GayGamer323

I'll second this for the LA-area. 

He's the real deal. While I've only received a purely therapeutic deep-tissue from Marc, it was one of the best massages I've had in a long time. I was already looking forward to booking my next appointment before the first one was even finished. He's so good, that I don't even care about his other "menu" of offerings. I think he'll be my go-to for therapeutic from here on out.

I'll second this for the LA-area. 

He's the real deal. While I've only received a purely therapeutic deep-tissue from Marc, it was one of the best massages I've had in a long time. I was already looking forward to booking my next appointment before the first one was even finished. He's so good, that I don't even care about his other "menu" of offerings. I think he'll be my go-to for therapeutic from here on out.

I just reached out to him. Based on what he shared, it's a bit more than therapeutic.

And his prices are pretty reasonable.
Three favorable reviews and they appear to be legit. He's been very sweet in my message exchange, so maybe he's the real deal. 

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't go into a massage session with any intention of having sex, even if it's listed as sensual. For me, the massage is the most important thing and I don't wish to sacrifice the quality of a good massage for the possibility of having sex.
I typically book therapeutic over sensual, but will opt for sensual if that means the masseur is also naked. I'm a bit of a nudist, so it's always nice when a masseur will also go naked during a sensual massage session. But getting a sensual massage or us both being naked doesn't mean sex. For me, being naked together is what makes the massage sensual and sensual does not need to end with anyone getting off. I've found having a masseur jerk me off to be a bit awkward and, honestly, I feel I can do a better job of that on my own.

Sure, skin on skin contact, or when a masseur's hand (or other body part) briefly glides across your balls/ass/dick is generally exciting and creates anticipation...but that can also ruin the moment for me, which should be focusing on the massage itself. 

I also understand that masseurs have different interpretations of what's involved with sensual massage or what should be classified as erotic. What I described above may sometimes be considered more erotic (though, I see an erotic massage as the gateway towards more sexual activities), so I may opt to book the erotic if that means the masseur will be naked too - however, I will make it clear up front what my expectations are, just so we're both on the same page. 

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

I'll second this for the LA-area. 

He's the real deal. While I've only received a purely therapeutic deep-tissue from Marc, it was one of the best massages I've had in a long time. I was already looking forward to booking my next appointment before the first one was even finished. He's so good, that I don't even care about his other "menu" of offerings. I think he'll be my go-to for therapeutic from here on out.

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Instead of attacking Russ because he “doesn’t turn you on” (which goes against the rules of this thread), how about sharing your choice for the best masseur on RM or MF? Sounds like you experienced many in NYC. Or do you base a masseur’s merit solely on looks? 

Hmmmm, with all due respect .... he does NOT turn me on.
But then again, I live and hire in NYC.  The competition here is ferocious, which benefits clients.  Clients have attractive choices offered to them.  

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't go into a massage session with any intention of having sex, even if it's listed as sensual. For me, the massage is the most important thing and I don't wish to sacrifice the quality of a good massage for the possibility of having sex.
I typically book therapeutic over sensual, but will opt for sensual if that means the masseur is also naked. I'm a bit of a nudist, so it's always nice when a masseur will also go naked during a sensual massage session. But getting a sensual massage or us both being naked doesn't mean sex. For me, being naked together is what makes the massage sensual and sensual does not need to end with anyone getting off. I've found having a masseur jerk me off to be a bit awkward and, honestly, I feel I can do a better job of that on my own.

Sure, skin on skin contact, or when a masseur's hand (or other body part) briefly glides across your balls/ass/dick is generally exciting and creates anticipation...but that can also ruin the moment for me, which should be focusing on the massage itself. 

I also understand that masseurs have different interpretations of what's involved with sensual massage or what should be classified as erotic. What I described above may sometimes be considered more erotic (though, I see an erotic massage as the gateway towards more sexual activities), so I may opt to book the erotic if that means the masseur will be naked too - however, I will make it clear up front what my expectations are, just so we're both on the same page. 

Why is it that I prefer the amateur/spy-type massage videos over those scripted professional series? 

Mine is an easy choice:
https://rentmasseur.com/MarcWeston

He’s in Los Angeles. 
He has real massage skills. He’s properly trained. He’s sexy, friendly and has a nice spa setup. I’ve been several times and look forward to our sessions. They get a little better each time.  

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't go into a massage session with any intention of having sex, even if it's listed as sensual. For me, the massage is the most important thing and I don't wish to sacrifice the quality of a good massage for the possibility of having sex.
I typically book therapeutic over sensual, but will opt for sensual if that means the masseur is also naked. I'm a bit of a nudist, so it's always nice when a masseur will also go naked during a sensual massage session. But getting a sensual massage or us both being naked doesn't mean sex. For me, being naked together is what makes the massage sensual and sensual does not need to end with anyone getting off. I've found having a masseur jerk me off to be a bit awkward and, honestly, I feel I can do a better job of that on my own.

Sure, skin on skin contact, or when a masseur's hand (or other body part) briefly glides across your balls/ass/dick is generally exciting and creates anticipation...but that can also ruin the moment for me, which should be focusing on the massage itself. 

I also understand that masseurs have different interpretations of what's involved with sensual massage or what should be classified as erotic. What I described above may sometimes be considered more erotic (though, I see an erotic massage as the gateway towards more sexual activities), so I may opt to book the erotic if that means the masseur will be naked too - however, I will make it clear up front what my expectations are, just so we're both on the same page. 

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't go into a massage session with any intention of having sex, even if it's listed as sensual. For me, the massage is the most important thing and I don't wish to sacrifice the quality of a good massage for the possibility of having sex.
I typically book therapeutic over sensual, but will opt for sensual if that means the masseur is also naked. I'm a bit of a nudist, so it's always nice when a masseur will also go naked during a sensual massage session. But getting a sensual massage or us both being naked doesn't mean sex. For me, being naked together is what makes the massage sensual and sensual does not need to end with anyone getting off. I've found having a masseur jerk me off to be a bit awkward and, honestly, I feel I can do a better job of that on my own.

Sure, skin on skin contact, or when a masseur's hand (or other body part) briefly glides across your balls/ass/dick is generally exciting and creates anticipation...but that can also ruin the moment for me, which should be focusing on the massage itself. 

I also understand that masseurs have different interpretations of what's involved with sensual massage or what should be classified as erotic. What I described above may sometimes be considered more erotic (though, I see an erotic massage as the gateway towards more sexual activities), so I may opt to book the erotic if that means the masseur will be naked too - however, I will make it clear up front what my expectations are, just so we're both on the same page. 

Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't go into a massage session with any intention of having sex, even if it's listed as sensual. For me, the massage is the most important thing and I don't wish to sacrifice the quality of a good massage for the possibility of having sex.
I typically book therapeutic over sensual, but will opt for sensual if that means the masseur is also naked. I'm a bit of a nudist, so it's always nice when a masseur will also go naked during a sensual massage session. But getting a sensual massage or us both being naked doesn't mean sex. For me, being naked together is what makes the massage sensual and sensual does not need to end with anyone getting off. I've found having a masseur jerk me off to be a bit awkward and, honestly, I feel I can do a better job of that on my own.

Sure, skin on skin contact, or when a masseur's hand (or other body part) briefly glides across your balls/ass/dick is generally exciting and creates anticipation...but that can also ruin the moment for me, which should be focusing on the massage itself. 

I also understand that masseurs have different interpretations of what's involved with sensual massage or what should be classified as erotic. What I described above may sometimes be considered more erotic (though, I see an erotic massage as the gateway towards more sexual activities), so I may opt to book the erotic if that means the masseur will be naked too - however, I will make it clear up front what my expectations are, just so we're both on the same page. 

I think this topic has run its course. We’ll agree to disagree, just like the long and boring specific tipping thread.
That said, unless you have been elected President of the International Brotherhood of Masseurs, the financial arrangements between a client and a willing, of age therapist is emphatically and without any doubt whatsoever, none of your business at all. You have a right to an opinion. But so do I and every other person on this planet. They generally mean squat. 
Everyone should do their own thing. Therapists can choose to see clients or not. They can offer extras for a stated price, or not. They can choose to not offer any extras at all! Or offer them just to people who appeal for o them. No big deal. It either works for the parties or it does not.

(I am certainly not including any potential human trafficking scenario in Bangkok in my opinion. That is a very different topic altogether. I’m talking about good old USA based grown men, most of whom could probably whip my ass! (Not in a sexual way))
Enjoy. 

I guarantee you that no one but no one on this board goes to a masseuse hoping it leads to sex. 
"Masseuse" is the French word for a female massage practitioner. If you mean a male practitioner, the word is "masseur."
Perhaps while you are learning the difference between male and female, you could also endeavor to remove your finger from your sphincter and learn to be less judgmental and condescending.

I just reached out to him. Based on what he shared, it's a bit more than therapeutic.

And his prices are pretty reasonable.
Three favorable reviews and they appear to be legit. He's been very sweet in my message exchange, so maybe he's the real deal. 

I just reached out to him. Based on what he shared, it's a bit more than therapeutic.

And his prices are pretty reasonable.
Three favorable reviews and they appear to be legit. He's been very sweet in my message exchange, so maybe he's the real deal. 

I just reached out to him. Based on what he shared, it's a bit more than therapeutic.

And his prices are pretty reasonable.
Three favorable reviews and they appear to be legit. He's been very sweet in my message exchange, so maybe he's the real deal.