreaker. Email and text are limited, so my goal is to choose wording that will let an escort know that I'm considerate, serious, and (hopefully) fun. Or at least a harmless old man who is not completely insane and will be reliable about meetings and money. I made a decision to build out my RM profile with more details, even though that's against my own instincts for privacy. There is enough information, including several reviews I've submitted, so at a glance someone can tell I'm not just a poseur, lurker, or pic collector. I even included my favorite Sappho quotation, hoping to find someone who takes the time to translate and actually understands. But that extra time isn't required, and I don't have any problems with an escort who doesn't give himself away to strangers. I wasn't coming down on @Mitch or anyone else, simply stating that I don't always connect with someone interesting despite my best efforts to be respectful in my communications.

Today's cover boy. https://www.daddysreviews.com/cruise/newest/texx_dallas

Somewhat similar experience for me, except good initial response. Ignored request for pics. I don't feel like tap dancing or saying pretty please, so not a good match.

Jeff Stryker Jon Vincent Aiden Shaw

And bring that boy with the fireworks.

Hmm. I thought this was a more open-minded place. Your reactions have been very Midwestern Pentecostal... “He’s different so let’s put him in another forum. He’s not for me and shouldn’t get so much attention. He has tastes that aren’t mine so let’s judge him.”

Don’t hold back. Not good for your blood pressure.

I would have gone with “fund me”.

I didn’t realize “fun” was a verb. I will PM you for more info later.

He is an escort.

Esteban and yes. https://www.companyofmen.org/threads/411-on-esteban.119125/